Shamar
Last seen for girls in 2006 at #13,606 · #5,608 for boys in 2025, 16 births
Given to boys 96.1% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2000 · 383 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 6,137since 1972
Shamar over time
Rank among boys' names. Shamar has never cracked the top 500 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #5,608 | 16 | |
| 2024 | — | #3,272 | 36 | |
| 2023 | — | #2,952 | 42 | |
| 2022 | — | #2,243 | 64 | |
| 2021 | — | #2,277 | 61 | |
| 2020 | — | #2,046 | 69 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,805 | 85 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,617 | 101 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,681 | 94 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,706 | 91 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,427 | 120 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,564 | 101 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,361 | 124 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,258 | 140 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,206 | 146 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,023 | 189 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,138 | 161 | |
| 2008 | — | #926 | 219 | |
| 2007 | — | #946 | 209 | |
| 2006 | #13,606 | 7 | #805 | 254 |
| 2005 | — | #809 | 235 | |
| 2004 | — | #876 | 199 | |
| 2003 | #15,784 | 5 | #788 | 223 |
| 2002 | — | #650 | 292 | |
| 2001 | #12,056 | 7 | #570 | 363 |
| 2000 | #13,154 | 6 | #552 | 383 |
| 1999 | #7,716 | 12 | #617 | 295 |
| 1998 | #10,122 | 8 | #701 | 238 |
| 1997 | #10,836 | 7 | #799 | 183 |
| 1996 | #10,567 | 7 | #860 | 161 |
| 1995 | #8,766 | 9 | #1,069 | 110 |
| 1994 | — | #1,564 | 59 | |
| 1993 | #11,780 | 6 | #2,007 | 40 |
| 1992 | #7,512 | 11 | #1,472 | 62 |
| 1991 | #7,987 | 10 | #1,325 | 72 |
| 1990 | #10,193 | 7 | #1,188 | 84 |
| 1989 | #6,531 | 12 | #1,294 | 71 |
| 1988 | — | #1,525 | 48 | |
| 1987 | #5,923 | 12 | #1,439 | 50 |
| 1986 | #6,156 | 11 | #1,153 | 67 |
| 1985 | #7,563 | 8 | #1,321 | 53 |
| 1984 | #5,899 | 11 | #1,198 | 58 |
| 1983 | #4,884 | 14 | #1,153 | 61 |
| 1982 | #8,224 | 7 | #1,039 | 76 |
| 1981 | #6,323 | 10 | #1,029 | 78 |
| 1980 | #5,245 | 13 | #1,145 | 63 |
| 1979 | #7,313 | 8 | #1,291 | 51 |
| 1978 | #9,750 | 5 | #1,438 | 42 |
| 1977 | #6,340 | 9 | #1,948 | 25 |
| 1976 | — | #2,177 | 21 | |
| 1975 | #9,067 | 5 | #1,948 | 24 |
| 1974 | #8,775 | 5 | #3,558 | 9 |
| 1973 | — | #2,857 | 12 | |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | #3,963 | 7 |
| 1971 | #7,388 | 6 | — | |
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | #7,471 | 5 | — | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Shamar! It came in at #3,963, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1972, when fewer than 8 boys a year got the name.
Where Shamar is popular in 2017
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Pennsylvania#945 · 1 in 8,315
- Georgia#991 · 1 in 7,670
- Florida#1,032 · 1 in 8,788
- New York#1,105 · 1 in 9,755
- Illinois#1,322 · 1 in 12,386
Best ever in a state: #150 in Delaware, 2001.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania | #945 | 7 | 1 in 8,315 |
| Georgia | #991 | 7 | 1 in 7,670 |
| Florida | #1,032 | 11 | 1 in 8,788 |
| New York | #1,105 | 10 | 1 in 9,755 |
| Illinois | #1,322 | 5 | 1 in 12,386 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Shamar
- 2,336 spots since 2024 (#3,272 → #5,608)
- 3,562 spots since 2020 (#2,046 → #5,608)
- 4,181 spots since 2015 (#1,427 → #5,608)
- Biggest jump: 209 spots in 1996 (#1,069 → #860)
- Biggest drop: 212 spots in 2009 (#926 → #1,138)
- Debuted 1972
- Peaked 2000 at #552 (383 births)
- Births halved by 2009, 9 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 13 yrs · run 1996–2008
- Highest: 1 in 5,128 boys born in 2000 were named Shamar (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 106,755 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 41.4% of all boys named Shamar (2,538) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 191 | #1,291 (1979) | #2,398 |
| 1980s | 625 | #1,029 (1981) | #1,230 |
| 1990s | 1,304 | #617 (1999) | #1,160 |
| 2000s | 2,538 | #552 (2000) | #806 |
| 2010s | 1,191 | #1,023 (2010) | #1,465 |
| 2020s | 288 | #2,046 (2020) | #3,066 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Shamar in 2017
Top boys' names in 2017
More about 2017
boys
1,850,956 boys got a published name in 2017; 1 in 19,691 of them was named Shamar, which outranked 88.2% of the 14,262 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,661Maxon95
- #1,661Mickey95
- #1,661Sulaiman95
- #1,681Shamar94
- #1,681Alessio94
- #1,681Amauri94
- #1,681Brighton94
- #1,695Ayman93
- #1,695Britton93
- #1,695Cayde93
Tied with 13 names at #1,681; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.