Raleigh
#1,880 for girls in 2025, 104 births · #2,207 for boys in 2025, 64 births
Given to boys 75.2% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1891 · 24 births
- Debut · boys
- 14 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 9,279since 1880
Raleigh over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,880 | 104 | #2,207 | 64 |
| 2024 | #1,913 | 104 | #2,261 | 63 |
| 2023 | #1,645 | 126 | #2,097 | 70 |
| 2022 | #1,742 | 119 | #2,217 | 65 |
| 2021 | #1,544 | 136 | #2,225 | 63 |
| 2020 | #1,459 | 147 | #1,815 | 82 |
| 2019 | #1,392 | 161 | #1,642 | 99 |
| 2018 | #1,474 | 149 | #1,687 | 93 |
| 2017 | #1,441 | 157 | #1,861 | 79 |
| 2016 | #1,380 | 170 | #1,739 | 89 |
| 2015 | #1,470 | 156 | #1,870 | 78 |
| 2014 | #1,714 | 122 | #1,447 | 113 |
| 2013 | #1,737 | 119 | #1,878 | 75 |
| 2012 | #1,859 | 108 | #1,818 | 81 |
| 2011 | #1,982 | 99 | #1,687 | 88 |
| 2010 | #1,913 | 105 | #1,768 | 84 |
| 2009 | #2,139 | 94 | #2,528 | 50 |
| 2008 | #2,267 | 86 | #2,104 | 65 |
| 2007 | #2,163 | 92 | #2,257 | 58 |
| 2006 | #3,414 | 47 | #2,348 | 53 |
| 2005 | #3,212 | 48 | #2,081 | 59 |
| 2004 | #3,224 | 47 | #2,024 | 59 |
| 2003 | #3,590 | 39 | #2,031 | 56 |
| 2002 | #4,381 | 28 | #1,792 | 64 |
| 2001 | #4,688 | 25 | #2,864 | 32 |
| 2000 | #4,527 | 26 | #2,087 | 48 |
| 1999 | #3,970 | 29 | #2,023 | 47 |
| 1998 | #5,583 | 18 | #2,012 | 47 |
| 1997 | #3,626 | 31 | #1,672 | 59 |
| 1996 | #4,453 | 23 | #1,785 | 51 |
| 1995 | #3,492 | 31 | #1,801 | 48 |
| 1994 | #5,016 | 19 | #1,581 | 58 |
| 1993 | #3,776 | 28 | #1,680 | 52 |
| 1992 | #3,581 | 30 | #1,352 | 70 |
| 1991 | #4,329 | 23 | #1,502 | 58 |
| 1990 | #4,120 | 24 | #1,685 | 48 |
| 1989 | #5,049 | 17 | #1,615 | 49 |
| 1988 | #5,321 | 15 | #1,467 | 52 |
| 1987 | #4,283 | 19 | #1,161 | 68 |
| 1986 | #6,156 | 11 | #1,511 | 44 |
| 1985 | #6,955 | 9 | #1,333 | 52 |
| 1984 | #6,810 | 9 | #1,214 | 57 |
| 1983 | #5,824 | 11 | #1,375 | 46 |
| 1982 | #6,371 | 10 | #1,342 | 49 |
| 1981 | — | #1,766 | 32 | |
| 1980 | — | #1,357 | 48 | |
| 1979 | — | #1,421 | 43 | |
| 1978 | #5,563 | 11 | #1,487 | 39 |
| 1977 | #9,652 | 5 | #1,407 | 42 |
| 1976 | #8,156 | 6 | #1,286 | 47 |
| 1975 | — | #1,345 | 42 | |
| 1974 | — | #1,501 | 34 | |
| 1973 | #7,435 | 6 | #1,435 | 35 |
| 1972 | — | #1,177 | 48 | |
| 1971 | #6,619 | 7 | #1,101 | 55 |
| 1970 | #7,995 | 5 | #1,063 | 59 |
| 1969 | #7,471 | 5 | #1,050 | 54 |
| 1968 | — | #996 | 55 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,132 | 43 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,016 | 51 | |
| 1965 | — | #873 | 70 | |
| 1964 | — | #1,059 | 51 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,081 | 50 | |
| 1962 | #6,578 | 5 | #891 | 73 |
| 1961 | — | #910 | 71 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,021 | 56 | |
| 1959 | #4,625 | 8 | #875 | 76 |
| 1958 | — | #785 | 91 | |
| 1957 | — | #873 | 75 | |
| 1956 | — | #822 | 82 | |
| 1955 | — | #818 | 80 | |
| 1954 | — | #778 | 84 | |
| 1953 | — | #762 | 87 | |
| 1952 | — | #709 | 98 | |
| 1951 | — | #726 | 91 | |
| 1950 | — | #701 | 96 | |
| 1949 | — | #707 | 94 | |
| 1948 | — | #673 | 100 | |
| 1947 | #5,295 | 5 | #658 | 110 |
| 1946 | #4,960 | 5 | #642 | 100 |
| 1945 | — | #597 | 104 | |
| 1944 | #4,054 | 6 | #614 | 100 |
| 1943 | #3,801 | 7 | #607 | 108 |
| 1942 | — | #543 | 127 | |
| 1941 | — | #628 | 93 | |
| 1940 | — | #643 | 87 | |
| 1939 | — | #594 | 95 | |
| 1938 | — | #628 | 90 | |
| 1937 | — | #648 | 84 | |
| 1936 | — | #669 | 78 | |
| 1935 | — | #593 | 95 | |
| 1934 | — | #571 | 107 | |
| 1933 | — | #577 | 100 | |
| 1932 | — | #686 | 80 | |
| 1931 | — | #596 | 97 | |
| 1930 | — | #645 | 90 | |
| 1929 | — | #644 | 91 | |
| 1928 | — | #647 | 93 | |
| 1927 | — | #551 | 125 | |
| 1926 | — | #622 | 101 | |
| 1925 | — | #636 | 100 | |
| 1924 | — | #538 | 138 | |
| 1923 | #4,967 | 5 | #594 | 113 |
| 1922 | — | #551 | 131 | |
| 1921 | — | #528 | 139 | |
| 1920 | — | #526 | 134 | |
| 1919 | — | #616 | 97 | |
| 1918 | — | #561 | 116 | |
| 1917 | — | #541 | 116 | |
| 1916 | — | #565 | 102 | |
| 1915 | — | #497 | 124 | |
| 1914 | — | #493 | 98 | |
| 1913 | — | #513 | 70 | |
| 1912 | — | #474 | 68 | |
| 1911 | — | #514 | 33 | |
| 1910 | — | #621 | 22 | |
| 1909 | — | #462 | 30 | |
| 1908 | — | #585 | 19 | |
| 1907 | — | #464 | 25 | |
| 1906 | — | #613 | 15 | |
| 1905 | — | #370 | 31 | |
| 1904 | — | #482 | 20 | |
| 1903 | — | #505 | 18 | |
| 1902 | — | #404 | 25 | |
| 1901 | — | #433 | 19 | |
| 1900 | — | #402 | 31 | |
| 1899 | — | #521 | 14 | |
| 1898 | — | #505 | 17 | |
| 1897 | — | #404 | 22 | |
| 1896 | — | #500 | 17 | |
| 1895 | — | #501 | 16 | |
| 1894 | — | #439 | 19 | |
| 1893 | — | #435 | 18 | |
| 1892 | — | #422 | 20 | |
| 1891 | — | #349 | 24 | |
| 1890 | — | #424 | 18 | |
| 1889 | — | #388 | 21 | |
| 1888 | — | #648 | 10 | |
| 1887 | — | #438 | 15 | |
| 1886 | — | #357 | 23 | |
| 1885 | — | #380 | 22 | |
| 1884 | — | #399 | 20 | |
| 1883 | — | #433 | 17 | |
| 1882 | — | #469 | 15 | |
| 1881 | — | #533 | 11 | |
| 1880 | — | #482 | 14 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Raleigh was already there! It came in at #482, and was given to 14 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1887–1888, when fewer than 16 boys a year got the name.
See more about Raleigh
- 54 spots since 2024 (#2,261 → #2,207)
- 392 spots since 2020 (#1,815 → #2,207)
- 337 spots since 2015 (#1,870 → #2,207)
- Biggest jump: 260 spots in 1889 (#648 → #388)
- Biggest drop: 243 spots in 1906 (#370 → #613)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1891 at #349 (24 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 84 yrs · run 1880–1959
- Highest: 1 in 4,216 boys born in 1891 were named Raleigh (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 26,689 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 12.6% of all boys named Raleigh (1,165) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 2006, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 168 | #357 (1886) | #453 |
| 1890s | 185 | #349 (1891) | #450 |
| 1900s | 233 | #370 (1905) | #472 |
| 1910s | 846 | #474 (1912) | #540 |
| 1920s | 1,165 | #526 (1920) | #584 |
| 1930s | 916 | #571 (1934) | #621 |
| 1940s | 1,023 | #543 (1942) | #631 |
| 1950s | 860 | #701 (1950) | #785 |
| 1960s | 574 | #873 (1965) | #1,003 |
| 1970s | 444 | #1,063 (1970) | #1,322 |
| 1980s | 497 | #1,161 (1987) | #1,414 |
| 1990s | 538 | #1,352 (1992) | #1,709 |
| 2000s | 544 | #1,792 (2002) | #2,212 |
| 2010s | 879 | #1,447 (2014) | #1,740 |
| 2020s | 407 | #1,815 (2020) | #2,137 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Raleigh in 2007
Top girls' names in 2007
Top boys' names in 2007
More about 2007
girls
1,922,617 girls got a published name in 2007; 1 in 20,898 of them was named Raleigh, which outranked 89.5% of the 20,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,147Samari93
- #2,147Skyy93
- #2,147Wren93
- #2,163Raleigh92
- #2,163Amaiya92
- #2,163Calla92
- #2,163Deana92
- #2,177Alizabeth91
- #2,177Alona91
- #2,177Anyla91
Tied with 13 names at #2,163; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,075,414 boys got a published name in 2007; 1 in 35,783 of them was named Raleigh, which outranked 84.3% of the 14,394 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,235Torian59
- #2,235Treveon59
- #2,235Yechiel59
- #2,257Raleigh58
- #2,257Aharon58
- #2,257Basil58
- #2,257Blair58
- #2,281Abiel57
- #2,281Adon57
- #2,281Auden57
Tied with 23 names at #2,257; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.