Rebecca
#349 for girls in 2025, 872 births · Last seen for boys in 2017 at #9,696
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1974 · 15,163 births
- Debut · girls
- 236 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 72 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 755,992since 1880
Rebecca over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #349 | 872 | — | |
| 2024 | #340 | 918 | — | |
| 2023 | #315 | 985 | — | |
| 2022 | #295 | 1,075 | — | |
| 2021 | #304 | 1,051 | — | |
| 2020 | #248 | 1,212 | — | |
| 2019 | #263 | 1,263 | — | |
| 2018 | #211 | 1,459 | — | |
| 2017 | #214 | 1,433 | #9,696 | 7 |
| 2016 | #205 | 1,580 | — | |
| 2015 | #188 | 1,728 | — | |
| 2014 | #181 | 1,782 | — | |
| 2013 | #177 | 1,806 | — | |
| 2012 | #157 | 2,019 | — | |
| 2011 | #148 | 2,119 | — | |
| 2010 | #134 | 2,299 | — | |
| 2009 | #132 | 2,473 | #12,491 | 5 |
| 2008 | #118 | 2,922 | #9,019 | 8 |
| 2007 | #105 | 3,215 | #12,367 | 5 |
| 2006 | #96 | 3,573 | #10,662 | 6 |
| 2005 | #81 | 4,018 | #7,640 | 9 |
| 2004 | #70 | 4,474 | #4,005 | 22 |
| 2003 | #62 | 4,873 | #9,581 | 6 |
| 2002 | #54 | 5,222 | #7,643 | 8 |
| 2001 | #46 | 5,893 | #8,339 | 7 |
| 2000 | #39 | 7,078 | #7,416 | 8 |
| 1999 | #38 | 7,437 | #5,656 | 11 |
| 1998 | #30 | 8,423 | #5,466 | 11 |
| 1997 | #25 | 9,634 | #5,642 | 10 |
| 1996 | #24 | 10,626 | #4,878 | 12 |
| 1995 | #28 | 9,911 | #4,280 | 14 |
| 1994 | #24 | 11,284 | #3,911 | 16 |
| 1993 | #22 | 12,321 | #3,246 | 20 |
| 1992 | #20 | 13,110 | #3,220 | 20 |
| 1991 | #21 | 13,298 | #2,227 | 32 |
| 1990 | #21 | 13,677 | #1,909 | 40 |
| 1989 | #24 | 12,436 | #1,150 | 85 |
| 1988 | #26 | 11,877 | #1,768 | 39 |
| 1987 | #25 | 11,627 | #1,534 | 46 |
| 1986 | #26 | 11,793 | #1,299 | 56 |
| 1985 | #25 | 12,705 | #1,333 | 52 |
| 1984 | #23 | 13,348 | #1,422 | 45 |
| 1983 | #19 | 14,714 | #1,178 | 59 |
| 1982 | #15 | 15,730 | #1,140 | 64 |
| 1981 | #12 | 16,737 | #1,143 | 64 |
| 1980 | #17 | 15,281 | #1,357 | 48 |
| 1979 | #17 | 14,548 | #1,270 | 52 |
| 1978 | #17 | 13,796 | #1,186 | 56 |
| 1977 | #17 | 14,196 | #1,144 | 58 |
| 1976 | #12 | 14,491 | #1,179 | 53 |
| 1975 | #11 | 13,925 | #982 | 70 |
| 1974 | #10 | 15,163 | #1,182 | 49 |
| 1973 | #10 | 14,868 | #1,082 | 56 |
| 1972 | #14 | 13,252 | #1,007 | 64 |
| 1971 | #23 | 12,192 | #1,214 | 46 |
| 1970 | #29 | 10,854 | #1,582 | 29 |
| 1969 | #28 | 10,950 | #1,280 | 38 |
| 1968 | #33 | 10,225 | #1,478 | 28 |
| 1967 | #39 | 9,823 | #1,388 | 30 |
| 1966 | #40 | 9,777 | #1,237 | 37 |
| 1965 | #41 | 10,211 | #1,483 | 27 |
| 1964 | #46 | 9,474 | #1,655 | 23 |
| 1963 | #44 | 9,393 | #1,455 | 29 |
| 1962 | #47 | 9,403 | #1,713 | 22 |
| 1961 | #44 | 10,236 | #1,467 | 30 |
| 1960 | #38 | 9,970 | #1,658 | 24 |
| 1959 | #38 | 10,475 | #1,806 | 20 |
| 1958 | #41 | 10,416 | #2,026 | 16 |
| 1957 | #34 | 11,482 | #1,388 | 32 |
| 1956 | #27 | 12,168 | #1,821 | 19 |
| 1955 | #27 | 12,398 | #1,682 | 21 |
| 1954 | #26 | 13,208 | #1,706 | 20 |
| 1953 | #24 | 12,959 | #1,677 | 21 |
| 1952 | #30 | 12,227 | #1,582 | 23 |
| 1951 | #32 | 10,932 | #1,972 | 15 |
| 1950 | #36 | 9,425 | #1,815 | 17 |
| 1949 | #40 | 8,778 | #1,754 | 18 |
| 1948 | #50 | 6,795 | #1,881 | 16 |
| 1947 | #52 | 6,333 | #2,169 | 13 |
| 1946 | #68 | 4,840 | #2,403 | 10 |
| 1945 | #85 | 3,331 | #2,996 | 6 |
| 1944 | #84 | 3,246 | #2,080 | 12 |
| 1943 | #87 | 3,270 | #2,964 | 7 |
| 1942 | #85 | 3,241 | #2,268 | 11 |
| 1941 | #86 | 2,924 | #2,656 | 8 |
| 1940 | #96 | 2,555 | #1,983 | 13 |
| 1939 | #134 | 1,796 | #2,449 | 9 |
| 1938 | #145 | 1,573 | #2,646 | 8 |
| 1937 | #166 | 1,210 | #2,479 | 9 |
| 1936 | #164 | 1,200 | #2,301 | 10 |
| 1935 | #163 | 1,208 | — | |
| 1934 | #165 | 1,161 | #3,277 | 6 |
| 1933 | #169 | 1,072 | — | |
| 1932 | #162 | 1,192 | #3,092 | 7 |
| 1931 | #170 | 1,089 | #2,864 | 8 |
| 1930 | #176 | 1,114 | #3,289 | 7 |
| 1929 | #181 | 1,084 | — | |
| 1928 | #183 | 1,121 | — | |
| 1927 | #170 | 1,260 | #3,780 | 6 |
| 1926 | #185 | 1,144 | #4,201 | 5 |
| 1925 | #182 | 1,203 | #3,155 | 8 |
| 1924 | #171 | 1,358 | #3,867 | 6 |
| 1923 | #174 | 1,274 | #3,467 | 7 |
| 1922 | #173 | 1,296 | #3,532 | 7 |
| 1921 | #175 | 1,272 | — | |
| 1920 | #175 | 1,269 | #3,208 | 8 |
| 1919 | #170 | 1,267 | — | |
| 1918 | #172 | 1,243 | #2,699 | 10 |
| 1917 | #165 | 1,215 | — | |
| 1916 | #169 | 1,132 | — | |
| 1915 | #159 | 1,169 | — | |
| 1914 | #162 | 890 | #2,651 | 7 |
| 1913 | #158 | 739 | #2,821 | 5 |
| 1912 | #144 | 754 | — | |
| 1911 | #148 | 546 | — | |
| 1910 | #154 | 519 | — | |
| 1909 | #151 | 470 | #1,155 | 7 |
| 1908 | #148 | 451 | — | |
| 1907 | #159 | 400 | — | |
| 1906 | #150 | 397 | — | |
| 1905 | #148 | 402 | — | |
| 1904 | #146 | 371 | — | |
| 1903 | #154 | 334 | — | |
| 1902 | #144 | 382 | — | |
| 1901 | #144 | 342 | — | |
| 1900 | #125 | 503 | — | |
| 1899 | #135 | 347 | — | |
| 1898 | #136 | 376 | — | |
| 1897 | #129 | 376 | — | |
| 1896 | #128 | 371 | — | |
| 1895 | #122 | 386 | — | |
| 1894 | #118 | 399 | — | |
| 1893 | #120 | 358 | — | |
| 1892 | #124 | 353 | — | |
| 1891 | #123 | 320 | — | |
| 1890 | #107 | 374 | — | |
| 1889 | #114 | 337 | — | |
| 1888 | #111 | 337 | — | |
| 1887 | #110 | 275 | — | |
| 1886 | #95 | 355 | — | |
| 1885 | #99 | 302 | — | |
| 1884 | #102 | 278 | — | |
| 1883 | #103 | 244 | — | |
| 1882 | #99 | 259 | — | |
| 1881 | #96 | 226 | — | |
| 1880 | #92 | 236 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Rebecca was already there! It came in at #92, and was given to 236 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1885, when fewer than 310 girls a year got the name.
Where Rebecca is popular in 1936
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- North Carolina#45 · 1 in 213
- South Carolina#65 · 1 in 250
- Tennessee#75 · 1 in 326
- Virginia#86 · 1 in 367
- Alabama#90 · 1 in 363
Best ever in a state: #4 in Utah, 1973.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina | #45 | 167 | 1 in 213 |
| South Carolina | #65 | 80 | 1 in 250 |
| Tennessee | #75 | 81 | 1 in 326 |
| Virginia | #86 | 62 | 1 in 367 |
| Alabama | #90 | 78 | 1 in 363 |
| Georgia | #109 | 68 | 1 in 432 |
| Kentucky | #113 | 54 | 1 in 477 |
| Arizona | #119 | 10 | 1 in 399 |
| Maryland | #126 | 18 | 1 in 617 |
| Indiana | #131 | 31 | 1 in 748 |
| Mississippi | #141 | 35 | 1 in 608 |
| Colorado | #143 | 13 | 1 in 609 |
| Florida | #145 | 21 | 1 in 599 |
| West Virginia | #157 | 25 | 1 in 735 |
| Pennsylvania | #168 | 65 | 1 in 1,093 |
| Texas | #168 | 72 | 1 in 762 |
| Arkansas | #169 | 23 | 1 in 752 |
| New Mexico | #172 | 7 | 1 in 694 |
| Ohio | #175 | 37 | 1 in 1,268 |
| South Dakota | #184 | 5 | 1 in 1,021 |
| Missouri | #192 | 23 | 1 in 1,123 |
| Oklahoma | #197 | 20 | 1 in 999 |
| Louisiana | #201 | 22 | 1 in 931 |
| Illinois | #220 | 27 | 1 in 1,872 |
| New York | #231 | 43 | 1 in 1,905 |
| California | #232 | 26 | 1 in 1,416 |
| New Jersey | #266 | 8 | 1 in 2,938 |
| Michigan | #283 | 12 | 1 in 3,230 |
| Iowa | #290 | 6 | 1 in 3,097 |
| Massachusetts | #292 | 6 | 1 in 4,539 |
| Minnesota | #298 | 6 | 1 in 3,313 |
| Wisconsin | #306 | 6 | 1 in 3,787 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Rebecca
- 9 spots since 2024 (#340 → #349)
- 101 spots since 2020 (#248 → #349)
- 161 spots since 2015 (#188 → #349)
- Biggest jump: 38 spots in 1940 (#134 → #96)
- Biggest drop: 56 spots in 2021 (#248 → #304)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1974 at #10 (15,163 births)
- Births halved by 1999, 25 yrs later
- Top 10: 2 yrs · run 1973–1974
- Top 100: 72 yrs · run 1940–2006
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 97 girls born in 1974 were named Rebecca (1.0%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,843 girls born in 2025 (0.05%)
- 18.2% of all girls named Rebecca (137,285) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 2,849 | #92 (1880) | #102 |
| 1890s | 3,660 | #107 (1890) | #124 |
| 1900s | 4,052 | #125 (1900) | #147 |
| 1910s | 9,474 | #144 (1912) | #160 |
| 1920s | 12,281 | #170 (1927) | #177 |
| 1930s | 12,615 | #134 (1939) | #161 |
| 1940s | 45,313 | #40 (1949) | #73 |
| 1950s | 115,690 | #24 (1953) | #32 |
| 1960s | 99,462 | #28 (1969) | #40 |
| 1970s | 137,285 | #10 (1974) | #16 |
| 1980s | 136,248 | #12 (1981) | #21 |
| 1990s | 109,721 | #20 (1992) | #25 |
| 2000s | 43,741 | #39 (2000) | #80 |
| 2010s | 17,488 | #134 (2010) | #188 |
| 2020s | 6,113 | #248 (2020) | #309 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Rebecca in 1936
Top girls' names in 1936
Top boys' names in 1936
More about 1936
girls
1,040,390 girls got a published name in 1936; 1 in 867 of them was named Rebecca, which outranked 96.6% of the 4,856 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- ↓ 1,028Norita#713 → #1,741
- ↓ 506Vernetta#974 → #1,480
- ↓ 461Ozella#984 → #1,445
- ↓ 400Shirleyann#896 → #1,296
- ↓ 342Idell#925 → #1,267
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,037,205 boys got a published name in 1936; 1 in 103,721 of them was named Rebecca, which outranked 43.0% of the 4,037 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.3% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,184Westley11
- #2,184Weyman11
- #2,184Windle11
- #2,301Rebecca10
- #2,301Abran10
- #2,301Alcide10
- #2,301Alson10
- #2,452Achille9
- #2,452Adelard9
- #2,452Alphonsus9
Tied with 150 names at #2,301; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.