Tyshawn
Last seen for girls in 2003 at #13,844 · #3,314 for boys in 2025, 35 births
Given to boys 97.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2003 · 207 births
- Debut · boys
- 8 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 5,266since 1972
Tyshawn over time
Rank among boys' names. Tyshawn has never cracked the top 800 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #3,314 | 35 | |
| 2024 | — | #3,394 | 34 | |
| 2023 | — | #2,614 | 50 | |
| 2022 | — | #2,648 | 50 | |
| 2021 | — | #2,253 | 62 | |
| 2020 | — | #2,046 | 69 | |
| 2019 | — | #2,292 | 60 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,856 | 81 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,977 | 72 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,863 | 80 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,780 | 85 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,701 | 89 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,528 | 105 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,376 | 122 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,209 | 145 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,012 | 193 | |
| 2009 | — | #998 | 197 | |
| 2008 | — | #915 | 224 | |
| 2007 | — | #981 | 200 | |
| 2006 | — | #895 | 218 | |
| 2005 | — | #909 | 195 | |
| 2004 | — | #934 | 181 | |
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 | #840 | 207 |
| 2002 | — | #886 | 184 | |
| 2001 | — | #882 | 178 | |
| 2000 | #13,154 | 6 | #880 | 179 |
| 1999 | #12,688 | 6 | #896 | 168 |
| 1998 | #11,138 | 7 | #888 | 164 |
| 1997 | #8,334 | 10 | #878 | 158 |
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | #860 | 161 |
| 1995 | #6,641 | 13 | #943 | 139 |
| 1994 | #7,604 | 11 | #955 | 133 |
| 1993 | #9,559 | 8 | #914 | 139 |
| 1992 | #9,491 | 8 | #931 | 131 |
| 1991 | #10,271 | 7 | #999 | 115 |
| 1990 | — | #1,111 | 93 | |
| 1989 | #9,681 | 7 | #1,258 | 74 |
| 1988 | — | #1,404 | 55 | |
| 1987 | #9,825 | 6 | #1,400 | 52 |
| 1986 | — | #1,242 | 60 | |
| 1985 | — | #1,333 | 52 | |
| 1984 | — | #2,098 | 25 | |
| 1983 | #10,275 | 5 | #1,594 | 37 |
| 1982 | — | #1,929 | 28 | |
| 1981 | — | #1,942 | 28 | |
| 1980 | — | #1,726 | 33 | |
| 1979 | #10,210 | 5 | #2,310 | 21 |
| 1978 | #9,750 | 5 | #2,205 | 21 |
| 1977 | #8,444 | 6 | #2,063 | 23 |
| 1976 | — | #2,329 | 19 | |
| 1975 | #7,984 | 6 | #2,361 | 18 |
| 1974 | — | #5,227 | 5 | |
| 1973 | — | #3,013 | 11 | |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | #3,622 | 8 |
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Tyshawn! It came in at #3,622, and was given to 8 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1974, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Tyshawn is popular in 1994
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Connecticut#280 · 1 in 2,471
- New York#368 · 1 in 2,860
- South Carolina#442 · 1 in 3,444
- New Jersey#462 · 1 in 4,596
- Illinois#541 · 1 in 4,967
Best ever in a state: #228 in South Carolina, 2010.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connecticut | #280 | 8 | 1 in 2,471 |
| New York | #368 | 44 | 1 in 2,860 |
| South Carolina | #442 | 6 | 1 in 3,444 |
| New Jersey | #462 | 11 | 1 in 4,596 |
| Illinois | #541 | 17 | 1 in 4,967 |
| Virginia | #583 | 7 | 1 in 5,855 |
| North Carolina | #654 | 6 | 1 in 7,456 |
| Ohio | #697 | 7 | 1 in 10,499 |
| Pennsylvania | #845 | 5 | 1 in 14,674 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Tyshawn
- 80 spots since 2024 (#3,394 → #3,314)
- 1,268 spots since 2020 (#2,046 → #3,314)
- 1,534 spots since 2015 (#1,780 → #3,314)
- Biggest jump: 112 spots in 1991 (#1,111 → #999)
- Biggest drop: 94 spots in 2004 (#840 → #934)
- Debuted 1972
- Peaked 2003 at #840 (207 births)
- Births halved by 2014, 11 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 19 yrs · run 1991–2009
- Highest: 1 in 9,108 boys born in 2008 were named Tyshawn (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 48,802 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #840 in 2003, was only 1 in 9,543 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 37.3% of all boys named Tyshawn (1,963) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 126 | #2,063 (1977) | #2,891 |
| 1980s | 444 | #1,242 (1986) | #1,593 |
| 1990s | 1,401 | #860 (1996) | #938 |
| 2000s | 1,963 | #840 (2003) | #912 |
| 2010s | 1,032 | #1,012 (2010) | #1,659 |
| 2020s | 300 | #2,046 (2020) | #2,712 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Tyshawn in 1994
Top girls' names in 1994
Top boys' names in 1994
More about 1994
girls
1,785,753 girls got a published name in 1994; 1 in 162,341 of them was named Tyshawn, which outranked 51.7% of the 15,759 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 12.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #7,097Yu12
- #7,097Zuleica12
- #7,097Zuleyka12
- #7,604Tyshawn11
- #7,604Abeni11
- #7,604Abreanna11
- #7,604Adanna11
- #8,122Aalyah10
- #8,122Aamina10
- #8,122Abbe10
Tied with 517 names at #7,604; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,932,031 boys got a published name in 1994; 1 in 14,527 of them was named Tyshawn, which outranked 90.7% of the 10,245 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.3% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).