Rogelio
Last seen for girls in 1991 at #10,271 · #1,159 for boys in 2025, 180 births
Given to boys 99.7% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1981 · 409 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 25,877since 1914
Rogelio over time
Rank among boys' names. Rogelio has never cracked the top 400 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,159 | 180 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,151 | 182 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,053 | 206 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,015 | 219 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,006 | 217 | |
| 2020 | — | #998 | 213 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,041 | 198 | |
| 2018 | — | #905 | 239 | |
| 2017 | — | #882 | 244 | |
| 2016 | — | #863 | 261 | |
| 2015 | — | #838 | 268 | |
| 2014 | — | #782 | 295 | |
| 2013 | — | #733 | 318 | |
| 2012 | — | #723 | 324 | |
| 2011 | — | #777 | 289 | |
| 2010 | — | #719 | 320 | |
| 2009 | — | #689 | 352 | |
| 2008 | — | #572 | 451 | |
| 2007 | — | #518 | 506 | |
| 2006 | — | #520 | 497 | |
| 2005 | — | #464 | 548 | |
| 2004 | — | #473 | 533 | |
| 2003 | — | #488 | 505 | |
| 2002 | — | #478 | 487 | |
| 2001 | — | #492 | 466 | |
| 2000 | — | #480 | 490 | |
| 1999 | — | #493 | 445 | |
| 1998 | — | #483 | 451 | |
| 1997 | — | #464 | 474 | |
| 1996 | — | #470 | 465 | |
| 1995 | — | #468 | 474 | |
| 1994 | — | #457 | 480 | |
| 1993 | — | #439 | 500 | |
| 1992 | — | #432 | 511 | |
| 1991 | #10,271 | 7 | #453 | 474 |
| 1990 | #12,958 | 5 | #439 | 505 |
| 1989 | #12,362 | 5 | #434 | 475 |
| 1988 | — | #463 | 385 | |
| 1987 | #9,825 | 6 | #436 | 409 |
| 1986 | — | #444 | 379 | |
| 1985 | — | #433 | 388 | |
| 1984 | #6,291 | 10 | #445 | 359 |
| 1983 | — | #453 | 333 | |
| 1982 | #10,517 | 5 | #421 | 395 |
| 1981 | #9,110 | 6 | #403 | 409 |
| 1980 | — | #404 | 403 | |
| 1979 | — | #407 | 377 | |
| 1978 | — | #440 | 325 | |
| 1977 | #7,567 | 7 | #419 | 354 |
| 1976 | — | #424 | 337 | |
| 1975 | — | #448 | 318 | |
| 1974 | — | #433 | 332 | |
| 1973 | #5,580 | 9 | #477 | 271 |
| 1972 | — | #467 | 282 | |
| 1971 | — | #512 | 254 | |
| 1970 | — | #498 | 262 | |
| 1969 | — | #478 | 256 | |
| 1968 | — | #506 | 223 | |
| 1967 | — | #558 | 179 | |
| 1966 | — | #535 | 201 | |
| 1965 | — | #599 | 161 | |
| 1964 | — | #594 | 177 | |
| 1963 | — | #613 | 163 | |
| 1962 | — | #581 | 181 | |
| 1961 | — | #640 | 149 | |
| 1960 | — | #585 | 177 | |
| 1959 | — | #556 | 194 | |
| 1958 | — | #646 | 142 | |
| 1957 | — | #603 | 162 | |
| 1956 | — | #615 | 152 | |
| 1955 | — | #616 | 145 | |
| 1954 | — | #610 | 147 | |
| 1953 | — | #544 | 169 | |
| 1952 | #5,563 | 5 | #516 | 183 |
| 1951 | — | #620 | 129 | |
| 1950 | — | #537 | 160 | |
| 1949 | — | #580 | 134 | |
| 1948 | — | #592 | 128 | |
| 1947 | — | #634 | 118 | |
| 1946 | — | #642 | 100 | |
| 1945 | — | #616 | 96 | |
| 1944 | — | #620 | 98 | |
| 1943 | — | #751 | 74 | |
| 1942 | — | #795 | 65 | |
| 1941 | — | #746 | 69 | |
| 1940 | — | #792 | 61 | |
| 1939 | — | #763 | 63 | |
| 1938 | — | #951 | 44 | |
| 1937 | — | #922 | 46 | |
| 1936 | — | #816 | 56 | |
| 1935 | — | #980 | 42 | |
| 1934 | — | #836 | 56 | |
| 1933 | — | #905 | 47 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,077 | 39 | |
| 1931 | — | #939 | 48 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,007 | 46 | |
| 1929 | — | #983 | 47 | |
| 1928 | — | #1,111 | 40 | |
| 1927 | — | #1,128 | 40 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,108 | 41 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,164 | 37 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,458 | 27 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,460 | 26 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,695 | 21 | |
| 1921 | — | #2,152 | 15 | |
| 1920 | — | #1,747 | 20 | |
| 1919 | — | #2,511 | 11 | |
| 1918 | — | #2,398 | 12 | |
| 1917 | — | #3,545 | 6 | |
| 1916 | — | #2,543 | 10 | |
| 1915 | — | #3,825 | 5 | |
| 1914 | — | #3,264 | 5 | |
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Rogelio! It came in at #3,264, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1914–1915, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
See more about Rogelio
- 8 spots since 2024 (#1,151 → #1,159)
- 161 spots since 2020 (#998 → #1,159)
- 321 spots since 2015 (#838 → #1,159)
- Biggest jump: 188 spots in 1939 (#951 → #763)
- Biggest drop: 144 spots in 1935 (#836 → #980)
- Debuted 1914
- Peaked 1981 at #403 (409 births)
- Births halved by 2019, 38 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 89 yrs · run 1933–2018
- Highest: 1 in 3,645 boys born in 2005 were named Rogelio (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 9,489 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #403 in 1981, was only 1 in 4,379 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 18.7% of all boys named Rogelio (4,835) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 49 | #2,398 (1918) | #3,014 |
| 1920s | 314 | #983 (1929) | #1,401 |
| 1930s | 487 | #763 (1939) | #920 |
| 1940s | 943 | #580 (1949) | #677 |
| 1950s | 1,583 | #516 (1952) | #586 |
| 1960s | 1,867 | #478 (1969) | #569 |
| 1970s | 3,112 | #407 (1979) | #453 |
| 1980s | 3,935 | #403 (1981) | #434 |
| 1990s | 4,779 | #432 (1992) | #460 |
| 2000s | 4,835 | #464 (2005) | #517 |
| 2010s | 2,756 | #719 (2010) | #826 |
| 2020s | 1,217 | #998 (2020) | #1,064 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Rogelio in 1954
Top boys' names in 1954
More about 1954
boys
2,038,751 boys got a published name in 1954; 1 in 13,869 of them was named Rogelio, which outranked 86.0% of the 4,360 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 32.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- ↓ 504Arlin#878 → #1,382
- ↓ 347Adan#895 → #1,242
- ↓ 345Dayton#966 → #1,311
- ↓ 302Garey#966 → #1,268
- ↓ 293Bartholomew#975 → #1,268
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.