Rayleigh
#1,443 for girls in 2025, 149 births · #5,608 for boys in 2025, 16 births
Given to girls 96.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2018 · 189 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 3,000since 1995
Rayleigh over time
Rank among girls' names. Rayleigh has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,443 | 149 | #5,608 | 16 |
| 2024 | #1,441 | 153 | #5,659 | 16 |
| 2023 | #1,356 | 166 | #6,517 | 13 |
| 2022 | #1,288 | 184 | #5,445 | 17 |
| 2021 | #1,600 | 131 | #7,587 | 10 |
| 2020 | #1,264 | 177 | #10,605 | 6 |
| 2019 | #1,247 | 187 | #7,643 | 10 |
| 2018 | #1,233 | 189 | #12,156 | 5 |
| 2017 | #1,263 | 187 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,456 | 158 | #12,185 | 5 |
| 2015 | #1,470 | 156 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,345 | 174 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,646 | 129 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,663 | 128 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,612 | 134 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,688 | 125 | — | |
| 2009 | #2,375 | 81 | — | |
| 2008 | #2,318 | 84 | — | |
| 2007 | #2,890 | 62 | — | |
| 2006 | #3,054 | 55 | — | |
| 2005 | #4,195 | 33 | — | |
| 2004 | #3,748 | 38 | — | |
| 2003 | #4,307 | 30 | — | |
| 2002 | #6,392 | 17 | — | |
| 2001 | #6,619 | 16 | — | |
| 2000 | #7,158 | 14 | — | |
| 1999 | #7,716 | 12 | — | |
| 1998 | #8,584 | 10 | — | |
| 1997 | #9,802 | 8 | — | |
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | — | |
| 1995 | #10,514 | 7 | — | |
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Rayleigh! It came in at #10,514, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1995–1997, when fewer than 9 girls a year got the name.
Where Rayleigh is popular in 2008
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Oklahoma#571 · 1 in 2,492
- Arkansas#580 · 1 in 2,445
- Louisiana#612 · 1 in 2,889
- Kentucky#623 · 1 in 3,371
- Texas#1,530 · 1 in 11,181
Best ever in a state: #242 in Mississippi, 2019.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma | #571 | 7 | 1 in 2,492 |
| Arkansas | #580 | 5 | 1 in 2,445 |
| Louisiana | #612 | 7 | 1 in 2,889 |
| Kentucky | #623 | 6 | 1 in 3,371 |
| Texas | #1,530 | 15 | 1 in 11,181 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Rayleigh
- 2 spots since 2024 (#1,441 → #1,443)
- 179 spots since 2020 (#1,264 → #1,443)
- 27 spots since 2015 (#1,470 → #1,443)
- Debuted 1995
- Peaked 2018 at #1,233 (189 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 8,914 girls born in 2022 were named Rayleigh (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 10,787 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #1,233 in 2018, was only 1 in 9,000 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 52.2% of all girls named Rayleigh (1,567) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 43 | #7,716 (1999) | #9,685 |
| 2000s | 430 | #2,318 (2008) | #4,306 |
| 2010s | 1,567 | #1,233 (2018) | #1,462 |
| 2020s | 960 | #1,264 (2020) | #1,399 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Rayleigh in 2008
Top girls' names in 2008
More about 2008
girls
1,890,938 girls got a published name in 2008; 1 in 22,511 of them was named Rayleigh, which outranked 88.7% of the 20,482 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,295Violette85
- #2,295Yanely85
- #2,295Yuri85
- #2,318Rayleigh84
- #2,318Adelle84
- #2,318Alba84
- #2,318Anamaria84
- #2,334Adilyn83
- #2,334Amaia83
- #2,334Anushka83
Tied with 15 names at #2,318; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.