Vilma
#7,491 for girls in 2025, 14 births
- Peak · girls
- 1927 · 213 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,989since 1901
Vilma over time
Rank among girls' names. Vilma has never cracked the top 400 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #7,491 | 14 |
| 2024 | #5,799 | 21 |
| 2023 | #5,390 | 23 |
| 2022 | #5,793 | 21 |
| 2021 | #6,414 | 18 |
| 2020 | #5,850 | 20 |
| 2019 | #6,414 | 18 |
| 2018 | #7,409 | 15 |
| 2017 | #8,299 | 13 |
| 2016 | #5,796 | 22 |
| 2015 | #6,721 | 18 |
| 2014 | #7,302 | 16 |
| 2013 | #9,036 | 12 |
| 2012 | #7,144 | 17 |
| 2011 | #8,614 | 13 |
| 2010 | #8,271 | 14 |
| 2009 | #5,097 | 28 |
| 2008 | #5,013 | 29 |
| 2007 | #5,709 | 24 |
| 2006 | #4,358 | 33 |
| 2005 | #5,113 | 25 |
| 2004 | #5,969 | 20 |
| 2003 | #5,419 | 22 |
| 2002 | #4,498 | 27 |
| 2001 | #6,956 | 15 |
| 2000 | #3,983 | 31 |
| 1999 | #4,313 | 26 |
| 1998 | #4,238 | 26 |
| 1997 | #4,370 | 24 |
| 1996 | #3,429 | 33 |
| 1995 | #3,285 | 34 |
| 1994 | #3,168 | 36 |
| 1993 | #2,990 | 39 |
| 1992 | #2,974 | 39 |
| 1991 | #2,356 | 54 |
| 1990 | #2,492 | 48 |
| 1989 | #2,338 | 50 |
| 1988 | #2,539 | 42 |
| 1987 | #2,360 | 44 |
| 1986 | #2,682 | 36 |
| 1985 | #3,084 | 29 |
| 1984 | #3,423 | 24 |
| 1983 | #2,433 | 38 |
| 1982 | #3,172 | 27 |
| 1981 | #3,066 | 28 |
| 1980 | #3,134 | 27 |
| 1979 | #3,078 | 27 |
| 1978 | #3,283 | 23 |
| 1977 | #3,366 | 22 |
| 1976 | #2,932 | 25 |
| 1975 | #2,023 | 43 |
| 1974 | #2,213 | 36 |
| 1973 | #2,689 | 26 |
| 1972 | #1,920 | 43 |
| 1971 | #2,137 | 38 |
| 1970 | #2,120 | 38 |
| 1969 | #1,609 | 55 |
| 1968 | #1,749 | 45 |
| 1967 | #1,921 | 37 |
| 1966 | #1,463 | 57 |
| 1965 | #1,516 | 54 |
| 1964 | #1,224 | 81 |
| 1963 | #1,290 | 73 |
| 1962 | #1,138 | 92 |
| 1961 | #1,253 | 78 |
| 1960 | #1,117 | 94 |
| 1959 | #971 | 118 |
| 1958 | #1,364 | 60 |
| 1957 | #1,531 | 49 |
| 1956 | #1,717 | 38 |
| 1955 | #1,907 | 31 |
| 1954 | #1,949 | 29 |
| 1953 | #1,872 | 29 |
| 1952 | #1,680 | 34 |
| 1951 | #1,637 | 34 |
| 1950 | #1,626 | 33 |
| 1949 | #1,807 | 28 |
| 1948 | #2,008 | 23 |
| 1947 | #1,752 | 30 |
| 1946 | #1,771 | 26 |
| 1945 | #1,993 | 18 |
| 1944 | #1,916 | 20 |
| 1943 | #1,527 | 30 |
| 1942 | #1,668 | 25 |
| 1941 | #1,569 | 25 |
| 1940 | #1,518 | 26 |
| 1939 | #1,240 | 35 |
| 1938 | #1,200 | 37 |
| 1937 | #1,282 | 32 |
| 1936 | #951 | 52 |
| 1935 | #974 | 50 |
| 1934 | #861 | 63 |
| 1933 | #814 | 67 |
| 1932 | #734 | 84 |
| 1931 | #605 | 120 |
| 1930 | #560 | 147 |
| 1929 | #480 | 198 |
| 1928 | #520 | 177 |
| 1927 | #477 | 213 |
| 1926 | #669 | 117 |
| 1925 | #1,020 | 54 |
| 1924 | #1,440 | 33 |
| 1923 | #1,213 | 41 |
| 1922 | #1,285 | 37 |
| 1921 | #1,115 | 47 |
| 1920 | #1,312 | 35 |
| 1919 | #1,177 | 40 |
| 1918 | #1,073 | 46 |
| 1917 | #964 | 52 |
| 1916 | #1,026 | 45 |
| 1915 | #1,012 | 43 |
| 1914 | #942 | 39 |
| 1913 | #981 | 30 |
| 1912 | #890 | 32 |
| 1911 | #898 | 23 |
| 1910 | #1,521 | 10 |
| 1909 | #1,152 | 13 |
| 1908 | #1,439 | 9 |
| 1907 | #1,289 | 10 |
| 1906 | #1,229 | 10 |
| 1905 | #1,931 | 5 |
| 1904 | #1,486 | 7 |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | #1,793 | 5 |
| 1901 | #1,679 | 5 |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Vilma! It came in at #1,679, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1901–1903, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
See more about Vilma
- 1,692 spots since 2024 (#5,799 → #7,491)
- 1,641 spots since 2020 (#5,850 → #7,491)
- 770 spots since 2015 (#6,721 → #7,491)
- Biggest jump: 623 spots in 1911 (#1,521 → #898)
- Biggest drop: 331 spots in 1937 (#951 → #1,282)
- Debuted 1901
- Peaked 1927 at #477 (213 births)
- Births halved by 1932, 5 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 17 yrs · run 1926–1936
- Highest: 1 in 5,598 girls born in 1927 were named Vilma (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 114,805 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 19.1% of all girls named Vilma (952) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 64 | #1,152 (1909) | #1,500 |
| 1910s | 360 | #890 (1912) | #1,048 |
| 1920s | 952 | #477 (1927) | #953 |
| 1930s | 687 | #560 (1930) | #922 |
| 1940s | 251 | #1,518 (1940) | #1,753 |
| 1950s | 455 | #971 (1959) | #1,625 |
| 1960s | 666 | #1,117 (1960) | #1,428 |
| 1970s | 321 | #1,920 (1972) | #2,576 |
| 1980s | 345 | #2,338 (1989) | #2,823 |
| 1990s | 359 | #2,356 (1991) | #3,362 |
| 2000s | 254 | #3,983 (2000) | #5,212 |
| 2010s | 158 | #5,796 (2016) | #7,501 |
| 2020s | 117 | #5,390 (2023) | #6,123 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Vilma in 1921
Top girls' names in 1921
More about 1921
girls
1,233,058 girls got a published name in 1921; 1 in 26,235 of them was named Vilma, which outranked 81.0% of the 5,871 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,092Oneta48
- #1,092Thora48
- #1,092Trula48
- #1,115Vilma47
- #1,115Celesta47
- #1,115Charleen47
- #1,115Clifford47
- #1,126Albert46
- #1,126Ara46
- #1,126Atha46
Tied with 10 names at #1,115; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.