Maple
#1,092 for girls in 2025, 221 births · Last seen for boys in 1917 at #3,981
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1902 · 14 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 3,281since 1896
Maple over time
Rank among girls' names. Maple has never cracked the top 900 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,092 | 221 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,180 | 203 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,238 | 188 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,309 | 180 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,524 | 138 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,593 | 131 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,668 | 126 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,474 | 149 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,053 | 95 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,775 | 117 | — | |
| 2015 | #2,471 | 73 | — | |
| 2014 | #3,137 | 52 | — | |
| 2013 | #3,404 | 46 | — | |
| 2012 | #4,121 | 36 | — | |
| 2011 | #4,915 | 28 | — | |
| 2010 | #5,247 | 26 | — | |
| 2009 | #6,091 | 22 | — | |
| 2008 | #7,742 | 16 | — | |
| 2007 | #7,394 | 17 | — | |
| 2006 | #7,482 | 16 | — | |
| 2005 | #7,891 | 14 | — | |
| 2004 | #12,761 | 7 | — | |
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 | — | |
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | #15,352 | 5 | — | |
| 2000 | #13,154 | 6 | — | |
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | #12,070 | 6 | — | |
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | #13,430 | 5 | — | |
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | #12,958 | 5 | — | |
| 1989 | #12,362 | 5 | — | |
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | #11,325 | 5 | — | |
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | #10,275 | 5 | — | |
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | #10,210 | 5 | — | |
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | #9,067 | 5 | — | |
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | #6,804 | 5 | — | |
| 1966 | #3,959 | 11 | — | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | #4,636 | 9 | — | |
| 1963 | #4,539 | 9 | — | |
| 1962 | #4,263 | 10 | — | |
| 1961 | #4,239 | 10 | — | |
| 1960 | #3,920 | 11 | — | |
| 1959 | #3,619 | 12 | — | |
| 1958 | #3,543 | 12 | — | |
| 1957 | #3,150 | 14 | — | |
| 1956 | #2,725 | 18 | — | |
| 1955 | #2,553 | 19 | — | |
| 1954 | #2,519 | 19 | — | |
| 1953 | #1,783 | 31 | — | |
| 1952 | #2,671 | 16 | — | |
| 1951 | #1,701 | 32 | — | |
| 1950 | #2,436 | 17 | — | |
| 1949 | #1,967 | 24 | — | |
| 1948 | #1,901 | 25 | — | |
| 1947 | #2,354 | 18 | — | |
| 1946 | #1,970 | 22 | — | |
| 1945 | #1,993 | 18 | — | |
| 1944 | #1,661 | 25 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,556 | 29 | — | |
| 1942 | #1,760 | 23 | — | |
| 1941 | #2,018 | 17 | — | |
| 1940 | #1,374 | 30 | — | |
| 1939 | #1,474 | 26 | — | |
| 1938 | #1,805 | 19 | — | |
| 1937 | #1,999 | 16 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,345 | 29 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,418 | 27 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,603 | 22 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,606 | 22 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,382 | 29 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,803 | 19 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,371 | 31 | — | |
| 1929 | #1,223 | 37 | — | |
| 1928 | #1,394 | 31 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,486 | 30 | — | |
| 1926 | #1,449 | 31 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,324 | 36 | — | |
| 1924 | #1,440 | 33 | — | |
| 1923 | #1,637 | 26 | — | |
| 1922 | #1,190 | 42 | — | |
| 1921 | #1,765 | 24 | — | |
| 1920 | #1,312 | 35 | — | |
| 1919 | #1,216 | 38 | — | |
| 1918 | #1,451 | 29 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,507 | 25 | #3,981 | 5 |
| 1916 | #1,533 | 24 | — | |
| 1915 | #2,688 | 10 | — | |
| 1914 | #1,541 | 18 | — | |
| 1913 | #1,528 | 15 | — | |
| 1912 | #1,421 | 15 | — | |
| 1911 | #2,191 | 6 | — | |
| 1910 | #1,335 | 12 | — | |
| 1909 | #1,957 | 6 | — | |
| 1908 | #1,862 | 6 | — | |
| 1907 | #1,512 | 8 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,416 | 8 | — | |
| 1905 | #1,298 | 9 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,877 | 5 | — | |
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | #936 | 14 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,679 | 5 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,723 | 6 | — | |
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | #1,385 | 6 | — | |
| 1896 | #1,416 | 6 | — | |
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Maple! It came in at #1,416, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1898–1899, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
See more about Maple
- 88 spots since 2024 (#1,180 → #1,092)
- 501 spots since 2020 (#1,593 → #1,092)
- 1,379 spots since 2015 (#2,471 → #1,092)
- Biggest jump: 743 spots in 1902 (#1,679 → #936)
- Debuted 1896
- Peaked 1902 at #936 (14 births)
- Births halved by 1903, 1 yr later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 1 yr · 1902
- Highest: 1 in 7,273 girls born in 2025 were named Maple (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #936 in 1902, was only 1 in 18,862 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 32.3% of all girls named Maple (1,061) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 12 | #1,385 (1897) | #1,401 |
| 1900s | 67 | #936 (1902) | #1,584 |
| 1910s | 192 | #1,216 (1919) | #1,641 |
| 1920s | 325 | #1,190 (1922) | #1,422 |
| 1930s | 240 | #1,345 (1936) | #1,581 |
| 1940s | 231 | #1,374 (1940) | #1,855 |
| 1950s | 190 | #1,701 (1951) | #2,670 |
| 1960s | 65 | #3,920 (1960) | #4,623 |
| 1970s | 10 | #9,067 (1975) | #9,639 |
| 1980s | 15 | #10,275 (1983) | #11,321 |
| 1990s | 16 | #12,070 (1997) | #12,819 |
| 2000s | 109 | #6,091 (2009) | #10,190 |
| 2010s | 748 | #1,474 (2018) | #3,027 |
| 2020s | 1,061 | #1,092 (2025) | #1,323 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Maple in 1902
Top girls' names in 1902
More about 1902
girls
264,073 girls got a published name in 1902; 1 in 18,862 of them was named Maple, which outranked 54.2% of the 2,042 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 19.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).