Velma

#5,722 for girls in 2025, 21 births · Last seen for boys in 1955 at #2,558
Given to girls 99.5% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1912 · 1,403 births
Debut · girls
16 births
In top 100 · girls
14 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
86,752
since 1880

Velma over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201953peak #88, 1912girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#5,72221—
2024#7,96713—
2023#5,54922—
2022#5,17225—
2021#7,25015—
2020#7,21215—
2019#7,71614—
2018#5,78521—
2017#11,6158—
2016#12,8767—
2015#14,4826—
2014#8,48513—
2013#11,0009—
2012#16,8695—
2011#7,78315—
2010#11,2469—
2009#10,67910—
2008#15,4056—
2007#17,6365—
2006#11,4179—
2005#13,0107—
2004#7,82814—
2003#9,04811—
2002#7,44414—
2001#10,1029—
2000#8,02712—
1999#7,71612—
1998#6,07316—
1997#7,74211—
1996#7,13012—
1995#6,64113—
1994#5,01619—
1993#4,82620—
1992#6,00815—
1991#2,88640—
1990#3,29733—
1989#3,25332—
1988#2,80337—
1987#2,49341—
1986#2,34443—
1985#2,70435—
1984#2,01850—
1983#1,88755—
1982#1,85058—
1981#1,45583—
1980#1,51878—
1979#1,50378—
1978#1,39783—
1977#1,45176—
1976#1,19195—
1975#1,22993—
1974#1,070110—
1973#933131—
1972#993120—
1971#828167—
1970#781181—
1969#731191—
1968#651222—
1967#577273—
1966#546299—
1965#499362—
1964#487395—
1963#478407—
1962#445464—
1961#428524—
1960#406559—
1959#400550—
1958#416502—
1957#352668—
1956#332692—
1955#338634#2,55810
1954#309749#3,8275
1953#304737—
1952#300706—
1951#277798—
1950#267825—
1949#272798#3,2986
1948#254871—
1947#259848—
1946#242875#3,1736
1945#223861#2,7437
1944#211935#2,19511
1943#2011,046—
1942#1961,052—
1941#1881,000—
1940#188986#2,6718
1939#1781,068#3,4805
1938#1741,160#2,32610
1937#1641,218#3,5185
1936#1671,180#2,18411
1935#1471,352#2,02913
1934#1441,426#2,5639
1933#1371,481#2,7388
1932#1331,689#1,46523
1931#1311,758#2,47110
1930#1271,918#1,96415
1929#1281,930#2,09614
1928#1142,290#2,27013
1927#1182,285#2,52311
1926#1242,120#1,84618
1925#1282,177#1,62822
1924#1232,272#1,77620
1923#1162,337#2,44612
1922#1132,367#2,80110
1921#1082,606#3,5177
1920#1052,491#1,88518
1919#1042,341#1,57622
1918#1032,439#2,26013
1917#982,411#2,42311
1916#992,319#2,38911
1915#942,287#2,18412
1914#921,795#2,4578
1913#891,556#1,44114
1912#881,403#2,5445
1911#901,045#1,2908
1910#901,035#1,1938
1909#92857#1,0838
1908#90860#1,2176
1907#90854#1,2006
1906#94721—
1905#94722—
1904#101615#1,0646
1903#99589—
1902#113526—
1901#130388#1,0585
1900#141426—
1899#139334—
1898#152331—
1897#160280—
1896#174249—
1895#188208—
1894#189196—
1893#201156—
1892#212146—
1891#236103—
1890#25496—
1889#28172—
1888#28667—
1887#27459—
1886#37133—
1885#35432—
1884#47918—
1883#36625—
1882#44617—
1881#38419—
1880#42116—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Velma was already there! It came in at #421, and was given to 16 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 2007–2008, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.

Where Velma is popular in 1953

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedNHWashington: #384 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,919 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedMNIllinois: #372 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 4,106 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedWIMichigan: #470 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 6,384 girlsMINew York: #596 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 9,615 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedRIOregon: #333 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,769 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedIAIndiana: #482 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 6,714 girlsINOhio: #403 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 5,075 girlsOHPennsylvania: #402 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 5,272 girlsPANew Jersey: #553 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 9,986 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #411 for girls · 36 births · 1 in 3,857 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedUTColorado: #323 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,386 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedNEMissouri: #226 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 1,822 girlsMOKentucky: #235 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,935 girlsKYWest Virginia: #196 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 1,388 girlsWVVirginia: #205 for girls · 31 births · 1 in 1,275 girlsVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedDEArizona: #216 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 1,014 girlsAZNew Mexico: #171 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 686 girlsNMKansas: #311 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,675 girlsKSArkansas: #126 for girls · 32 births · 1 in 607 girlsARTennessee: #182 for girls · 34 births · 1 in 1,112 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #195 for girls · 45 births · 1 in 1,140 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #225 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 1,311 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #233 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 1,695 girlsOKLouisiana: #186 for girls · 40 births · 1 in 926 girlsLAMississippi: #96 for girls · 68 births · 1 in 410 girlsMSAlabama: #262 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 1,817 girlsALGeorgia: #216 for girls · 35 births · 1 in 1,273 girlsGAHawaii: #193 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 746 girlsHITexas: #214 for girls · 94 births · 1 in 1,179 girlsTXFlorida: #302 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 2,233 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Mississippi#96 · 1 in 410
  2. Arkansas#126 · 1 in 607
  3. New Mexico#171 · 1 in 686
  4. Tennessee#182 · 1 in 1,112
  5. Louisiana#186 · 1 in 926

Best ever in a state: #12 in Kansas, 1910.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Mississippi#96681 in 410
Arkansas#126321 in 607
New Mexico#171151 in 686
Tennessee#182341 in 1,112
Louisiana#186401 in 926
Hawaii#19381 in 746
North Carolina#195451 in 1,140
West Virginia#196151 in 1,388
Virginia#205311 in 1,275
Texas#214941 in 1,179
Arizona#216111 in 1,014
Georgia#216351 in 1,273
South Carolina#225221 in 1,311
Missouri#226231 in 1,822
Oklahoma#233131 in 1,695
Kentucky#235171 in 1,935
Alabama#262201 in 1,817
Florida#302161 in 2,233
Kansas#31181 in 2,675
Colorado#32371 in 2,386
Oregon#33361 in 2,769
Illinois#372231 in 4,106
Washington#38471 in 3,919
Pennsylvania#402211 in 5,272
Ohio#403191 in 5,075
California#411361 in 3,857
Michigan#470131 in 6,384
Indiana#48271 in 6,714
New Jersey#55351 in 9,986
New York#596161 in 9,615
Alaska———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
North Dakota———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Velma
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 2,245 spots since 2024 (#7,967 → #5,722)
  • 1,490 spots since 2020 (#7,212 → #5,722)
  • 8,760 spots since 2015 (#14,482 → #5,722)
  • Biggest jump: 125 spots in 1885 (#479 → #354)
  • Biggest drop: 165 spots in 1972 (#828 → #993)
Rise & fade · girls
32 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1912 at #88 (1,403 births)
  • Births halved by 1955, 43 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 14 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 14 yrs · run 1905–1917
  • Top 1,000: 94 yrs · run 1880–1973
Share of babies · girls
1 in 373
  • Highest: 1 in 373 girls born in 1907 were named Velma (0.27%)
  • Latest: 1 in 76,537 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
  • Its best rank, #88 in 1912, was only 1 in 398 (0.25%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 26.4% of all girls named Velma (22,875) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s358#274 (1887)#366
1890s2,099#139 (1899)#191
1900s6,558#90 (1908)#104
1910s18,631#88 (1912)#95
1920s22,875#105 (1920)#118
1930s14,250#127 (1930)#150
1940s9,272#188 (1941)#223
1950s6,861#267 (1950)#330
1960s3,696#406 (1960)#525
1970s1,134#781 (1970)#1,138
1980s512#1,455 (1981)#2,233
1990s191#2,886 (1991)#5,734
2000s97#7,444 (2002)#11,060
2010s107#5,785 (2018)#10,786
2020s111#5,172 (2022)#6,479

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Velma in 1953

girls
#304
737 births · 1 in 2,553 girls

Top girls' names in 1953

  1. #1Mary64,389
  2. #2Linda61,281
  3. #3Deborah52,199
  4. #4Patricia51,019
  5. #5Susan44,297
  6. #6Barbara38,473
  7. #7Debra36,856
  8. #8Nancy30,620
  9. #9Karen29,858
  10. #10Pamela25,760
  11. #304Velma737
More about 1953

girls

1,881,301 girls got a published name in 1953; 1 in 2,553 of them was named Velma, which outranked 95.3% of the 6,497 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Velma
  1. #301Geneva746
  2. #302Deloris738
  3. #302Rosanne738
  4. #304Velma737
  5. #305Hilda727
  6. #305Teri727
  7. #307Lorna721
Biggest movers since 1952
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,253Enola#3,201 → #948
  2. ↑ 885Lu#1,368 → #483
  3. ↑ 749Joni#1,046 → #297
  4. ↑ 553Brooke#1,351 → #798
  5. ↑ 531Lorri#1,430 → #899
Fallers
  1. ↓ 274Roseanna#808 → #1,082
  2. ↓ 253Georgie#946 → #1,199
  3. ↓ 218Pandora#783 → #1,001
  4. ↓ 204Fonda#822 → #1,026
  5. ↓ 195Brinda#935 → #1,130

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1953 →