Radley
#8,860 for girls in 2025, 11 births · #1,826 for boys in 2025, 87 births
Given to boys 92.3% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2024 · 110 births
- Debut · boys
- 8 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 1,597since 1956
Radley over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #8,860 | 11 | #1,826 | 87 |
| 2024 | #10,271 | 9 | #1,573 | 110 |
| 2023 | #9,616 | 10 | #1,774 | 91 |
| 2022 | #11,231 | 8 | #1,938 | 80 |
| 2021 | #15,251 | 5 | #2,439 | 55 |
| 2020 | #8,953 | 11 | #2,069 | 68 |
| 2019 | #9,736 | 10 | #2,464 | 54 |
| 2018 | #9,151 | 11 | #2,065 | 69 |
| 2017 | #9,943 | 10 | #2,388 | 54 |
| 2016 | #6,901 | 17 | #2,028 | 70 |
| 2015 | #11,835 | 8 | #2,112 | 66 |
| 2014 | #16,513 | 5 | #1,873 | 78 |
| 2013 | #13,150 | 7 | #2,090 | 64 |
| 2012 | #13,483 | 7 | #2,104 | 64 |
| 2011 | — | #2,798 | 42 | |
| 2010 | #16,992 | 5 | #2,467 | 50 |
| 2009 | — | #3,045 | 38 | |
| 2008 | — | #3,646 | 29 | |
| 2007 | — | #3,893 | 26 | |
| 2006 | — | #3,384 | 31 | |
| 2005 | — | #5,034 | 16 | |
| 2004 | — | #5,007 | 16 | |
| 2003 | — | #7,245 | 9 | |
| 2002 | — | #5,131 | 14 | |
| 2001 | — | #6,445 | 10 | |
| 2000 | — | #6,316 | 10 | |
| 1999 | — | #6,530 | 9 | |
| 1998 | — | #9,631 | 5 | |
| 1997 | — | #7,281 | 7 | |
| 1996 | — | #7,971 | 6 | |
| 1995 | — | #5,501 | 10 | |
| 1994 | — | #6,968 | 7 | |
| 1993 | — | #8,700 | 5 | |
| 1992 | — | #3,748 | 16 | |
| 1991 | — | #6,519 | 7 | |
| 1990 | — | #4,673 | 11 | |
| 1989 | — | #3,809 | 14 | |
| 1988 | — | #2,765 | 20 | |
| 1987 | — | #3,339 | 14 | |
| 1986 | — | #4,457 | 9 | |
| 1985 | — | #4,052 | 10 | |
| 1984 | — | #4,215 | 9 | |
| 1983 | — | #5,484 | 6 | |
| 1982 | — | #4,593 | 8 | |
| 1981 | — | #4,153 | 9 | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | #4,403 | 8 | |
| 1978 | — | #5,772 | 5 | |
| 1977 | — | #2,556 | 17 | |
| 1976 | — | #3,264 | 11 | |
| 1975 | — | #3,659 | 9 | |
| 1974 | — | #3,558 | 9 | |
| 1973 | — | #3,013 | 11 | |
| 1972 | — | #4,441 | 6 | |
| 1971 | — | #3,370 | 9 | |
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | #2,861 | 10 | |
| 1968 | — | #3,673 | 6 | |
| 1967 | — | #3,966 | 5 | |
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | #2,969 | 8 | |
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Radley! It came in at #2,969, and was given to 8 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1957–1967, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Radley is popular in 2013
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Washington#807 · 1 in 5,944
- Texas#1,832 · 1 in 25,751
- California#2,518 · 1 in 45,405
Best ever in a state: #441 in Utah, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Washington | #807 | 6 | 1 in 5,944 |
| Texas | #1,832 | 7 | 1 in 25,751 |
| California | #2,518 | 5 | 1 in 45,405 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Radley
- 253 spots since 2024 (#1,573 → #1,826)
- 243 spots since 2020 (#2,069 → #1,826)
- 286 spots since 2015 (#2,112 → #1,826)
- Debuted 1956
- Peaked 2024 at #1,573 (110 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 15,663 boys born in 2024 were named Radley (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 19,633 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 38.3% of all boys named Radley (611) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 8 | #2,969 (1956) | #2,969 |
| 1960s | 21 | #2,861 (1969) | #3,500 |
| 1970s | 85 | #2,556 (1977) | #3,782 |
| 1980s | 99 | #2,765 (1988) | #4,096 |
| 1990s | 83 | #3,748 (1992) | #6,752 |
| 2000s | 199 | #3,045 (2009) | #4,915 |
| 2010s | 611 | #1,873 (2014) | #2,239 |
| 2020s | 491 | #1,573 (2024) | #1,937 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Radley in 2013
Top girls' names in 2013
Top boys' names in 2013
More about 2013
girls
1,754,746 girls got a published name in 2013; 1 in 250,678 of them was named Radley, which outranked 31.8% of the 19,279 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #11,969Zyiona8
- #11,969Zylia8
- #11,969Zyona8
- #13,150Radley7
- #13,150Aailyah7
- #13,150Aakriti7
- #13,150Aala7
- #14,582Aadi6
- #14,582Aaditri6
- #14,582Aadvika6
Tied with 1,431 names at #13,150; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,891,581 boys got a published name in 2013; 1 in 29,556 of them was named Radley, which outranked 85.1% of the 14,070 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,065Ryne65
- #2,065Teddy65
- #2,065Teo65
- #2,090Radley64
- #2,090Aspen64
- #2,090Bayron64
- #2,090Boris64
- #2,113Abe63
- #2,113Advik63
- #2,113Anirudh63
Tied with 22 names at #2,090; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.