Roxanne
#1,309 for girls in 2025, 170 births · Last seen for boys in 1988 at #5,200
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1954 · 2,232 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 59,532since 1906
Roxanne over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Roxanne has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,309 | 170 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,275 | 182 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,310 | 173 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,371 | 169 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,175 | 208 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,120 | 215 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,180 | 199 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,262 | 183 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,248 | 190 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,284 | 188 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,311 | 181 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,164 | 211 | — | |
| 2013 | #988 | 253 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,035 | 245 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,019 | 245 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,051 | 236 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,017 | 258 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,104 | 234 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,196 | 211 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,173 | 207 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,061 | 225 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,043 | 222 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,146 | 189 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,077 | 197 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,127 | 186 | — | |
| 2000 | #946 | 225 | — | |
| 1999 | #896 | 237 | — | |
| 1998 | #831 | 256 | — | |
| 1997 | #783 | 266 | — | |
| 1996 | #671 | 330 | — | |
| 1995 | #638 | 341 | — | |
| 1994 | #598 | 376 | — | |
| 1993 | #527 | 459 | — | |
| 1992 | #431 | 585 | — | |
| 1991 | #403 | 634 | — | |
| 1990 | #336 | 803 | — | |
| 1989 | #277 | 975 | — | |
| 1988 | #218 | 1,191 | #5,200 | 8 |
| 1987 | #250 | 1,021 | #3,959 | 11 |
| 1986 | #302 | 811 | — | |
| 1985 | #285 | 878 | #6,523 | 5 |
| 1984 | #317 | 749 | — | |
| 1983 | #287 | 818 | #6,238 | 5 |
| 1982 | #277 | 879 | — | |
| 1981 | #285 | 852 | #6,262 | 5 |
| 1980 | #285 | 870 | — | |
| 1979 | #278 | 879 | — | |
| 1978 | #307 | 760 | — | |
| 1977 | #316 | 751 | — | |
| 1976 | #328 | 679 | — | |
| 1975 | #309 | 744 | — | |
| 1974 | #316 | 722 | — | |
| 1973 | #321 | 702 | — | |
| 1972 | #288 | 883 | — | |
| 1971 | #277 | 1,036 | — | |
| 1970 | #289 | 1,013 | #4,724 | 5 |
| 1969 | #268 | 1,090 | — | |
| 1968 | #267 | 1,015 | — | |
| 1967 | #268 | 1,005 | — | |
| 1966 | #244 | 1,186 | — | |
| 1965 | #242 | 1,271 | — | |
| 1964 | #241 | 1,324 | — | |
| 1963 | #220 | 1,527 | — | |
| 1962 | #219 | 1,515 | — | |
| 1961 | #202 | 1,724 | #3,652 | 6 |
| 1960 | #193 | 1,920 | — | |
| 1959 | #202 | 1,707 | #3,988 | 5 |
| 1958 | #205 | 1,586 | — | |
| 1957 | #198 | 1,774 | — | |
| 1956 | #172 | 2,114 | #3,942 | 5 |
| 1955 | #165 | 2,092 | — | |
| 1954 | #158 | 2,232 | — | |
| 1953 | #178 | 1,763 | — | |
| 1952 | #187 | 1,578 | — | |
| 1951 | #234 | 1,080 | — | |
| 1950 | #296 | 682 | — | |
| 1949 | #436 | 331 | — | |
| 1948 | #471 | 290 | — | |
| 1947 | #502 | 270 | — | |
| 1946 | #517 | 232 | — | |
| 1945 | #515 | 198 | — | |
| 1944 | #547 | 175 | — | |
| 1943 | #565 | 179 | — | |
| 1942 | #720 | 107 | — | |
| 1941 | #661 | 115 | — | |
| 1940 | #732 | 90 | — | |
| 1939 | #862 | 66 | — | |
| 1938 | #899 | 62 | — | |
| 1937 | #940 | 54 | — | |
| 1936 | #941 | 53 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,331 | 30 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,440 | 26 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,513 | 24 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,597 | 23 | — | |
| 1931 | #2,105 | 15 | — | |
| 1930 | #2,845 | 10 | — | |
| 1929 | #3,137 | 9 | — | |
| 1928 | #2,954 | 10 | — | |
| 1927 | #3,561 | 8 | — | |
| 1926 | #2,708 | 12 | — | |
| 1925 | #3,362 | 9 | — | |
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | #3,125 | 10 | — | |
| 1922 | #4,445 | 6 | — | |
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | #3,957 | 7 | — | |
| 1919 | #3,817 | 7 | — | |
| 1918 | #4,291 | 6 | — | |
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | #3,187 | 5 | — | |
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | #1,727 | 6 | — | |
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1906
The first year at least five girls were named Roxanne! It came in at #1,727, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1907–1917, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Roxanne is popular in 1965
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Hawaii#65 · 1 in 236
- North Dakota#82 · 1 in 267
- New Hampshire#109 · 1 in 459
- Minnesota#112 · 1 in 462
- South Dakota#117 · 1 in 429
Best ever in a state: #29 in Hawaii, 1955.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawaii | #65 | 23 | 1 in 236 |
| North Dakota | #82 | 19 | 1 in 267 |
| New Hampshire | #109 | 11 | 1 in 459 |
| Minnesota | #112 | 68 | 1 in 462 |
| South Dakota | #117 | 12 | 1 in 429 |
| Wyoming | #128 | 5 | 1 in 405 |
| Washington | #132 | 41 | 1 in 540 |
| Wisconsin | #135 | 56 | 1 in 654 |
| Alaska | #139 | 5 | 1 in 457 |
| Maine | #139 | 14 | 1 in 586 |
| Louisiana | #145 | 56 | 1 in 597 |
| Iowa | #147 | 33 | 1 in 671 |
| Montana | #157 | 8 | 1 in 608 |
| Maryland | #178 | 31 | 1 in 910 |
| Nebraska | #188 | 13 | 1 in 888 |
| Idaho | #198 | 6 | 1 in 782 |
| Michigan | #204 | 66 | 1 in 1,118 |
| Colorado | #207 | 17 | 1 in 935 |
| District of Columbia | #207 | 12 | 1 in 975 |
| Rhode Island | #207 | 5 | 1 in 1,461 |
| Connecticut | #210 | 18 | 1 in 1,279 |
| Pennsylvania | #211 | 75 | 1 in 1,240 |
| New York | #214 | 139 | 1 in 1,106 |
| Illinois | #237 | 65 | 1 in 1,404 |
| California | #238 | 130 | 1 in 1,244 |
| Indiana | #241 | 30 | 1 in 1,432 |
| Kansas | #248 | 13 | 1 in 1,184 |
| Virginia | #251 | 23 | 1 in 1,586 |
| New Mexico | #267 | 8 | 1 in 1,211 |
| Ohio | #285 | 45 | 1 in 1,956 |
| Mississippi | #287 | 13 | 1 in 1,600 |
| New Jersey | #296 | 26 | 1 in 2,071 |
| North Carolina | #297 | 19 | 1 in 2,200 |
| Oregon | #298 | 8 | 1 in 1,683 |
| South Carolina | #301 | 12 | 1 in 1,877 |
| Missouri | #309 | 16 | 1 in 2,277 |
| Arizona | #311 | 9 | 1 in 1,488 |
| Utah | #327 | 5 | 1 in 1,726 |
| Massachusetts | #338 | 14 | 1 in 3,374 |
| Texas | #391 | 40 | 1 in 2,398 |
| Tennessee | #397 | 9 | 1 in 3,556 |
| Florida | #398 | 15 | 1 in 2,960 |
| Alabama | #418 | 9 | 1 in 3,277 |
| Kentucky | #444 | 6 | 1 in 4,464 |
| Georgia | #501 | 9 | 1 in 4,538 |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Roxanne
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 34 spots since 2024 (#1,275 → #1,309)
- 189 spots since 2020 (#1,120 → #1,309)
- 2 spots since 2015 (#1,311 → #1,309)
- Biggest jump: 390 spots in 1936 (#1,331 → #941)
- Biggest drop: 181 spots in 2001 (#946 → #1,127)
Rise & fade · girls
48 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1906
- Peaked 1954 at #158 (2,232 births)
- Births halved by 1967, 13 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 66 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 66 yrs · run 1936–2000
Share of babies · girls
1 in 870
- Highest: 1 in 870 girls born in 1954 were named Roxanne (0.11%)
- Latest: 1 in 9,455 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1950s
- 27.9% of all girls named Roxanne (16,608) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 6 | #1,727 (1906) | #1,727 |
| 1910s | 18 | #3,187 (1913) | #3,765 |
| 1920s | 71 | #2,708 (1926) | #3,406 |
| 1930s | 363 | #862 (1939) | #1,447 |
| 1940s | 1,987 | #436 (1949) | #567 |
| 1950s | 16,608 | #158 (1954) | #200 |
| 1960s | 13,577 | #193 (1960) | #236 |
| 1970s | 8,169 | #277 (1971) | #303 |
| 1980s | 9,044 | #218 (1988) | #278 |
| 1990s | 4,287 | #336 (1990) | #611 |
| 2000s | 2,154 | #946 (2000) | #1,089 |
| 2010s | 2,131 | #988 (2013) | #1,154 |
| 2020s | 1,117 | #1,120 (2020) | #1,260 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Roxanne in 1965
girls
#242
1,271 births · 1 in 1,389 girls
Top girls' names in 1965
More about 1965
girls
1,765,164 girls got a published name in 1965; 1 in 1,389 of them was named Roxanne, which outranked 96.8% of the 7,535 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Roxanne
Biggest movers since 1964
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.