Velma
#5,722 for girls in 2025, 21 births · Last seen for boys in 1955 at #2,558
Given to girls 99.5% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1912 · 1,403 births
- Debut · girls
- 16 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 14 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 86,752since 1880
Velma over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,722 | 21 | — | |
| 2024 | #7,967 | 13 | — | |
| 2023 | #5,549 | 22 | — | |
| 2022 | #5,172 | 25 | — | |
| 2021 | #7,250 | 15 | — | |
| 2020 | #7,212 | 15 | — | |
| 2019 | #7,716 | 14 | — | |
| 2018 | #5,785 | 21 | — | |
| 2017 | #11,615 | 8 | — | |
| 2016 | #12,876 | 7 | — | |
| 2015 | #14,482 | 6 | — | |
| 2014 | #8,485 | 13 | — | |
| 2013 | #11,000 | 9 | — | |
| 2012 | #16,869 | 5 | — | |
| 2011 | #7,783 | 15 | — | |
| 2010 | #11,246 | 9 | — | |
| 2009 | #10,679 | 10 | — | |
| 2008 | #15,405 | 6 | — | |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 | — | |
| 2006 | #11,417 | 9 | — | |
| 2005 | #13,010 | 7 | — | |
| 2004 | #7,828 | 14 | — | |
| 2003 | #9,048 | 11 | — | |
| 2002 | #7,444 | 14 | — | |
| 2001 | #10,102 | 9 | — | |
| 2000 | #8,027 | 12 | — | |
| 1999 | #7,716 | 12 | — | |
| 1998 | #6,073 | 16 | — | |
| 1997 | #7,742 | 11 | — | |
| 1996 | #7,130 | 12 | — | |
| 1995 | #6,641 | 13 | — | |
| 1994 | #5,016 | 19 | — | |
| 1993 | #4,826 | 20 | — | |
| 1992 | #6,008 | 15 | — | |
| 1991 | #2,886 | 40 | — | |
| 1990 | #3,297 | 33 | — | |
| 1989 | #3,253 | 32 | — | |
| 1988 | #2,803 | 37 | — | |
| 1987 | #2,493 | 41 | — | |
| 1986 | #2,344 | 43 | — | |
| 1985 | #2,704 | 35 | — | |
| 1984 | #2,018 | 50 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,887 | 55 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,850 | 58 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,455 | 83 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,518 | 78 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,503 | 78 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,397 | 83 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,451 | 76 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,191 | 95 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,229 | 93 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,070 | 110 | — | |
| 1973 | #933 | 131 | — | |
| 1972 | #993 | 120 | — | |
| 1971 | #828 | 167 | — | |
| 1970 | #781 | 181 | — | |
| 1969 | #731 | 191 | — | |
| 1968 | #651 | 222 | — | |
| 1967 | #577 | 273 | — | |
| 1966 | #546 | 299 | — | |
| 1965 | #499 | 362 | — | |
| 1964 | #487 | 395 | — | |
| 1963 | #478 | 407 | — | |
| 1962 | #445 | 464 | — | |
| 1961 | #428 | 524 | — | |
| 1960 | #406 | 559 | — | |
| 1959 | #400 | 550 | — | |
| 1958 | #416 | 502 | — | |
| 1957 | #352 | 668 | — | |
| 1956 | #332 | 692 | — | |
| 1955 | #338 | 634 | #2,558 | 10 |
| 1954 | #309 | 749 | #3,827 | 5 |
| 1953 | #304 | 737 | — | |
| 1952 | #300 | 706 | — | |
| 1951 | #277 | 798 | — | |
| 1950 | #267 | 825 | — | |
| 1949 | #272 | 798 | #3,298 | 6 |
| 1948 | #254 | 871 | — | |
| 1947 | #259 | 848 | — | |
| 1946 | #242 | 875 | #3,173 | 6 |
| 1945 | #223 | 861 | #2,743 | 7 |
| 1944 | #211 | 935 | #2,195 | 11 |
| 1943 | #201 | 1,046 | — | |
| 1942 | #196 | 1,052 | — | |
| 1941 | #188 | 1,000 | — | |
| 1940 | #188 | 986 | #2,671 | 8 |
| 1939 | #178 | 1,068 | #3,480 | 5 |
| 1938 | #174 | 1,160 | #2,326 | 10 |
| 1937 | #164 | 1,218 | #3,518 | 5 |
| 1936 | #167 | 1,180 | #2,184 | 11 |
| 1935 | #147 | 1,352 | #2,029 | 13 |
| 1934 | #144 | 1,426 | #2,563 | 9 |
| 1933 | #137 | 1,481 | #2,738 | 8 |
| 1932 | #133 | 1,689 | #1,465 | 23 |
| 1931 | #131 | 1,758 | #2,471 | 10 |
| 1930 | #127 | 1,918 | #1,964 | 15 |
| 1929 | #128 | 1,930 | #2,096 | 14 |
| 1928 | #114 | 2,290 | #2,270 | 13 |
| 1927 | #118 | 2,285 | #2,523 | 11 |
| 1926 | #124 | 2,120 | #1,846 | 18 |
| 1925 | #128 | 2,177 | #1,628 | 22 |
| 1924 | #123 | 2,272 | #1,776 | 20 |
| 1923 | #116 | 2,337 | #2,446 | 12 |
| 1922 | #113 | 2,367 | #2,801 | 10 |
| 1921 | #108 | 2,606 | #3,517 | 7 |
| 1920 | #105 | 2,491 | #1,885 | 18 |
| 1919 | #104 | 2,341 | #1,576 | 22 |
| 1918 | #103 | 2,439 | #2,260 | 13 |
| 1917 | #98 | 2,411 | #2,423 | 11 |
| 1916 | #99 | 2,319 | #2,389 | 11 |
| 1915 | #94 | 2,287 | #2,184 | 12 |
| 1914 | #92 | 1,795 | #2,457 | 8 |
| 1913 | #89 | 1,556 | #1,441 | 14 |
| 1912 | #88 | 1,403 | #2,544 | 5 |
| 1911 | #90 | 1,045 | #1,290 | 8 |
| 1910 | #90 | 1,035 | #1,193 | 8 |
| 1909 | #92 | 857 | #1,083 | 8 |
| 1908 | #90 | 860 | #1,217 | 6 |
| 1907 | #90 | 854 | #1,200 | 6 |
| 1906 | #94 | 721 | — | |
| 1905 | #94 | 722 | — | |
| 1904 | #101 | 615 | #1,064 | 6 |
| 1903 | #99 | 589 | — | |
| 1902 | #113 | 526 | — | |
| 1901 | #130 | 388 | #1,058 | 5 |
| 1900 | #141 | 426 | — | |
| 1899 | #139 | 334 | — | |
| 1898 | #152 | 331 | — | |
| 1897 | #160 | 280 | — | |
| 1896 | #174 | 249 | — | |
| 1895 | #188 | 208 | — | |
| 1894 | #189 | 196 | — | |
| 1893 | #201 | 156 | — | |
| 1892 | #212 | 146 | — | |
| 1891 | #236 | 103 | — | |
| 1890 | #254 | 96 | — | |
| 1889 | #281 | 72 | — | |
| 1888 | #286 | 67 | — | |
| 1887 | #274 | 59 | — | |
| 1886 | #371 | 33 | — | |
| 1885 | #354 | 32 | — | |
| 1884 | #479 | 18 | — | |
| 1883 | #366 | 25 | — | |
| 1882 | #446 | 17 | — | |
| 1881 | #384 | 19 | — | |
| 1880 | #421 | 16 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Velma was already there! It came in at #421, and was given to 16 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2007–2008, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.
See more about Velma
- 2,245 spots since 2024 (#7,967 → #5,722)
- 1,490 spots since 2020 (#7,212 → #5,722)
- 8,760 spots since 2015 (#14,482 → #5,722)
- Biggest jump: 125 spots in 1885 (#479 → #354)
- Biggest drop: 165 spots in 1972 (#828 → #993)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1912 at #88 (1,403 births)
- Births halved by 1955, 43 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 14 yrs · run 1905–1917
- Top 1,000: 94 yrs · run 1880–1973
- Highest: 1 in 373 girls born in 1907 were named Velma (0.27%)
- Latest: 1 in 76,537 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #88 in 1912, was only 1 in 398 (0.25%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 26.4% of all girls named Velma (22,875) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 358 | #274 (1887) | #366 |
| 1890s | 2,099 | #139 (1899) | #191 |
| 1900s | 6,558 | #90 (1908) | #104 |
| 1910s | 18,631 | #88 (1912) | #95 |
| 1920s | 22,875 | #105 (1920) | #118 |
| 1930s | 14,250 | #127 (1930) | #150 |
| 1940s | 9,272 | #188 (1941) | #223 |
| 1950s | 6,861 | #267 (1950) | #330 |
| 1960s | 3,696 | #406 (1960) | #525 |
| 1970s | 1,134 | #781 (1970) | #1,138 |
| 1980s | 512 | #1,455 (1981) | #2,233 |
| 1990s | 191 | #2,886 (1991) | #5,734 |
| 2000s | 97 | #7,444 (2002) | #11,060 |
| 2010s | 107 | #5,785 (2018) | #10,786 |
| 2020s | 111 | #5,172 (2022) | #6,479 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Velma in 1909
Top girls' names in 1909
Top boys' names in 1909
More about 1909
girls
347,228 girls got a published name in 1909; 1 in 405 of them was named Velma, which outranked 96.4% of the 2,548 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 21.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
163,996 boys got a published name in 1909; 1 in 20,500 of them was named Velma, which outranked 35.5% of the 1,679 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.3% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,020Verner9
- #1,020Vidal9
- #1,020Werner9
- #1,083Velma8
- #1,083Alfonse8
- #1,083Arden8
- #1,083Arlo8
- #1,155Adolf7
- #1,155Adron7
- #1,155Anastacio7
Tied with 71 names at #1,083; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.