Rehan
#11,932 for girls in 2025, 7 births · #3,089 for boys in 2025, 39 births
Given to boys 98.1% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2008 · 81 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 1,460since 1974
Rehan over time
Rank among boys' names. Rehan has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #11,932 | 7 | #3,089 | 39 |
| 2024 | — | #3,161 | 38 | |
| 2023 | — | #3,117 | 39 | |
| 2022 | — | #2,919 | 43 | |
| 2021 | #11,146 | 8 | #3,180 | 37 |
| 2020 | — | #2,759 | 44 | |
| 2019 | — | #2,766 | 45 | |
| 2018 | — | #2,230 | 61 | |
| 2017 | #12,713 | 7 | #2,637 | 47 |
| 2016 | — | #2,028 | 70 | |
| 2015 | — | #2,145 | 64 | |
| 2014 | — | #2,044 | 69 | |
| 2013 | — | #2,065 | 65 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,909 | 75 | |
| 2011 | — | #2,173 | 60 | |
| 2010 | #14,959 | 6 | #2,169 | 61 |
| 2009 | — | #1,975 | 71 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,813 | 81 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,830 | 79 | |
| 2006 | — | #2,513 | 48 | |
| 2005 | — | #5,578 | 14 | |
| 2004 | — | #4,129 | 21 | |
| 2003 | — | #4,815 | 16 | |
| 2002 | — | #5,725 | 12 | |
| 2001 | — | #4,302 | 18 | |
| 2000 | — | #3,640 | 22 | |
| 1999 | — | #4,537 | 15 | |
| 1998 | — | #5,466 | 11 | |
| 1997 | — | #5,642 | 10 | |
| 1996 | — | #5,187 | 11 | |
| 1995 | — | #5,928 | 9 | |
| 1994 | — | #4,290 | 14 | |
| 1993 | — | #6,228 | 8 | |
| 1992 | — | #4,327 | 13 | |
| 1991 | — | #4,476 | 12 | |
| 1990 | — | #4,673 | 11 | |
| 1989 | — | #4,271 | 12 | |
| 1988 | — | #4,786 | 9 | |
| 1987 | — | #4,239 | 10 | |
| 1986 | — | #5,926 | 6 | |
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | #3,701 | 11 | |
| 1983 | — | #6,238 | 5 | |
| 1982 | — | #4,234 | 9 | |
| 1981 | — | #5,468 | 6 | |
| 1980 | — | #4,940 | 7 | |
| 1979 | — | #3,810 | 10 | |
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | #5,845 | 5 | |
| 1976 | — | #5,587 | 5 | |
| 1975 | — | #4,797 | 6 | |
| 1974 | — | #4,634 | 6 | |
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Rehan! It came in at #4,634, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1976–1978, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Rehan is popular in 2008
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New York#711 · 1 in 5,743
- Illinois#1,208 · 1 in 12,459
- California#1,725 · 1 in 28,241
- Texas#1,817 · 1 in 27,028
Best ever in a state: #641 in New Jersey, 2012.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York | #711 | 19 | 1 in 5,743 |
| Illinois | #1,208 | 6 | 1 in 12,459 |
| California | #1,725 | 9 | 1 in 28,241 |
| Texas | #1,817 | 7 | 1 in 27,028 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Rehan
- 72 spots since 2024 (#3,161 → #3,089)
- 330 spots since 2020 (#2,759 → #3,089)
- 944 spots since 2015 (#2,145 → #3,089)
- Debuted 1974
- Peaked 2008 at #1,813 (81 births)
- Births halved by 2021, 13 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 25,187 boys born in 2008 were named Rehan (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 43,797 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 42.3% of all boys named Rehan (617) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 32 | #3,810 (1979) | #4,935 |
| 1980s | 75 | #3,701 (1984) | #4,867 |
| 1990s | 114 | #4,290 (1994) | #5,075 |
| 2000s | 382 | #1,813 (2008) | #3,632 |
| 2010s | 617 | #1,909 (2012) | #2,217 |
| 2020s | 240 | #2,759 (2020) | #3,038 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Rehan in 2008
Top boys' names in 2008
More about 2008
boys
2,040,150 boys got a published name in 2008; 1 in 25,187 of them was named Rehan, which outranked 87.6% of the 14,625 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,802Nahum82
- #1,802Vito82
- #1,802Yusef82
- #1,813Rehan81
- #1,813Amauri81
- #1,813Braedan81
- #1,813Fox81
- #1,825Apollo80
- #1,825Armand80
- #1,825Brandan80
Tied with 11 names at #1,813; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.