Virgil
Last seen for girls in 1985 at #10,677 · #1,409 for boys in 2025, 129 births
Given to boys 98.0% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1907 · 276 births
- Debut · boys
- 81 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 8 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 72,009since 1880
Virgil over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,409 | 129 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,540 | 114 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,465 | 123 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,917 | 81 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,645 | 101 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,778 | 85 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,723 | 91 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,994 | 73 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,644 | 96 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,754 | 88 | |
| 2015 | — | #2,036 | 70 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,920 | 75 | |
| 2013 | — | #2,009 | 68 | |
| 2012 | — | #2,488 | 50 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,905 | 73 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,816 | 80 | |
| 2009 | — | #2,119 | 64 | |
| 2008 | — | #2,374 | 54 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,928 | 73 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,943 | 69 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,854 | 69 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,701 | 75 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,749 | 69 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,660 | 71 | |
| 2001 | — | #1,591 | 75 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,713 | 66 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,449 | 80 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,205 | 102 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,350 | 82 | |
| 1996 | — | #1,257 | 88 | |
| 1995 | — | #1,182 | 96 | |
| 1994 | — | #1,268 | 85 | |
| 1993 | — | #1,033 | 114 | |
| 1992 | — | #1,033 | 112 | |
| 1991 | — | #856 | 149 | |
| 1990 | — | #804 | 159 | |
| 1989 | — | #819 | 146 | |
| 1988 | — | #796 | 142 | |
| 1987 | — | #772 | 142 | |
| 1986 | — | #670 | 179 | |
| 1985 | #10,677 | 5 | #728 | 147 |
| 1984 | — | #641 | 180 | |
| 1983 | — | #675 | 160 | |
| 1982 | — | #570 | 227 | |
| 1981 | #10,411 | 5 | #576 | 220 |
| 1980 | #9,095 | 6 | #616 | 203 |
| 1979 | — | #557 | 238 | |
| 1978 | #7,649 | 7 | #550 | 228 |
| 1977 | #8,444 | 6 | #522 | 253 |
| 1976 | #6,611 | 8 | #488 | 265 |
| 1975 | — | #451 | 311 | |
| 1974 | — | #450 | 312 | |
| 1973 | #5,580 | 9 | #422 | 345 |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | #413 | 366 |
| 1971 | #6,619 | 7 | #392 | 421 |
| 1970 | — | #396 | 408 | |
| 1969 | #5,974 | 7 | #405 | 384 |
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | #371 | 442 |
| 1967 | #5,457 | 7 | #353 | 446 |
| 1966 | — | #348 | 458 | |
| 1965 | #4,494 | 9 | #338 | 503 |
| 1964 | #5,008 | 8 | #335 | 547 |
| 1963 | #5,296 | 7 | #332 | 561 |
| 1962 | #5,293 | 7 | #334 | 555 |
| 1961 | #4,009 | 11 | #314 | 625 |
| 1960 | #4,437 | 9 | #296 | 687 |
| 1959 | #2,980 | 16 | #304 | 651 |
| 1958 | #3,543 | 12 | #290 | 696 |
| 1957 | #3,696 | 11 | #286 | 668 |
| 1956 | #3,696 | 11 | #276 | 709 |
| 1955 | #3,778 | 10 | #268 | 699 |
| 1954 | #4,655 | 7 | #259 | 743 |
| 1953 | #3,106 | 13 | #249 | 759 |
| 1952 | #2,806 | 15 | #237 | 786 |
| 1951 | #2,810 | 14 | #242 | 789 |
| 1950 | #2,909 | 13 | #234 | 786 |
| 1949 | #3,176 | 11 | #228 | 791 |
| 1948 | #2,126 | 21 | #230 | 794 |
| 1947 | #2,769 | 14 | #219 | 854 |
| 1946 | #2,228 | 18 | #198 | 881 |
| 1945 | #1,993 | 18 | #183 | 845 |
| 1944 | #2,511 | 13 | #177 | 928 |
| 1943 | #1,949 | 20 | #175 | 993 |
| 1942 | #3,194 | 9 | #167 | 1,003 |
| 1941 | #2,272 | 14 | #170 | 923 |
| 1940 | #2,029 | 16 | #166 | 938 |
| 1939 | #2,038 | 16 | #164 | 937 |
| 1938 | #2,730 | 10 | #151 | 1,069 |
| 1937 | #2,448 | 12 | #157 | 969 |
| 1936 | #2,857 | 9 | #149 | 1,034 |
| 1935 | #1,917 | 17 | #140 | 1,104 |
| 1934 | #2,003 | 16 | #141 | 1,128 |
| 1933 | #1,970 | 16 | #138 | 1,139 |
| 1932 | #2,037 | 16 | #139 | 1,228 |
| 1931 | #1,876 | 18 | #121 | 1,384 |
| 1930 | #1,371 | 31 | #128 | 1,371 |
| 1929 | #1,555 | 25 | #127 | 1,339 |
| 1928 | #1,223 | 39 | #126 | 1,404 |
| 1927 | #1,587 | 27 | #121 | 1,499 |
| 1926 | #1,414 | 32 | #118 | 1,576 |
| 1925 | #1,847 | 22 | #120 | 1,503 |
| 1924 | #1,354 | 36 | #111 | 1,627 |
| 1923 | #1,490 | 30 | #100 | 1,713 |
| 1922 | #1,309 | 36 | #99 | 1,790 |
| 1921 | #1,237 | 39 | #98 | 1,830 |
| 1920 | #968 | 57 | #101 | 1,711 |
| 1919 | #1,155 | 41 | #103 | 1,570 |
| 1918 | #1,091 | 45 | #99 | 1,707 |
| 1917 | #1,126 | 40 | #103 | 1,523 |
| 1916 | #1,043 | 44 | #104 | 1,496 |
| 1915 | #1,173 | 34 | #108 | 1,376 |
| 1914 | #1,175 | 27 | #107 | 1,048 |
| 1913 | #1,040 | 27 | #107 | 819 |
| 1912 | #1,143 | 21 | #111 | 684 |
| 1911 | #1,241 | 14 | #107 | 355 |
| 1910 | #1,030 | 18 | #111 | 280 |
| 1909 | #1,104 | 14 | #110 | 250 |
| 1908 | #970 | 17 | #100 | 258 |
| 1907 | #1,092 | 13 | #93 | 276 |
| 1906 | #1,154 | 11 | #102 | 207 |
| 1905 | #968 | 15 | #97 | 226 |
| 1904 | #1,486 | 7 | #100 | 211 |
| 1903 | #896 | 15 | #112 | 173 |
| 1902 | #1,133 | 10 | #119 | 163 |
| 1901 | #1,007 | 11 | #108 | 158 |
| 1900 | #941 | 16 | #110 | 212 |
| 1899 | #935 | 12 | #111 | 154 |
| 1898 | #886 | 15 | #119 | 155 |
| 1897 | #1,037 | 10 | #108 | 159 |
| 1896 | #950 | 12 | #126 | 138 |
| 1895 | #1,426 | 6 | #116 | 146 |
| 1894 | #998 | 10 | #128 | 125 |
| 1893 | — | #126 | 119 | |
| 1892 | #958 | 10 | #129 | 130 |
| 1891 | #893 | 10 | #114 | 123 |
| 1890 | #1,338 | 5 | #142 | 100 |
| 1889 | — | #153 | 93 | |
| 1888 | #1,276 | 5 | #137 | 112 |
| 1887 | — | #163 | 77 | |
| 1886 | — | #175 | 79 | |
| 1885 | — | #162 | 82 | |
| 1884 | — | #157 | 88 | |
| 1883 | — | #176 | 70 | |
| 1882 | — | #170 | 80 | |
| 1881 | — | #178 | 65 | |
| 1880 | — | #163 | 81 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Virgil was already there! It came in at #163, and was given to 81 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 2011–2015, when fewer than 76 boys a year got the name.
See more about Virgil
- 131 spots since 2024 (#1,540 → #1,409)
- 369 spots since 2020 (#1,778 → #1,409)
- 627 spots since 2015 (#2,036 → #1,409)
- Biggest jump: 58 spots in 1986 (#728 → #670)
- Biggest drop: 177 spots in 1992 (#856 → #1,033)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1907 at #93 (276 births)
- Births halved by 1992, 85 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 8 yrs · run 1921–1923
- Top 1,000: 112 yrs · run 1880–1991
- Highest: 1 in 532 boys born in 1907 were named Virgil (0.19%)
- Latest: 1 in 13,241 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 22.2% of all boys named Virgil (15,992) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 827 | #137 (1888) | #163 |
| 1890s | 1,349 | #108 (1897) | #122 |
| 1900s | 2,134 | #93 (1907) | #105 |
| 1910s | 10,858 | #99 (1918) | #106 |
| 1920s | 15,992 | #98 (1921) | #112 |
| 1930s | 11,363 | #121 (1931) | #143 |
| 1940s | 8,950 | #166 (1940) | #191 |
| 1950s | 7,286 | #234 (1950) | #265 |
| 1960s | 5,208 | #296 (1960) | #343 |
| 1970s | 3,147 | #392 (1971) | #464 |
| 1980s | 1,746 | #570 (1982) | #686 |
| 1990s | 1,067 | #804 (1990) | #1,144 |
| 2000s | 685 | #1,591 (2001) | #1,863 |
| 2010s | 764 | #1,644 (2017) | #1,929 |
| 2020s | 633 | #1,409 (2025) | #1,626 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Virgil in 1905
Top girls' names in 1905
Top boys' names in 1905
More about 1905
girls
291,617 girls got a published name in 1905; 1 in 19,441 of them was named Virgil, which outranked 56.7% of the 2,234 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 19.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
132,306 boys got a published name in 1905; 1 in 585 of them was named Virgil, which outranked 93.2% of the 1,421 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 32.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.