Timothy
Last seen for girls in 2016 at #16,215 · #203 for boys in 2025, 1,734 births
Given to boys 99.6% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1960 · 30,498 births
- Debut · boys
- 70 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 65 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 1,084,192since 1880
Timothy over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #203 | 1,734 | |
| 2024 | — | #206 | 1,721 | |
| 2023 | — | #211 | 1,747 | |
| 2022 | — | #202 | 1,848 | |
| 2021 | — | #198 | 1,923 | |
| 2020 | — | #192 | 2,011 | |
| 2019 | — | #188 | 2,092 | |
| 2018 | — | #165 | 2,356 | |
| 2017 | — | #163 | 2,420 | |
| 2016 | #16,215 | 5 | #152 | 2,674 |
| 2015 | #16,419 | 5 | #147 | 2,802 |
| 2014 | — | #134 | 3,012 | |
| 2013 | — | #124 | 3,068 | |
| 2012 | #16,869 | 5 | #118 | 3,123 |
| 2011 | — | #123 | 3,233 | |
| 2010 | #16,992 | 5 | #114 | 3,454 |
| 2009 | — | #109 | 3,773 | |
| 2008 | #15,405 | 6 | #107 | 4,095 |
| 2007 | #13,924 | 7 | #99 | 4,437 |
| 2006 | #17,168 | 5 | #93 | 4,706 |
| 2005 | #11,834 | 8 | #84 | 5,034 |
| 2004 | #4,172 | 33 | #79 | 5,234 |
| 2003 | #7,998 | 13 | #76 | 5,487 |
| 2002 | #10,246 | 9 | #70 | 6,020 |
| 2001 | #7,724 | 13 | #67 | 6,423 |
| 2000 | #9,874 | 9 | #58 | 7,261 |
| 1999 | #6,836 | 14 | #49 | 7,593 |
| 1998 | #6,360 | 15 | #49 | 7,845 |
| 1997 | #6,483 | 14 | #43 | 8,502 |
| 1996 | #5,065 | 19 | #40 | 8,919 |
| 1995 | #5,221 | 18 | #40 | 9,788 |
| 1994 | #5,016 | 19 | #39 | 10,767 |
| 1993 | #3,987 | 26 | #38 | 11,640 |
| 1992 | #3,680 | 29 | #34 | 12,864 |
| 1991 | #3,633 | 29 | #32 | 14,154 |
| 1990 | #2,153 | 60 | #30 | 15,700 |
| 1989 | #2,027 | 62 | #28 | 16,427 |
| 1988 | #1,269 | 115 | #25 | 16,807 |
| 1987 | #1,216 | 118 | #26 | 17,398 |
| 1986 | #1,260 | 107 | #27 | 16,875 |
| 1985 | #1,091 | 133 | #26 | 17,140 |
| 1984 | #1,103 | 125 | #26 | 16,987 |
| 1983 | #1,096 | 125 | #26 | 16,363 |
| 1982 | #1,074 | 133 | #24 | 17,464 |
| 1981 | #1,004 | 145 | #24 | 18,228 |
| 1980 | #1,244 | 105 | #20 | 19,146 |
| 1979 | #1,069 | 129 | #18 | 19,077 |
| 1978 | #1,176 | 107 | #17 | 19,597 |
| 1977 | #1,199 | 102 | #18 | 17,977 |
| 1976 | #1,043 | 118 | #21 | 16,620 |
| 1975 | #1,111 | 105 | #22 | 15,947 |
| 1974 | #1,351 | 77 | #22 | 15,890 |
| 1973 | #1,160 | 94 | #22 | 16,036 |
| 1972 | #1,022 | 114 | #21 | 17,605 |
| 1971 | #1,047 | 115 | #21 | 20,089 |
| 1970 | #916 | 141 | #20 | 22,422 |
| 1969 | #1,059 | 107 | #17 | 23,358 |
| 1968 | #875 | 138 | #13 | 26,496 |
| 1967 | #908 | 127 | #11 | 28,587 |
| 1966 | #949 | 115 | #11 | 28,923 |
| 1965 | #973 | 112 | #12 | 28,334 |
| 1964 | #1,153 | 91 | #15 | 28,090 |
| 1963 | #1,087 | 99 | #15 | 27,187 |
| 1962 | #1,145 | 91 | #16 | 27,111 |
| 1961 | #1,095 | 100 | #15 | 28,253 |
| 1960 | #1,156 | 89 | #11 | 30,498 |
| 1959 | #1,203 | 79 | #12 | 30,783 |
| 1958 | #1,180 | 81 | #13 | 28,797 |
| 1957 | #1,407 | 56 | #19 | 24,733 |
| 1956 | #1,533 | 48 | #19 | 23,288 |
| 1955 | #1,480 | 47 | #22 | 20,738 |
| 1954 | #1,560 | 42 | #26 | 17,427 |
| 1953 | #1,671 | 35 | #26 | 15,187 |
| 1952 | #1,861 | 29 | #27 | 14,167 |
| 1951 | #3,106 | 12 | #28 | 12,705 |
| 1950 | #1,835 | 27 | #32 | 10,499 |
| 1949 | #2,274 | 19 | #34 | 9,346 |
| 1948 | #2,416 | 17 | #38 | 8,043 |
| 1947 | #2,898 | 13 | #52 | 6,747 |
| 1946 | #2,024 | 21 | #60 | 5,152 |
| 1945 | #2,916 | 10 | #70 | 3,591 |
| 1944 | #2,762 | 11 | #92 | 2,754 |
| 1943 | #2,558 | 13 | #99 | 2,578 |
| 1942 | #2,986 | 10 | #108 | 2,275 |
| 1941 | #3,559 | 7 | #121 | 1,632 |
| 1940 | — | #135 | 1,385 | |
| 1939 | #3,145 | 8 | #153 | 1,066 |
| 1938 | #2,730 | 10 | #167 | 882 |
| 1937 | — | #192 | 674 | |
| 1936 | — | #253 | 439 | |
| 1935 | #4,204 | 5 | #281 | 371 |
| 1934 | — | #295 | 336 | |
| 1933 | — | #283 | 346 | |
| 1932 | — | #299 | 341 | |
| 1931 | — | #301 | 344 | |
| 1930 | #4,550 | 5 | #316 | 306 |
| 1929 | — | #324 | 292 | |
| 1928 | #4,725 | 5 | #326 | 297 |
| 1927 | — | #319 | 325 | |
| 1926 | — | #351 | 274 | |
| 1925 | #4,973 | 5 | #319 | 319 |
| 1924 | — | #324 | 322 | |
| 1923 | — | #323 | 325 | |
| 1922 | — | #350 | 288 | |
| 1921 | #3,666 | 8 | #383 | 249 |
| 1920 | — | #365 | 269 | |
| 1919 | — | #366 | 249 | |
| 1918 | — | #340 | 285 | |
| 1917 | — | #344 | 260 | |
| 1916 | — | #339 | 246 | |
| 1915 | — | #332 | 253 | |
| 1914 | — | #353 | 174 | |
| 1913 | — | #317 | 160 | |
| 1912 | — | #334 | 128 | |
| 1911 | — | #279 | 88 | |
| 1910 | — | #279 | 75 | |
| 1909 | — | #275 | 67 | |
| 1908 | — | #257 | 67 | |
| 1907 | — | #227 | 81 | |
| 1906 | — | #273 | 52 | |
| 1905 | — | #224 | 73 | |
| 1904 | — | #249 | 58 | |
| 1903 | — | #263 | 49 | |
| 1902 | — | #229 | 62 | |
| 1901 | — | #218 | 62 | |
| 1900 | — | #228 | 76 | |
| 1899 | — | #216 | 60 | |
| 1898 | — | #199 | 75 | |
| 1897 | — | #222 | 58 | |
| 1896 | — | #211 | 71 | |
| 1895 | — | #227 | 60 | |
| 1894 | — | #204 | 71 | |
| 1893 | — | #219 | 62 | |
| 1892 | — | #205 | 71 | |
| 1891 | — | #188 | 66 | |
| 1890 | — | #221 | 56 | |
| 1889 | — | #166 | 82 | |
| 1888 | — | #197 | 76 | |
| 1887 | — | #210 | 54 | |
| 1886 | — | #181 | 74 | |
| 1885 | — | #199 | 64 | |
| 1884 | — | #181 | 77 | |
| 1883 | — | #190 | 62 | |
| 1882 | — | #186 | 71 | |
| 1881 | — | #184 | 63 | |
| 1880 | — | #180 | 70 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Timothy was already there! It came in at #180, and was given to 70 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1901–1906, when fewer than 74 boys a year got the name.
See more about Timothy
- 3 spots since 2024 (#206 → #203)
- 11 spots since 2020 (#192 → #203)
- 56 spots since 2015 (#147 → #203)
- Biggest jump: 61 spots in 1937 (#253 → #192)
- Biggest drop: 55 spots in 1890 (#166 → #221)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1960 at #11 (30,498 births)
- Births halved by 1991, 31 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 65 yrs · run 1943–2007
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 61 boys born in 1967 were named Timothy (1.6%)
- Latest: 1 in 985 boys born in 2025 (0.10%)
- Its best rank, #11 in 1960, was only 1 in 70 (1.4%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 25.5% of all boys named Timothy (276,837) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 693 | #166 (1889) | #187 |
| 1890s | 650 | #188 (1891) | #211 |
| 1900s | 647 | #218 (1901) | #244 |
| 1910s | 1,918 | #279 (1911) | #328 |
| 1920s | 2,960 | #319 (1927) | #338 |
| 1930s | 5,105 | #153 (1939) | #254 |
| 1940s | 43,503 | #34 (1949) | #81 |
| 1950s | 198,324 | #12 (1959) | #22 |
| 1960s | 276,837 | #11 (1960) | #14 |
| 1970s | 181,260 | #17 (1978) | #20 |
| 1980s | 172,835 | #20 (1980) | #25 |
| 1990s | 107,772 | #30 (1990) | #39 |
| 2000s | 52,470 | #58 (2000) | #84 |
| 2010s | 28,234 | #114 (2010) | #143 |
| 2020s | 10,984 | #192 (2020) | #202 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Timothy in 1961
Top girls' names in 1961
Top boys' names in 1961
More about 1961
girls
2,018,495 girls got a published name in 1961; 1 in 20,185 of them was named Timothy, which outranked 85.5% of the 7,527 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,090Courtney101
- #1,090Leola101
- #1,090Lona101
- #1,095Timothy100
- #1,095Adela100
- #1,095Cinda100
- #1,095Lani100
- #1,101Beckie99
- #1,101Carmelita99
- #1,101Karri99
Tied with 5 names at #1,095; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,124,195 boys got a published name in 1961; 1 in 75 of them was named Timothy, which outranked 99.7% of the 4,657 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 29.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.