Winslow
#1,163 for girls in 2025, 199 births · #2,833 for boys in 2025, 44 births
Given to boys 65.7% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1907 · 8 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 1,789since 1897
Winslow over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,163 | 199 | #2,833 | 44 |
| 2024 | #1,472 | 148 | #2,715 | 48 |
| 2023 | #1,709 | 120 | #3,293 | 36 |
| 2022 | #2,174 | 87 | #2,616 | 51 |
| 2021 | #2,674 | 64 | #3,912 | 27 |
| 2020 | #3,015 | 53 | #3,202 | 35 |
| 2019 | #3,172 | 50 | #4,337 | 23 |
| 2018 | #3,346 | 47 | #3,524 | 31 |
| 2017 | #3,919 | 38 | #3,889 | 27 |
| 2016 | #4,850 | 28 | #4,943 | 19 |
| 2015 | #5,458 | 24 | #4,545 | 21 |
| 2014 | #4,657 | 30 | #4,866 | 19 |
| 2013 | #7,748 | 15 | #7,026 | 11 |
| 2012 | #14,962 | 6 | #5,256 | 17 |
| 2011 | #9,723 | 11 | #7,502 | 10 |
| 2010 | #16,992 | 5 | #5,047 | 18 |
| 2009 | #10,679 | 10 | #8,310 | 9 |
| 2008 | — | #7,187 | 11 | |
| 2007 | — | #7,094 | 11 | |
| 2006 | — | #5,303 | 16 | |
| 2005 | — | #10,151 | 6 | |
| 2004 | — | #8,927 | 7 | |
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | #8,456 | 7 | |
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | #6,839 | 9 | |
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | #9,631 | 5 | |
| 1997 | — | #6,618 | 8 | |
| 1996 | — | #7,971 | 6 | |
| 1995 | — | #8,868 | 5 | |
| 1994 | — | #5,452 | 10 | |
| 1993 | — | #5,360 | 10 | |
| 1992 | — | #8,435 | 5 | |
| 1991 | — | #3,462 | 17 | |
| 1990 | — | #5,823 | 8 | |
| 1989 | — | #5,615 | 8 | |
| 1988 | — | #3,915 | 12 | |
| 1987 | — | #4,239 | 10 | |
| 1986 | — | #3,653 | 12 | |
| 1985 | — | #4,333 | 9 | |
| 1984 | — | #3,459 | 12 | |
| 1983 | — | #3,411 | 12 | |
| 1982 | — | #4,593 | 8 | |
| 1981 | — | #3,030 | 14 | |
| 1980 | — | #3,615 | 11 | |
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | #5,772 | 5 | |
| 1977 | — | #3,606 | 10 | |
| 1976 | — | #4,012 | 8 | |
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | #3,318 | 10 | |
| 1973 | — | #4,054 | 7 | |
| 1972 | — | #3,152 | 10 | |
| 1971 | — | #3,146 | 10 | |
| 1970 | — | #3,071 | 10 | |
| 1969 | — | #3,062 | 9 | |
| 1968 | — | #3,107 | 8 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,906 | 17 | |
| 1966 | — | #2,327 | 12 | |
| 1965 | — | #2,617 | 10 | |
| 1964 | — | #2,546 | 11 | |
| 1963 | — | #2,539 | 11 | |
| 1962 | — | #2,504 | 11 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,731 | 22 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,973 | 17 | |
| 1959 | — | #2,414 | 12 | |
| 1958 | — | #1,766 | 20 | |
| 1957 | — | #2,093 | 15 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,945 | 17 | |
| 1955 | — | #2,219 | 13 | |
| 1954 | — | #1,762 | 19 | |
| 1953 | — | #1,630 | 22 | |
| 1952 | — | #2,514 | 10 | |
| 1951 | — | #2,135 | 13 | |
| 1950 | — | #1,615 | 21 | |
| 1949 | — | #2,123 | 13 | |
| 1948 | — | #2,115 | 13 | |
| 1947 | — | #1,988 | 15 | |
| 1946 | — | #1,759 | 17 | |
| 1945 | — | #1,581 | 18 | |
| 1944 | — | #2,080 | 12 | |
| 1943 | — | #2,074 | 13 | |
| 1942 | — | #1,946 | 14 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,821 | 15 | |
| 1940 | — | #2,871 | 7 | |
| 1939 | — | #1,636 | 17 | |
| 1938 | — | #1,613 | 18 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,992 | 13 | |
| 1936 | — | #2,629 | 8 | |
| 1935 | — | #1,656 | 18 | |
| 1934 | — | #1,932 | 14 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,707 | 17 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,651 | 19 | |
| 1931 | — | #1,927 | 15 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,496 | 24 | |
| 1929 | — | #1,564 | 22 | |
| 1928 | — | #1,707 | 20 | |
| 1927 | — | #1,959 | 17 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,605 | 22 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,628 | 22 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,458 | 27 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,502 | 25 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,545 | 24 | |
| 1921 | — | #1,509 | 25 | |
| 1920 | — | #1,642 | 22 | |
| 1919 | — | #1,624 | 21 | |
| 1918 | — | #1,539 | 23 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,238 | 30 | |
| 1916 | — | #1,240 | 29 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,342 | 25 | |
| 1914 | — | #1,492 | 17 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,497 | 13 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,268 | 14 | |
| 1911 | — | #1,537 | 6 | |
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | #1,277 | 6 | |
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | #999 | 8 | |
| 1906 | — | #1,253 | 5 | |
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | #1,162 | 6 | |
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | #1,057 | 5 | |
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Winslow! It came in at #1,057, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1897–1899, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
See more about Winslow
- 118 spots since 2024 (#2,715 → #2,833)
- 369 spots since 2020 (#3,202 → #2,833)
- 1,712 spots since 2015 (#4,545 → #2,833)
- Biggest jump: 254 spots in 1907 (#1,253 → #999)
- Debuted 1897
- Peaked 1907 at #999 (8 births)
- Births halved by 1908, 1 yr later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 1 yr · 1907
- Highest: 1 in 18,353 boys born in 1907 were named Winslow (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 38,820 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 13.5% of all boys named Winslow (241) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 2012, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 5 | #1,057 (1897) | #1,057 |
| 1900s | 25 | #999 (1907) | #1,173 |
| 1910s | 178 | #1,238 (1917) | #1,420 |
| 1920s | 226 | #1,458 (1924) | #1,612 |
| 1930s | 163 | #1,496 (1930) | #1,824 |
| 1940s | 137 | #1,581 (1945) | #2,036 |
| 1950s | 162 | #1,615 (1950) | #2,009 |
| 1960s | 128 | #1,731 (1961) | #2,431 |
| 1970s | 70 | #3,071 (1970) | #3,766 |
| 1980s | 108 | #3,030 (1981) | #3,986 |
| 1990s | 74 | #3,462 (1991) | #6,847 |
| 2000s | 76 | #5,303 (2006) | #7,783 |
| 2010s | 196 | #3,524 (2018) | #5,094 |
| 2020s | 241 | #2,616 (2022) | #3,095 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Winslow in 2020
Top girls' names in 2020
Top boys' names in 2020
More about 2020
girls
1,616,549 girls got a published name in 2020; 1 in 30,501 of them was named Winslow, which outranked 82.8% of the 17,527 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,966Veera54
- #2,966Xenia54
- #2,966Zoelle54
- #3,015Winslow53
- #3,015Aariyah53
- #3,015Aarohi53
- #3,015Addelynn53
- #3,061Aaleyah52
- #3,061Aicha52
- #3,061Amairani52
Tied with 45 names at #3,015; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,726,076 boys got a published name in 2020; 1 in 49,316 of them was named Winslow, which outranked 77.2% of the 14,060 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #3,136Vedansh36
- #3,136Vikram36
- #3,136Yug36
- #3,202Winslow35
- #3,202Abbott35
- #3,202Amaree35
- #3,202Amay35
- #3,274Akshar34
- #3,274Ashad34
- #3,274Ashar34
Tied with 71 names at #3,202; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↓ 380Vivaan#875 → #1,255
- ↓ 282Alexzander#890 → #1,172
- ↓ 268Reyansh#806 → #1,074
- ↓ 266Javion#949 → #1,215
- ↓ 224Kenny#862 → #1,086
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.