Lonnie
#5,410 for girls in 2025, 23 births · #1,837 for boys in 2025, 86 births
Given to boys 93.1% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1896 · 159 births
- Debut · boys
- 53 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 94,486since 1880
Lonnie over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,410 | 23 | #1,837 | 86 |
| 2024 | #5,300 | 24 | #1,809 | 90 |
| 2023 | #7,247 | 15 | #1,727 | 96 |
| 2022 | #6,707 | 17 | #1,861 | 85 |
| 2021 | #5,955 | 20 | #1,667 | 99 |
| 2020 | #9,546 | 10 | #1,634 | 98 |
| 2019 | #9,112 | 11 | #1,755 | 89 |
| 2018 | #6,792 | 17 | #1,671 | 95 |
| 2017 | #9,943 | 10 | #1,746 | 88 |
| 2016 | #8,875 | 12 | #1,484 | 115 |
| 2015 | #8,931 | 12 | #1,406 | 122 |
| 2014 | #11,931 | 8 | #1,389 | 122 |
| 2013 | #13,150 | 7 | #1,405 | 119 |
| 2012 | #12,199 | 8 | #1,448 | 114 |
| 2011 | #12,153 | 8 | #1,459 | 112 |
| 2010 | #14,959 | 6 | #1,358 | 125 |
| 2009 | #13,704 | 7 | #1,257 | 140 |
| 2008 | #17,504 | 5 | #1,188 | 149 |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 | #1,457 | 110 |
| 2006 | — | #1,073 | 166 | |
| 2005 | #10,128 | 10 | #1,021 | 165 |
| 2004 | #9,264 | 11 | #1,053 | 153 |
| 2003 | — | #1,049 | 148 | |
| 2002 | #13,595 | 6 | #901 | 179 |
| 2001 | #12,056 | 7 | #876 | 181 |
| 2000 | #8,534 | 11 | #824 | 194 |
| 1999 | #11,385 | 7 | #776 | 205 |
| 1998 | — | #787 | 194 | |
| 1997 | #6,844 | 13 | #706 | 224 |
| 1996 | #5,771 | 16 | #670 | 246 |
| 1995 | #5,958 | 15 | #638 | 265 |
| 1994 | #7,604 | 11 | #573 | 321 |
| 1993 | #5,955 | 15 | #576 | 317 |
| 1992 | #4,686 | 21 | #539 | 354 |
| 1991 | #5,399 | 17 | #497 | 394 |
| 1990 | #4,868 | 19 | #509 | 377 |
| 1989 | #3,784 | 26 | #461 | 417 |
| 1988 | #4,653 | 18 | #443 | 415 |
| 1987 | #2,852 | 34 | #446 | 399 |
| 1986 | #4,186 | 19 | #419 | 419 |
| 1985 | #3,419 | 25 | #380 | 474 |
| 1984 | #3,874 | 20 | #360 | 505 |
| 1983 | #2,310 | 41 | #349 | 520 |
| 1982 | #2,901 | 31 | #304 | 651 |
| 1981 | #2,529 | 37 | #301 | 641 |
| 1980 | #2,246 | 44 | #294 | 694 |
| 1979 | #2,343 | 40 | #279 | 734 |
| 1978 | #3,009 | 26 | #277 | 700 |
| 1977 | #2,515 | 34 | #243 | 848 |
| 1976 | #2,387 | 34 | #241 | 833 |
| 1975 | #2,097 | 41 | #236 | 873 |
| 1974 | #2,172 | 37 | #227 | 922 |
| 1973 | #1,622 | 56 | #220 | 985 |
| 1972 | #1,804 | 47 | #207 | 1,098 |
| 1971 | #2,107 | 39 | #195 | 1,274 |
| 1970 | #1,389 | 75 | #194 | 1,382 |
| 1969 | #1,609 | 55 | #192 | 1,385 |
| 1968 | #1,387 | 65 | #181 | 1,444 |
| 1967 | #1,524 | 54 | #185 | 1,325 |
| 1966 | #1,448 | 58 | #178 | 1,429 |
| 1965 | #1,292 | 70 | #175 | 1,505 |
| 1964 | #1,190 | 86 | #171 | 1,597 |
| 1963 | #1,087 | 99 | #189 | 1,575 |
| 1962 | #1,184 | 86 | #194 | 1,561 |
| 1961 | #1,095 | 100 | #191 | 1,595 |
| 1960 | #1,117 | 94 | #182 | 1,704 |
| 1959 | #1,099 | 95 | #173 | 1,776 |
| 1958 | #988 | 110 | #171 | 1,775 |
| 1957 | #951 | 117 | #157 | 2,048 |
| 1956 | #927 | 119 | #155 | 2,014 |
| 1955 | #995 | 101 | #155 | 1,857 |
| 1954 | #940 | 105 | #146 | 1,976 |
| 1953 | #806 | 130 | #147 | 1,919 |
| 1952 | #825 | 122 | #148 | 1,888 |
| 1951 | #824 | 118 | #139 | 1,946 |
| 1950 | #751 | 132 | #135 | 1,999 |
| 1949 | #835 | 111 | #134 | 2,018 |
| 1948 | #720 | 137 | #134 | 2,040 |
| 1947 | #685 | 151 | #137 | 2,086 |
| 1946 | #672 | 141 | #136 | 1,775 |
| 1945 | #624 | 135 | #143 | 1,463 |
| 1944 | #681 | 120 | #148 | 1,434 |
| 1943 | #721 | 114 | #144 | 1,462 |
| 1942 | #814 | 88 | #148 | 1,318 |
| 1941 | #707 | 98 | #147 | 1,202 |
| 1940 | #683 | 103 | #153 | 1,103 |
| 1939 | #727 | 87 | #150 | 1,071 |
| 1938 | #749 | 85 | #160 | 997 |
| 1937 | #796 | 74 | #171 | 855 |
| 1936 | #739 | 81 | #177 | 749 |
| 1935 | #834 | 68 | #178 | 758 |
| 1934 | #774 | 75 | #180 | 754 |
| 1933 | #790 | 70 | #176 | 736 |
| 1932 | #869 | 64 | #179 | 762 |
| 1931 | #750 | 79 | #183 | 720 |
| 1930 | #867 | 68 | #193 | 715 |
| 1929 | #746 | 88 | #190 | 722 |
| 1928 | #862 | 71 | #197 | 708 |
| 1927 | #786 | 85 | #199 | 709 |
| 1926 | #911 | 67 | #207 | 660 |
| 1925 | #753 | 96 | #199 | 707 |
| 1924 | #788 | 89 | #196 | 716 |
| 1923 | #881 | 70 | #202 | 670 |
| 1922 | #763 | 92 | #195 | 704 |
| 1921 | #885 | 70 | #209 | 643 |
| 1920 | #757 | 92 | #186 | 740 |
| 1919 | #792 | 79 | #210 | 592 |
| 1918 | #785 | 83 | #194 | 658 |
| 1917 | #834 | 67 | #196 | 597 |
| 1916 | #904 | 56 | #201 | 567 |
| 1915 | #856 | 58 | #199 | 546 |
| 1914 | #817 | 51 | #186 | 468 |
| 1913 | #758 | 48 | #191 | 351 |
| 1912 | #763 | 43 | #179 | 327 |
| 1911 | #790 | 30 | #157 | 213 |
| 1910 | #640 | 44 | #148 | 217 |
| 1909 | #669 | 35 | #128 | 209 |
| 1908 | #809 | 23 | #142 | 169 |
| 1907 | #680 | 31 | #131 | 182 |
| 1906 | #528 | 43 | #132 | 156 |
| 1905 | #587 | 35 | #120 | 179 |
| 1904 | #880 | 17 | #147 | 133 |
| 1903 | #596 | 30 | #129 | 145 |
| 1902 | #667 | 25 | #137 | 138 |
| 1901 | #699 | 21 | #114 | 148 |
| 1900 | #611 | 33 | #125 | 186 |
| 1899 | #616 | 25 | #134 | 119 |
| 1898 | #650 | 25 | #138 | 129 |
| 1897 | #594 | 26 | #142 | 114 |
| 1896 | #999 | 11 | #114 | 159 |
| 1895 | #638 | 23 | #134 | 120 |
| 1894 | #609 | 23 | #117 | 138 |
| 1893 | #535 | 27 | #131 | 114 |
| 1892 | #861 | 12 | #133 | 120 |
| 1891 | #644 | 17 | #118 | 117 |
| 1890 | #667 | 16 | #135 | 107 |
| 1889 | #516 | 24 | #136 | 106 |
| 1888 | #793 | 11 | #148 | 101 |
| 1887 | #586 | 15 | #166 | 76 |
| 1886 | #572 | 15 | #157 | 88 |
| 1885 | #557 | 15 | #176 | 74 |
| 1884 | #1,024 | 5 | #157 | 88 |
| 1883 | #651 | 9 | #140 | 91 |
| 1882 | #507 | 13 | #173 | 78 |
| 1881 | #830 | 5 | #158 | 77 |
| 1880 | #466 | 13 | #220 | 53 |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Lonnie was already there! It came in at #220, and was given to 53 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1882, when fewer than 79 boys a year got the name.
See more about Lonnie
- 28 spots since 2024 (#1,809 → #1,837)
- 203 spots since 2020 (#1,634 → #1,837)
- 431 spots since 2015 (#1,406 → #1,837)
- Biggest jump: 62 spots in 1881 (#220 → #158)
- Biggest drop: 148 spots in 2003 (#901 → #1,049)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1896 at #114 (159 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 123 yrs · run 1880–2002
- Highest: 1 in 719 boys born in 1901 were named Lonnie (0.14%)
- Latest: 1 in 19,861 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #114 in 1896, was only 1 in 752 (0.13%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 20.3% of all boys named Lonnie (19,198) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 832 | #136 (1889) | #163 |
| 1890s | 1,237 | #114 (1896) | #130 |
| 1900s | 1,645 | #114 (1901) | #131 |
| 1910s | 4,536 | #148 (1910) | #186 |
| 1920s | 6,979 | #186 (1920) | #198 |
| 1930s | 8,117 | #150 (1939) | #175 |
| 1940s | 15,901 | #134 (1948) | #142 |
| 1950s | 19,198 | #135 (1950) | #153 |
| 1960s | 15,120 | #171 (1964) | #184 |
| 1970s | 9,649 | #194 (1970) | #232 |
| 1980s | 5,135 | #294 (1980) | #376 |
| 1990s | 2,897 | #497 (1991) | #627 |
| 2000s | 1,585 | #824 (2000) | #1,070 |
| 2010s | 1,101 | #1,358 (2010) | #1,512 |
| 2020s | 554 | #1,634 (2020) | #1,756 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lonnie in 1880
Top girls' names in 1880
Top boys' names in 1880
More about 1880
girls
90,994 girls got a published name in 1880; 1 in 7,000 of them was named Lonnie, which outranked 50.5% of the 942 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.6% of girls (7.0% in 2025).
boys
110,490 boys got a published name in 1880; 1 in 2,085 of them was named Lonnie, which outranked 79.2% of the 1,058 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 44.2% of boys (8.0% in 2025).