Young
Last seen for girls in 1998 at #14,122 · Last seen for boys in 2022 at #10,863
Given to boys 80.8% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1880 · 14 births
- Debut · boys
- 14 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 2,234since 1880
Young over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | #10,863 | 6 | |
| 2021 | — | #8,825 | 8 | |
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | #6,345 | 13 | |
| 2017 | — | #10,775 | 6 | |
| 2016 | — | #12,185 | 5 | |
| 2015 | — | #6,676 | 12 | |
| 2014 | — | #8,130 | 9 | |
| 2013 | — | #8,789 | 8 | |
| 2012 | — | #7,559 | 10 | |
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | #10,766 | 6 | |
| 2009 | — | #8,985 | 8 | |
| 2008 | — | #8,324 | 9 | |
| 2007 | — | #7,094 | 11 | |
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | #6,634 | 11 | |
| 2004 | — | #6,520 | 11 | |
| 2003 | — | #6,258 | 11 | |
| 2002 | — | #5,395 | 13 | |
| 2001 | — | #6,935 | 9 | |
| 2000 | — | #3,640 | 22 | |
| 1999 | — | #3,182 | 25 | |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | #3,390 | 22 |
| 1997 | #9,802 | 8 | #2,228 | 38 |
| 1996 | #13,518 | 5 | #3,021 | 24 |
| 1995 | #9,553 | 8 | #2,444 | 31 |
| 1994 | #11,778 | 6 | #1,977 | 42 |
| 1993 | #5,955 | 15 | #2,509 | 29 |
| 1992 | #6,652 | 13 | #2,128 | 36 |
| 1991 | #5,181 | 18 | #1,867 | 42 |
| 1990 | #6,131 | 14 | #2,255 | 31 |
| 1989 | #6,955 | 11 | #2,106 | 33 |
| 1988 | #7,691 | 9 | #2,305 | 26 |
| 1987 | #5,923 | 12 | #3,072 | 16 |
| 1986 | #5,459 | 13 | #1,873 | 32 |
| 1985 | #4,860 | 15 | #1,975 | 29 |
| 1984 | #6,291 | 10 | #1,581 | 38 |
| 1983 | #3,949 | 19 | #1,864 | 29 |
| 1982 | #6,888 | 9 | #1,622 | 37 |
| 1981 | #4,532 | 16 | #1,548 | 39 |
| 1980 | #5,544 | 12 | #2,367 | 21 |
| 1979 | #5,751 | 11 | #1,788 | 31 |
| 1978 | #4,931 | 13 | #1,760 | 30 |
| 1977 | #5,532 | 11 | #2,458 | 18 |
| 1976 | #6,048 | 9 | #1,873 | 26 |
| 1975 | #4,593 | 13 | #1,658 | 30 |
| 1974 | #6,900 | 7 | #2,050 | 21 |
| 1973 | #6,666 | 7 | #1,982 | 21 |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | #1,928 | 22 |
| 1971 | #6,006 | 8 | #2,052 | 20 |
| 1970 | — | #2,509 | 14 | |
| 1969 | #4,198 | 12 | #2,046 | 17 |
| 1968 | — | #1,788 | 20 | |
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 | #3,966 | 5 |
| 1966 | — | #2,784 | 9 | |
| 1965 | #4,831 | 8 | #2,366 | 12 |
| 1964 | #4,096 | 11 | #2,546 | 11 |
| 1963 | #5,891 | 6 | #2,200 | 14 |
| 1962 | #5,860 | 6 | #2,364 | 12 |
| 1961 | #5,851 | 6 | #2,070 | 16 |
| 1960 | #5,168 | 7 | #2,210 | 14 |
| 1959 | #3,827 | 11 | #2,530 | 11 |
| 1958 | #3,925 | 10 | #2,265 | 13 |
| 1957 | #6,086 | 5 | #2,019 | 16 |
| 1956 | #4,467 | 8 | #2,091 | 15 |
| 1955 | #4,740 | 7 | #1,902 | 17 |
| 1954 | #3,490 | 11 | #1,706 | 20 |
| 1953 | #3,955 | 9 | #2,287 | 12 |
| 1952 | #2,671 | 16 | #2,073 | 14 |
| 1951 | #4,011 | 8 | #2,367 | 11 |
| 1950 | #3,962 | 8 | #1,746 | 18 |
| 1949 | #4,235 | 7 | #2,022 | 14 |
| 1948 | #4,651 | 6 | #1,703 | 19 |
| 1947 | #4,007 | 8 | #1,786 | 18 |
| 1946 | #4,960 | 5 | #1,759 | 17 |
| 1945 | — | #2,996 | 6 | |
| 1944 | #3,687 | 7 | #1,683 | 17 |
| 1943 | — | #1,636 | 19 | |
| 1942 | #4,124 | 6 | #2,386 | 10 |
| 1941 | — | #2,083 | 12 | |
| 1940 | — | #1,983 | 13 | |
| 1939 | — | #2,159 | 11 | |
| 1938 | #4,342 | 5 | #1,901 | 14 |
| 1937 | — | #2,680 | 8 | |
| 1936 | #4,181 | 5 | #1,463 | 21 |
| 1935 | #4,204 | 5 | #1,708 | 17 |
| 1934 | — | #1,932 | 14 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,586 | 19 | |
| 1932 | #3,568 | 7 | #1,995 | 14 |
| 1931 | — | #1,770 | 17 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,533 | 23 | |
| 1929 | #4,053 | 6 | #2,096 | 14 |
| 1928 | — | #1,960 | 16 | |
| 1927 | — | #1,603 | 23 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,846 | 18 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,870 | 18 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,727 | 21 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,502 | 25 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,282 | 32 | |
| 1921 | — | #1,588 | 23 | |
| 1920 | #4,975 | 5 | #1,694 | 21 |
| 1919 | — | #1,576 | 22 | |
| 1918 | — | #1,446 | 25 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,238 | 30 | |
| 1916 | — | #1,549 | 21 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,782 | 16 | |
| 1914 | — | #1,441 | 18 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,676 | 11 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,223 | 15 | |
| 1911 | — | #982 | 12 | |
| 1910 | — | #1,314 | 7 | |
| 1909 | — | #1,155 | 7 | |
| 1908 | — | #1,217 | 6 | |
| 1907 | — | #999 | 8 | |
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | #1,064 | 6 | |
| 1903 | — | #1,130 | 5 | |
| 1902 | — | #687 | 11 | |
| 1901 | — | #1,058 | 5 | |
| 1900 | — | #968 | 8 | |
| 1899 | — | #1,051 | 5 | |
| 1898 | — | #885 | 7 | |
| 1897 | — | #725 | 9 | |
| 1896 | — | #982 | 6 | |
| 1895 | — | #795 | 8 | |
| 1894 | — | #1,074 | 5 | |
| 1893 | — | #907 | 6 | |
| 1892 | — | #861 | 7 | |
| 1891 | — | #841 | 6 | |
| 1890 | — | #814 | 7 | |
| 1889 | — | #628 | 10 | |
| 1888 | — | #917 | 6 | |
| 1887 | — | #516 | 12 | |
| 1886 | — | #605 | 10 | |
| 1885 | — | #604 | 10 | |
| 1884 | — | #570 | 11 | |
| 1883 | — | #527 | 12 | |
| 1882 | — | #652 | 9 | |
| 1881 | — | #595 | 9 | |
| 1880 | — | #482 | 14 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Young was already there! It came in at #482, and was given to 14 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1905–1906, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
See more about Young
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2022
- Biggest jump: 371 spots in 1902 (#1,058 → #687)
- Biggest drop: 443 spots in 1903 (#687 → #1,130)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1880 at #482 (14 births)
- Births halved by 1888, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 22 yrs · run 1880–1893
- Highest: 1 in 7,892 boys born in 1880 were named Young (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 291,001 boys born in 2022 (0.00%)
- 14.3% of all boys named Young (320) were born in this decade
- Mostly girls until 1967, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 103 | #482 (1880) | #610 |
| 1890s | 66 | #725 (1897) | #894 |
| 1900s | 56 | #687 (1902) | #1,035 |
| 1910s | 177 | #982 (1911) | #1,423 |
| 1920s | 211 | #1,282 (1922) | #1,717 |
| 1930s | 158 | #1,463 (1936) | #1,873 |
| 1940s | 145 | #1,636 (1943) | #2,004 |
| 1950s | 147 | #1,706 (1954) | #2,099 |
| 1960s | 130 | #1,788 (1968) | #2,434 |
| 1970s | 233 | #1,658 (1975) | #2,006 |
| 1980s | 300 | #1,548 (1981) | #2,031 |
| 1990s | 320 | #1,867 (1991) | #2,500 |
| 2000s | 105 | #3,640 (2000) | #6,643 |
| 2010s | 69 | #6,345 (2018) | #8,903 |
| 2020s | 14 | #8,825 (2021) | #9,844 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Young in 1952
Top girls' names in 1952
Top boys' names in 1952
More about 1952
girls
1,854,335 girls got a published name in 1952; 1 in 115,896 of them was named Young, which outranked 58.2% of the 6,389 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,581Wandra17
- #2,581Wanetta17
- #2,581Yasmin17
- #2,671Young16
- #2,671Aleatha16
- #2,671Aleda16
- #2,671Angella16
- #2,806Abbey15
- #2,806Adair15
- #2,806Adelaida15
Tied with 134 names at #2,671; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,943,633 boys got a published name in 1952; 1 in 138,831 of them was named Young, which outranked 51.3% of the 4,257 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,010Tobin15
- #2,010Vernal15
- #2,010Vincente15
- #2,073Young14
- #2,073Adron14
- #2,073Alexandro14
- #2,073Alger14
- #2,153Alma13
- #2,153Alphonza13
- #2,153Alson13
Tied with 79 names at #2,073; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.