Travis
Last seen for girls in 2004 at #6,216 · #434 for boys in 2025, 732 births
Given to boys 99.3% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1979 · 11,037 births
- Debut · boys
- 12 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 29 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 308,571since 1880
Travis over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #434 | 732 | |
| 2024 | — | #359 | 923 | |
| 2023 | — | #379 | 848 | |
| 2022 | — | #382 | 849 | |
| 2021 | — | #380 | 850 | |
| 2020 | — | #337 | 965 | |
| 2019 | — | #322 | 1,032 | |
| 2018 | — | #314 | 1,077 | |
| 2017 | — | #302 | 1,168 | |
| 2016 | — | #276 | 1,314 | |
| 2015 | — | #257 | 1,404 | |
| 2014 | — | #253 | 1,491 | |
| 2013 | — | #232 | 1,585 | |
| 2012 | — | #212 | 1,758 | |
| 2011 | — | #190 | 1,943 | |
| 2010 | — | #178 | 2,126 | |
| 2009 | — | #177 | 2,198 | |
| 2008 | — | #177 | 2,232 | |
| 2007 | — | #170 | 2,404 | |
| 2006 | — | #162 | 2,599 | |
| 2005 | — | #175 | 2,368 | |
| 2004 | #6,216 | 19 | #166 | 2,461 |
| 2003 | — | #159 | 2,541 | |
| 2002 | — | #144 | 2,702 | |
| 2001 | — | #134 | 2,943 | |
| 2000 | #9,163 | 10 | #115 | 3,289 |
| 1999 | — | #102 | 3,608 | |
| 1998 | — | #98 | 3,924 | |
| 1997 | #12,070 | 6 | #81 | 4,684 |
| 1996 | #7,574 | 11 | #73 | 5,159 |
| 1995 | #6,257 | 14 | #66 | 5,602 |
| 1994 | #7,604 | 11 | #53 | 6,800 |
| 1993 | #3,506 | 31 | #50 | 7,940 |
| 1992 | #4,686 | 21 | #48 | 8,895 |
| 1991 | #3,633 | 29 | #44 | 10,134 |
| 1990 | #3,297 | 33 | #42 | 11,462 |
| 1989 | #2,371 | 49 | #41 | 11,526 |
| 1988 | #1,491 | 91 | #41 | 11,423 |
| 1987 | #1,619 | 76 | #42 | 10,397 |
| 1986 | #1,638 | 72 | #49 | 8,480 |
| 1985 | #1,650 | 71 | #46 | 9,094 |
| 1984 | #1,751 | 62 | #42 | 10,241 |
| 1983 | #1,358 | 88 | #41 | 10,478 |
| 1982 | #1,436 | 84 | #39 | 10,415 |
| 1981 | #1,455 | 83 | #40 | 10,109 |
| 1980 | #1,419 | 86 | #37 | 10,764 |
| 1979 | #1,555 | 74 | #36 | 11,037 |
| 1978 | #1,804 | 56 | #46 | 6,953 |
| 1977 | #1,538 | 70 | #44 | 7,277 |
| 1976 | #1,775 | 53 | #46 | 6,832 |
| 1975 | #1,935 | 46 | #51 | 5,961 |
| 1974 | #1,709 | 53 | #54 | 5,702 |
| 1973 | #1,755 | 50 | #53 | 5,868 |
| 1972 | #1,989 | 40 | #57 | 5,136 |
| 1971 | #1,772 | 50 | #61 | 5,016 |
| 1970 | #2,577 | 28 | #69 | 4,321 |
| 1969 | #2,058 | 37 | #113 | 2,862 |
| 1968 | #2,969 | 19 | #141 | 2,063 |
| 1967 | #2,376 | 26 | #166 | 1,602 |
| 1966 | #3,740 | 12 | #189 | 1,299 |
| 1965 | #3,952 | 11 | #222 | 1,076 |
| 1964 | #4,355 | 10 | #235 | 1,024 |
| 1963 | #4,019 | 11 | #257 | 888 |
| 1962 | #3,782 | 12 | #302 | 652 |
| 1961 | #3,060 | 17 | #324 | 585 |
| 1960 | #4,773 | 8 | #330 | 549 |
| 1959 | #4,625 | 8 | #347 | 504 |
| 1958 | #3,232 | 14 | #372 | 435 |
| 1957 | #4,536 | 8 | #415 | 353 |
| 1956 | #4,467 | 8 | #384 | 384 |
| 1955 | #5,828 | 5 | #380 | 356 |
| 1954 | #3,718 | 10 | #371 | 360 |
| 1953 | #3,955 | 9 | #355 | 383 |
| 1952 | #3,796 | 9 | #355 | 366 |
| 1951 | #3,106 | 12 | #355 | 374 |
| 1950 | #4,315 | 7 | #344 | 383 |
| 1949 | #2,726 | 14 | #349 | 373 |
| 1948 | #2,974 | 12 | #348 | 373 |
| 1947 | #2,279 | 19 | #338 | 408 |
| 1946 | #3,430 | 9 | #319 | 406 |
| 1945 | #2,339 | 14 | #344 | 307 |
| 1944 | #3,139 | 9 | #331 | 334 |
| 1943 | #2,151 | 17 | #348 | 315 |
| 1942 | #2,537 | 13 | #320 | 359 |
| 1941 | #2,846 | 10 | #310 | 350 |
| 1940 | #2,572 | 11 | #295 | 355 |
| 1939 | #2,300 | 13 | #295 | 353 |
| 1938 | #2,021 | 16 | #291 | 354 |
| 1937 | #3,434 | 7 | #301 | 320 |
| 1936 | #3,376 | 7 | #295 | 335 |
| 1935 | #2,926 | 9 | #293 | 345 |
| 1934 | #3,802 | 6 | #281 | 364 |
| 1933 | #3,406 | 7 | #313 | 295 |
| 1932 | #2,490 | 12 | #328 | 282 |
| 1931 | — | #324 | 286 | |
| 1930 | #4,047 | 6 | #361 | 254 |
| 1929 | #2,921 | 10 | #337 | 273 |
| 1928 | #2,954 | 10 | #374 | 243 |
| 1927 | #2,859 | 11 | #365 | 256 |
| 1926 | #3,564 | 8 | #406 | 217 |
| 1925 | #2,489 | 14 | #384 | 241 |
| 1924 | #2,809 | 12 | #382 | 246 |
| 1923 | #2,169 | 17 | #386 | 237 |
| 1922 | #4,445 | 6 | #373 | 262 |
| 1921 | #3,400 | 9 | #385 | 246 |
| 1920 | #3,097 | 10 | #386 | 240 |
| 1919 | #3,817 | 7 | #381 | 232 |
| 1918 | #3,244 | 9 | #382 | 244 |
| 1917 | #2,879 | 10 | #393 | 205 |
| 1916 | #2,028 | 16 | #405 | 189 |
| 1915 | #2,688 | 10 | #427 | 160 |
| 1914 | #2,638 | 8 | #387 | 150 |
| 1913 | #2,540 | 7 | #413 | 109 |
| 1912 | #2,634 | 6 | #446 | 77 |
| 1911 | — | #461 | 40 | |
| 1910 | #2,398 | 5 | #501 | 31 |
| 1909 | — | #449 | 32 | |
| 1908 | — | #499 | 25 | |
| 1907 | — | #511 | 21 | |
| 1906 | — | #568 | 17 | |
| 1905 | — | #491 | 21 | |
| 1904 | — | #492 | 19 | |
| 1903 | — | #734 | 10 | |
| 1902 | — | #536 | 16 | |
| 1901 | — | #943 | 6 | |
| 1900 | — | #430 | 27 | |
| 1899 | — | #613 | 11 | |
| 1898 | — | #885 | 7 | |
| 1897 | — | #615 | 12 | |
| 1896 | — | #722 | 10 | |
| 1895 | — | #685 | 10 | |
| 1894 | — | #787 | 8 | |
| 1893 | — | #768 | 8 | |
| 1892 | — | #572 | 13 | |
| 1891 | — | #635 | 9 | |
| 1890 | — | #667 | 9 | |
| 1889 | — | #789 | 7 | |
| 1888 | — | #917 | 6 | |
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | #578 | 11 | |
| 1885 | — | #577 | 11 | |
| 1884 | — | #613 | 10 | |
| 1883 | — | #644 | 9 | |
| 1882 | — | #611 | 10 | |
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | #526 | 12 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Travis was already there! It came in at #526, and was given to 12 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1881, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
See more about Travis
- 75 spots since 2024 (#359 → #434)
- 97 spots since 2020 (#337 → #434)
- 177 spots since 2015 (#257 → #434)
- Biggest jump: 407 spots in 1902 (#943 → #536)
- Biggest drop: 513 spots in 1901 (#430 → #943)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1979 at #36 (11,037 births)
- Births halved by 1996, 17 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 29 yrs · run 1970–1998
- Top 1,000: 144 yrs · run 1888–2025
- Highest: 1 in 156 boys born in 1979 were named Travis (0.64%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,333 boys born in 2025 (0.04%)
- 33.4% of all boys named Travis (102,927) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 76 | #526 (1880) | #657 |
| 1890s | 97 | #572 (1892) | #695 |
| 1900s | 194 | #430 (1900) | #565 |
| 1910s | 1,437 | #381 (1919) | #420 |
| 1920s | 2,461 | #337 (1929) | #378 |
| 1930s | 3,188 | #281 (1934) | #308 |
| 1940s | 3,580 | #295 (1940) | #330 |
| 1950s | 3,898 | #344 (1950) | #368 |
| 1960s | 12,600 | #113 (1969) | #228 |
| 1970s | 64,103 | #36 (1979) | #52 |
| 1980s | 102,927 | #37 (1980) | #42 |
| 1990s | 68,208 | #42 (1990) | #66 |
| 2000s | 25,737 | #115 (2000) | #158 |
| 2010s | 14,898 | #178 (2010) | #254 |
| 2020s | 5,167 | #337 (2020) | #379 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Travis in 1926
Top girls' names in 1926
Top boys' names in 1926
More about 1926
girls
1,185,401 girls got a published name in 1926; 1 in 148,175 of them was named Travis, which outranked 36.6% of the 5,622 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #3,269Zilpha9
- #3,269Zilphia9
- #3,269Zulema9
- #3,564Travis8
- #3,564Aaron8
- #3,564Adair8
- #3,564Adalaide8
- #3,873Adalee7
- #3,873Adelita7
- #3,873Adrianne7
Tied with 308 names at #3,564; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↑ 1,047Janell#1,795 → #748
- ↑ 389Madalyn#1,225 → #836
- ↑ 382Evangelina#1,324 → #942
- ↑ 379Carla#1,252 → #873
- ↑ 351Vilma#1,020 → #669
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,110,505 boys got a published name in 1926; 1 in 5,118 of them was named Travis, which outranked 91.6% of the 4,837 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- ↓ 531Okey#984 → #1,515
- ↓ 459Florentino#973 → #1,432
- ↓ 407Rexford#924 → #1,331
- ↓ 380Marshal#973 → #1,353
- ↓ 378Coolidge#746 → #1,124
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.