Roseanne
#5,554 for girls in 2025, 22 births
- Peak · girls
- 1950 · 228 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 7,307since 1912
Roseanne over time
Rank among girls' names. Roseanne has never cracked the top 500 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,554 | 22 |
| 2024 | #6,642 | 17 |
| 2023 | #6,409 | 18 |
| 2022 | #6,984 | 16 |
| 2021 | #8,464 | 12 |
| 2020 | #10,250 | 9 |
| 2019 | #10,473 | 9 |
| 2018 | #7,409 | 15 |
| 2017 | #7,840 | 14 |
| 2016 | #6,901 | 17 |
| 2015 | #9,481 | 11 |
| 2014 | #10,955 | 9 |
| 2013 | #11,000 | 9 |
| 2012 | — | |
| 2011 | #13,347 | 7 |
| 2010 | — | |
| 2009 | #13,704 | 7 |
| 2008 | #10,807 | 10 |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 |
| 2006 | #12,420 | 8 |
| 2005 | #9,452 | 11 |
| 2004 | #7,828 | 14 |
| 2003 | #7,207 | 15 |
| 2002 | #10,246 | 9 |
| 2001 | #7,724 | 13 |
| 2000 | #5,705 | 19 |
| 1999 | #6,484 | 15 |
| 1998 | #8,016 | 11 |
| 1997 | #5,228 | 19 |
| 1996 | #6,723 | 13 |
| 1995 | #6,257 | 14 |
| 1994 | #4,521 | 22 |
| 1993 | #2,990 | 39 |
| 1992 | #2,974 | 39 |
| 1991 | #2,935 | 39 |
| 1990 | #2,053 | 65 |
| 1989 | #1,250 | 126 |
| 1988 | #1,513 | 89 |
| 1987 | #1,792 | 65 |
| 1986 | #1,602 | 74 |
| 1985 | #1,552 | 78 |
| 1984 | #1,490 | 77 |
| 1983 | #1,512 | 75 |
| 1982 | #1,284 | 99 |
| 1981 | #1,433 | 85 |
| 1980 | #1,605 | 72 |
| 1979 | #1,503 | 78 |
| 1978 | #1,938 | 50 |
| 1977 | #1,661 | 63 |
| 1976 | #1,662 | 59 |
| 1975 | #1,516 | 67 |
| 1974 | #1,345 | 78 |
| 1973 | #1,329 | 76 |
| 1972 | #1,303 | 78 |
| 1971 | #1,336 | 80 |
| 1970 | #1,208 | 93 |
| 1969 | #1,054 | 108 |
| 1968 | #978 | 113 |
| 1967 | #1,039 | 98 |
| 1966 | #929 | 118 |
| 1965 | #856 | 137 |
| 1964 | #832 | 159 |
| 1963 | #870 | 145 |
| 1962 | #798 | 171 |
| 1961 | #777 | 183 |
| 1960 | #822 | 161 |
| 1959 | #800 | 163 |
| 1958 | #776 | 166 |
| 1957 | #765 | 170 |
| 1956 | #830 | 142 |
| 1955 | #738 | 165 |
| 1954 | #734 | 159 |
| 1953 | #688 | 172 |
| 1952 | #691 | 166 |
| 1951 | #604 | 202 |
| 1950 | #547 | 228 |
| 1949 | #594 | 195 |
| 1948 | #680 | 149 |
| 1947 | #663 | 160 |
| 1946 | #671 | 142 |
| 1945 | #634 | 132 |
| 1944 | #616 | 141 |
| 1943 | #563 | 180 |
| 1942 | #804 | 90 |
| 1941 | #741 | 92 |
| 1940 | #854 | 70 |
| 1939 | #824 | 70 |
| 1938 | #905 | 61 |
| 1937 | #964 | 52 |
| 1936 | #1,053 | 44 |
| 1935 | #1,039 | 44 |
| 1934 | #1,292 | 31 |
| 1933 | #1,008 | 47 |
| 1932 | #1,488 | 26 |
| 1931 | #1,336 | 30 |
| 1930 | #1,748 | 21 |
| 1929 | #1,257 | 35 |
| 1928 | #1,680 | 24 |
| 1927 | #1,523 | 29 |
| 1926 | #1,883 | 21 |
| 1925 | #1,946 | 20 |
| 1924 | #1,811 | 23 |
| 1923 | #1,895 | 21 |
| 1922 | #2,027 | 19 |
| 1921 | #2,120 | 18 |
| 1920 | #2,463 | 14 |
| 1919 | #3,452 | 8 |
| 1918 | #3,024 | 10 |
| 1917 | #4,083 | 6 |
| 1916 | — | |
| 1915 | #2,526 | 11 |
| 1914 | #3,618 | 5 |
| 1913 | — | |
| 1912 | #2,634 | 6 |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Roseanne! It came in at #2,634, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1913–1914, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Roseanne is popular in 1935
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Pennsylvania#374 · 1 in 5,505
- New York#410 · 1 in 6,369
Best ever in a state: #232 in Connecticut, 1950.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania | #374 | 13 | 1 in 5,505 |
| New York | #410 | 13 | 1 in 6,369 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Roseanne
- 1,088 spots since 2024 (#6,642 → #5,554)
- 4,696 spots since 2020 (#10,250 → #5,554)
- 3,927 spots since 2015 (#9,481 → #5,554)
- Biggest jump: 241 spots in 1943 (#804 → #563)
- Biggest drop: 110 spots in 1967 (#929 → #1,039)
- Debuted 1912
- Peaked 1950 at #547 (228 births)
- Births halved by 1967, 17 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 31 yrs · run 1937–1966
- Highest: 1 in 7,513 girls born in 1950 were named Roseanne (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 73,058 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 23.7% of all girls named Roseanne (1,733) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 46 | #2,526 (1915) | #3,223 |
| 1920s | 224 | #1,257 (1929) | #1,861 |
| 1930s | 426 | #824 (1939) | #1,166 |
| 1940s | 1,351 | #563 (1943) | #682 |
| 1950s | 1,733 | #547 (1950) | #717 |
| 1960s | 1,393 | #777 (1961) | #896 |
| 1970s | 722 | #1,208 (1970) | #1,480 |
| 1980s | 840 | #1,250 (1989) | #1,503 |
| 1990s | 276 | #2,053 (1990) | #4,818 |
| 2000s | 111 | #5,705 (2000) | #10,273 |
| 2010s | 91 | #6,901 (2016) | #9,676 |
| 2020s | 94 | #5,554 (2025) | #7,384 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Roseanne in 1935
Top girls' names in 1935
More about 1935
girls
1,048,577 girls got a published name in 1935; 1 in 23,831 of them was named Roseanne, which outranked 78.8% of the 4,893 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,031Mimi45
- #1,031Phillis45
- #1,031Phylis45
- #1,039Roseanne44
- #1,039Albertine44
- #1,039Berneice44
- #1,039Dian44
- #1,055Altha43
- #1,055Arthur43
- #1,055Augustine43
Tied with 15 names at #1,039; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↑ 2,736Norita#3,449 → #713
- ↑ 1,073Shelby#1,913 → #840
- ↑ 672Darla#1,344 → #672
- ↑ 396Shirleyann#1,292 → #896
- ↑ 375Loris#1,236 → #861
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.