Rosemary
#251 for girls in 2025, 1,222 births · Last seen for boys in 1990 at #8,117
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1946 · 4,486 births
- Debut · girls
- 9 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 20 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 163,165since 1882
Rosemary over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #251 | 1,222 | — | |
| 2024 | #301 | 1,048 | — | |
| 2023 | #310 | 995 | — | |
| 2022 | #364 | 873 | — | |
| 2021 | #363 | 846 | — | |
| 2020 | #442 | 698 | — | |
| 2019 | #402 | 771 | — | |
| 2018 | #452 | 699 | — | |
| 2017 | #453 | 699 | — | |
| 2016 | #436 | 740 | — | |
| 2015 | #517 | 607 | — | |
| 2014 | #570 | 537 | — | |
| 2013 | #531 | 563 | — | |
| 2012 | #600 | 479 | — | |
| 2011 | #651 | 439 | — | |
| 2010 | #712 | 396 | — | |
| 2009 | #716 | 404 | — | |
| 2008 | #746 | 398 | — | |
| 2007 | #720 | 406 | — | |
| 2006 | #686 | 411 | — | |
| 2005 | #745 | 362 | — | |
| 2004 | #712 | 376 | — | |
| 2003 | #658 | 403 | — | |
| 2002 | #632 | 403 | — | |
| 2001 | #624 | 401 | — | |
| 2000 | #631 | 397 | — | |
| 1999 | #629 | 375 | — | |
| 1998 | #608 | 395 | — | |
| 1997 | #651 | 339 | — | |
| 1996 | #554 | 421 | — | |
| 1995 | #570 | 403 | — | |
| 1994 | #572 | 402 | — | |
| 1993 | #594 | 395 | — | |
| 1992 | #560 | 420 | — | |
| 1991 | #550 | 429 | — | |
| 1990 | #509 | 472 | #8,117 | 5 |
| 1989 | #504 | 466 | #5,615 | 8 |
| 1988 | #510 | 431 | — | |
| 1987 | #476 | 455 | — | |
| 1986 | #455 | 473 | — | |
| 1985 | #431 | 512 | — | |
| 1984 | #429 | 490 | — | |
| 1983 | #433 | 489 | #6,238 | 5 |
| 1982 | #420 | 532 | — | |
| 1981 | #400 | 565 | #4,509 | 8 |
| 1980 | #395 | 576 | — | |
| 1979 | #427 | 489 | — | |
| 1978 | #441 | 453 | — | |
| 1977 | #444 | 460 | #5,123 | 6 |
| 1976 | #404 | 497 | — | |
| 1975 | #384 | 534 | — | |
| 1974 | #348 | 624 | — | |
| 1973 | #349 | 609 | — | |
| 1972 | #357 | 617 | — | |
| 1971 | #341 | 743 | #4,375 | 6 |
| 1970 | #331 | 797 | — | |
| 1969 | #322 | 794 | #3,595 | 7 |
| 1968 | #296 | 876 | #3,673 | 6 |
| 1967 | #281 | 914 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1966 | #254 | 1,122 | — | |
| 1965 | #241 | 1,276 | #2,982 | 8 |
| 1964 | #214 | 1,629 | #3,282 | 7 |
| 1963 | #205 | 1,729 | #4,048 | 5 |
| 1962 | #195 | 1,939 | #2,848 | 9 |
| 1961 | #181 | 2,133 | — | |
| 1960 | #181 | 2,192 | — | |
| 1959 | #173 | 2,230 | #3,619 | 6 |
| 1958 | #171 | 2,223 | — | |
| 1957 | #168 | 2,275 | #3,257 | 7 |
| 1956 | #175 | 2,066 | #3,216 | 7 |
| 1955 | #171 | 2,015 | #3,886 | 5 |
| 1954 | #160 | 2,192 | #2,743 | 9 |
| 1953 | #147 | 2,432 | — | |
| 1952 | #130 | 2,787 | — | |
| 1951 | #109 | 3,345 | #3,066 | 7 |
| 1950 | #101 | 3,455 | #3,021 | 7 |
| 1949 | #98 | 3,633 | #3,019 | 7 |
| 1948 | #90 | 3,870 | #2,326 | 11 |
| 1947 | #80 | 4,542 | — | |
| 1946 | #74 | 4,486 | #2,690 | 8 |
| 1945 | #79 | 3,500 | #3,338 | 5 |
| 1944 | #99 | 2,744 | #2,080 | 12 |
| 1943 | #97 | 2,966 | #2,182 | 12 |
| 1942 | #92 | 3,005 | #2,268 | 11 |
| 1941 | #94 | 2,677 | #2,491 | 9 |
| 1940 | #85 | 2,874 | #2,322 | 10 |
| 1939 | #93 | 2,612 | #2,829 | 7 |
| 1938 | #95 | 2,681 | #2,185 | 11 |
| 1937 | #110 | 2,307 | #2,197 | 11 |
| 1936 | #111 | 2,148 | #2,629 | 8 |
| 1935 | #97 | 2,394 | #2,951 | 7 |
| 1934 | #111 | 2,132 | #2,742 | 8 |
| 1933 | #102 | 2,227 | #2,738 | 8 |
| 1932 | #100 | 2,483 | #2,465 | 10 |
| 1931 | #88 | 2,722 | #2,003 | 14 |
| 1930 | #82 | 3,151 | — | |
| 1929 | #80 | 3,107 | #2,096 | 14 |
| 1928 | #88 | 2,972 | #3,076 | 8 |
| 1927 | #86 | 3,153 | #2,408 | 12 |
| 1926 | #95 | 2,900 | #3,708 | 6 |
| 1925 | #103 | 2,755 | #4,197 | 5 |
| 1924 | #106 | 2,734 | #4,347 | 5 |
| 1923 | #110 | 2,427 | #4,239 | 5 |
| 1922 | #120 | 2,170 | — | |
| 1921 | #128 | 2,034 | — | |
| 1920 | #141 | 1,713 | — | |
| 1919 | #165 | 1,330 | — | |
| 1918 | #171 | 1,259 | — | |
| 1917 | #176 | 1,124 | — | |
| 1916 | #184 | 996 | — | |
| 1915 | #201 | 820 | — | |
| 1914 | #224 | 563 | — | |
| 1913 | #245 | 388 | — | |
| 1912 | #259 | 298 | — | |
| 1911 | #312 | 160 | — | |
| 1910 | #325 | 141 | — | |
| 1909 | #323 | 123 | — | |
| 1908 | #375 | 91 | — | |
| 1907 | #376 | 87 | — | |
| 1906 | #440 | 61 | — | |
| 1905 | #423 | 64 | — | |
| 1904 | #438 | 54 | — | |
| 1903 | #461 | 48 | — | |
| 1902 | #528 | 37 | — | |
| 1901 | #577 | 29 | — | |
| 1900 | #531 | 40 | — | |
| 1899 | #644 | 23 | — | |
| 1898 | #597 | 29 | — | |
| 1897 | #554 | 29 | — | |
| 1896 | #754 | 18 | — | |
| 1895 | #638 | 23 | — | |
| 1894 | #905 | 12 | — | |
| 1893 | #594 | 23 | — | |
| 1892 | #726 | 16 | — | |
| 1891 | #839 | 11 | — | |
| 1890 | #667 | 16 | — | |
| 1889 | #687 | 14 | — | |
| 1888 | #959 | 8 | — | |
| 1887 | #693 | 11 | — | |
| 1886 | #693 | 11 | — | |
| 1885 | #1,047 | 5 | — | |
| 1884 | #851 | 7 | — | |
| 1883 | #692 | 8 | — | |
| 1882 | #634 | 9 | — | |
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1882
The first year at least five girls were named Rosemary! It came in at #634, and was given to 9 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1884–1885, when fewer than 8 girls a year got the name.
See more about Rosemary
Momentum · girls
Rising
- 50 spots since 2024 (#301 → #251)
- 191 spots since 2020 (#442 → #251)
- 266 spots since 2015 (#517 → #251)
- Biggest jump: 354 spots in 1886 (#1,047 → #693)
- Biggest drop: 311 spots in 1894 (#594 → #905)
Rise & fade · girls
64 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1882
- Peaked 1946 at #74 (4,486 births)
- Births halved by 1954, 8 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 20 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 20 yrs · run 1938–1949
- Top 1,000: 143 yrs · run 1886–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 350
- Highest: 1 in 350 girls born in 1946 were named Rosemary (0.29%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,315 girls born in 2025 (0.08%)
Era · girls
The 1940s
- 21.0% of all girls named Rosemary (34,297) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 73 | #634 (1882) | #782 |
| 1890s | 200 | #554 (1897) | #692 |
| 1900s | 634 | #323 (1909) | #447 |
| 1910s | 7,079 | #165 (1919) | #226 |
| 1920s | 25,965 | #80 (1929) | #106 |
| 1930s | 24,857 | #82 (1930) | #99 |
| 1940s | 34,297 | #74 (1946) | #89 |
| 1950s | 25,020 | #101 (1950) | #151 |
| 1960s | 14,604 | #181 (1960) | #237 |
| 1970s | 5,823 | #331 (1970) | #383 |
| 1980s | 4,989 | #395 (1980) | #445 |
| 1990s | 4,051 | #509 (1990) | #580 |
| 2000s | 3,961 | #624 (2001) | #687 |
| 2010s | 5,930 | #402 (2019) | #532 |
| 2020s | 5,682 | #251 (2025) | #339 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Rosemary in 1902
girls
#528
37 births · 1 in 7,137 girls
Top girls' names in 1902
More about 1902
girls
264,073 girls got a published name in 1902; 1 in 7,137 of them was named Rosemary, which outranked 74.1% of the 2,042 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 19.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).