Lonnie
#5,410 for girls in 2025, 23 births · #1,837 for boys in 2025, 86 births
Given to boys 93.1% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1896 · 159 births
- Debut · boys
- 53 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 94,486since 1880
Lonnie over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,410 | 23 | #1,837 | 86 |
| 2024 | #5,300 | 24 | #1,809 | 90 |
| 2023 | #7,247 | 15 | #1,727 | 96 |
| 2022 | #6,707 | 17 | #1,861 | 85 |
| 2021 | #5,955 | 20 | #1,667 | 99 |
| 2020 | #9,546 | 10 | #1,634 | 98 |
| 2019 | #9,112 | 11 | #1,755 | 89 |
| 2018 | #6,792 | 17 | #1,671 | 95 |
| 2017 | #9,943 | 10 | #1,746 | 88 |
| 2016 | #8,875 | 12 | #1,484 | 115 |
| 2015 | #8,931 | 12 | #1,406 | 122 |
| 2014 | #11,931 | 8 | #1,389 | 122 |
| 2013 | #13,150 | 7 | #1,405 | 119 |
| 2012 | #12,199 | 8 | #1,448 | 114 |
| 2011 | #12,153 | 8 | #1,459 | 112 |
| 2010 | #14,959 | 6 | #1,358 | 125 |
| 2009 | #13,704 | 7 | #1,257 | 140 |
| 2008 | #17,504 | 5 | #1,188 | 149 |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 | #1,457 | 110 |
| 2006 | — | #1,073 | 166 | |
| 2005 | #10,128 | 10 | #1,021 | 165 |
| 2004 | #9,264 | 11 | #1,053 | 153 |
| 2003 | — | #1,049 | 148 | |
| 2002 | #13,595 | 6 | #901 | 179 |
| 2001 | #12,056 | 7 | #876 | 181 |
| 2000 | #8,534 | 11 | #824 | 194 |
| 1999 | #11,385 | 7 | #776 | 205 |
| 1998 | — | #787 | 194 | |
| 1997 | #6,844 | 13 | #706 | 224 |
| 1996 | #5,771 | 16 | #670 | 246 |
| 1995 | #5,958 | 15 | #638 | 265 |
| 1994 | #7,604 | 11 | #573 | 321 |
| 1993 | #5,955 | 15 | #576 | 317 |
| 1992 | #4,686 | 21 | #539 | 354 |
| 1991 | #5,399 | 17 | #497 | 394 |
| 1990 | #4,868 | 19 | #509 | 377 |
| 1989 | #3,784 | 26 | #461 | 417 |
| 1988 | #4,653 | 18 | #443 | 415 |
| 1987 | #2,852 | 34 | #446 | 399 |
| 1986 | #4,186 | 19 | #419 | 419 |
| 1985 | #3,419 | 25 | #380 | 474 |
| 1984 | #3,874 | 20 | #360 | 505 |
| 1983 | #2,310 | 41 | #349 | 520 |
| 1982 | #2,901 | 31 | #304 | 651 |
| 1981 | #2,529 | 37 | #301 | 641 |
| 1980 | #2,246 | 44 | #294 | 694 |
| 1979 | #2,343 | 40 | #279 | 734 |
| 1978 | #3,009 | 26 | #277 | 700 |
| 1977 | #2,515 | 34 | #243 | 848 |
| 1976 | #2,387 | 34 | #241 | 833 |
| 1975 | #2,097 | 41 | #236 | 873 |
| 1974 | #2,172 | 37 | #227 | 922 |
| 1973 | #1,622 | 56 | #220 | 985 |
| 1972 | #1,804 | 47 | #207 | 1,098 |
| 1971 | #2,107 | 39 | #195 | 1,274 |
| 1970 | #1,389 | 75 | #194 | 1,382 |
| 1969 | #1,609 | 55 | #192 | 1,385 |
| 1968 | #1,387 | 65 | #181 | 1,444 |
| 1967 | #1,524 | 54 | #185 | 1,325 |
| 1966 | #1,448 | 58 | #178 | 1,429 |
| 1965 | #1,292 | 70 | #175 | 1,505 |
| 1964 | #1,190 | 86 | #171 | 1,597 |
| 1963 | #1,087 | 99 | #189 | 1,575 |
| 1962 | #1,184 | 86 | #194 | 1,561 |
| 1961 | #1,095 | 100 | #191 | 1,595 |
| 1960 | #1,117 | 94 | #182 | 1,704 |
| 1959 | #1,099 | 95 | #173 | 1,776 |
| 1958 | #988 | 110 | #171 | 1,775 |
| 1957 | #951 | 117 | #157 | 2,048 |
| 1956 | #927 | 119 | #155 | 2,014 |
| 1955 | #995 | 101 | #155 | 1,857 |
| 1954 | #940 | 105 | #146 | 1,976 |
| 1953 | #806 | 130 | #147 | 1,919 |
| 1952 | #825 | 122 | #148 | 1,888 |
| 1951 | #824 | 118 | #139 | 1,946 |
| 1950 | #751 | 132 | #135 | 1,999 |
| 1949 | #835 | 111 | #134 | 2,018 |
| 1948 | #720 | 137 | #134 | 2,040 |
| 1947 | #685 | 151 | #137 | 2,086 |
| 1946 | #672 | 141 | #136 | 1,775 |
| 1945 | #624 | 135 | #143 | 1,463 |
| 1944 | #681 | 120 | #148 | 1,434 |
| 1943 | #721 | 114 | #144 | 1,462 |
| 1942 | #814 | 88 | #148 | 1,318 |
| 1941 | #707 | 98 | #147 | 1,202 |
| 1940 | #683 | 103 | #153 | 1,103 |
| 1939 | #727 | 87 | #150 | 1,071 |
| 1938 | #749 | 85 | #160 | 997 |
| 1937 | #796 | 74 | #171 | 855 |
| 1936 | #739 | 81 | #177 | 749 |
| 1935 | #834 | 68 | #178 | 758 |
| 1934 | #774 | 75 | #180 | 754 |
| 1933 | #790 | 70 | #176 | 736 |
| 1932 | #869 | 64 | #179 | 762 |
| 1931 | #750 | 79 | #183 | 720 |
| 1930 | #867 | 68 | #193 | 715 |
| 1929 | #746 | 88 | #190 | 722 |
| 1928 | #862 | 71 | #197 | 708 |
| 1927 | #786 | 85 | #199 | 709 |
| 1926 | #911 | 67 | #207 | 660 |
| 1925 | #753 | 96 | #199 | 707 |
| 1924 | #788 | 89 | #196 | 716 |
| 1923 | #881 | 70 | #202 | 670 |
| 1922 | #763 | 92 | #195 | 704 |
| 1921 | #885 | 70 | #209 | 643 |
| 1920 | #757 | 92 | #186 | 740 |
| 1919 | #792 | 79 | #210 | 592 |
| 1918 | #785 | 83 | #194 | 658 |
| 1917 | #834 | 67 | #196 | 597 |
| 1916 | #904 | 56 | #201 | 567 |
| 1915 | #856 | 58 | #199 | 546 |
| 1914 | #817 | 51 | #186 | 468 |
| 1913 | #758 | 48 | #191 | 351 |
| 1912 | #763 | 43 | #179 | 327 |
| 1911 | #790 | 30 | #157 | 213 |
| 1910 | #640 | 44 | #148 | 217 |
| 1909 | #669 | 35 | #128 | 209 |
| 1908 | #809 | 23 | #142 | 169 |
| 1907 | #680 | 31 | #131 | 182 |
| 1906 | #528 | 43 | #132 | 156 |
| 1905 | #587 | 35 | #120 | 179 |
| 1904 | #880 | 17 | #147 | 133 |
| 1903 | #596 | 30 | #129 | 145 |
| 1902 | #667 | 25 | #137 | 138 |
| 1901 | #699 | 21 | #114 | 148 |
| 1900 | #611 | 33 | #125 | 186 |
| 1899 | #616 | 25 | #134 | 119 |
| 1898 | #650 | 25 | #138 | 129 |
| 1897 | #594 | 26 | #142 | 114 |
| 1896 | #999 | 11 | #114 | 159 |
| 1895 | #638 | 23 | #134 | 120 |
| 1894 | #609 | 23 | #117 | 138 |
| 1893 | #535 | 27 | #131 | 114 |
| 1892 | #861 | 12 | #133 | 120 |
| 1891 | #644 | 17 | #118 | 117 |
| 1890 | #667 | 16 | #135 | 107 |
| 1889 | #516 | 24 | #136 | 106 |
| 1888 | #793 | 11 | #148 | 101 |
| 1887 | #586 | 15 | #166 | 76 |
| 1886 | #572 | 15 | #157 | 88 |
| 1885 | #557 | 15 | #176 | 74 |
| 1884 | #1,024 | 5 | #157 | 88 |
| 1883 | #651 | 9 | #140 | 91 |
| 1882 | #507 | 13 | #173 | 78 |
| 1881 | #830 | 5 | #158 | 77 |
| 1880 | #466 | 13 | #220 | 53 |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Lonnie was already there! It came in at #220, and was given to 53 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1882, when fewer than 79 boys a year got the name.
Where Lonnie is popular in 1924
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- North Carolina#58 · 1 in 311
- Alabama#78 · 1 in 399
- Georgia#85 · 1 in 456
- Tennessee#99 · 1 in 572
- Mississippi#103 · 1 in 513
Best ever in a state: #32 in Florida, 1910.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina | #58 | 112 | 1 in 311 |
| Alabama | #78 | 65 | 1 in 399 |
| Georgia | #85 | 61 | 1 in 456 |
| Tennessee | #99 | 44 | 1 in 572 |
| Mississippi | #103 | 36 | 1 in 513 |
| South Carolina | #105 | 36 | 1 in 558 |
| Louisiana | #109 | 38 | 1 in 509 |
| Florida | #116 | 19 | 1 in 614 |
| Kentucky | #117 | 38 | 1 in 709 |
| Arkansas | #123 | 29 | 1 in 633 |
| Oklahoma | #124 | 37 | 1 in 616 |
| Texas | #128 | 90 | 1 in 623 |
| West Virginia | #145 | 21 | 1 in 879 |
| Virginia | #164 | 23 | 1 in 1,055 |
| Missouri | #218 | 16 | 1 in 1,903 |
| Ohio | #348 | 9 | 1 in 5,999 |
| California | #403 | 8 | 1 in 4,570 |
| Illinois | #432 | 7 | 1 in 8,532 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lonnie
- 28 spots since 2024 (#1,809 → #1,837)
- 203 spots since 2020 (#1,634 → #1,837)
- 431 spots since 2015 (#1,406 → #1,837)
- Biggest jump: 62 spots in 1881 (#220 → #158)
- Biggest drop: 148 spots in 2003 (#901 → #1,049)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1896 at #114 (159 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 123 yrs · run 1880–2002
- Highest: 1 in 719 boys born in 1901 were named Lonnie (0.14%)
- Latest: 1 in 19,861 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #114 in 1896, was only 1 in 752 (0.13%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 20.3% of all boys named Lonnie (19,198) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 832 | #136 (1889) | #163 |
| 1890s | 1,237 | #114 (1896) | #130 |
| 1900s | 1,645 | #114 (1901) | #131 |
| 1910s | 4,536 | #148 (1910) | #186 |
| 1920s | 6,979 | #186 (1920) | #198 |
| 1930s | 8,117 | #150 (1939) | #175 |
| 1940s | 15,901 | #134 (1948) | #142 |
| 1950s | 19,198 | #135 (1950) | #153 |
| 1960s | 15,120 | #171 (1964) | #184 |
| 1970s | 9,649 | #194 (1970) | #232 |
| 1980s | 5,135 | #294 (1980) | #376 |
| 1990s | 2,897 | #497 (1991) | #627 |
| 2000s | 1,585 | #824 (2000) | #1,070 |
| 2010s | 1,101 | #1,358 (2010) | #1,512 |
| 2020s | 554 | #1,634 (2020) | #1,756 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lonnie in 1924
Top girls' names in 1924
Top boys' names in 1924
More about 1924
girls
1,248,872 girls got a published name in 1924; 1 in 14,032 of them was named Lonnie, which outranked 86.6% of the 5,900 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
1,132,742 boys got a published name in 1924; 1 in 1,582 of them was named Lonnie, which outranked 96.1% of the 4,970 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 32.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.