Ruth

#173 for girls in 2025, 1,781 births · Last seen for boys in 2008 at #12,553
Given to girls 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1893 · 3,658 births
Debut · girls
234 births
In top 100 · girls
82 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
836,122
since 1880

Ruth over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100rank188019001920194019601980200020201989peak #3, 1893girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1731,781—
2024#1711,787—
2023#1871,604—
2022#1791,668—
2021#1871,579—
2020#2191,327—
2019#2311,351—
2018#2611,251—
2017#2641,213—
2016#2951,103—
2015#2911,110—
2014#3051,064—
2013#327993—
2012#338931—
2011#355907—
2010#345934—
2009#354916—
2008#355929#12,5535
2007#344964—
2006#363892—
2005#347908—
2004#349915—
2003#344897—
2002#334906—
2001#326951—
2000#339909—
1999#343875—
1998#342853—
1997#333857—
1996#346802—
1995#320853#7,7926
1994#308882—
1993#308861#8,7005
1992#319855—
1991#285985#8,2365
1990#305907#5,8238
1989#273987#4,27112
1988#256997#3,52314
1987#2481,031#4,5739
1986#2381,084#3,44013
1985#2321,116#4,3339
1984#2221,165#3,70111
1983#2231,121#3,63011
1982#2221,178#2,97215
1981#2071,267#5,4686
1980#2071,258#4,4958
1979#2161,202#4,4038
1978#2121,208#3,40011
1977#2121,192#4,1648
1976#2051,198#3,26411
1975#1991,230#5,4645
1974#1951,299#5,2275
1973#2011,273#2,60614
1972#2011,383—
1971#1901,629#2,81312
1970#1781,817#2,89111
1969#1681,900#3,3148
1968#1492,151#3,1078
1967#1452,420#2,03015
1966#1282,845#2,46511
1965#1183,231#2,36612
1964#1143,640#1,97517
1963#1133,869#1,95717
1962#1044,294#1,71322
1961#964,896#2,40912
1960#974,943#1,97317
1959#975,057#2,41412
1958#905,247#2,26513
1957#845,667#1,79120
1956#776,075#2,26313
1955#706,187#1,90217
1954#666,566#2,9428
1953#626,582#2,7099
1952#576,953#1,85617
1951#537,076#2,36711
1950#497,128#2,43810
1949#477,651#1,61621
1948#457,903#2,02714
1947#448,482#1,48225
1946#388,474#1,27830
1945#338,046#1,58118
1944#328,674#1,17332
1943#339,370#1,03742
1942#339,315#1,02643
1941#288,863#1,04039
1940#248,888#1,09036
1939#229,062#86750
1938#219,303#96343
1937#159,602#88049
1936#169,217#94043
1935#159,988#87252
1934#1310,565#76265
1933#1311,136#86052
1932#1112,257#70876
1931#1113,132#80860
1930#1014,942#76570
1929#816,021#76370
1928#617,859#78668
1927#619,412#66891
1926#620,225#74973
1925#622,247#74677
1924#623,601#79771
1923#623,637#86062
1922#523,633#78073
1921#525,783#92058
1920#526,102#94054
1919#524,562#82263
1918#525,535#97547
1917#523,568#90050
1916#523,189#84055
1915#521,878#91646
1914#515,839#77746
1913#512,609#83533
1912#511,280#63543
1911#58,003#56229
1910#57,212#46135
1909#46,509#65317
1908#46,180#56620
1907#55,573#66415
1906#55,140#52319
1905#55,068#50720
1904#54,900#58715
1903#54,517#61913
1902#54,384#52117
1901#53,974#50615
1900#54,765#62316
1899#53,912#7149
1898#54,249#54315
1897#53,878#42220
1896#53,905#64112
1895#63,551#8727
1894#63,372#52115
1893#33,658#57212
1892#53,290#59712
1891#191,857—
1890#461,195#9945
1889#461,073—
1888#59850—
1887#62627#9215
1886#66581—
1885#70506#9365
1884#74442—
1883#73387—
1882#80323—
1881#84275—
1880#93234—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Ruth was already there! It came in at #93, and was given to 234 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1882, when fewer than 330 girls a year got the name.

Where Ruth is popular in 1989

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: #119 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 442 girlsAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Ruth, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Ruth, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Ruth, so not publishedNHWashington: #325 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 1,966 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Ruth, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Ruth, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Ruth, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #229 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 1,489 girlsMNIllinois: #311 for girls · 38 births · 1 in 2,034 girlsILWisconsin: #204 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 1,274 girlsWIMichigan: #365 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 2,628 girlsMINew York: #225 for girls · 85 births · 1 in 1,397 girlsNYMassachusetts: #245 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 1,604 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Ruth, so not publishedRIOregon: #379 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,295 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Ruth, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Ruth, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Ruth, so not publishedSDIowa: #261 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 1,586 girlsIAIndiana: #188 for girls · 31 births · 1 in 1,108 girlsINOhio: #314 for girls · 31 births · 1 in 2,253 girlsOHPennsylvania: #226 for girls · 49 births · 1 in 1,466 girlsPANew Jersey: #384 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 2,666 girlsNJConnecticut: #312 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,124 girlsCTCalifornia: #196 for girls · 227 births · 1 in 1,075 girlsCAUtah: #249 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 1,222 girlsUTColorado: #442 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,940 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Ruth, so not publishedNEMissouri: #278 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,913 girlsMOKentucky: #301 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,129 girlsKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Ruth, so not publishedWVVirginia: #246 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 1,613 girlsVAMaryland: #244 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,630 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Ruth, so not publishedDEArizona: #285 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,496 girlsAZNew Mexico: #317 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,526 girlsNMKansas: #331 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,018 girlsKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Ruth, so not publishedARTennessee: #322 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 2,128 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #661 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 5,812 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #306 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 1,980 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: #100 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 307 girlsDCOklahoma: #270 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 1,568 girlsOKLouisiana: #422 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,575 girlsLAMississippi: #445 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,739 girlsMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Ruth, so not publishedALGeorgia: #429 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 2,989 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Ruth, so not publishedHITexas: #231 for girls · 100 births · 1 in 1,334 girlsTXFlorida: #252 for girls · 47 births · 1 in 1,639 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. District of Columbia#100 · 1 in 307
  2. Alaska#119 · 1 in 442
  3. Indiana#188 · 1 in 1,108
  4. California#196 · 1 in 1,075
  5. Wisconsin#204 · 1 in 1,274

Best ever in a state: #1 in Nevada, 1914.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
District of Columbia#10051 in 307
Alaska#11981 in 442
Indiana#188311 in 1,108
California#1962271 in 1,075
Wisconsin#204231 in 1,274
New York#225851 in 1,397
Pennsylvania#226491 in 1,466
Minnesota#229191 in 1,489
Texas#2311001 in 1,334
Maryland#244171 in 1,630
Massachusetts#245241 in 1,604
Virginia#246231 in 1,613
Utah#249111 in 1,222
Florida#252471 in 1,639
Iowa#261101 in 1,586
Oklahoma#270111 in 1,568
Missouri#278171 in 1,913
Arizona#285171 in 1,496
Kentucky#301101 in 2,129
South Carolina#306101 in 1,980
Illinois#311381 in 2,034
Connecticut#31291 in 2,124
Ohio#314311 in 2,253
New Mexico#31761 in 1,526
Tennessee#322141 in 2,128
Washington#325151 in 1,966
Kansas#33171 in 2,018
Michigan#365231 in 2,628
Oregon#37971 in 2,295
New Jersey#384181 in 2,666
Louisiana#422101 in 2,575
Georgia#429141 in 2,989
Colorado#44271 in 2,940
Mississippi#44551 in 2,739
North Carolina#66171 in 5,812
Alabama———
Arkansas———
Delaware———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Maine———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
North Dakota———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Vermont———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Ruth
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 2 spots since 2024 (#171 → #173)
  • 46 spots since 2020 (#219 → #173)
  • 118 spots since 2015 (#291 → #173)
  • Biggest jump: 32 spots in 2021 (#219 → #187)
  • Biggest drop: 34 spots in 1992 (#285 → #319)
Rise & fade · girls
13 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1893 at #3 (3,658 births)
  • Births halved by 1970, 77 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 10 for 39 yrs
  • Top 10: 39 yrs · run 1892–1930
  • Top 100: 82 yrs · run 1880–1961
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 45
  • Highest: 1 in 45 girls born in 1915 were named Ruth (2.2%)
  • Latest: 1 in 902 girls born in 2025 (0.11%)
  • Its best rank, #3 in 1893, was only 1 in 58 (1.7%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 26.1% of all girls named Ruth (218,520) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s5,298#46 (1889)#71
1890s32,867#3 (1893)#11
1900s51,010#4 (1909)#5
1910s173,675#5 (1918)#5
1920s218,520#5 (1920)#6
1930s109,204#10 (1930)#15
1940s85,666#24 (1940)#36
1950s62,538#49 (1950)#71
1960s34,189#96 (1961)#123
1970s13,431#178 (1970)#201
1980s11,204#207 (1981)#233
1990s8,730#285 (1991)#321
2000s9,187#326 (2001)#346
2010s10,857#231 (2019)#301
2020s9,746#171 (2024)#186

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Ruth in 1989

girls
#273
987 births · 1 in 1,868 girls
boys
#4,271
12 births · 1 in 166,744 boys

Top girls' names in 1989

  1. #1Jessica47,887
  2. #2Ashley47,588
  3. #3Brittany37,792
  4. #4Amanda36,834
  5. #5Sarah27,797
  6. #6Samantha24,792
  7. #7Jennifer24,006
  8. #8Stephanie22,766
  9. #9Lauren21,065
  10. #10Elizabeth20,298
  11. #273Ruth987

Top boys' names in 1989

  1. #1Michael65,415
  2. #2Christopher53,186
  3. #3Matthew45,375
  4. #4Joshua44,100
  5. #5David35,225
  6. #6Daniel35,007
  7. #7Andrew34,817
  8. #8Justin32,852
  9. #9James32,720
  10. #10Robert30,072
  11. #4,271Ruth12
More about 1989

girls

1,843,552 girls got a published name in 1989; 1 in 1,868 of them was named Ruth, which outranked 98.1% of the 14,550 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Ruth
  1. #270Donna992
  2. #271Naomi991
  3. #272Regina990
  4. #273Ruth987
  5. #274Lori986
  6. #275Kaylee985
  7. #276Trisha980
Biggest movers since 1988
Risers
  1. ↑ 9,523Audriana#10,386 → #863
  2. ↑ 7,504Martika#8,391 → #887
  3. ↑ 6,932Audrianna#7,691 → #759
  4. ↑ 3,972Elizabet#4,496 → #524
  5. ↑ 1,772Katherin#2,489 → #717
Fallers
  1. ↓ 539Diandra#905 → #1,444
  2. ↓ 524Taja#720 → #1,244
  3. ↓ 455Jonathan#999 → #1,454
  4. ↓ 445Katarina#960 → #1,405
  5. ↓ 397Caryn#816 → #1,213

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

2,000,928 boys got a published name in 1989; 1 in 166,744 of them was named Ruth, which outranked 53.7% of the 9,232 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 20.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Ruth
  1. #4,017Wynn13
  2. #4,017Zan13
  3. #4,017Zebulun13
  4. #4,271Ruth12
  5. #4,271Adair12
  6. #4,271Aeron12
  7. #4,271Ahron12
  8. #4,527Aaren11
  9. #4,527Abbas11
  10. #4,527Abdon11

Tied with 255 names at #4,271; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1988
Risers
  1. ↑ 6,314Kiara#7,270 → #956
  2. ↑ 5,870Alexande#6,426 → #556
  3. ↑ 1,111Kwame#1,768 → #657
  4. ↑ 766Kadeem#1,467 → #701
  5. ↑ 684Hakeem#1,270 → #586
Fallers
  1. ↓ 839Long#819 → #1,658
  2. ↓ 337Darell#981 → #1,318
  3. ↓ 294Whitney#890 → #1,184
  4. ↓ 269Trevin#840 → #1,109
  5. ↓ 252Curt#850 → #1,102

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1989 →