Rochelle
#4,546 for girls in 2025, 30 births · Last seen for boys in 1995 at #7,792
Given to girls 99.2% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1969 · 1,271 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 46,994since 1900
Rochelle over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Rochelle has never cracked the top 200 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #4,546 | 30 | — | |
| 2024 | #3,963 | 37 | — | |
| 2023 | #4,873 | 27 | — | |
| 2022 | #4,472 | 31 | — | |
| 2021 | #3,435 | 45 | — | |
| 2020 | #4,005 | 35 | — | |
| 2019 | #4,437 | 31 | — | |
| 2018 | #3,677 | 41 | — | |
| 2017 | #3,919 | 38 | — | |
| 2016 | #3,379 | 47 | — | |
| 2015 | #2,890 | 60 | — | |
| 2014 | #2,739 | 63 | — | |
| 2013 | #2,973 | 56 | — | |
| 2012 | #2,935 | 58 | — | |
| 2011 | #2,945 | 58 | — | |
| 2010 | #2,614 | 69 | — | |
| 2009 | #2,270 | 86 | — | |
| 2008 | #2,042 | 101 | — | |
| 2007 | #2,509 | 74 | — | |
| 2006 | #2,081 | 94 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,533 | 134 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,431 | 144 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,454 | 135 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,203 | 169 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,246 | 159 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,053 | 197 | — | |
| 1999 | #951 | 218 | — | |
| 1998 | #871 | 242 | — | |
| 1997 | #785 | 265 | — | |
| 1996 | #684 | 319 | — | |
| 1995 | #620 | 356 | #7,792 | 6 |
| 1994 | #545 | 447 | — | |
| 1993 | #489 | 514 | — | |
| 1992 | #446 | 567 | — | |
| 1991 | #409 | 625 | #8,236 | 5 |
| 1990 | #376 | 696 | — | |
| 1989 | #364 | 707 | #4,811 | 10 |
| 1988 | #337 | 728 | — | |
| 1987 | #332 | 740 | #6,951 | 5 |
| 1986 | #347 | 695 | — | |
| 1985 | #347 | 673 | — | |
| 1984 | #335 | 692 | #4,215 | 9 |
| 1983 | #338 | 683 | #4,907 | 7 |
| 1982 | #302 | 810 | — | |
| 1981 | #297 | 812 | #3,858 | 10 |
| 1980 | #321 | 754 | #4,940 | 7 |
| 1979 | #301 | 792 | #5,355 | 6 |
| 1978 | #316 | 722 | #4,554 | 7 |
| 1977 | #331 | 711 | #4,582 | 7 |
| 1976 | #311 | 739 | #4,418 | 7 |
| 1975 | #290 | 829 | — | |
| 1974 | #281 | 899 | #2,459 | 16 |
| 1973 | #251 | 1,007 | #3,223 | 10 |
| 1972 | #257 | 1,049 | #3,344 | 9 |
| 1971 | #256 | 1,155 | #3,146 | 10 |
| 1970 | #260 | 1,179 | — | |
| 1969 | #236 | 1,271 | #2,415 | 13 |
| 1968 | #256 | 1,049 | — | |
| 1967 | #267 | 1,009 | — | |
| 1966 | #282 | 901 | #2,986 | 8 |
| 1965 | #297 | 900 | #2,780 | 9 |
| 1964 | #301 | 948 | #2,854 | 9 |
| 1963 | #316 | 871 | #2,858 | 9 |
| 1962 | #293 | 990 | #1,896 | 18 |
| 1961 | #289 | 1,036 | #2,900 | 9 |
| 1960 | #310 | 910 | #2,685 | 10 |
| 1959 | #299 | 919 | #2,821 | 9 |
| 1958 | #307 | 862 | #2,642 | 10 |
| 1957 | #325 | 787 | — | |
| 1956 | #313 | 786 | #2,361 | 12 |
| 1955 | #318 | 728 | #2,764 | 9 |
| 1954 | #340 | 624 | #3,176 | 7 |
| 1953 | #354 | 574 | #2,531 | 10 |
| 1952 | #353 | 544 | — | |
| 1951 | #344 | 537 | — | |
| 1950 | #341 | 524 | #3,021 | 7 |
| 1949 | #353 | 494 | #3,298 | 6 |
| 1948 | #356 | 475 | — | |
| 1947 | #365 | 486 | — | |
| 1946 | #356 | 455 | #2,690 | 8 |
| 1945 | #368 | 364 | — | |
| 1944 | #352 | 383 | — | |
| 1943 | #326 | 465 | #3,538 | 5 |
| 1942 | #311 | 487 | #2,940 | 7 |
| 1941 | #302 | 456 | #3,133 | 6 |
| 1940 | #295 | 460 | #2,871 | 7 |
| 1939 | #298 | 420 | #1,795 | 15 |
| 1938 | #287 | 478 | #3,175 | 6 |
| 1937 | #293 | 451 | #2,905 | 7 |
| 1936 | #291 | 440 | #2,184 | 11 |
| 1935 | #425 | 233 | — | |
| 1934 | #660 | 103 | — | |
| 1933 | #790 | 70 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,015 | 48 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,258 | 33 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,371 | 31 | — | |
| 1929 | #1,078 | 46 | — | |
| 1928 | #1,179 | 42 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,303 | 37 | — | |
| 1926 | #1,514 | 29 | #4,201 | 5 |
| 1925 | #1,089 | 49 | #3,741 | 6 |
| 1924 | #1,354 | 36 | — | |
| 1923 | #1,158 | 44 | #4,239 | 5 |
| 1922 | #1,252 | 39 | — | |
| 1921 | #987 | 57 | — | |
| 1920 | #1,190 | 41 | #4,286 | 5 |
| 1919 | #1,075 | 46 | #3,736 | 6 |
| 1918 | #1,031 | 49 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,219 | 35 | — | |
| 1916 | #1,100 | 41 | #3,897 | 5 |
| 1915 | #1,190 | 33 | — | |
| 1914 | #1,444 | 20 | #2,915 | 6 |
| 1913 | #1,465 | 16 | — | |
| 1912 | #1,620 | 12 | — | |
| 1911 | #1,241 | 14 | — | |
| 1910 | #1,335 | 12 | #1,589 | 5 |
| 1909 | #1,607 | 8 | — | |
| 1908 | #2,101 | 5 | — | |
| 1907 | #2,061 | 5 | — | |
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | #1,931 | 5 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,877 | 5 | — | |
| 1903 | #1,592 | 6 | — | |
| 1902 | #1,793 | 5 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,679 | 5 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,723 | 6 | — | |
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1900
The first year at least five girls were named Rochelle! It came in at #1,723, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1904–1908, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Rochelle is popular in 1952
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- New York#196 · 1 in 1,179
- South Dakota#219 · 1 in 1,485
- Pennsylvania#226 · 1 in 1,791
- Illinois#246 · 1 in 2,044
- Kansas#250 · 1 in 1,873
Best ever in a state: #44 in Hawaii, 1971.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York | #196 | 131 | 1 in 1,179 |
| South Dakota | #219 | 5 | 1 in 1,485 |
| Pennsylvania | #226 | 62 | 1 in 1,791 |
| Illinois | #246 | 46 | 1 in 2,044 |
| Kansas | #250 | 11 | 1 in 1,873 |
| Wisconsin | #253 | 15 | 1 in 2,672 |
| District of Columbia | #257 | 7 | 1 in 1,866 |
| Minnesota | #259 | 14 | 1 in 2,519 |
| Massachusetts | #276 | 13 | 1 in 3,717 |
| California | #284 | 63 | 1 in 2,085 |
| Missouri | #284 | 16 | 1 in 2,583 |
| Michigan | #306 | 27 | 1 in 2,993 |
| Maryland | #324 | 8 | 1 in 3,257 |
| Colorado | #331 | 6 | 1 in 2,709 |
| Washington | #335 | 9 | 1 in 3,044 |
| New Jersey | #348 | 11 | 1 in 4,420 |
| Iowa | #412 | 5 | 1 in 5,687 |
| Ohio | #415 | 16 | 1 in 5,937 |
| Tennessee | #487 | 6 | 1 in 6,173 |
| Florida | #499 | 6 | 1 in 5,452 |
| Indiana | #511 | 6 | 1 in 7,765 |
| Texas | #1,024 | 6 | 1 in 17,757 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Rochelle
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 583 spots since 2024 (#3,963 → #4,546)
- 541 spots since 2020 (#4,005 → #4,546)
- 1,656 spots since 2015 (#2,890 → #4,546)
- Biggest jump: 235 spots in 1935 (#660 → #425)
- Biggest drop: 265 spots in 1922 (#987 → #1,252)
Rise & fade · girls
69 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1900
- Peaked 1969 at #236 (1,271 births)
- Births halved by 1991, 22 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 68 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 68 yrs · run 1933–1999
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,327
- Highest: 1 in 1,327 girls born in 1969 were named Rochelle (0.08%)
- Latest: 1 in 53,576 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1960s
- 21.0% of all girls named Rochelle (9,885) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 50 | #1,592 (1903) | #1,818 |
| 1910s | 278 | #1,031 (1918) | #1,272 |
| 1920s | 420 | #987 (1921) | #1,210 |
| 1930s | 2,307 | #287 (1938) | #669 |
| 1940s | 4,525 | #295 (1940) | #338 |
| 1950s | 6,885 | #299 (1959) | #329 |
| 1960s | 9,885 | #236 (1969) | #285 |
| 1970s | 9,082 | #251 (1973) | #285 |
| 1980s | 7,294 | #297 (1981) | #332 |
| 1990s | 4,249 | #376 (1990) | #618 |
| 2000s | 1,293 | #1,053 (2000) | #1,682 |
| 2010s | 521 | #2,614 (2010) | #3,251 |
| 2020s | 205 | #3,435 (2021) | #4,216 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Rochelle in 1952
girls
#353
544 births · 1 in 3,409 girls
Top girls' names in 1952
More about 1952
girls
1,854,335 girls got a published name in 1952; 1 in 3,409 of them was named Rochelle, which outranked 94.5% of the 6,389 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Rochelle
Biggest movers since 1951
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.