Rosemary

#251 for girls in 2025, 1,222 births · Last seen for boys in 1990 at #8,117
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1946 · 4,486 births
Debut · girls
9 births
In top 100 · girls
20 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
163,165
since 1882

Rosemary over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202020peak #74, 1946girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#2511,222—
2024#3011,048—
2023#310995—
2022#364873—
2021#363846—
2020#442698—
2019#402771—
2018#452699—
2017#453699—
2016#436740—
2015#517607—
2014#570537—
2013#531563—
2012#600479—
2011#651439—
2010#712396—
2009#716404—
2008#746398—
2007#720406—
2006#686411—
2005#745362—
2004#712376—
2003#658403—
2002#632403—
2001#624401—
2000#631397—
1999#629375—
1998#608395—
1997#651339—
1996#554421—
1995#570403—
1994#572402—
1993#594395—
1992#560420—
1991#550429—
1990#509472#8,1175
1989#504466#5,6158
1988#510431—
1987#476455—
1986#455473—
1985#431512—
1984#429490—
1983#433489#6,2385
1982#420532—
1981#400565#4,5098
1980#395576—
1979#427489—
1978#441453—
1977#444460#5,1236
1976#404497—
1975#384534—
1974#348624—
1973#349609—
1972#357617—
1971#341743#4,3756
1970#331797—
1969#322794#3,5957
1968#296876#3,6736
1967#281914#3,5596
1966#2541,122—
1965#2411,276#2,9828
1964#2141,629#3,2827
1963#2051,729#4,0485
1962#1951,939#2,8489
1961#1812,133—
1960#1812,192—
1959#1732,230#3,6196
1958#1712,223—
1957#1682,275#3,2577
1956#1752,066#3,2167
1955#1712,015#3,8865
1954#1602,192#2,7439
1953#1472,432—
1952#1302,787—
1951#1093,345#3,0667
1950#1013,455#3,0217
1949#983,633#3,0197
1948#903,870#2,32611
1947#804,542—
1946#744,486#2,6908
1945#793,500#3,3385
1944#992,744#2,08012
1943#972,966#2,18212
1942#923,005#2,26811
1941#942,677#2,4919
1940#852,874#2,32210
1939#932,612#2,8297
1938#952,681#2,18511
1937#1102,307#2,19711
1936#1112,148#2,6298
1935#972,394#2,9517
1934#1112,132#2,7428
1933#1022,227#2,7388
1932#1002,483#2,46510
1931#882,722#2,00314
1930#823,151—
1929#803,107#2,09614
1928#882,972#3,0768
1927#863,153#2,40812
1926#952,900#3,7086
1925#1032,755#4,1975
1924#1062,734#4,3475
1923#1102,427#4,2395
1922#1202,170—
1921#1282,034—
1920#1411,713—
1919#1651,330—
1918#1711,259—
1917#1761,124—
1916#184996—
1915#201820—
1914#224563—
1913#245388—
1912#259298—
1911#312160—
1910#325141—
1909#323123—
1908#37591—
1907#37687—
1906#44061—
1905#42364—
1904#43854—
1903#46148—
1902#52837—
1901#57729—
1900#53140—
1899#64423—
1898#59729—
1897#55429—
1896#75418—
1895#63823—
1894#90512—
1893#59423—
1892#72616—
1891#83911—
1890#66716—
1889#68714—
1888#9598—
1887#69311—
1886#69311—
1885#1,0475—
1884#8517—
1883#6928—
1882#6349—
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1882

The first year at least five girls were named Rosemary! It came in at #634, and was given to 9 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1884–1885, when fewer than 8 girls a year got the name.

Where Rosemary is popular in 2020

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Rosemary, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Rosemary, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Rosemary, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: #211 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 692 girlsNHWashington: #351 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 1,456 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Rosemary, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Rosemary, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Rosemary, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #397 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 1,666 girlsMNIllinois: #368 for girls · 30 births · 1 in 1,625 girlsILWisconsin: #304 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,222 girlsWIMichigan: #314 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 1,305 girlsMINew York: #683 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 3,460 girlsNYMassachusetts: #308 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 1,326 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Rosemary, so not publishedRIOregon: #300 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,091 girlsORNevada: #365 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,393 girlsNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Rosemary, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Rosemary, so not publishedSDIowa: #284 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 1,047 girlsIAIndiana: #403 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,648 girlsINOhio: #345 for girls · 33 births · 1 in 1,452 girlsOHPennsylvania: #589 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 2,686 girlsPANew Jersey: #667 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 3,167 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Rosemary, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #459 for girls · 77 births · 1 in 2,263 girlsCAUtah: #345 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,343 girlsUTColorado: #354 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 1,436 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Rosemary, so not publishedNEMissouri: #193 for girls · 30 births · 1 in 816 girlsMOKentucky: #391 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 1,536 girlsKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Rosemary, so not publishedWVVirginia: #337 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 1,422 girlsVAMaryland: #401 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 1,594 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Rosemary, so not publishedDEArizona: #573 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 2,515 girlsAZNew Mexico: #319 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,030 girlsNMKansas: #442 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,636 girlsKSArkansas: #350 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 1,291 girlsARTennessee: #299 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 1,265 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #447 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 1,897 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Rosemary, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: #170 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 486 girlsDCOklahoma: #427 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 1,642 girlsOKLouisiana: #382 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 1,423 girlsLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Rosemary, so not publishedMSAlabama: #399 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,559 girlsALGeorgia: #497 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 2,118 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Rosemary, so not publishedHITexas: #649 for girls · 47 births · 1 in 3,254 girlsTXFlorida: #610 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 2,980 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. District of Columbia#170 · 1 in 486
  2. Missouri#193 · 1 in 816
  3. New Hampshire#211 · 1 in 692
  4. Iowa#284 · 1 in 1,047
  5. Tennessee#299 · 1 in 1,265

Best ever in a state: #25 in Indiana, 1923.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
District of Columbia#17061 in 486
Missouri#193301 in 816
New Hampshire#21151 in 692
Iowa#284111 in 1,047
Tennessee#299241 in 1,265
Oregon#300121 in 1,091
Wisconsin#304171 in 1,222
Massachusetts#308181 in 1,326
Michigan#314291 in 1,305
New Mexico#31951 in 1,030
Virginia#337241 in 1,422
Ohio#345331 in 1,452
Utah#345121 in 1,343
Arkansas#35081 in 1,291
Washington#351201 in 1,456
Colorado#354151 in 1,436
Nevada#36571 in 1,393
Illinois#368301 in 1,625
Louisiana#382131 in 1,423
Kentucky#391111 in 1,536
Minnesota#397131 in 1,666
Alabama#399121 in 1,559
Maryland#401141 in 1,594
Indiana#403171 in 1,648
Oklahoma#42791 in 1,642
Kansas#44271 in 1,636
North Carolina#447231 in 1,897
California#459771 in 2,263
Georgia#497211 in 2,118
Arizona#573111 in 2,515
Pennsylvania#589181 in 2,686
Florida#610271 in 2,980
Texas#649471 in 3,254
New Jersey#667111 in 3,167
New York#683231 in 3,460
Alaska———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Maine———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
North Dakota———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Vermont———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Rosemary
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 50 spots since 2024 (#301 → #251)
  • 191 spots since 2020 (#442 → #251)
  • 266 spots since 2015 (#517 → #251)
  • Biggest jump: 354 spots in 1886 (#1,047 → #693)
  • Biggest drop: 311 spots in 1894 (#594 → #905)
Rise & fade · girls
64 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1882
  • Peaked 1946 at #74 (4,486 births)
  • Births halved by 1954, 8 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 20 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 20 yrs · run 1938–1949
  • Top 1,000: 143 yrs · run 1886–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 350
  • Highest: 1 in 350 girls born in 1946 were named Rosemary (0.29%)
  • Latest: 1 in 1,315 girls born in 2025 (0.08%)
Era · girls
The 1940s
  • 21.0% of all girls named Rosemary (34,297) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s73#634 (1882)#782
1890s200#554 (1897)#692
1900s634#323 (1909)#447
1910s7,079#165 (1919)#226
1920s25,965#80 (1929)#106
1930s24,857#82 (1930)#99
1940s34,297#74 (1946)#89
1950s25,020#101 (1950)#151
1960s14,604#181 (1960)#237
1970s5,823#331 (1970)#383
1980s4,989#395 (1980)#445
1990s4,051#509 (1990)#580
2000s3,961#624 (2001)#687
2010s5,930#402 (2019)#532
2020s5,682#251 (2025)#339

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Rosemary in 2020

girls
#442
698 births · 1 in 2,316 girls

Top girls' names in 2020

  1. #1Olivia17,691
  2. #2Emma15,723
  3. #3Ava13,201
  4. #4Sophia13,105
  5. #5Charlotte13,100
  6. #6Amelia12,802
  7. #7Isabella12,226
  8. #8Mia11,269
  9. #9Evelyn9,517
  10. #10Harper8,849
  11. #442Rosemary698
More about 2020

girls

1,616,549 girls got a published name in 2020; 1 in 2,316 of them was named Rosemary, which outranked 97.5% of the 17,527 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Rosemary
  1. #437Stephanie703
  2. #440Alison699
  3. #440Annalise699
  4. #442Rosemary698
  5. #443Jacqueline696
  6. #444Amanda695
  7. #445Braelynn694
Biggest movers since 2019
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,492Avayah#2,428 → #936
  2. ↑ 950Denisse#1,802 → #852
  3. ↑ 818Jianna#1,668 → #850
  4. ↑ 609Capri#1,291 → #682
  5. ↑ 550Rosalia#1,287 → #737
Fallers
  1. ↓ 393Yaritza#813 → #1,206
  2. ↓ 271Seraphina#1,000 → #1,271
  3. ↓ 207Marissa#874 → #1,081
  4. ↓ 203Annabella#644 → #847
  5. ↓ 195Jayde#832 → #1,027

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2020 →