Roseann
#6,546 for girls in 2025, 17 births
- Peak · girls
- 1943 · 555 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 15,878since 1905
Roseann over time
Rank among girls' names. Roseann has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #6,546 | 17 |
| 2024 | #7,251 | 15 |
| 2023 | #7,640 | 14 |
| 2022 | #8,032 | 13 |
| 2021 | #10,292 | 9 |
| 2020 | #7,212 | 15 |
| 2019 | #12,448 | 7 |
| 2018 | #8,146 | 13 |
| 2017 | #7,092 | 16 |
| 2016 | #11,781 | 8 |
| 2015 | #13,006 | 7 |
| 2014 | #9,517 | 11 |
| 2013 | #11,000 | 9 |
| 2012 | #9,711 | 11 |
| 2011 | #16,764 | 5 |
| 2010 | — | |
| 2009 | #11,459 | 9 |
| 2008 | #8,109 | 15 |
| 2007 | #9,007 | 13 |
| 2006 | #13,606 | 7 |
| 2005 | #8,883 | 12 |
| 2004 | #7,828 | 14 |
| 2003 | #11,325 | 8 |
| 2002 | #13,595 | 6 |
| 2001 | #9,351 | 10 |
| 2000 | #5,151 | 22 |
| 1999 | #6,484 | 15 |
| 1998 | #6,073 | 16 |
| 1997 | #4,819 | 21 |
| 1996 | #9,581 | 8 |
| 1995 | #4,846 | 20 |
| 1994 | #4,687 | 21 |
| 1993 | #3,506 | 31 |
| 1992 | #6,008 | 15 |
| 1991 | #2,738 | 43 |
| 1990 | #2,374 | 52 |
| 1989 | #1,733 | 78 |
| 1988 | #1,533 | 87 |
| 1987 | #1,387 | 97 |
| 1986 | #1,272 | 106 |
| 1985 | #1,249 | 109 |
| 1984 | #1,067 | 131 |
| 1983 | #1,024 | 137 |
| 1982 | #1,171 | 117 |
| 1981 | #1,109 | 125 |
| 1980 | #1,176 | 114 |
| 1979 | #1,019 | 138 |
| 1978 | #1,053 | 128 |
| 1977 | #1,075 | 121 |
| 1976 | #1,047 | 117 |
| 1975 | #896 | 147 |
| 1974 | #984 | 124 |
| 1973 | #1,033 | 113 |
| 1972 | #928 | 132 |
| 1971 | #833 | 166 |
| 1970 | #779 | 182 |
| 1969 | #804 | 164 |
| 1968 | #663 | 213 |
| 1967 | #646 | 219 |
| 1966 | #632 | 229 |
| 1965 | #540 | 308 |
| 1964 | #552 | 323 |
| 1963 | #507 | 370 |
| 1962 | #513 | 359 |
| 1961 | #493 | 388 |
| 1960 | #477 | 424 |
| 1959 | #458 | 440 |
| 1958 | #491 | 380 |
| 1957 | #480 | 391 |
| 1956 | #490 | 363 |
| 1955 | #479 | 357 |
| 1954 | #456 | 375 |
| 1953 | #430 | 411 |
| 1952 | #405 | 427 |
| 1951 | #373 | 473 |
| 1950 | #353 | 496 |
| 1949 | #386 | 417 |
| 1948 | #383 | 430 |
| 1947 | #377 | 449 |
| 1946 | #374 | 410 |
| 1945 | #352 | 388 |
| 1944 | #335 | 417 |
| 1943 | #294 | 555 |
| 1942 | #394 | 327 |
| 1941 | #433 | 249 |
| 1940 | #462 | 211 |
| 1939 | #460 | 211 |
| 1938 | #485 | 189 |
| 1937 | #519 | 161 |
| 1936 | #557 | 137 |
| 1935 | #563 | 129 |
| 1934 | #572 | 127 |
| 1933 | #620 | 110 |
| 1932 | #740 | 83 |
| 1931 | #725 | 86 |
| 1930 | #894 | 65 |
| 1929 | #855 | 69 |
| 1928 | #805 | 79 |
| 1927 | #976 | 61 |
| 1926 | #997 | 56 |
| 1925 | #1,176 | 43 |
| 1924 | #999 | 58 |
| 1923 | #1,197 | 42 |
| 1922 | #1,232 | 40 |
| 1921 | #1,543 | 29 |
| 1920 | #1,816 | 22 |
| 1919 | #1,801 | 21 |
| 1918 | #1,690 | 23 |
| 1917 | #1,847 | 19 |
| 1916 | #2,133 | 15 |
| 1915 | #3,795 | 6 |
| 1914 | #2,265 | 10 |
| 1913 | #2,164 | 9 |
| 1912 | #2,634 | 6 |
| 1911 | #1,956 | 7 |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | #1,931 | 5 |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Roseann! It came in at #1,931, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1905–1910, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Roseann is popular in 1950
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Jersey#149 · 1 in 860
- Connecticut#154 · 1 in 969
- Pennsylvania#188 · 1 in 1,311
- New York#190 · 1 in 1,090
- New Mexico#222 · 1 in 1,131
Best ever in a state: #122 in New Jersey, 1943.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey | #149 | 50 | 1 in 860 |
| Connecticut | #154 | 18 | 1 in 969 |
| Pennsylvania | #188 | 78 | 1 in 1,311 |
| New York | #190 | 131 | 1 in 1,090 |
| New Mexico | #222 | 8 | 1 in 1,131 |
| Nebraska | #224 | 7 | 1 in 1,893 |
| Wisconsin | #233 | 15 | 1 in 2,456 |
| Minnesota | #267 | 13 | 1 in 2,552 |
| Ohio | #283 | 31 | 1 in 2,747 |
| Illinois | #322 | 26 | 1 in 3,345 |
| Massachusetts | #352 | 7 | 1 in 6,306 |
| Indiana | #355 | 10 | 1 in 4,186 |
| Michigan | #368 | 17 | 1 in 4,306 |
| Florida | #462 | 6 | 1 in 4,715 |
| Missouri | #466 | 6 | 1 in 6,560 |
| California | #527 | 18 | 1 in 6,308 |
| Texas | #966 | 6 | 1 in 15,950 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Roseann
- 705 spots since 2024 (#7,251 → #6,546)
- 666 spots since 2020 (#7,212 → #6,546)
- 6,460 spots since 2015 (#13,006 → #6,546)
- Biggest jump: 198 spots in 1924 (#1,197 → #999)
- Biggest drop: 177 spots in 1925 (#999 → #1,176)
- Debuted 1905
- Peaked 1943 at #294 (555 births)
- Births halved by 1966, 23 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 50 yrs · run 1926–1972
- Highest: 1 in 2,514 girls born in 1943 were named Roseann (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 94,545 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 25.9% of all girls named Roseann (4,113) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 5 | #1,931 (1905) | #1,931 |
| 1910s | 116 | #1,690 (1918) | #2,254 |
| 1920s | 499 | #805 (1928) | #1,160 |
| 1930s | 1,298 | #460 (1939) | #614 |
| 1940s | 3,853 | #294 (1943) | #379 |
| 1950s | 4,113 | #353 (1950) | #442 |
| 1960s | 2,997 | #477 (1960) | #583 |
| 1970s | 1,368 | #779 (1970) | #965 |
| 1980s | 1,101 | #1,024 (1983) | #1,272 |
| 1990s | 242 | #2,374 (1990) | #5,112 |
| 2000s | 116 | #5,151 (2000) | #9,831 |
| 2010s | 87 | #7,092 (2017) | #11,052 |
| 2020s | 83 | #6,546 (2025) | #7,829 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Roseann in 1950
Top girls' names in 1950
More about 1950
girls
1,713,054 girls got a published name in 1950; 1 in 3,454 of them was named Roseann, which outranked 94.2% of the 6,109 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.