Raelynn
#116 for girls in 2025, 2,326 births · Last seen for boys in 2024 at #10,938
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2022 · 2,726 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 1 yrof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 34,671since 1947
Raelynn over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #116 | 2,326 | — | |
| 2024 | #113 | 2,422 | #10,938 | 6 |
| 2023 | #112 | 2,415 | #8,921 | 8 |
| 2022 | #99 | 2,726 | #8,990 | 8 |
| 2021 | #103 | 2,683 | #12,146 | 5 |
| 2020 | #104 | 2,611 | #12,022 | 5 |
| 2019 | #113 | 2,573 | #10,803 | 6 |
| 2018 | #116 | 2,617 | — | |
| 2017 | #124 | 2,459 | — | |
| 2016 | #157 | 1,986 | — | |
| 2015 | #177 | 1,807 | #10,644 | 6 |
| 2014 | #265 | 1,238 | — | |
| 2013 | #283 | 1,121 | #9,655 | 7 |
| 2012 | #336 | 932 | — | |
| 2011 | #494 | 599 | — | |
| 2010 | #626 | 469 | — | |
| 2009 | #847 | 330 | — | |
| 2008 | #909 | 303 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,054 | 249 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,335 | 174 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,406 | 152 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,413 | 147 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,498 | 130 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,493 | 127 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,489 | 126 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,617 | 109 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,492 | 115 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,578 | 104 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,864 | 79 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,826 | 80 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,819 | 78 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,841 | 77 | — | |
| 1993 | #2,045 | 67 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,987 | 69 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,996 | 69 | — | |
| 1990 | #2,523 | 47 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,943 | 66 | — | |
| 1988 | #2,093 | 55 | — | |
| 1987 | #2,309 | 46 | — | |
| 1986 | #2,420 | 41 | — | |
| 1985 | #2,100 | 50 | — | |
| 1984 | #2,470 | 38 | — | |
| 1983 | #2,097 | 47 | — | |
| 1982 | #2,250 | 44 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,409 | 40 | — | |
| 1980 | #2,486 | 38 | — | |
| 1979 | #2,621 | 34 | — | |
| 1978 | #3,637 | 20 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,083 | 25 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,728 | 28 | — | |
| 1975 | #3,155 | 22 | — | |
| 1974 | #3,695 | 17 | — | |
| 1973 | #3,342 | 19 | — | |
| 1972 | #2,747 | 25 | — | |
| 1971 | #2,736 | 26 | — | |
| 1970 | #2,856 | 24 | — | |
| 1969 | #2,171 | 34 | — | |
| 1968 | #2,296 | 28 | — | |
| 1967 | #2,376 | 26 | — | |
| 1966 | #2,668 | 21 | — | |
| 1965 | #2,064 | 32 | — | |
| 1964 | #2,040 | 34 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,364 | 26 | — | |
| 1962 | #2,668 | 21 | — | |
| 1961 | #2,359 | 26 | — | |
| 1960 | #2,649 | 21 | — | |
| 1959 | #3,619 | 12 | — | |
| 1958 | #3,232 | 14 | — | |
| 1957 | #3,930 | 10 | — | |
| 1956 | #4,161 | 9 | — | |
| 1955 | #2,971 | 15 | — | |
| 1954 | #5,753 | 5 | — | |
| 1953 | #5,673 | 5 | — | |
| 1952 | #4,908 | 6 | — | |
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | #5,295 | 5 | — | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Raelynn! It came in at #5,295, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1947–1951, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Raelynn is popular in 2020
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- West Virginia#18 · 1 in 130
- Mississippi#27 · 1 in 184
- Kentucky#32 · 1 in 204
- Missouri#48 · 1 in 288
- Arkansas#52 · 1 in 272
Best ever in a state: #18 in West Virginia, 2020.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia | #18 | 42 | 1 in 130 |
| Mississippi | #27 | 55 | 1 in 184 |
| Kentucky | #32 | 83 | 1 in 204 |
| Missouri | #48 | 85 | 1 in 288 |
| Alabama | #52 | 67 | 1 in 279 |
| Arkansas | #52 | 38 | 1 in 272 |
| Alaska | #54 | 10 | 1 in 191 |
| Indiana | #54 | 94 | 1 in 298 |
| Tennessee | #54 | 100 | 1 in 304 |
| Ohio | #56 | 148 | 1 in 324 |
| Georgia | #58 | 128 | 1 in 348 |
| South Carolina | #58 | 57 | 1 in 304 |
| Wyoming | #61 | 6 | 1 in 143 |
| Nebraska | #63 | 25 | 1 in 284 |
| North Carolina | #68 | 126 | 1 in 346 |
| Kansas | #72 | 36 | 1 in 318 |
| Michigan | #74 | 100 | 1 in 379 |
| South Dakota | #80 | 10 | 1 in 264 |
| New Mexico | #86 | 15 | 1 in 343 |
| Oregon | #88 | 33 | 1 in 397 |
| Wisconsin | #90 | 52 | 1 in 400 |
| North Dakota | #92 | 10 | 1 in 280 |
| Pennsylvania | #97 | 99 | 1 in 488 |
| Iowa | #98 | 29 | 1 in 397 |
| Louisiana | #98 | 41 | 1 in 451 |
| Maryland | #102 | 47 | 1 in 475 |
| Florida | #104 | 150 | 1 in 536 |
| Virginia | #105 | 69 | 1 in 495 |
| Minnesota | #108 | 45 | 1 in 481 |
| Montana | #110 | 8 | 1 in 310 |
| Illinois | #113 | 85 | 1 in 574 |
| Idaho | #114 | 15 | 1 in 407 |
| Washington | #115 | 54 | 1 in 539 |
| New Hampshire | #119 | 9 | 1 in 384 |
| Oklahoma | #119 | 30 | 1 in 493 |
| Delaware | #120 | 7 | 1 in 334 |
| Texas | #140 | 204 | 1 in 750 |
| Hawaii | #148 | 6 | 1 in 413 |
| Arizona | #153 | 39 | 1 in 709 |
| Colorado | #168 | 31 | 1 in 695 |
| Massachusetts | #168 | 33 | 1 in 723 |
| New York | #192 | 83 | 1 in 959 |
| Nevada | #197 | 13 | 1 in 750 |
| Utah | #199 | 20 | 1 in 806 |
| New Jersey | #204 | 38 | 1 in 917 |
| Connecticut | #288 | 10 | 1 in 1,125 |
| California | #304 | 115 | 1 in 1,515 |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Raelynn
- 3 spots since 2024 (#113 → #116)
- 12 spots since 2020 (#104 → #116)
- 61 spots since 2015 (#177 → #116)
- Biggest jump: 221 spots in 2010 (#847 → #626)
- Biggest drop: 13 spots in 2023 (#99 → #112)
- Debuted 1947
- Peaked 2022 at #99 (2,726 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 1 yr · 2022
- Top 1,000: 18 yrs · run 2008–2025
- Highest: 1 in 602 girls born in 2022 were named Raelynn (0.17%)
- Latest: 1 in 691 girls born in 2025 (0.14%)
- 45.6% of all girls named Raelynn (15,801) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 5 | #5,295 (1947) | #5,295 |
| 1950s | 76 | #2,971 (1955) | #4,281 |
| 1960s | 269 | #2,040 (1964) | #2,366 |
| 1970s | 240 | #2,621 (1979) | #3,060 |
| 1980s | 465 | #1,943 (1989) | #2,258 |
| 1990s | 785 | #1,492 (1999) | #1,897 |
| 2000s | 1,847 | #847 (2009) | #1,306 |
| 2010s | 15,801 | #113 (2019) | #269 |
| 2020s | 15,183 | #99 (2022) | #108 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Raelynn in 2020
Top girls' names in 2020
Top boys' names in 2020
More about 2020
girls
1,616,549 girls got a published name in 2020; 1 in 619 of them was named Raelynn, which outranked 99.4% of the 17,527 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,726,076 boys got a published name in 2020; 1 in 345,215 of them was named Raelynn, which outranked 14.5% of the 14,060 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Tied with 2,038 names at #12,022; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↓ 380Vivaan#875 → #1,255
- ↓ 282Alexzander#890 → #1,172
- ↓ 268Reyansh#806 → #1,074
- ↓ 266Javion#949 → #1,215
- ↓ 224Kenny#862 → #1,086
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.