Rickey
Last seen for girls in 1990 at #11,409 · #2,798 for boys in 2025, 45 births
Given to boys 98.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1958 · 3,782 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 61,717since 1924
Rickey over time
Rank among boys' names. Rickey has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #2,798 | 45 | |
| 2024 | — | #2,750 | 47 | |
| 2023 | — | #2,895 | 43 | |
| 2022 | — | #2,753 | 47 | |
| 2021 | — | #2,096 | 69 | |
| 2020 | — | #2,113 | 66 | |
| 2019 | — | #2,150 | 66 | |
| 2018 | — | #2,122 | 66 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,780 | 86 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,890 | 78 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,729 | 89 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,506 | 107 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,528 | 105 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,602 | 97 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,484 | 109 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,399 | 119 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,381 | 123 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,329 | 130 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,188 | 148 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,077 | 165 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,105 | 149 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,101 | 143 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,093 | 141 | |
| 2002 | — | #930 | 172 | |
| 2001 | — | #926 | 167 | |
| 2000 | — | #890 | 176 | |
| 1999 | — | #809 | 188 | |
| 1998 | — | #900 | 160 | |
| 1997 | — | #706 | 224 | |
| 1996 | — | #727 | 211 | |
| 1995 | — | #659 | 251 | |
| 1994 | — | #655 | 252 | |
| 1993 | — | #584 | 311 | |
| 1992 | — | #565 | 324 | |
| 1991 | — | #530 | 363 | |
| 1990 | #11,409 | 6 | #502 | 382 |
| 1989 | — | #456 | 424 | |
| 1988 | — | #437 | 429 | |
| 1987 | #9,825 | 6 | #441 | 406 |
| 1986 | #7,749 | 8 | #409 | 434 |
| 1985 | #9,307 | 6 | #370 | 500 |
| 1984 | #8,153 | 7 | #357 | 510 |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 | #354 | 502 |
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 | #338 | 556 |
| 1981 | #9,110 | 6 | #330 | 580 |
| 1980 | #7,418 | 8 | #329 | 576 |
| 1979 | #8,061 | 7 | #343 | 526 |
| 1978 | #6,385 | 9 | #344 | 500 |
| 1977 | #6,340 | 9 | #330 | 553 |
| 1976 | #6,611 | 8 | #322 | 551 |
| 1975 | #5,984 | 9 | #329 | 534 |
| 1974 | #6,258 | 8 | #354 | 477 |
| 1973 | #8,423 | 5 | #341 | 496 |
| 1972 | #8,292 | 5 | #342 | 504 |
| 1971 | #7,388 | 6 | #349 | 525 |
| 1970 | #5,818 | 8 | #339 | 561 |
| 1969 | #4,723 | 10 | #314 | 594 |
| 1968 | #4,779 | 9 | #259 | 768 |
| 1967 | #4,625 | 9 | #263 | 766 |
| 1966 | #4,198 | 10 | #227 | 945 |
| 1965 | #3,050 | 17 | #215 | 1,118 |
| 1964 | #3,000 | 18 | #205 | 1,356 |
| 1963 | #3,458 | 14 | #175 | 1,680 |
| 1962 | #2,605 | 22 | #169 | 1,887 |
| 1961 | #2,299 | 27 | #153 | 2,255 |
| 1960 | #2,820 | 19 | #138 | 2,573 |
| 1959 | #2,289 | 25 | #116 | 3,458 |
| 1958 | #1,820 | 36 | #106 | 3,782 |
| 1957 | #3,033 | 15 | #108 | 3,522 |
| 1956 | #2,453 | 21 | #112 | 3,263 |
| 1955 | #2,472 | 20 | #114 | 3,065 |
| 1954 | #1,801 | 33 | #113 | 3,130 |
| 1953 | #2,595 | 17 | #113 | 2,840 |
| 1952 | #2,266 | 21 | #140 | 2,052 |
| 1951 | #2,577 | 16 | #166 | 1,543 |
| 1950 | #2,253 | 19 | #173 | 1,301 |
| 1949 | #2,274 | 19 | #191 | 1,087 |
| 1948 | #1,739 | 29 | #197 | 1,020 |
| 1947 | #1,633 | 34 | #226 | 809 |
| 1946 | #2,392 | 16 | #294 | 483 |
| 1945 | #1,699 | 24 | #371 | 262 |
| 1944 | #2,027 | 18 | #422 | 207 |
| 1943 | #3,801 | 7 | #620 | 104 |
| 1942 | #2,817 | 11 | #791 | 66 |
| 1941 | — | #1,004 | 41 | |
| 1940 | — | #1,519 | 20 | |
| 1939 | — | #1,795 | 15 | |
| 1938 | — | #1,559 | 19 | |
| 1937 | — | #2,088 | 12 | |
| 1936 | — | #1,417 | 22 | |
| 1935 | — | #2,396 | 10 | |
| 1934 | — | #1,783 | 16 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,586 | 19 | |
| 1932 | — | #3,776 | 5 | |
| 1931 | — | #3,390 | 6 | |
| 1930 | — | #2,781 | 9 | |
| 1929 | — | #3,559 | 6 | |
| 1928 | #4,725 | 5 | #3,357 | 7 |
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | #3,741 | 6 | |
| 1924 | — | #4,347 | 5 | |
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Rickey! It came in at #4,347, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1926–1927, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
See more about Rickey
- 48 spots since 2024 (#2,750 → #2,798)
- 685 spots since 2020 (#2,113 → #2,798)
- 1,069 spots since 2015 (#1,729 → #2,798)
- Biggest jump: 213 spots in 1942 (#1,004 → #791)
- Biggest drop: 194 spots in 1998 (#706 → #900)
- Debuted 1924
- Peaked 1958 at #106 (3,782 births)
- Births halved by 1962, 4 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 61 yrs · run 1942–2002
- Highest: 1 in 561 boys born in 1958 were named Rickey (0.18%)
- Latest: 1 in 37,957 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 45.3% of all boys named Rickey (27,956) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 24 | #3,357 (1928) | #3,751 |
| 1930s | 133 | #1,417 (1936) | #2,257 |
| 1940s | 4,099 | #191 (1949) | #564 |
| 1950s | 27,956 | #106 (1958) | #126 |
| 1960s | 13,942 | #138 (1960) | #212 |
| 1970s | 5,227 | #322 (1976) | #339 |
| 1980s | 4,917 | #329 (1980) | #382 |
| 1990s | 2,666 | #502 (1990) | #664 |
| 2000s | 1,514 | #890 (2000) | #1,102 |
| 2010s | 922 | #1,399 (2010) | #1,719 |
| 2020s | 317 | #2,096 (2021) | #2,568 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Rickey in 1969
Top girls' names in 1969
Top boys' names in 1969
More about 1969
girls
1,687,016 girls got a published name in 1969; 1 in 168,702 of them was named Rickey, which outranked 45.8% of the 8,708 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #4,418Yumi11
- #4,418Zanetta11
- #4,418Zita11
- #4,723Rickey10
- #4,723Adel10
- #4,723Aimie10
- #4,723Alease10
- #5,057Akiko9
- #5,057Alinda9
- #5,057Amal9
Tied with 333 names at #4,723; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,788,174 boys got a published name in 1969; 1 in 3,010 of them was named Rickey, which outranked 93.8% of the 5,043 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 27.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- ↓ 449Artis#877 → #1,326
- ↓ 410Kennedy#986 → #1,396
- ↓ 408Alfie#968 → #1,376
- ↓ 360Micky#861 → #1,221
- ↓ 356Montgomery#946 → #1,302
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.