Walker
#1,942 for girls in 2025, 99 births · #78 for boys in 2025, 4,204 births
Given to boys 97.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2022 · 4,250 births
- Debut · boys
- 29 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 4 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 47,914since 1880
Walker over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,942 | 99 | #78 | 4,204 |
| 2024 | #1,753 | 115 | #82 | 4,033 |
| 2023 | #1,699 | 121 | #85 | 4,018 |
| 2022 | #1,422 | 158 | #78 | 4,250 |
| 2021 | #1,680 | 123 | #130 | 2,868 |
| 2020 | #3,281 | 47 | #206 | 1,861 |
| 2019 | #3,718 | 40 | #230 | 1,638 |
| 2018 | #4,889 | 27 | #266 | 1,343 |
| 2017 | #6,287 | 19 | #315 | 1,100 |
| 2016 | #7,988 | 14 | #331 | 1,048 |
| 2015 | #6,721 | 18 | #340 | 1,010 |
| 2014 | #6,451 | 19 | #326 | 1,046 |
| 2013 | #7,031 | 17 | #369 | 840 |
| 2012 | #12,199 | 8 | #410 | 707 |
| 2011 | #10,374 | 10 | #417 | 676 |
| 2010 | #13,448 | 7 | #426 | 649 |
| 2009 | #15,242 | 6 | #462 | 589 |
| 2008 | #15,405 | 6 | #494 | 554 |
| 2007 | #12,676 | 8 | #460 | 601 |
| 2006 | #9,286 | 12 | #413 | 696 |
| 2005 | #10,921 | 9 | #369 | 803 |
| 2004 | #6,489 | 18 | #380 | 722 |
| 2003 | #7,998 | 13 | #412 | 625 |
| 2002 | #13,595 | 6 | #406 | 622 |
| 2001 | #11,020 | 8 | #399 | 629 |
| 2000 | #15,031 | 5 | #426 | 578 |
| 1999 | #10,345 | 8 | #434 | 535 |
| 1998 | #9,260 | 9 | #427 | 542 |
| 1997 | #6,844 | 13 | #426 | 536 |
| 1996 | #8,132 | 10 | #446 | 504 |
| 1995 | #8,079 | 10 | #480 | 450 |
| 1994 | #7,604 | 11 | #533 | 369 |
| 1993 | #13,442 | 5 | #646 | 255 |
| 1992 | — | #736 | 197 | |
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | #774 | 176 |
| 1990 | — | #842 | 148 | |
| 1989 | — | #891 | 128 | |
| 1988 | — | #970 | 99 | |
| 1987 | — | #1,047 | 83 | |
| 1986 | — | #1,028 | 81 | |
| 1985 | — | #975 | 87 | |
| 1984 | — | #951 | 86 | |
| 1983 | — | #987 | 80 | |
| 1982 | — | #1,088 | 70 | |
| 1981 | — | #1,169 | 62 | |
| 1980 | #10,392 | 5 | #1,176 | 60 |
| 1979 | — | #1,260 | 53 | |
| 1978 | — | #1,326 | 47 | |
| 1977 | — | #1,019 | 71 | |
| 1976 | — | #1,084 | 60 | |
| 1975 | — | #1,065 | 61 | |
| 1974 | — | #1,007 | 66 | |
| 1973 | — | #1,163 | 50 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,129 | 52 | |
| 1971 | — | #1,199 | 47 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,314 | 40 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,198 | 43 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,339 | 33 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,312 | 33 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,149 | 42 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,189 | 41 | |
| 1964 | — | #1,350 | 34 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,238 | 39 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,121 | 47 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,121 | 49 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,382 | 33 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,034 | 55 | |
| 1958 | — | #1,040 | 54 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,185 | 43 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,032 | 53 | |
| 1955 | — | #957 | 61 | |
| 1954 | — | #908 | 66 | |
| 1953 | — | #959 | 56 | |
| 1952 | — | #863 | 66 | |
| 1951 | — | #830 | 72 | |
| 1950 | — | #934 | 54 | |
| 1949 | — | #782 | 77 | |
| 1948 | — | #891 | 59 | |
| 1947 | — | #794 | 75 | |
| 1946 | — | #753 | 77 | |
| 1945 | — | #728 | 71 | |
| 1944 | — | #697 | 80 | |
| 1943 | — | #773 | 71 | |
| 1942 | — | #755 | 72 | |
| 1941 | — | #770 | 65 | |
| 1940 | — | #711 | 73 | |
| 1939 | — | #805 | 57 | |
| 1938 | — | #799 | 60 | |
| 1937 | — | #650 | 83 | |
| 1936 | — | #787 | 60 | |
| 1935 | — | #697 | 75 | |
| 1934 | — | #725 | 71 | |
| 1933 | — | #752 | 66 | |
| 1932 | — | #756 | 69 | |
| 1931 | — | #677 | 78 | |
| 1930 | — | #644 | 91 | |
| 1929 | — | #606 | 99 | |
| 1928 | — | #652 | 92 | |
| 1927 | #4,805 | 5 | #726 | 80 |
| 1926 | — | #660 | 91 | |
| 1925 | #4,973 | 5 | #617 | 103 |
| 1924 | — | #600 | 113 | |
| 1923 | — | #600 | 111 | |
| 1922 | — | #612 | 112 | |
| 1921 | — | #553 | 128 | |
| 1920 | #3,598 | 8 | #490 | 151 |
| 1919 | — | #548 | 119 | |
| 1918 | — | #589 | 107 | |
| 1917 | — | #577 | 105 | |
| 1916 | — | #562 | 104 | |
| 1915 | #4,274 | 5 | #555 | 103 |
| 1914 | #3,618 | 5 | #591 | 72 |
| 1913 | — | #498 | 76 | |
| 1912 | — | #484 | 66 | |
| 1911 | — | #514 | 33 | |
| 1910 | — | #447 | 38 | |
| 1909 | — | #505 | 26 | |
| 1908 | — | #389 | 36 | |
| 1907 | — | #495 | 22 | |
| 1906 | — | #411 | 28 | |
| 1905 | — | #507 | 20 | |
| 1904 | — | #538 | 17 | |
| 1903 | — | #430 | 22 | |
| 1902 | — | #490 | 19 | |
| 1901 | — | #371 | 25 | |
| 1900 | — | #430 | 27 | |
| 1899 | — | #355 | 26 | |
| 1898 | — | #364 | 28 | |
| 1897 | — | #316 | 34 | |
| 1896 | — | #290 | 40 | |
| 1895 | — | #301 | 36 | |
| 1894 | — | #399 | 22 | |
| 1893 | — | #349 | 26 | |
| 1892 | — | #329 | 32 | |
| 1891 | — | #377 | 21 | |
| 1890 | — | #322 | 29 | |
| 1889 | — | #294 | 33 | |
| 1888 | — | #302 | 35 | |
| 1887 | — | #330 | 25 | |
| 1886 | — | #317 | 29 | |
| 1885 | — | #364 | 23 | |
| 1884 | — | #416 | 19 | |
| 1883 | — | #381 | 20 | |
| 1882 | — | #324 | 28 | |
| 1881 | — | #324 | 25 | |
| 1880 | — | #314 | 29 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Walker was already there! It came in at #314, and was given to 29 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1901–1905, when fewer than 26 boys a year got the name.
See more about Walker
Momentum · boys
Rising
- 4 spots since 2024 (#82 → #78)
- 128 spots since 2020 (#206 → #78)
- 262 spots since 2015 (#340 → #78)
- Biggest jump: 137 spots in 1937 (#787 → #650)
- Biggest drop: 152 spots in 1950 (#782 → #934)
Rise & fade · boys
142 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2022 at #78 (4,250 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 4 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 4 yrs · run 2022–2025
- Top 1,000: 117 yrs · run 1880–1955
Share of babies · boys
1 in 406
- Highest: 1 in 406 boys born in 2025 were named Walker (0.25%)
- Its best rank, #78 in 2022, was only 1 in 411 (0.24%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2020s
- 44.3% of all boys named Walker (21,234) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 266 | #294 (1889) | #337 |
| 1890s | 294 | #290 (1896) | #340 |
| 1900s | 242 | #371 (1901) | #457 |
| 1910s | 823 | #447 (1910) | #537 |
| 1920s | 1,080 | #490 (1920) | #612 |
| 1930s | 710 | #644 (1930) | #729 |
| 1940s | 720 | #697 (1944) | #765 |
| 1950s | 580 | #830 (1951) | #974 |
| 1960s | 394 | #1,121 (1961) | #1,240 |
| 1970s | 547 | #1,007 (1974) | #1,157 |
| 1980s | 836 | #891 (1989) | #1,028 |
| 1990s | 3,712 | #426 (1997) | #574 |
| 2000s | 6,419 | #369 (2005) | #422 |
| 2010s | 10,057 | #230 (2019) | #343 |
| 2020s | 21,234 | #78 (2022) | #110 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Walker in 1952
boys
#863
66 births · 1 in 29,449 boys
Top boys' names in 1952
More about 1952
boys
1,943,633 boys got a published name in 1952; 1 in 29,449 of them was named Walker, which outranked 79.7% of the 4,257 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).