Yasmine
#1,183 for girls in 2025, 196 births · Last seen for boys in 2004 at #11,356
Given to girls >99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1997 · 684 births
- Debut · girls
- 8 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 13,801since 1951
Yasmine over time
Rank among girls' names. Yasmine has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,183 | 196 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,207 | 196 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,407 | 159 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,478 | 148 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,317 | 171 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,474 | 145 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,436 | 155 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,435 | 154 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,236 | 193 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,412 | 164 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,454 | 158 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,333 | 177 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,347 | 173 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,211 | 201 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,111 | 222 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,108 | 223 | — | |
| 2009 | #930 | 287 | — | |
| 2008 | #837 | 338 | — | |
| 2007 | #686 | 427 | — | |
| 2006 | #588 | 496 | — | |
| 2005 | #545 | 528 | — | |
| 2004 | #507 | 572 | #11,356 | 5 |
| 2003 | #478 | 615 | — | |
| 2002 | #461 | 620 | — | |
| 2001 | #419 | 677 | — | |
| 2000 | #419 | 676 | — | |
| 1999 | #400 | 701 | — | |
| 1998 | #412 | 648 | — | |
| 1997 | #385 | 684 | — | |
| 1996 | #428 | 597 | — | |
| 1995 | #580 | 396 | — | |
| 1994 | #645 | 336 | — | |
| 1993 | #596 | 393 | — | |
| 1992 | #674 | 326 | — | |
| 1991 | #934 | 205 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,088 | 162 | — | |
| 1989 | #944 | 188 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,217 | 123 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,280 | 109 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,484 | 84 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,740 | 65 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,593 | 70 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,798 | 59 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,991 | 52 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,028 | 51 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,863 | 58 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,952 | 53 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,824 | 55 | — | |
| 1977 | #2,091 | 45 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,387 | 34 | — | |
| 1975 | #2,516 | 31 | — | |
| 1974 | #3,558 | 18 | — | |
| 1973 | #4,586 | 12 | — | |
| 1972 | #3,894 | 15 | — | |
| 1971 | #2,874 | 24 | — | |
| 1970 | #3,712 | 16 | — | |
| 1969 | #3,958 | 13 | — | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | #4,625 | 9 | — | |
| 1966 | #4,198 | 10 | — | |
| 1965 | #6,539 | 5 | — | |
| 1964 | #3,515 | 14 | — | |
| 1963 | #6,592 | 5 | — | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | #4,546 | 9 | — | |
| 1960 | #6,390 | 5 | — | |
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | #6,103 | 5 | — | |
| 1957 | #4,918 | 7 | — | |
| 1956 | #4,161 | 9 | — | |
| 1955 | #5,208 | 6 | — | |
| 1954 | #4,278 | 8 | — | |
| 1953 | #4,595 | 7 | — | |
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | #4,011 | 8 | — | |
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Yasmine! It came in at #4,011, and was given to 8 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1952, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Yasmine is popular in 1981
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New York#851 · 1 in 7,795
- California#2,323 · 1 in 36,258
Best ever in a state: #108 in District of Columbia, 1993.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York | #851 | 13 | 1 in 7,795 |
| California | #2,323 | 5 | 1 in 36,258 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Yasmine
- 24 spots since 2024 (#1,207 → #1,183)
- 291 spots since 2020 (#1,474 → #1,183)
- 271 spots since 2015 (#1,454 → #1,183)
- Biggest jump: 273 spots in 1989 (#1,217 → #944)
- Biggest drop: 178 spots in 2010 (#930 → #1,108)
- Debuted 1951
- Peaked 1997 at #385 (684 births)
- Births halved by 2008, 11 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 20 yrs · run 1991–2009
- Highest: 1 in 2,530 girls born in 1999 were named Yasmine (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 8,200 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #385 in 1997, was only 1 in 2,545 (0.04%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 37.9% of all girls named Yasmine (5,236) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 50 | #4,011 (1951) | #4,753 |
| 1960s | 70 | #3,515 (1964) | #5,045 |
| 1970s | 303 | #1,824 (1978) | #2,939 |
| 1980s | 859 | #944 (1989) | #1,594 |
| 1990s | 4,448 | #385 (1997) | #614 |
| 2000s | 5,236 | #419 (2001) | #587 |
| 2010s | 1,820 | #1,108 (2010) | #1,308 |
| 2020s | 1,015 | #1,183 (2025) | #1,344 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Yasmine in 1981
Top girls' names in 1981
More about 1981
girls
1,668,060 girls got a published name in 1981; 1 in 32,707 of them was named Yasmine, which outranked 83.4% of the 12,198 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,009Tiffney52
- #2,009Unique52
- #2,009Wendie52
- #2,028Yasmine51
- #2,028Allegra51
- #2,028Berenice51
- #2,028Beronica51
- #2,061Alea50
- #2,061Azucena50
- #2,061Brande50
Tied with 32 names at #2,028; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.