Vernell
Last seen for girls in 1999 at #14,411 · Last seen for boys in 2021 at #10,799
Given to girls 68.1% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1935 · 173 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 7,124since 1897
Vernell over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | #10,799 | 6 | |
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | #8,215 | 9 | |
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | #10,775 | 6 | |
| 2016 | — | #7,605 | 10 | |
| 2015 | — | #9,568 | 7 | |
| 2014 | — | #10,717 | 6 | |
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | #9,709 | 7 | |
| 2011 | — | #5,675 | 15 | |
| 2010 | — | #10,766 | 6 | |
| 2009 | — | #7,236 | 11 | |
| 2008 | — | #8,324 | 9 | |
| 2007 | — | #7,590 | 10 | |
| 2006 | — | #5,303 | 16 | |
| 2005 | — | #4,824 | 17 | |
| 2004 | — | #5,246 | 15 | |
| 2003 | — | #4,114 | 20 | |
| 2002 | — | #9,392 | 6 | |
| 2001 | — | #5,667 | 12 | |
| 2000 | — | #4,066 | 19 | |
| 1999 | #14,411 | 5 | #4,162 | 17 |
| 1998 | #12,426 | 6 | #4,019 | 17 |
| 1997 | — | #3,601 | 19 | |
| 1996 | — | #4,396 | 14 | |
| 1995 | #11,783 | 6 | #3,100 | 22 |
| 1994 | #11,778 | 6 | #2,618 | 28 |
| 1993 | #10,588 | 7 | #2,257 | 34 |
| 1992 | — | #2,909 | 23 | |
| 1991 | — | #2,227 | 32 | |
| 1990 | — | #2,308 | 30 | |
| 1989 | #12,362 | 5 | #2,068 | 34 |
| 1988 | #7,111 | 10 | #2,090 | 30 |
| 1987 | #8,778 | 7 | #2,272 | 25 |
| 1986 | #8,523 | 7 | #2,096 | 27 |
| 1985 | #6,955 | 9 | #1,916 | 30 |
| 1984 | #6,291 | 10 | #1,723 | 33 |
| 1983 | #3,949 | 19 | #2,017 | 26 |
| 1982 | #5,209 | 13 | #2,341 | 21 |
| 1981 | #9,110 | 6 | #1,766 | 32 |
| 1980 | #4,743 | 15 | #1,910 | 29 |
| 1979 | #3,777 | 20 | #1,833 | 30 |
| 1978 | #4,459 | 15 | #1,688 | 32 |
| 1977 | #4,069 | 17 | #1,645 | 33 |
| 1976 | #3,407 | 20 | #1,781 | 28 |
| 1975 | #3,774 | 17 | #1,455 | 37 |
| 1974 | #4,041 | 15 | #1,582 | 31 |
| 1973 | #2,629 | 27 | #1,435 | 35 |
| 1972 | #2,398 | 30 | #1,391 | 37 |
| 1971 | #3,062 | 22 | #1,165 | 49 |
| 1970 | #1,904 | 45 | #1,159 | 51 |
| 1969 | #1,955 | 41 | #1,302 | 37 |
| 1968 | #1,834 | 42 | #1,047 | 50 |
| 1967 | #1,537 | 53 | #1,117 | 44 |
| 1966 | #1,916 | 36 | #1,723 | 20 |
| 1965 | #1,421 | 60 | #1,064 | 48 |
| 1964 | #1,281 | 75 | #1,199 | 41 |
| 1963 | #1,340 | 68 | #1,279 | 37 |
| 1962 | #1,177 | 87 | #996 | 59 |
| 1961 | #1,288 | 74 | #1,206 | 43 |
| 1960 | #1,212 | 81 | #1,034 | 55 |
| 1959 | #1,135 | 88 | #1,101 | 49 |
| 1958 | #1,028 | 103 | #1,222 | 40 |
| 1957 | #970 | 114 | #1,022 | 55 |
| 1956 | #897 | 124 | #1,071 | 50 |
| 1955 | #916 | 115 | #988 | 58 |
| 1954 | #852 | 123 | #902 | 67 |
| 1953 | #768 | 142 | #939 | 58 |
| 1952 | #819 | 124 | #896 | 62 |
| 1951 | #779 | 129 | #949 | 54 |
| 1950 | #728 | 138 | #948 | 53 |
| 1949 | #772 | 125 | #849 | 65 |
| 1948 | #675 | 152 | #1,023 | 47 |
| 1947 | #711 | 142 | #938 | 56 |
| 1946 | #712 | 128 | #897 | 54 |
| 1945 | #658 | 125 | #1,016 | 39 |
| 1944 | #668 | 123 | #1,018 | 41 |
| 1943 | #601 | 157 | #986 | 46 |
| 1942 | #663 | 127 | #1,193 | 34 |
| 1941 | #661 | 115 | #925 | 47 |
| 1940 | #579 | 146 | #967 | 44 |
| 1939 | #593 | 127 | #1,103 | 34 |
| 1938 | #512 | 170 | #1,095 | 35 |
| 1937 | #551 | 148 | #1,000 | 40 |
| 1936 | #538 | 146 | #1,169 | 32 |
| 1935 | #479 | 173 | #980 | 42 |
| 1934 | #491 | 170 | #982 | 42 |
| 1933 | #514 | 152 | #1,103 | 35 |
| 1932 | #496 | 177 | #1,141 | 35 |
| 1931 | #501 | 166 | #1,194 | 33 |
| 1930 | #539 | 159 | #1,215 | 34 |
| 1929 | #565 | 147 | #1,443 | 25 |
| 1928 | #573 | 152 | #1,165 | 37 |
| 1927 | #598 | 141 | #1,227 | 35 |
| 1926 | #539 | 167 | #1,404 | 27 |
| 1925 | #550 | 170 | #1,745 | 20 |
| 1924 | #543 | 178 | #1,532 | 25 |
| 1923 | #612 | 143 | #1,194 | 36 |
| 1922 | #689 | 113 | #1,120 | 40 |
| 1921 | #675 | 120 | #1,588 | 23 |
| 1920 | #680 | 114 | #1,457 | 26 |
| 1919 | #704 | 99 | #1,449 | 25 |
| 1918 | #711 | 103 | #1,539 | 23 |
| 1917 | #849 | 65 | #1,437 | 24 |
| 1916 | #824 | 67 | #2,543 | 10 |
| 1915 | #839 | 60 | #1,968 | 14 |
| 1914 | #988 | 36 | #1,545 | 16 |
| 1913 | #1,020 | 28 | #1,945 | 9 |
| 1912 | #1,143 | 21 | #1,619 | 10 |
| 1911 | #982 | 20 | #1,537 | 6 |
| 1910 | #1,421 | 11 | #1,589 | 5 |
| 1909 | #1,219 | 12 | — | |
| 1908 | #1,439 | 9 | — | |
| 1907 | #1,289 | 10 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,553 | 7 | — | |
| 1905 | #1,420 | 8 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,659 | 6 | — | |
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | #1,320 | 8 | — | |
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | #1,555 | 5 | — | |
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Vernell! It came in at #1,555, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1897–1901, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
See more about Vernell
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1999
- Biggest jump: 439 spots in 1911 (#1,421 → #982)
- Biggest drop: 161 spots in 1912 (#982 → #1,143)
- Debuted 1897
- Peaked 1935 at #479 (173 births)
- Births halved by 1960, 25 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 45 yrs · run 1914–1957
- Highest: 1 in 6,029 girls born in 1932 were named Vernell (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 354,765 girls born in 1999 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #479 in 1935, was only 1 in 6,061 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 22.3% of all girls named Vernell (1,588) were born in this decade
- Mostly girls until 1969, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 5 | #1,555 (1897) | #1,555 |
| 1900s | 60 | #1,219 (1909) | #1,414 |
| 1910s | 510 | #704 (1919) | #948 |
| 1920s | 1,445 | #539 (1926) | #602 |
| 1930s | 1,588 | #479 (1935) | #521 |
| 1940s | 1,340 | #579 (1940) | #670 |
| 1950s | 1,200 | #728 (1950) | #889 |
| 1960s | 617 | #1,177 (1962) | #1,496 |
| 1970s | 228 | #1,904 (1970) | #3,352 |
| 1980s | 101 | #3,949 (1983) | #7,303 |
| 1990s | 30 | #10,588 (1993) | #12,197 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Vernell in 1926
Top girls' names in 1926
Top boys' names in 1926
More about 1926
girls
1,185,401 girls got a published name in 1926; 1 in 7,098 of them was named Vernell, which outranked 90.4% of the 5,622 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #536Belva170
- #537Laurel169
- #538Pearline168
- #539Vernell167
- #539Adell167
- #539Francisca167
- #539Glenda167
- #544Hellen166
- #544Stephanie166
- #544Veda166
Tied with 4 names at #539; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↑ 1,047Janell#1,795 → #748
- ↑ 389Madalyn#1,225 → #836
- ↑ 382Evangelina#1,324 → #942
- ↑ 379Carla#1,252 → #873
- ↑ 351Vilma#1,020 → #669
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,110,505 boys got a published name in 1926; 1 in 41,130 of them was named Vernell, which outranked 71.0% of the 4,837 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,379Stafford28
- #1,379Wilburt28
- #1,379Zeb28
- #1,404Vernell27
- #1,404Akira27
- #1,404Amado27
- #1,404Arlyn27
- #1,432Adan26
- #1,432Algie26
- #1,432Beauford26
Tied with 27 names at #1,404; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↓ 531Okey#984 → #1,515
- ↓ 459Florentino#973 → #1,432
- ↓ 407Rexford#924 → #1,331
- ↓ 380Marshal#973 → #1,353
- ↓ 378Coolidge#746 → #1,124
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.