Windsor
#5,554 for girls in 2025, 22 births · #5,861 for boys in 2025, 15 births
Given to boys 54.2% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1925 · 16 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 564since 1912
Windsor over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,554 | 22 | #5,861 | 15 |
| 2024 | #3,758 | 40 | #5,443 | 17 |
| 2023 | #5,752 | 21 | #8,255 | 9 |
| 2022 | #4,202 | 34 | #8,990 | 8 |
| 2021 | #4,245 | 33 | #7,089 | 11 |
| 2020 | #3,915 | 36 | #5,699 | 15 |
| 2019 | #4,437 | 31 | #6,777 | 12 |
| 2018 | #4,562 | 30 | #5,770 | 15 |
| 2017 | #5,191 | 25 | #8,140 | 9 |
| 2016 | #4,157 | 35 | #6,053 | 14 |
| 2015 | #4,403 | 32 | #7,066 | 11 |
| 2014 | #5,310 | 25 | #7,562 | 10 |
| 2013 | #6,017 | 21 | #10,728 | 6 |
| 2012 | #10,429 | 10 | — | |
| 2011 | #13,347 | 7 | — | |
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | #17,294 | 5 | #12,491 | 5 |
| 2008 | #10,084 | 11 | — | |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 | #7,590 | 10 |
| 2006 | #17,168 | 5 | — | |
| 2005 | #16,462 | 5 | — | |
| 2004 | #14,179 | 6 | #6,976 | 10 |
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | #9,482 | 10 | — | |
| 2001 | #15,352 | 5 | — | |
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | #11,385 | 7 | #8,704 | 6 |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | #9,631 | 5 |
| 1997 | #13,724 | 5 | #6,618 | 8 |
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | #8,868 | 5 | |
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | #5,771 | 9 | |
| 1992 | — | #8,435 | 5 | |
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | #7,905 | 5 | |
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | #5,926 | 6 | |
| 1985 | #10,677 | 5 | #4,698 | 8 |
| 1984 | — | #6,315 | 5 | |
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | #6,385 | 5 | |
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | #6,056 | 5 | |
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | #5,123 | 6 | |
| 1976 | — | #5,587 | 5 | |
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | #4,404 | 5 | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | #2,780 | 9 | |
| 1964 | — | #3,050 | 8 | |
| 1963 | — | #3,318 | 7 | |
| 1962 | — | #3,640 | 6 | |
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | #3,290 | 7 | |
| 1958 | — | #3,559 | 6 | |
| 1957 | — | #3,993 | 5 | |
| 1956 | — | #3,535 | 6 | |
| 1955 | — | #2,764 | 9 | |
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | #3,373 | 6 | |
| 1951 | — | #3,714 | 5 | |
| 1950 | — | #3,021 | 7 | |
| 1949 | — | #2,802 | 8 | |
| 1948 | — | #3,668 | 5 | |
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | #2,393 | 9 | |
| 1944 | — | #3,109 | 6 | |
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | #2,872 | 7 | |
| 1940 | — | #3,459 | 5 | |
| 1939 | — | #2,609 | 8 | |
| 1938 | — | #2,646 | 8 | |
| 1937 | — | #2,905 | 7 | |
| 1936 | — | #3,147 | 6 | |
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | #3,277 | 6 | |
| 1933 | — | #3,268 | 6 | |
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | #3,763 | 5 | |
| 1930 | — | #3,592 | 6 | |
| 1929 | — | #2,589 | 10 | |
| 1928 | — | #4,151 | 5 | |
| 1927 | — | #2,703 | 10 | |
| 1926 | — | #3,708 | 6 | |
| 1925 | — | #2,012 | 16 | |
| 1924 | — | #3,867 | 6 | |
| 1923 | — | #2,950 | 9 | |
| 1922 | — | #3,014 | 9 | |
| 1921 | — | #2,632 | 11 | |
| 1920 | — | #3,489 | 7 | |
| 1919 | — | #3,391 | 7 | |
| 1918 | — | #3,368 | 7 | |
| 1917 | — | #2,423 | 11 | |
| 1916 | — | #3,177 | 7 | |
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | #2,544 | 5 | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Windsor! It came in at #2,544, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1912–1915, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
See more about Windsor
- 418 spots since 2024 (#5,443 → #5,861)
- 162 spots since 2020 (#5,699 → #5,861)
- 1,205 spots since 2015 (#7,066 → #5,861)
- Debuted 1912
- Peaked 1925 at #2,012 (16 births)
- Births halved by 1926, 1 yr later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 69,745 boys born in 1925 were named Windsor (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 113,872 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 15.8% of all boys named Windsor (89) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 2007, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 37 | #2,423 (1917) | #2,981 |
| 1920s | 89 | #2,012 (1925) | #3,112 |
| 1930s | 52 | #2,609 (1939) | #3,151 |
| 1940s | 40 | #2,393 (1945) | #3,051 |
| 1950s | 51 | #2,764 (1955) | #3,406 |
| 1960s | 35 | #2,780 (1965) | #3,438 |
| 1970s | 16 | #5,123 (1977) | #5,589 |
| 1980s | 29 | #4,698 (1985) | #6,246 |
| 1990s | 38 | #5,771 (1993) | #8,005 |
| 2000s | 25 | #6,976 (2004) | #9,019 |
| 2010s | 77 | #5,770 (2018) | #7,442 |
| 2020s | 75 | #5,443 (2024) | #6,890 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Windsor in 1925
Top boys' names in 1925
More about 1925
boys
1,115,919 boys got a published name in 1925; 1 in 69,745 of them was named Windsor, which outranked 58.7% of the 4,867 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 32.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,935Worley17
- #1,935Wray17
- #1,935Xavier17
- #2,012Windsor16
- #2,012Ardis16
- #2,012Bartlett16
- #2,012Bentley16
- #2,089Achille15
- #2,089Addie15
- #2,089Adolphe15
Tied with 76 names at #2,012; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.