Sara
#198 for girls in 2025, 1,568 births · Last seen for boys in 2024 at #12,349
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1981 · 11,359 births
- Debut · girls
- 165 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 36 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 436,193since 1880
Sara over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #198 | 1,568 | — | |
| 2024 | #187 | 1,612 | #12,349 | 5 |
| 2023 | #188 | 1,602 | — | |
| 2022 | #178 | 1,680 | — | |
| 2021 | #197 | 1,519 | #10,799 | 6 |
| 2020 | #182 | 1,577 | — | |
| 2019 | #163 | 1,746 | — | |
| 2018 | #169 | 1,718 | — | |
| 2017 | #158 | 1,887 | — | |
| 2016 | #151 | 2,041 | — | |
| 2015 | #161 | 1,982 | — | |
| 2014 | #165 | 1,972 | #9,642 | 7 |
| 2013 | #153 | 2,093 | — | |
| 2012 | #142 | 2,261 | — | |
| 2011 | #130 | 2,396 | — | |
| 2010 | #119 | 2,636 | #12,231 | 5 |
| 2009 | #106 | 3,044 | — | |
| 2008 | #92 | 3,595 | #9,871 | 7 |
| 2007 | #80 | 4,024 | #12,367 | 5 |
| 2006 | #72 | 4,411 | #8,732 | 8 |
| 2005 | #75 | 4,285 | #7,096 | 10 |
| 2004 | #68 | 4,507 | #3,735 | 24 |
| 2003 | #65 | 4,764 | #10,894 | 5 |
| 2002 | #59 | 4,945 | #10,667 | 5 |
| 2001 | #58 | 5,156 | #8,339 | 7 |
| 2000 | #57 | 5,325 | #5,920 | 11 |
| 1999 | #50 | 5,626 | #4,762 | 14 |
| 1998 | #48 | 6,010 | #4,873 | 13 |
| 1997 | #50 | 6,159 | #6,618 | 8 |
| 1996 | #50 | 6,288 | #5,535 | 10 |
| 1995 | #48 | 6,697 | #6,407 | 8 |
| 1994 | #43 | 7,220 | #3,596 | 18 |
| 1993 | #40 | 7,902 | #3,819 | 16 |
| 1992 | #37 | 8,443 | #4,327 | 13 |
| 1991 | #37 | 8,846 | #2,915 | 22 |
| 1990 | #34 | 8,979 | #2,432 | 28 |
| 1989 | #29 | 9,706 | #1,590 | 50 |
| 1988 | #30 | 10,020 | #1,645 | 43 |
| 1987 | #29 | 10,090 | #1,467 | 49 |
| 1986 | #27 | 11,052 | #1,617 | 40 |
| 1985 | #30 | 10,562 | #1,452 | 46 |
| 1984 | #32 | 9,314 | #1,422 | 45 |
| 1983 | #31 | 10,087 | #1,470 | 42 |
| 1982 | #28 | 11,344 | #1,382 | 47 |
| 1981 | #26 | 11,359 | #1,766 | 32 |
| 1980 | #27 | 11,148 | #1,432 | 44 |
| 1979 | #30 | 8,654 | #1,788 | 31 |
| 1978 | #28 | 8,869 | #1,718 | 31 |
| 1977 | #27 | 8,709 | #1,707 | 31 |
| 1976 | #27 | 8,020 | #1,711 | 30 |
| 1975 | #54 | 5,131 | #3,078 | 12 |
| 1974 | #61 | 4,650 | #2,199 | 19 |
| 1973 | #89 | 3,479 | #2,513 | 15 |
| 1972 | #101 | 3,179 | #3,344 | 9 |
| 1971 | #114 | 3,207 | #2,813 | 12 |
| 1970 | #126 | 3,060 | #2,739 | 12 |
| 1969 | #124 | 2,791 | #3,595 | 7 |
| 1968 | #130 | 2,457 | #2,200 | 14 |
| 1967 | #155 | 2,216 | #2,760 | 9 |
| 1966 | #166 | 2,059 | — | |
| 1965 | #178 | 1,973 | #2,982 | 8 |
| 1964 | #166 | 2,355 | #2,854 | 9 |
| 1963 | #162 | 2,486 | #3,646 | 6 |
| 1962 | #163 | 2,472 | #3,041 | 8 |
| 1961 | #176 | 2,198 | — | |
| 1960 | #186 | 2,037 | — | |
| 1959 | #180 | 2,032 | #3,290 | 7 |
| 1958 | #184 | 1,991 | #3,944 | 5 |
| 1957 | #178 | 2,110 | #3,993 | 5 |
| 1956 | #178 | 2,004 | #3,535 | 6 |
| 1955 | #176 | 1,973 | — | |
| 1954 | #164 | 2,121 | — | |
| 1953 | #158 | 2,078 | #3,425 | 6 |
| 1952 | #160 | 2,044 | — | |
| 1951 | #152 | 2,079 | — | |
| 1950 | #147 | 2,059 | #3,329 | 6 |
| 1949 | #148 | 1,971 | — | |
| 1948 | #142 | 2,020 | #3,668 | 5 |
| 1947 | #138 | 2,174 | #2,498 | 10 |
| 1946 | #135 | 2,035 | #3,525 | 5 |
| 1945 | #135 | 1,803 | — | |
| 1944 | #136 | 1,903 | #2,633 | 8 |
| 1943 | #137 | 2,020 | #2,405 | 10 |
| 1942 | #128 | 2,191 | #3,212 | 6 |
| 1941 | #124 | 2,071 | #2,872 | 7 |
| 1940 | #121 | 2,087 | #2,478 | 9 |
| 1939 | #127 | 1,873 | #2,288 | 10 |
| 1938 | #124 | 1,949 | #2,326 | 10 |
| 1937 | #130 | 1,901 | #2,479 | 9 |
| 1936 | #128 | 1,823 | #2,062 | 12 |
| 1935 | #128 | 1,773 | #2,529 | 9 |
| 1934 | #125 | 1,844 | #1,783 | 16 |
| 1933 | #122 | 1,862 | #2,368 | 10 |
| 1932 | #130 | 1,759 | #2,465 | 10 |
| 1931 | #135 | 1,707 | #2,864 | 8 |
| 1930 | #134 | 1,770 | #2,444 | 11 |
| 1929 | #133 | 1,748 | #2,452 | 11 |
| 1928 | #129 | 1,873 | #3,076 | 8 |
| 1927 | #129 | 1,994 | #3,151 | 8 |
| 1926 | #131 | 2,022 | #3,385 | 7 |
| 1925 | #133 | 2,032 | #4,197 | 5 |
| 1924 | #116 | 2,313 | — | |
| 1923 | #123 | 2,185 | — | |
| 1922 | #118 | 2,220 | #2,801 | 10 |
| 1921 | #115 | 2,350 | #3,869 | 6 |
| 1920 | #111 | 2,364 | #2,967 | 9 |
| 1919 | #112 | 2,171 | #2,877 | 9 |
| 1918 | #109 | 2,295 | #4,179 | 5 |
| 1917 | #106 | 2,147 | — | |
| 1916 | #108 | 1,992 | — | |
| 1915 | #106 | 1,913 | #2,621 | 9 |
| 1914 | #108 | 1,488 | — | |
| 1913 | #114 | 1,121 | — | |
| 1912 | #121 | 962 | — | |
| 1911 | #123 | 687 | — | |
| 1910 | #128 | 633 | — | |
| 1909 | #127 | 559 | — | |
| 1908 | #127 | 546 | #1,373 | 5 |
| 1907 | #134 | 494 | — | |
| 1906 | #135 | 457 | — | |
| 1905 | #137 | 437 | — | |
| 1904 | #149 | 359 | — | |
| 1903 | #155 | 333 | — | |
| 1902 | #154 | 335 | — | |
| 1901 | #156 | 315 | — | |
| 1900 | #157 | 375 | — | |
| 1899 | #146 | 323 | — | |
| 1898 | #139 | 362 | — | |
| 1897 | #137 | 353 | — | |
| 1896 | #143 | 326 | — | |
| 1895 | #127 | 363 | — | |
| 1894 | #141 | 304 | — | |
| 1893 | #143 | 290 | — | |
| 1892 | #148 | 276 | — | |
| 1891 | #138 | 260 | — | |
| 1890 | #137 | 262 | — | |
| 1889 | #129 | 286 | — | |
| 1888 | #125 | 293 | — | |
| 1887 | #128 | 214 | — | |
| 1886 | #117 | 247 | — | |
| 1885 | #121 | 215 | — | |
| 1884 | #126 | 197 | — | |
| 1883 | #116 | 183 | — | |
| 1882 | #115 | 180 | — | |
| 1881 | #117 | 147 | — | |
| 1880 | #110 | 165 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Sara was already there! It came in at #110, and was given to 165 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1885, when fewer than 220 girls a year got the name.
Where Sara is popular in 1960
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Iowa#110 · 1 in 454
- Vermont#111 · 1 in 450
- Wisconsin#112 · 1 in 516
- South Carolina#113 · 1 in 492
- Kansas#120 · 1 in 500
Best ever in a state: #7 in Vermont, 1977.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa | #110 | 62 | 1 in 454 |
| Vermont | #111 | 8 | 1 in 450 |
| Wisconsin | #112 | 87 | 1 in 516 |
| South Carolina | #113 | 53 | 1 in 492 |
| Kansas | #120 | 42 | 1 in 500 |
| Nebraska | #132 | 25 | 1 in 579 |
| Delaware | #134 | 9 | 1 in 506 |
| New Hampshire | #135 | 9 | 1 in 609 |
| Minnesota | #148 | 57 | 1 in 680 |
| Indiana | #150 | 71 | 1 in 709 |
| District of Columbia | #151 | 19 | 1 in 695 |
| North Dakota | #151 | 11 | 1 in 602 |
| Connecticut | #152 | 29 | 1 in 849 |
| North Carolina | #155 | 64 | 1 in 759 |
| Arizona | #158 | 26 | 1 in 582 |
| Oregon | #160 | 24 | 1 in 674 |
| Texas | #160 | 156 | 1 in 727 |
| Massachusetts | #162 | 51 | 1 in 1,034 |
| Missouri | #162 | 58 | 1 in 772 |
| Tennessee | #169 | 41 | 1 in 888 |
| Alabama | #176 | 39 | 1 in 890 |
| Illinois | #178 | 115 | 1 in 936 |
| Michigan | #178 | 91 | 1 in 970 |
| New York | #184 | 171 | 1 in 981 |
| New Mexico | #189 | 16 | 1 in 772 |
| Georgia | #191 | 48 | 1 in 928 |
| Florida | #193 | 50 | 1 in 1,005 |
| Virginia | #193 | 35 | 1 in 1,137 |
| Mississippi | #197 | 24 | 1 in 1,056 |
| Rhode Island | #201 | 6 | 1 in 1,361 |
| South Dakota | #205 | 7 | 1 in 1,010 |
| Ohio | #206 | 83 | 1 in 1,267 |
| California | #207 | 167 | 1 in 1,034 |
| Idaho | #209 | 7 | 1 in 918 |
| Kentucky | #209 | 26 | 1 in 1,231 |
| Arkansas | #212 | 15 | 1 in 1,186 |
| Oklahoma | #216 | 18 | 1 in 1,165 |
| West Virginia | #217 | 13 | 1 in 1,338 |
| Maine | #218 | 7 | 1 in 1,420 |
| Washington | #225 | 25 | 1 in 1,131 |
| Colorado | #240 | 16 | 1 in 1,221 |
| Pennsylvania | #241 | 67 | 1 in 1,667 |
| Maryland | #247 | 20 | 1 in 1,508 |
| Utah | #269 | 8 | 1 in 1,333 |
| New Jersey | #285 | 25 | 1 in 2,312 |
| Louisiana | #315 | 21 | 1 in 1,849 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Sara
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 11 spots since 2024 (#187 → #198)
- 16 spots since 2020 (#182 → #198)
- 37 spots since 2015 (#161 → #198)
- Biggest jump: 28 spots in 1974 (#89 → #61)
- Biggest drop: 19 spots in 2020 (#163 → #182)
Rise & fade · girls
101 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1981 at #26 (11,359 births)
- Births halved by 1999, 18 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 36 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 36 yrs · run 1973–2008
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 147
- Highest: 1 in 147 girls born in 1981 were named Sara (0.68%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,025 girls born in 2025 (0.10%)
Era · girls
The 1980s
- 24.0% of all girls named Sara (104,682) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 2,127 | #110 (1880) | #120 |
| 1890s | 3,119 | #127 (1895) | #140 |
| 1900s | 4,210 | #127 (1909) | #143 |
| 1910s | 15,409 | #106 (1917) | #114 |
| 1920s | 21,101 | #111 (1920) | #124 |
| 1930s | 18,261 | #122 (1933) | #128 |
| 1940s | 20,275 | #121 (1940) | #134 |
| 1950s | 20,491 | #147 (1950) | #168 |
| 1960s | 23,044 | #124 (1969) | #161 |
| 1970s | 56,958 | #27 (1977) | #66 |
| 1980s | 104,682 | #26 (1981) | #29 |
| 1990s | 72,170 | #34 (1990) | #44 |
| 2000s | 44,056 | #57 (2000) | #73 |
| 2010s | 20,732 | #119 (2010) | #151 |
| 2020s | 9,558 | #178 (2022) | #188 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Sara in 1960
girls
#186
2,037 births · 1 in 993 girls
Top girls' names in 1960
More about 1960
girls
2,021,941 girls got a published name in 1960; 1 in 993 of them was named Sara, which outranked 97.5% of the 7,332 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Sara
Biggest movers since 1959
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.