Rogelio
Last seen for girls in 1991 at #10,271 · #1,159 for boys in 2025, 180 births
Given to boys 99.7% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1981 · 409 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 25,877since 1914
Rogelio over time
Rank among boys' names. Rogelio has never cracked the top 400 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,159 | 180 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,151 | 182 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,053 | 206 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,015 | 219 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,006 | 217 | |
| 2020 | — | #998 | 213 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,041 | 198 | |
| 2018 | — | #905 | 239 | |
| 2017 | — | #882 | 244 | |
| 2016 | — | #863 | 261 | |
| 2015 | — | #838 | 268 | |
| 2014 | — | #782 | 295 | |
| 2013 | — | #733 | 318 | |
| 2012 | — | #723 | 324 | |
| 2011 | — | #777 | 289 | |
| 2010 | — | #719 | 320 | |
| 2009 | — | #689 | 352 | |
| 2008 | — | #572 | 451 | |
| 2007 | — | #518 | 506 | |
| 2006 | — | #520 | 497 | |
| 2005 | — | #464 | 548 | |
| 2004 | — | #473 | 533 | |
| 2003 | — | #488 | 505 | |
| 2002 | — | #478 | 487 | |
| 2001 | — | #492 | 466 | |
| 2000 | — | #480 | 490 | |
| 1999 | — | #493 | 445 | |
| 1998 | — | #483 | 451 | |
| 1997 | — | #464 | 474 | |
| 1996 | — | #470 | 465 | |
| 1995 | — | #468 | 474 | |
| 1994 | — | #457 | 480 | |
| 1993 | — | #439 | 500 | |
| 1992 | — | #432 | 511 | |
| 1991 | #10,271 | 7 | #453 | 474 |
| 1990 | #12,958 | 5 | #439 | 505 |
| 1989 | #12,362 | 5 | #434 | 475 |
| 1988 | — | #463 | 385 | |
| 1987 | #9,825 | 6 | #436 | 409 |
| 1986 | — | #444 | 379 | |
| 1985 | — | #433 | 388 | |
| 1984 | #6,291 | 10 | #445 | 359 |
| 1983 | — | #453 | 333 | |
| 1982 | #10,517 | 5 | #421 | 395 |
| 1981 | #9,110 | 6 | #403 | 409 |
| 1980 | — | #404 | 403 | |
| 1979 | — | #407 | 377 | |
| 1978 | — | #440 | 325 | |
| 1977 | #7,567 | 7 | #419 | 354 |
| 1976 | — | #424 | 337 | |
| 1975 | — | #448 | 318 | |
| 1974 | — | #433 | 332 | |
| 1973 | #5,580 | 9 | #477 | 271 |
| 1972 | — | #467 | 282 | |
| 1971 | — | #512 | 254 | |
| 1970 | — | #498 | 262 | |
| 1969 | — | #478 | 256 | |
| 1968 | — | #506 | 223 | |
| 1967 | — | #558 | 179 | |
| 1966 | — | #535 | 201 | |
| 1965 | — | #599 | 161 | |
| 1964 | — | #594 | 177 | |
| 1963 | — | #613 | 163 | |
| 1962 | — | #581 | 181 | |
| 1961 | — | #640 | 149 | |
| 1960 | — | #585 | 177 | |
| 1959 | — | #556 | 194 | |
| 1958 | — | #646 | 142 | |
| 1957 | — | #603 | 162 | |
| 1956 | — | #615 | 152 | |
| 1955 | — | #616 | 145 | |
| 1954 | — | #610 | 147 | |
| 1953 | — | #544 | 169 | |
| 1952 | #5,563 | 5 | #516 | 183 |
| 1951 | — | #620 | 129 | |
| 1950 | — | #537 | 160 | |
| 1949 | — | #580 | 134 | |
| 1948 | — | #592 | 128 | |
| 1947 | — | #634 | 118 | |
| 1946 | — | #642 | 100 | |
| 1945 | — | #616 | 96 | |
| 1944 | — | #620 | 98 | |
| 1943 | — | #751 | 74 | |
| 1942 | — | #795 | 65 | |
| 1941 | — | #746 | 69 | |
| 1940 | — | #792 | 61 | |
| 1939 | — | #763 | 63 | |
| 1938 | — | #951 | 44 | |
| 1937 | — | #922 | 46 | |
| 1936 | — | #816 | 56 | |
| 1935 | — | #980 | 42 | |
| 1934 | — | #836 | 56 | |
| 1933 | — | #905 | 47 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,077 | 39 | |
| 1931 | — | #939 | 48 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,007 | 46 | |
| 1929 | — | #983 | 47 | |
| 1928 | — | #1,111 | 40 | |
| 1927 | — | #1,128 | 40 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,108 | 41 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,164 | 37 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,458 | 27 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,460 | 26 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,695 | 21 | |
| 1921 | — | #2,152 | 15 | |
| 1920 | — | #1,747 | 20 | |
| 1919 | — | #2,511 | 11 | |
| 1918 | — | #2,398 | 12 | |
| 1917 | — | #3,545 | 6 | |
| 1916 | — | #2,543 | 10 | |
| 1915 | — | #3,825 | 5 | |
| 1914 | — | #3,264 | 5 | |
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Rogelio! It came in at #3,264, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1914–1915, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
See more about Rogelio
- 8 spots since 2024 (#1,151 → #1,159)
- 161 spots since 2020 (#998 → #1,159)
- 321 spots since 2015 (#838 → #1,159)
- Biggest jump: 188 spots in 1939 (#951 → #763)
- Biggest drop: 144 spots in 1935 (#836 → #980)
- Debuted 1914
- Peaked 1981 at #403 (409 births)
- Births halved by 2019, 38 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 89 yrs · run 1933–2018
- Highest: 1 in 3,645 boys born in 2005 were named Rogelio (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 9,489 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #403 in 1981, was only 1 in 4,379 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 18.7% of all boys named Rogelio (4,835) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 49 | #2,398 (1918) | #3,014 |
| 1920s | 314 | #983 (1929) | #1,401 |
| 1930s | 487 | #763 (1939) | #920 |
| 1940s | 943 | #580 (1949) | #677 |
| 1950s | 1,583 | #516 (1952) | #586 |
| 1960s | 1,867 | #478 (1969) | #569 |
| 1970s | 3,112 | #407 (1979) | #453 |
| 1980s | 3,935 | #403 (1981) | #434 |
| 1990s | 4,779 | #432 (1992) | #460 |
| 2000s | 4,835 | #464 (2005) | #517 |
| 2010s | 2,756 | #719 (2010) | #826 |
| 2020s | 1,217 | #998 (2020) | #1,064 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Rogelio in 1982
Top girls' names in 1982
Top boys' names in 1982
More about 1982
girls
1,693,325 girls got a published name in 1982; 1 in 338,665 of them was named Rogelio, which outranked 14.7% of the 12,332 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Tied with 1,815 names at #10,517; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,814,447 boys got a published name in 1982; 1 in 4,594 of them was named Rogelio, which outranked 94.3% of the 7,367 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).