Stuart
Last seen for girls in 1998 at #14,122 · #2,516 for boys in 2025, 53 births
Given to boys 99.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1960 · 2,074 births
- Debut · boys
- 16 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 68,876since 1880
Stuart over time
Rank among boys' names. Stuart has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #2,516 | 53 | |
| 2024 | — | #3,216 | 37 | |
| 2023 | — | #2,614 | 50 | |
| 2022 | — | #2,355 | 60 | |
| 2021 | — | #2,552 | 51 | |
| 2020 | — | #2,292 | 59 | |
| 2019 | — | #2,228 | 62 | |
| 2018 | — | #2,083 | 68 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,958 | 73 | |
| 2016 | — | #2,184 | 62 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,790 | 84 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,794 | 83 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,733 | 84 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,729 | 87 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,587 | 97 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,697 | 90 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,459 | 114 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,452 | 113 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,306 | 132 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,097 | 160 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,053 | 157 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,034 | 158 | |
| 2003 | — | #964 | 169 | |
| 2002 | — | #868 | 189 | |
| 2001 | — | #723 | 242 | |
| 2000 | — | #667 | 268 | |
| 1999 | — | #696 | 241 | |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | #661 | 259 |
| 1997 | #10,836 | 7 | #589 | 305 |
| 1996 | #13,518 | 5 | #564 | 324 |
| 1995 | #10,514 | 7 | #514 | 397 |
| 1994 | — | #463 | 473 | |
| 1993 | — | #468 | 450 | |
| 1992 | #11,738 | 6 | #427 | 519 |
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | #360 | 666 |
| 1990 | — | #344 | 708 | |
| 1989 | — | #323 | 739 | |
| 1988 | #10,386 | 6 | #319 | 676 |
| 1987 | #9,825 | 6 | #319 | 658 |
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | #300 | 685 |
| 1985 | #6,457 | 10 | #268 | 780 |
| 1984 | #10,422 | 5 | #293 | 691 |
| 1983 | #8,047 | 7 | #310 | 637 |
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 | #326 | 586 |
| 1981 | — | #321 | 595 | |
| 1980 | — | #334 | 561 | |
| 1979 | — | #327 | 570 | |
| 1978 | — | #324 | 540 | |
| 1977 | #7,567 | 7 | #323 | 577 |
| 1976 | — | #314 | 560 | |
| 1975 | #9,067 | 5 | #315 | 565 |
| 1974 | — | #276 | 678 | |
| 1973 | #6,080 | 8 | #273 | 677 |
| 1972 | — | #313 | 587 | |
| 1971 | #8,324 | 5 | #269 | 788 |
| 1970 | #7,070 | 6 | #273 | 768 |
| 1969 | #5,974 | 7 | #250 | 834 |
| 1968 | — | #240 | 887 | |
| 1967 | #5,457 | 7 | #228 | 962 |
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | #202 | 1,171 |
| 1965 | — | #195 | 1,295 | |
| 1964 | #6,009 | 6 | #184 | 1,512 |
| 1963 | #4,539 | 9 | #187 | 1,589 |
| 1962 | — | #175 | 1,735 | |
| 1961 | #5,309 | 7 | #166 | 1,902 |
| 1960 | #4,184 | 10 | #161 | 2,074 |
| 1959 | #5,031 | 7 | #168 | 1,848 |
| 1958 | #4,520 | 8 | #203 | 1,337 |
| 1957 | — | #194 | 1,427 | |
| 1956 | — | #186 | 1,489 | |
| 1955 | #5,828 | 5 | #189 | 1,405 |
| 1954 | #5,753 | 5 | #178 | 1,495 |
| 1953 | — | #185 | 1,367 | |
| 1952 | #4,123 | 8 | #188 | 1,258 |
| 1951 | — | #186 | 1,250 | |
| 1950 | #3,962 | 8 | #186 | 1,196 |
| 1949 | #5,244 | 5 | #178 | 1,194 |
| 1948 | #4,205 | 7 | #188 | 1,073 |
| 1947 | #5,295 | 5 | #178 | 1,191 |
| 1946 | — | #180 | 1,031 | |
| 1945 | — | #191 | 788 | |
| 1944 | — | #192 | 795 | |
| 1943 | #4,196 | 6 | #178 | 924 |
| 1942 | #3,194 | 9 | #171 | 963 |
| 1941 | — | #173 | 886 | |
| 1940 | #4,349 | 5 | #195 | 680 |
| 1939 | #3,782 | 6 | #207 | 590 |
| 1938 | #4,342 | 5 | #199 | 640 |
| 1937 | #2,940 | 9 | #198 | 623 |
| 1936 | #4,181 | 5 | #215 | 542 |
| 1935 | — | #236 | 495 | |
| 1934 | — | #235 | 493 | |
| 1933 | — | #250 | 439 | |
| 1932 | #3,568 | 7 | #250 | 463 |
| 1931 | — | #277 | 399 | |
| 1930 | #3,345 | 8 | #279 | 412 |
| 1929 | — | #282 | 386 | |
| 1928 | #4,725 | 5 | #282 | 395 |
| 1927 | #3,875 | 7 | #305 | 358 |
| 1926 | — | #296 | 368 | |
| 1925 | — | #287 | 399 | |
| 1924 | #5,061 | 5 | #303 | 355 |
| 1923 | — | #289 | 374 | |
| 1922 | — | #309 | 344 | |
| 1921 | — | #307 | 351 | |
| 1920 | — | #322 | 326 | |
| 1919 | — | #343 | 270 | |
| 1918 | #2,822 | 11 | #344 | 280 |
| 1917 | — | #326 | 278 | |
| 1916 | — | #332 | 259 | |
| 1915 | #4,274 | 5 | #335 | 249 |
| 1914 | — | #338 | 188 | |
| 1913 | — | #322 | 157 | |
| 1912 | — | #349 | 118 | |
| 1911 | — | #416 | 48 | |
| 1910 | — | #430 | 40 | |
| 1909 | — | #436 | 33 | |
| 1908 | — | #522 | 23 | |
| 1907 | — | #375 | 36 | |
| 1906 | — | #363 | 33 | |
| 1905 | — | #355 | 34 | |
| 1904 | — | #322 | 38 | |
| 1903 | — | #381 | 26 | |
| 1902 | — | #440 | 22 | |
| 1901 | — | #399 | 22 | |
| 1900 | — | #490 | 22 | |
| 1899 | — | #438 | 18 | |
| 1898 | — | #452 | 20 | |
| 1897 | — | #392 | 23 | |
| 1896 | — | #438 | 20 | |
| 1895 | — | #437 | 20 | |
| 1894 | — | #502 | 16 | |
| 1893 | — | #448 | 17 | |
| 1892 | — | #480 | 17 | |
| 1891 | — | #386 | 20 | |
| 1890 | — | #533 | 13 | |
| 1889 | — | #388 | 21 | |
| 1888 | — | #505 | 15 | |
| 1887 | — | #392 | 18 | |
| 1886 | — | #431 | 17 | |
| 1885 | — | #521 | 13 | |
| 1884 | — | #570 | 11 | |
| 1883 | — | #556 | 11 | |
| 1882 | — | #611 | 10 | |
| 1881 | — | #503 | 12 | |
| 1880 | — | #442 | 16 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Stuart was already there! It came in at #442, and was given to 16 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1881–1885, when fewer than 14 boys a year got the name.
Where Stuart is popular in 1982
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Virginia#179 · 1 in 1,216
- Kentucky#183 · 1 in 1,576
- Utah#213 · 1 in 1,600
- Arkansas#224 · 1 in 1,707
- Nebraska#225 · 1 in 2,429
Best ever in a state: #54 in Hawaii, 1964.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia | #179 | 29 | 1 in 1,216 |
| Kentucky | #183 | 17 | 1 in 1,576 |
| Utah | #213 | 12 | 1 in 1,600 |
| Arkansas | #224 | 9 | 1 in 1,707 |
| Nebraska | #225 | 5 | 1 in 2,429 |
| Washington | #228 | 16 | 1 in 1,976 |
| Georgia | #232 | 26 | 1 in 1,560 |
| Oregon | #235 | 9 | 1 in 2,122 |
| Hawaii | #237 | 6 | 1 in 1,163 |
| South Carolina | #257 | 12 | 1 in 1,752 |
| Louisiana | #264 | 22 | 1 in 1,718 |
| Colorado | #273 | 10 | 1 in 2,512 |
| Arizona | #274 | 12 | 1 in 1,968 |
| North Carolina | #274 | 16 | 1 in 2,405 |
| Wisconsin | #276 | 10 | 1 in 3,467 |
| Connecticut | #278 | 6 | 1 in 3,011 |
| Minnesota | #284 | 8 | 1 in 4,095 |
| Indiana | #286 | 12 | 1 in 3,302 |
| Oklahoma | #288 | 10 | 1 in 2,584 |
| Ohio | #290 | 22 | 1 in 3,593 |
| Massachusetts | #295 | 8 | 1 in 4,533 |
| Maryland | #299 | 8 | 1 in 3,199 |
| Pennsylvania | #305 | 19 | 1 in 4,109 |
| Florida | #306 | 27 | 1 in 2,447 |
| Kansas | #306 | 6 | 1 in 2,981 |
| Michigan | #320 | 17 | 1 in 3,817 |
| Missouri | #329 | 9 | 1 in 4,084 |
| New Jersey | #332 | 13 | 1 in 3,384 |
| Alabama | #344 | 8 | 1 in 3,256 |
| Texas | #349 | 54 | 1 in 2,670 |
| Tennessee | #357 | 8 | 1 in 4,076 |
| Illinois | #363 | 23 | 1 in 3,646 |
| California | #395 | 52 | 1 in 3,939 |
| New York | #418 | 25 | 1 in 4,638 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Stuart
- 700 spots since 2024 (#3,216 → #2,516)
- 224 spots since 2020 (#2,292 → #2,516)
- 726 spots since 2015 (#1,790 → #2,516)
- Biggest jump: 147 spots in 1891 (#533 → #386)
- Biggest drop: 147 spots in 1908 (#375 → #522)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1960 at #161 (2,074 births)
- Births halved by 1967, 7 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 124 yrs · run 1880–2003
- Highest: 1 in 1,028 boys born in 1960 were named Stuart (0.10%)
- Latest: 1 in 32,228 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 20.4% of all boys named Stuart (14,072) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 144 | #388 (1889) | #492 |
| 1890s | 184 | #386 (1891) | #451 |
| 1900s | 289 | #322 (1904) | #408 |
| 1910s | 1,887 | #322 (1913) | #354 |
| 1920s | 3,656 | #282 (1928) | #298 |
| 1930s | 5,096 | #198 (1937) | #235 |
| 1940s | 9,525 | #171 (1942) | #182 |
| 1950s | 14,072 | #168 (1959) | #186 |
| 1960s | 13,961 | #161 (1960) | #199 |
| 1970s | 6,310 | #269 (1971) | #301 |
| 1980s | 6,608 | #268 (1985) | #311 |
| 1990s | 4,342 | #344 (1990) | #509 |
| 2000s | 1,702 | #667 (2000) | #1,062 |
| 2010s | 790 | #1,587 (2011) | #1,878 |
| 2020s | 310 | #2,292 (2020) | #2,591 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Stuart in 1982
Top girls' names in 1982
Top boys' names in 1982
More about 1982
girls
1,693,325 girls got a published name in 1982; 1 in 282,221 of them was named Stuart, which outranked 25.1% of the 12,332 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #8,224Zia7
- #8,224Ziomara7
- #8,224Zohra7
- #9,237Stuart6
- #9,237Aarica6
- #9,237Abbagail6
- #9,237Abbygail6
- #10,517Aapri5
- #10,517Aaronda5
- #10,517Abimbola5
Tied with 1,279 names at #9,237; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,814,447 boys got a published name in 1982; 1 in 3,096 of them was named Stuart, which outranked 95.6% of the 7,367 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).