Rachell
#4,546 for girls in 2025, 30 births
- Peak · girls
- 1982 · 99 births
- Debut · girls
- 8 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 3,976since 1915
Rachell over time
Rank among girls' names. Rachell has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #4,546 | 30 |
| 2024 | #3,459 | 45 |
| 2023 | #3,984 | 37 |
| 2022 | #5,984 | 20 |
| 2021 | #8,978 | 11 |
| 2020 | #7,559 | 14 |
| 2019 | #4,773 | 28 |
| 2018 | #5,785 | 21 |
| 2017 | #5,661 | 22 |
| 2016 | #5,796 | 22 |
| 2015 | #4,584 | 30 |
| 2014 | #4,892 | 28 |
| 2013 | #4,422 | 32 |
| 2012 | #4,296 | 34 |
| 2011 | #4,466 | 32 |
| 2010 | #3,516 | 45 |
| 2009 | #4,370 | 34 |
| 2008 | #3,584 | 45 |
| 2007 | #3,428 | 48 |
| 2006 | #2,850 | 61 |
| 2005 | #2,756 | 60 |
| 2004 | #3,180 | 48 |
| 2003 | #2,707 | 58 |
| 2002 | #2,673 | 57 |
| 2001 | #2,259 | 71 |
| 2000 | #2,258 | 69 |
| 1999 | #2,283 | 65 |
| 1998 | #2,973 | 43 |
| 1997 | #2,360 | 56 |
| 1996 | #2,630 | 47 |
| 1995 | #2,421 | 53 |
| 1994 | #2,124 | 64 |
| 1993 | #2,090 | 65 |
| 1992 | #1,755 | 84 |
| 1991 | #1,619 | 93 |
| 1990 | #2,011 | 67 |
| 1989 | #1,574 | 89 |
| 1988 | #1,439 | 96 |
| 1987 | #1,553 | 81 |
| 1986 | #1,367 | 94 |
| 1985 | #1,339 | 98 |
| 1984 | #1,511 | 75 |
| 1983 | #1,319 | 91 |
| 1982 | #1,284 | 99 |
| 1981 | #1,455 | 83 |
| 1980 | #1,494 | 80 |
| 1979 | #1,431 | 85 |
| 1978 | #1,412 | 82 |
| 1977 | #1,526 | 71 |
| 1976 | #1,406 | 75 |
| 1975 | #1,544 | 65 |
| 1974 | #1,399 | 73 |
| 1973 | #1,690 | 53 |
| 1972 | #1,404 | 70 |
| 1971 | #1,427 | 73 |
| 1970 | #1,526 | 64 |
| 1969 | #1,423 | 67 |
| 1968 | #1,539 | 55 |
| 1967 | #1,598 | 50 |
| 1966 | #2,407 | 25 |
| 1965 | #2,154 | 30 |
| 1964 | #2,600 | 23 |
| 1963 | #2,211 | 29 |
| 1962 | #1,947 | 35 |
| 1961 | #1,955 | 35 |
| 1960 | #2,307 | 26 |
| 1959 | #2,395 | 23 |
| 1958 | #2,581 | 20 |
| 1957 | #2,121 | 27 |
| 1956 | #2,725 | 18 |
| 1955 | #2,411 | 21 |
| 1954 | #2,592 | 18 |
| 1953 | #2,431 | 19 |
| 1952 | #3,040 | 13 |
| 1951 | #4,011 | 8 |
| 1950 | #2,652 | 15 |
| 1949 | #2,999 | 12 |
| 1948 | #5,243 | 5 |
| 1947 | #4,007 | 8 |
| 1946 | #4,417 | 6 |
| 1945 | — | |
| 1944 | — | |
| 1943 | #3,801 | 7 |
| 1942 | — | |
| 1941 | #3,252 | 8 |
| 1940 | #4,349 | 5 |
| 1939 | — | |
| 1938 | #3,847 | 6 |
| 1937 | #3,434 | 7 |
| 1936 | #3,103 | 8 |
| 1935 | #3,431 | 7 |
| 1934 | #4,286 | 5 |
| 1933 | — | |
| 1932 | #3,274 | 8 |
| 1931 | #4,331 | 5 |
| 1930 | — | |
| 1929 | — | |
| 1928 | — | |
| 1927 | #3,561 | 8 |
| 1926 | — | |
| 1925 | #3,664 | 8 |
| 1924 | #2,973 | 11 |
| 1923 | #3,350 | 9 |
| 1922 | #4,445 | 6 |
| 1921 | #4,023 | 7 |
| 1920 | #2,899 | 11 |
| 1919 | #4,814 | 5 |
| 1918 | #3,512 | 8 |
| 1917 | — | |
| 1916 | #4,417 | 5 |
| 1915 | #3,134 | 8 |
| 1914 | — | |
| 1913 | — | |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Rachell! It came in at #3,134, and was given to 8 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1916–1917, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
See more about Rachell
- 1,087 spots since 2024 (#3,459 → #4,546)
- 3,013 spots since 2020 (#7,559 → #4,546)
- 38 spots since 2015 (#4,584 → #4,546)
- Debuted 1915
- Peaked 1982 at #1,284 (99 births)
- Births halved by 1996, 14 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 17,104 girls born in 1982 were named Rachell (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 53,576 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 22.3% of all girls named Rachell (886) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 26 | #3,134 (1915) | #3,969 |
| 1920s | 60 | #2,899 (1920) | #3,559 |
| 1930s | 46 | #3,103 (1936) | #3,672 |
| 1940s | 51 | #2,999 (1949) | #4,010 |
| 1950s | 182 | #2,121 (1957) | #2,696 |
| 1960s | 375 | #1,423 (1969) | #2,014 |
| 1970s | 711 | #1,399 (1974) | #1,477 |
| 1980s | 886 | #1,284 (1982) | #1,434 |
| 1990s | 637 | #1,619 (1991) | #2,227 |
| 2000s | 551 | #2,258 (2000) | #3,007 |
| 2010s | 294 | #3,516 (2010) | #4,819 |
| 2020s | 157 | #3,459 (2024) | #5,752 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Rachell in 2003
Top girls' names in 2003
More about 2003
girls
1,827,145 girls got a published name in 2003; 1 in 31,503 of them was named Rachell, which outranked 85.3% of the 18,439 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,673Taylee59
- #2,673Tiera59
- #2,673Yulianna59
- #2,707Rachell58
- #2,707Ameera58
- #2,707Ariadne58
- #2,707Aryssa58
- #2,737Aislynn57
- #2,737Alexxis57
- #2,737Annastasia57
Tied with 29 names at #2,707; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.