Vernell

Last seen for girls in 1999 at #14,411 · Last seen for boys in 2021 at #10,799
Given to girls 68.1% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1935 · 173 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
7,124
since 1897

Vernell over time

girlsboys

Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201962peak #479, 1935peak #849, 1949girlsboys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021#10,7996
2020
2019#8,2159
2018
2017#10,7756
2016#7,60510
2015#9,5687
2014#10,7176
2013
2012#9,7097
2011#5,67515
2010#10,7666
2009#7,23611
2008#8,3249
2007#7,59010
2006#5,30316
2005#4,82417
2004#5,24615
2003#4,11420
2002#9,3926
2001#5,66712
2000#4,06619
1999#14,4115#4,16217
1998#12,4266#4,01917
1997#3,60119
1996#4,39614
1995#11,7836#3,10022
1994#11,7786#2,61828
1993#10,5887#2,25734
1992#2,90923
1991#2,22732
1990#2,30830
1989#12,3625#2,06834
1988#7,11110#2,09030
1987#8,7787#2,27225
1986#8,5237#2,09627
1985#6,9559#1,91630
1984#6,29110#1,72333
1983#3,94919#2,01726
1982#5,20913#2,34121
1981#9,1106#1,76632
1980#4,74315#1,91029
1979#3,77720#1,83330
1978#4,45915#1,68832
1977#4,06917#1,64533
1976#3,40720#1,78128
1975#3,77417#1,45537
1974#4,04115#1,58231
1973#2,62927#1,43535
1972#2,39830#1,39137
1971#3,06222#1,16549
1970#1,90445#1,15951
1969#1,95541#1,30237
1968#1,83442#1,04750
1967#1,53753#1,11744
1966#1,91636#1,72320
1965#1,42160#1,06448
1964#1,28175#1,19941
1963#1,34068#1,27937
1962#1,17787#99659
1961#1,28874#1,20643
1960#1,21281#1,03455
1959#1,13588#1,10149
1958#1,028103#1,22240
1957#970114#1,02255
1956#897124#1,07150
1955#916115#98858
1954#852123#90267
1953#768142#93958
1952#819124#89662
1951#779129#94954
1950#728138#94853
1949#772125#84965
1948#675152#1,02347
1947#711142#93856
1946#712128#89754
1945#658125#1,01639
1944#668123#1,01841
1943#601157#98646
1942#663127#1,19334
1941#661115#92547
1940#579146#96744
1939#593127#1,10334
1938#512170#1,09535
1937#551148#1,00040
1936#538146#1,16932
1935#479173#98042
1934#491170#98242
1933#514152#1,10335
1932#496177#1,14135
1931#501166#1,19433
1930#539159#1,21534
1929#565147#1,44325
1928#573152#1,16537
1927#598141#1,22735
1926#539167#1,40427
1925#550170#1,74520
1924#543178#1,53225
1923#612143#1,19436
1922#689113#1,12040
1921#675120#1,58823
1920#680114#1,45726
1919#70499#1,44925
1918#711103#1,53923
1917#84965#1,43724
1916#82467#2,54310
1915#83960#1,96814
1914#98836#1,54516
1913#1,02028#1,9459
1912#1,14321#1,61910
1911#98220#1,5376
1910#1,42111#1,5895
1909#1,21912
1908#1,4399
1907#1,28910
1906#1,5537
1905#1,4208
1904#1,6596
1903
1902#1,3208
1901
1900
1899
1898
1897#1,5555
1896
1895
1894
1893
1892
1891
1890
1889
1888
1887
1886
1885
1884
1883
1882
1881
1880
First appearance
1897

The first year at least five girls were named Vernell! It came in at #1,555, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1897–1901, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Vernell is popular in 1962

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedMINew York: #638 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 8,169 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedVAMaryland: #509 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,857 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #560 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 6,812 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #355 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,538 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: #337 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,177 girlsDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedHITexas: #1,022 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 13,819 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Vernell, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. District of Columbia#337 · 1 in 2,177
  2. South Carolina#355 · 1 in 2,538
  3. Maryland#509 · 1 in 5,857
  4. North Carolina#560 · 1 in 6,812
  5. New York#638 · 1 in 8,169

Best ever in a state: #160 in South Carolina, 1940.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
District of Columbia#33761 in 2,177
South Carolina#355101 in 2,538
Maryland#50951 in 5,857
North Carolina#56071 in 6,812
New York#638201 in 8,169
Texas#1,02281 in 13,819
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Vernell
Momentum · girls
Faded out
  • Not published in 2025; last seen 1999
  • Biggest jump: 439 spots in 1911 (#1,421#982)
  • Biggest drop: 161 spots in 1912 (#982#1,143)
Rise & fade · girls
38 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1897
  • Peaked 1935 at #479 (173 births)
  • Births halved by 1960, 25 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 45 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 45 yrs · run 1914–1957
Share of babies · girls
1 in 6,029
  • Highest: 1 in 6,029 girls born in 1932 were named Vernell (0.02%)
  • Latest: 1 in 354,765 girls born in 1999 (0.00%)
  • Its best rank, #479 in 1935, was only 1 in 6,061 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1930s
  • 22.3% of all girls named Vernell (1,588) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1970
  • Mostly girls until 1969, mostly boys since
all girlsall boys
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1890s5#1,555 (1897)#1,555
1900s60#1,219 (1909)#1,414
1910s510#704 (1919)#948
1920s1,445#539 (1926)#602
1930s1,588#479 (1935)#521
1940s1,340#579 (1940)#670
1950s1,200#728 (1950)#889
1960s617#1,177 (1962)#1,496
1970s228#1,904 (1970)#3,352
1980s101#3,949 (1983)#7,303
1990s30#10,588 (1993)#12,197

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Vernell in 1962

girls
#1,177
87 births · 1 in 22,605 girls
boys
#996
59 births · 1 in 35,064 boys

Top girls' names in 1962

  1. #1Lisa46,069
  2. #2Mary43,502
  3. #3Susan35,752
  4. #4Karen35,184
  5. #5Linda31,461
  6. #6Patricia26,532
  7. #7Donna25,719
  8. #8Cynthia24,025
  9. #9Deborah22,889
  10. #10Sandra22,420
  11. #1,177Vernell87

Top boys' names in 1962

  1. #1Michael85,059
  2. #2David81,337
  3. #3John78,427
  4. #4James72,555
  5. #5Robert70,199
  6. #6Mark53,520
  7. #7William44,853
  8. #8Richard39,422
  9. #9Thomas36,529
  10. #10Jeffrey33,537
  11. #996Vernell59
More about 1962

girls

1,966,603 girls got a published name in 1962; 1 in 22,605 of them was named Vernell, which outranked 84.5% of the 7,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Vernell
  1. #1,167Margery88
  2. #1,167Sharri88
  3. #1,167Tamala88
  4. #1,177Vernell87
  5. #1,177Carlotta87
  6. #1,177Cristy87
  7. #1,177Dalia87
  8. #1,184Alyssa86
  9. #1,184Dorthy86
  10. #1,184Eddie86

Tied with 6 names at #1,177; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1961
Risers
  1. 1,281Tiffany#2,070#789
  2. 879Whitney#1,627#748
  3. 541Zina#1,533#992
  4. 414Glynis#1,406#992
  5. 408Lolita#978#570
Fallers
  1. 300Fern#821#1,121
  2. 259Jacklyn#815#1,074
  3. 255Dorthy#929#1,184
  4. 224Laurene#943#1,167
  5. 215Jimmie#911#1,126

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

2,068,772 boys got a published name in 1962; 1 in 35,064 of them was named Vernell, which outranked 78.5% of the 4,631 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 28.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Vernell
  1. #984Logan60
  2. #984Michale60
  3. #984Rodrigo60
  4. #996Vernell59
  5. #996Dwyane59
  6. #996Eliseo59
  7. #996King59
  8. #1,007Aurelio58
  9. #1,007Farrell58
  10. #1,007Foster58

Tied with 10 names at #996; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1961
Risers
  1. 490Ritchie#1,262#772
  2. 353King#1,349#996
  3. 338Arlie#1,322#984
  4. 250Robb#1,052#802
  5. 243Pernell#928#685
Fallers
  1. 351Mariano#928#1,279
  2. 349Michal#910#1,259
  3. 337Loran#958#1,295
  4. 292Sid#967#1,259
  5. 275Lorenza#940#1,215

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1962