Rosamond
#14,942 for girls in 2025, 5 births · Last seen for boys in 1927 at #3,780
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1912 · 71 births
- Debut · girls
- 8 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 3,288since 1881
Rosamond over time
Rank among girls' names. Rosamond has never cracked the top 500 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #14,942 | 5 | — | |
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | #9,112 | 11 | — | |
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | #16,215 | 5 | — | |
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 | — | |
| 2006 | #15,152 | 6 | — | |
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | #16,099 | 5 | — | |
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 | — | |
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | #14,411 | 5 | — | |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | — | |
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | — | |
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | #11,778 | 6 | — | |
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | #13,317 | 5 | — | |
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | #11,409 | 6 | — | |
| 1989 | #12,362 | 5 | — | |
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | #9,307 | 6 | — | |
| 1984 | #6,810 | 9 | — | |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 | — | |
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | #9,110 | 6 | — | |
| 1980 | #8,178 | 7 | — | |
| 1979 | #9,010 | 6 | — | |
| 1978 | #6,385 | 9 | — | |
| 1977 | #9,652 | 5 | — | |
| 1976 | #7,296 | 7 | — | |
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | #8,292 | 5 | — | |
| 1971 | #6,006 | 8 | — | |
| 1970 | #7,995 | 5 | — | |
| 1969 | #7,471 | 5 | — | |
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | — | |
| 1967 | #5,457 | 7 | — | |
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | #5,891 | 6 | — | |
| 1962 | #4,865 | 8 | — | |
| 1961 | #4,882 | 8 | — | |
| 1960 | #4,184 | 10 | — | |
| 1959 | #4,300 | 9 | — | |
| 1958 | #2,663 | 19 | — | |
| 1957 | #3,309 | 13 | — | |
| 1956 | #2,826 | 17 | — | |
| 1955 | #2,839 | 16 | — | |
| 1954 | #3,490 | 11 | — | |
| 1953 | #2,431 | 19 | — | |
| 1952 | #2,581 | 17 | — | |
| 1951 | #2,116 | 22 | — | |
| 1950 | #1,871 | 26 | — | |
| 1949 | #2,069 | 22 | — | |
| 1948 | #1,901 | 25 | — | |
| 1947 | #1,545 | 37 | — | |
| 1946 | #1,617 | 30 | — | |
| 1945 | #1,941 | 19 | — | |
| 1944 | #1,808 | 22 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,467 | 32 | — | |
| 1942 | #1,497 | 30 | — | |
| 1941 | #1,569 | 25 | — | |
| 1940 | #1,635 | 23 | — | |
| 1939 | #1,308 | 32 | — | |
| 1938 | #1,288 | 32 | — | |
| 1937 | #1,416 | 27 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,062 | 43 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,307 | 31 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,205 | 35 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,008 | 47 | — | |
| 1932 | #940 | 56 | — | |
| 1931 | #941 | 54 | — | |
| 1930 | #916 | 63 | — | |
| 1929 | #909 | 62 | — | |
| 1928 | #902 | 66 | — | |
| 1927 | #720 | 100 | #3,780 | 6 |
| 1926 | #783 | 85 | — | |
| 1925 | #698 | 111 | — | |
| 1924 | #777 | 92 | — | |
| 1923 | #779 | 88 | — | |
| 1922 | #730 | 99 | — | |
| 1921 | #711 | 106 | — | |
| 1920 | #780 | 86 | — | |
| 1919 | #792 | 79 | — | |
| 1918 | #682 | 111 | — | |
| 1917 | #646 | 111 | — | |
| 1916 | #641 | 111 | — | |
| 1915 | #648 | 104 | — | |
| 1914 | #613 | 87 | — | |
| 1913 | #573 | 79 | — | |
| 1912 | #571 | 71 | — | |
| 1911 | #585 | 53 | — | |
| 1910 | #593 | 49 | — | |
| 1909 | #644 | 37 | — | |
| 1908 | #629 | 37 | — | |
| 1907 | #614 | 37 | — | |
| 1906 | #661 | 30 | — | |
| 1905 | #664 | 28 | — | |
| 1904 | #773 | 21 | — | |
| 1903 | #596 | 30 | — | |
| 1902 | #688 | 24 | — | |
| 1901 | #699 | 21 | — | |
| 1900 | #885 | 18 | — | |
| 1899 | #814 | 16 | — | |
| 1898 | #679 | 23 | — | |
| 1897 | #1,263 | 7 | — | |
| 1896 | #813 | 16 | — | |
| 1895 | #703 | 20 | — | |
| 1894 | #905 | 12 | — | |
| 1893 | #794 | 14 | — | |
| 1892 | #1,278 | 6 | — | |
| 1891 | #943 | 9 | — | |
| 1890 | #1,006 | 8 | — | |
| 1889 | #1,025 | 7 | — | |
| 1888 | #1,036 | 7 | — | |
| 1887 | #693 | 11 | — | |
| 1886 | #897 | 7 | — | |
| 1885 | #842 | 7 | — | |
| 1884 | #1,024 | 5 | — | |
| 1883 | #651 | 9 | — | |
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | #623 | 8 | — | |
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Rosamond! It came in at #623, and was given to 8 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1882, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
See more about Rosamond
- Biggest jump: 584 spots in 1898 (#1,263 → #679)
- Biggest drop: 450 spots in 1897 (#813 → #1,263)
- Debuted 1881
- Peaked 1912 at #571 (71 births)
- Births halved by 1934, 22 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 45 yrs · run 1898–1932
- Highest: 1 in 7,861 girls born in 1912 were named Rosamond (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 321,453 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 27.2% of all girls named Rosamond (895) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 61 | #623 (1881) | #849 |
| 1890s | 131 | #679 (1898) | #920 |
| 1900s | 283 | #596 (1903) | #685 |
| 1910s | 855 | #571 (1912) | #634 |
| 1920s | 895 | #698 (1925) | #779 |
| 1930s | 420 | #916 (1930) | #1,139 |
| 1940s | 265 | #1,467 (1943) | #1,705 |
| 1950s | 169 | #1,871 (1950) | #2,843 |
| 1960s | 49 | #4,184 (1960) | #5,681 |
| 1970s | 45 | #6,006 (1971) | #7,805 |
| 1980s | 39 | #6,810 (1984) | #9,130 |
| 1990s | 33 | #11,409 (1990) | #12,807 |
| 2000s | 22 | #13,844 (2003) | #15,683 |
| 2010s | 16 | #9,112 (2019) | #12,664 |
| 2020s | 5 | #14,942 (2025) | #14,942 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Rosamond in 1932
Top girls' names in 1932
More about 1932
girls
1,067,148 girls got a published name in 1932; 1 in 19,056 of them was named Rosamond, which outranked 81.6% of the 5,098 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).