Rubin
Last seen for girls in 1968 at #7,016 · #5,399 for boys in 2025, 17 births
Given to boys 99.8% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1907 · 35 births
- Debut · boys
- 14 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 7,054since 1880
Rubin over time
Rank among boys' names. Rubin has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #5,399 | 17 | |
| 2024 | — | #6,469 | 13 | |
| 2023 | — | #6,517 | 13 | |
| 2022 | — | #5,019 | 19 | |
| 2021 | — | #4,362 | 23 | |
| 2020 | — | #5,235 | 17 | |
| 2019 | — | #5,153 | 18 | |
| 2018 | — | #4,918 | 19 | |
| 2017 | — | #5,526 | 16 | |
| 2016 | — | #5,124 | 18 | |
| 2015 | — | #3,513 | 31 | |
| 2014 | — | #3,617 | 29 | |
| 2013 | — | #4,621 | 20 | |
| 2012 | — | #5,256 | 17 | |
| 2011 | — | #4,221 | 23 | |
| 2010 | — | #3,994 | 25 | |
| 2009 | — | #6,436 | 13 | |
| 2008 | — | #3,561 | 30 | |
| 2007 | — | #4,996 | 18 | |
| 2006 | — | #3,024 | 36 | |
| 2005 | — | #3,528 | 27 | |
| 2004 | — | #2,953 | 34 | |
| 2003 | — | #3,186 | 29 | |
| 2002 | — | #2,817 | 33 | |
| 2001 | — | #3,228 | 27 | |
| 2000 | — | #2,736 | 33 | |
| 1999 | — | #2,722 | 31 | |
| 1998 | — | #2,711 | 30 | |
| 1997 | — | #2,260 | 37 | |
| 1996 | — | #2,332 | 34 | |
| 1995 | — | #2,626 | 28 | |
| 1994 | — | #2,259 | 35 | |
| 1993 | — | #2,399 | 31 | |
| 1992 | — | #1,955 | 41 | |
| 1991 | — | #1,744 | 46 | |
| 1990 | — | #1,968 | 38 | |
| 1989 | — | #1,705 | 45 | |
| 1988 | — | #1,501 | 50 | |
| 1987 | — | #1,587 | 44 | |
| 1986 | — | #1,457 | 47 | |
| 1985 | — | #1,698 | 36 | |
| 1984 | — | #1,458 | 43 | |
| 1983 | — | #1,490 | 41 | |
| 1982 | — | #1,563 | 39 | |
| 1981 | — | #1,433 | 44 | |
| 1980 | — | #1,910 | 29 | |
| 1979 | — | #1,241 | 55 | |
| 1978 | — | #1,240 | 52 | |
| 1977 | — | #1,187 | 55 | |
| 1976 | — | #1,084 | 60 | |
| 1975 | — | #1,322 | 43 | |
| 1974 | — | #1,115 | 54 | |
| 1973 | — | #1,023 | 62 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,083 | 56 | |
| 1971 | — | #1,047 | 60 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,043 | 61 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,075 | 52 | |
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | #1,083 | 47 |
| 1967 | — | #981 | 55 | |
| 1966 | — | #998 | 53 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,129 | 44 | |
| 1964 | #6,767 | 5 | #982 | 59 |
| 1963 | — | #886 | 71 | |
| 1962 | — | #879 | 75 | |
| 1961 | — | #882 | 75 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,008 | 58 | |
| 1959 | #5,566 | 6 | #1,034 | 55 |
| 1958 | — | #936 | 66 | |
| 1957 | — | #957 | 63 | |
| 1956 | — | #822 | 82 | |
| 1955 | — | #780 | 87 | |
| 1954 | — | #819 | 78 | |
| 1953 | — | #908 | 62 | |
| 1952 | — | #850 | 67 | |
| 1951 | — | #763 | 84 | |
| 1950 | — | #800 | 72 | |
| 1949 | — | #782 | 77 | |
| 1948 | — | #733 | 84 | |
| 1947 | — | #815 | 72 | |
| 1946 | — | #869 | 57 | |
| 1945 | — | #899 | 50 | |
| 1944 | — | #824 | 58 | |
| 1943 | — | #875 | 58 | |
| 1942 | — | #947 | 49 | |
| 1941 | — | #850 | 55 | |
| 1940 | — | #881 | 51 | |
| 1939 | — | #818 | 55 | |
| 1938 | — | #808 | 59 | |
| 1937 | — | #845 | 52 | |
| 1936 | — | #816 | 56 | |
| 1935 | — | #785 | 62 | |
| 1934 | — | #836 | 56 | |
| 1933 | — | #721 | 71 | |
| 1932 | — | #677 | 81 | |
| 1931 | — | #733 | 70 | |
| 1930 | — | #640 | 92 | |
| 1929 | — | #695 | 79 | |
| 1928 | — | #610 | 100 | |
| 1927 | — | #634 | 99 | |
| 1926 | — | #595 | 112 | |
| 1925 | — | #608 | 108 | |
| 1924 | — | #556 | 128 | |
| 1923 | — | #502 | 147 | |
| 1922 | — | #568 | 125 | |
| 1921 | — | #611 | 107 | |
| 1920 | — | #578 | 116 | |
| 1919 | — | #541 | 122 | |
| 1918 | — | #532 | 130 | |
| 1917 | — | #532 | 119 | |
| 1916 | — | #491 | 134 | |
| 1915 | — | #462 | 141 | |
| 1914 | — | #459 | 110 | |
| 1913 | — | #445 | 93 | |
| 1912 | — | #463 | 73 | |
| 1911 | — | #409 | 49 | |
| 1910 | — | #430 | 40 | |
| 1909 | — | #462 | 30 | |
| 1908 | — | #522 | 23 | |
| 1907 | — | #381 | 35 | |
| 1906 | — | #394 | 30 | |
| 1905 | — | #421 | 26 | |
| 1904 | — | #587 | 15 | |
| 1903 | — | #550 | 16 | |
| 1902 | — | #440 | 22 | |
| 1901 | — | #536 | 14 | |
| 1900 | — | #477 | 23 | |
| 1899 | — | #714 | 9 | |
| 1898 | — | #505 | 17 | |
| 1897 | — | #556 | 14 | |
| 1896 | — | #592 | 13 | |
| 1895 | — | #872 | 7 | |
| 1894 | — | #668 | 10 | |
| 1893 | — | #768 | 8 | |
| 1892 | — | #641 | 11 | |
| 1891 | — | #497 | 13 | |
| 1890 | — | #533 | 13 | |
| 1889 | — | #722 | 8 | |
| 1888 | — | #648 | 10 | |
| 1887 | — | #679 | 8 | |
| 1886 | — | #694 | 8 | |
| 1885 | — | #641 | 9 | |
| 1884 | — | #663 | 9 | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | #540 | 12 | |
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | #482 | 14 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Rubin was already there! It came in at #482, and was given to 14 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1881, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Rubin is popular in 1968
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New York#629 · 1 in 13,433
- California#913 · 1 in 23,887
Best ever in a state: #142 in New York, 1910.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York | #629 | 11 | 1 in 13,433 |
| California | #913 | 7 | 1 in 23,887 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Rubin
- 1,070 spots since 2024 (#6,469 → #5,399)
- 164 spots since 2020 (#5,235 → #5,399)
- 1,886 spots since 2015 (#3,513 → #5,399)
- Biggest jump: 280 spots in 1896 (#872 → #592)
- Biggest drop: 209 spots in 1899 (#505 → #714)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1907 at #381 (35 births)
- Births halved by 2009, 102 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 83 yrs · run 1884–1958
- Highest: 1 in 4,195 boys born in 1907 were named Rubin (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 100,475 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 15.9% of all boys named Rubin (1,121) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 78 | #482 (1880) | #634 |
| 1890s | 115 | #497 (1891) | #635 |
| 1900s | 234 | #381 (1907) | #477 |
| 1910s | 1,011 | #409 (1911) | #476 |
| 1920s | 1,121 | #502 (1923) | #596 |
| 1930s | 654 | #640 (1930) | #768 |
| 1940s | 611 | #733 (1948) | #848 |
| 1950s | 716 | #763 (1951) | #867 |
| 1960s | 589 | #879 (1962) | #990 |
| 1970s | 558 | #1,023 (1973) | #1,139 |
| 1980s | 418 | #1,433 (1981) | #1,580 |
| 1990s | 351 | #1,744 (1991) | #2,298 |
| 2000s | 280 | #2,736 (2000) | #3,647 |
| 2010s | 216 | #3,513 (2015) | #4,594 |
| 2020s | 102 | #4,362 (2021) | #5,500 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Rubin in 1968
Top girls' names in 1968
Top boys' names in 1968
More about 1968
girls
1,640,389 girls got a published name in 1968; 1 in 328,078 of them was named Rubin, which outranked 14.4% of the 8,198 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Tied with 1,182 names at #7,016; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,737,974 boys got a published name in 1968; 1 in 36,978 of them was named Rubin, which outranked 77.2% of the 4,746 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 28.3% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,068Rosario48
- #1,068Shanon48
- #1,068Val48
- #1,083Rubin47
- #1,083Ambrose47
- #1,083Buford47
- #1,083Cyril47
- #1,100Benson46
- #1,100Demetrios46
- #1,100Dickie46
Tied with 16 names at #1,083; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.