Saundra
Last seen for girls in 2017 at #14,124 · Last seen for boys in 1943 at #3,231
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1942 · 805 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 17,851since 1925
Saundra over time
Rank among girls' names. Saundra has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | #14,124 | 6 | — | |
| 2016 | #12,876 | 7 | — | |
| 2015 | #16,419 | 5 | — | |
| 2014 | #16,513 | 5 | — | |
| 2013 | #14,582 | 6 | — | |
| 2012 | #14,962 | 6 | — | |
| 2011 | #16,764 | 5 | — | |
| 2010 | #16,992 | 5 | — | |
| 2009 | #9,975 | 11 | — | |
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | #8,520 | 14 | — | |
| 2006 | #7,868 | 15 | — | |
| 2005 | #11,834 | 8 | — | |
| 2004 | #8,259 | 13 | — | |
| 2003 | #6,576 | 17 | — | |
| 2002 | #7,045 | 15 | — | |
| 2001 | #7,317 | 14 | — | |
| 2000 | #6,208 | 17 | — | |
| 1999 | #5,039 | 21 | — | |
| 1998 | #3,831 | 30 | — | |
| 1997 | #3,897 | 28 | — | |
| 1996 | #4,059 | 26 | — | |
| 1995 | #3,492 | 31 | — | |
| 1994 | #3,615 | 30 | — | |
| 1993 | #3,221 | 35 | — | |
| 1992 | #2,733 | 44 | — | |
| 1991 | #2,388 | 53 | — | |
| 1990 | #2,128 | 61 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,998 | 63 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,521 | 88 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,371 | 99 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,219 | 113 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,505 | 81 | — | |
| 1984 | #2,050 | 49 | — | |
| 1983 | #2,156 | 45 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,461 | 82 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,935 | 55 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,583 | 73 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,503 | 78 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,299 | 93 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,414 | 79 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,131 | 105 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,074 | 109 | — | |
| 1974 | #950 | 130 | — | |
| 1973 | #830 | 158 | — | |
| 1972 | #870 | 147 | — | |
| 1971 | #722 | 210 | — | |
| 1970 | #644 | 256 | — | |
| 1969 | #627 | 250 | — | |
| 1968 | #577 | 277 | — | |
| 1967 | #583 | 269 | — | |
| 1966 | #543 | 300 | — | |
| 1965 | #568 | 283 | — | |
| 1964 | #548 | 326 | — | |
| 1963 | #505 | 371 | — | |
| 1962 | #530 | 340 | — | |
| 1961 | #531 | 340 | — | |
| 1960 | #533 | 326 | — | |
| 1959 | #521 | 347 | — | |
| 1958 | #538 | 325 | — | |
| 1957 | #534 | 322 | — | |
| 1956 | #506 | 345 | — | |
| 1955 | #517 | 320 | — | |
| 1954 | #480 | 346 | — | |
| 1953 | #447 | 372 | — | |
| 1952 | #386 | 453 | — | |
| 1951 | #372 | 475 | — | |
| 1950 | #349 | 508 | — | |
| 1949 | #304 | 648 | — | |
| 1948 | #288 | 711 | — | |
| 1947 | #269 | 813 | — | |
| 1946 | #264 | 744 | — | |
| 1945 | #280 | 619 | — | |
| 1944 | #260 | 702 | — | |
| 1943 | #256 | 746 | #3,231 | 6 |
| 1942 | #238 | 805 | — | |
| 1941 | #263 | 592 | — | |
| 1940 | #285 | 485 | #3,459 | 5 |
| 1939 | #306 | 409 | — | |
| 1938 | #349 | 341 | — | |
| 1937 | #456 | 206 | — | |
| 1936 | #494 | 170 | — | |
| 1935 | #600 | 118 | — | |
| 1934 | #815 | 68 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,024 | 46 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,213 | 35 | — | |
| 1931 | #2,205 | 14 | — | |
| 1930 | #2,552 | 12 | — | |
| 1929 | #3,682 | 7 | — | |
| 1928 | #3,164 | 9 | — | |
| 1927 | #3,053 | 10 | — | |
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | #4,973 | 5 | — | |
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Saundra! It came in at #4,973, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1925–1926, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Saundra is popular in 1958
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Oklahoma#231 · 1 in 1,421
- District of Columbia#302 · 1 in 2,253
- Ohio#316 · 1 in 2,740
- Kentucky#322 · 1 in 2,742
- North Carolina#359 · 1 in 2,895
Best ever in a state: #87 in Utah, 1942.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma | #231 | 15 | 1 in 1,421 |
| District of Columbia | #302 | 6 | 1 in 2,253 |
| Ohio | #316 | 39 | 1 in 2,740 |
| Kentucky | #322 | 12 | 1 in 2,742 |
| North Carolina | #359 | 17 | 1 in 2,895 |
| South Carolina | #374 | 9 | 1 in 2,983 |
| Virginia | #391 | 11 | 1 in 3,713 |
| Indiana | #393 | 13 | 1 in 3,879 |
| Missouri | #393 | 11 | 1 in 4,048 |
| Kansas | #394 | 6 | 1 in 3,508 |
| West Virginia | #411 | 5 | 1 in 3,866 |
| Alabama | #420 | 10 | 1 in 3,599 |
| Louisiana | #420 | 12 | 1 in 3,276 |
| Maryland | #435 | 6 | 1 in 5,002 |
| California | #478 | 37 | 1 in 4,405 |
| Michigan | #523 | 13 | 1 in 7,074 |
| New Jersey | #549 | 7 | 1 in 8,209 |
| Pennsylvania | #569 | 13 | 1 in 8,916 |
| Georgia | #622 | 6 | 1 in 7,520 |
| Texas | #623 | 18 | 1 in 6,237 |
| Illinois | #663 | 11 | 1 in 9,658 |
| Florida | #722 | 5 | 1 in 9,492 |
| New York | #733 | 14 | 1 in 12,116 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Saundra
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2017
- Biggest jump: 215 spots in 1935 (#815 → #600)
- Biggest drop: 148 spots in 1972 (#722 → #870)
- Debuted 1925
- Peaked 1942 at #238 (805 births)
- Births halved by 1953, 11 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 41 yrs · run 1934–1974
- Highest: 1 in 1,678 girls born in 1942 were named Saundra (0.06%)
- Latest: 1 in 287,744 girls born in 2017 (0.00%)
- 38.5% of all girls named Saundra (6,865) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 31 | #3,053 (1927) | #3,718 |
| 1930s | 1,419 | #306 (1939) | #1,001 |
| 1940s | 6,865 | #238 (1942) | #271 |
| 1950s | 3,813 | #349 (1950) | #465 |
| 1960s | 3,082 | #505 (1963) | #555 |
| 1970s | 1,365 | #644 (1970) | #1,044 |
| 1980s | 748 | #1,219 (1986) | #1,680 |
| 1990s | 359 | #2,128 (1990) | #3,440 |
| 2000s | 124 | #6,208 (2000) | #8,178 |
| 2010s | 45 | #12,876 (2016) | #15,404 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Saundra in 1958
Top girls' names in 1958
More about 1958
girls
2,011,619 girls got a published name in 1958; 1 in 6,190 of them was named Saundra, which outranked 92.3% of the 7,030 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 18.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).