Philip
Last seen for girls in 1996 at #13,518 · #527 for boys in 2025, 568 births
Given to boys 99.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1941 · 4,166 births
- Debut · boys
- 186 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 108 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 344,036since 1880
Philip over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #527 | 568 | |
| 2024 | — | #520 | 588 | |
| 2023 | — | #499 | 605 | |
| 2022 | — | #491 | 619 | |
| 2021 | — | #451 | 675 | |
| 2020 | — | #453 | 658 | |
| 2019 | — | #439 | 696 | |
| 2018 | — | #436 | 693 | |
| 2017 | — | #426 | 729 | |
| 2016 | — | #435 | 712 | |
| 2015 | — | #432 | 708 | |
| 2014 | — | #389 | 799 | |
| 2013 | — | #387 | 769 | |
| 2012 | — | #408 | 715 | |
| 2011 | — | #406 | 696 | |
| 2010 | — | #403 | 699 | |
| 2009 | — | #393 | 765 | |
| 2008 | — | #377 | 817 | |
| 2007 | — | #358 | 881 | |
| 2006 | — | #341 | 909 | |
| 2005 | — | #325 | 993 | |
| 2004 | — | #307 | 1,019 | |
| 2003 | — | #289 | 1,075 | |
| 2002 | — | #263 | 1,201 | |
| 2001 | — | #267 | 1,221 | |
| 2000 | — | #255 | 1,312 | |
| 1999 | — | #240 | 1,326 | |
| 1998 | — | #214 | 1,499 | |
| 1997 | — | #195 | 1,661 | |
| 1996 | #13,518 | 5 | #185 | 1,725 |
| 1995 | — | #180 | 1,757 | |
| 1994 | #10,569 | 7 | #168 | 1,896 |
| 1993 | — | #147 | 2,270 | |
| 1992 | #13,317 | 5 | #138 | 2,434 |
| 1991 | #7,987 | 10 | #120 | 2,749 |
| 1990 | #7,880 | 10 | #111 | 3,143 |
| 1989 | #5,545 | 15 | #101 | 3,330 |
| 1988 | #4,172 | 21 | #94 | 3,373 |
| 1987 | #3,857 | 22 | #84 | 3,837 |
| 1986 | #3,459 | 25 | #86 | 3,665 |
| 1985 | #2,657 | 36 | #84 | 3,735 |
| 1984 | #3,990 | 19 | #81 | 3,519 |
| 1983 | #3,949 | 19 | #82 | 3,488 |
| 1982 | #3,344 | 25 | #79 | 3,642 |
| 1981 | #2,928 | 30 | #84 | 3,581 |
| 1980 | #3,853 | 20 | #82 | 3,563 |
| 1979 | #3,541 | 22 | #83 | 3,460 |
| 1978 | #3,777 | 19 | #84 | 3,298 |
| 1977 | #4,235 | 16 | #90 | 3,093 |
| 1976 | #3,407 | 20 | #89 | 2,943 |
| 1975 | #3,404 | 20 | #85 | 3,011 |
| 1974 | #3,558 | 18 | #86 | 2,967 |
| 1973 | #3,971 | 15 | #91 | 2,997 |
| 1972 | #5,109 | 10 | #104 | 2,776 |
| 1971 | #3,789 | 16 | #94 | 3,302 |
| 1970 | #3,435 | 18 | #92 | 3,520 |
| 1969 | #3,958 | 13 | #86 | 3,540 |
| 1968 | #2,874 | 20 | #82 | 3,622 |
| 1967 | #3,211 | 16 | #82 | 3,786 |
| 1966 | #3,740 | 12 | #86 | 3,954 |
| 1965 | #4,202 | 10 | #87 | 4,278 |
| 1964 | #3,692 | 13 | #76 | 4,977 |
| 1963 | #3,066 | 17 | #83 | 4,757 |
| 1962 | #4,263 | 10 | #81 | 5,069 |
| 1961 | #2,839 | 19 | #79 | 5,288 |
| 1960 | #4,184 | 10 | #76 | 5,509 |
| 1959 | #2,760 | 18 | #68 | 5,862 |
| 1958 | #3,925 | 10 | #67 | 5,832 |
| 1957 | #2,926 | 16 | #68 | 6,012 |
| 1956 | — | #64 | 6,105 | |
| 1955 | #3,377 | 12 | #62 | 6,162 |
| 1954 | #5,753 | 5 | #62 | 6,279 |
| 1953 | #3,955 | 9 | #61 | 6,279 |
| 1952 | #3,796 | 9 | #60 | 6,154 |
| 1951 | #4,011 | 8 | #55 | 6,098 |
| 1950 | #3,052 | 12 | #53 | 6,070 |
| 1949 | #2,410 | 17 | #55 | 6,224 |
| 1948 | #2,974 | 12 | #54 | 6,162 |
| 1947 | #3,706 | 9 | #57 | 6,235 |
| 1946 | #2,597 | 14 | #61 | 5,093 |
| 1945 | #2,458 | 13 | #58 | 4,112 |
| 1944 | — | #60 | 3,992 | |
| 1943 | #2,447 | 14 | #57 | 4,473 |
| 1942 | #2,666 | 12 | #54 | 4,604 |
| 1941 | #3,030 | 9 | #52 | 4,166 |
| 1940 | #3,503 | 7 | #60 | 3,674 |
| 1939 | #2,300 | 13 | #66 | 3,174 |
| 1938 | #2,730 | 10 | #64 | 3,172 |
| 1937 | #2,101 | 15 | #62 | 3,162 |
| 1936 | #2,032 | 15 | #63 | 3,033 |
| 1935 | #4,204 | 5 | #65 | 3,064 |
| 1934 | #4,286 | 5 | #69 | 2,784 |
| 1933 | #2,275 | 13 | #70 | 2,530 |
| 1932 | #2,130 | 15 | #70 | 2,625 |
| 1931 | #2,750 | 10 | #71 | 2,648 |
| 1930 | #1,875 | 19 | #75 | 2,655 |
| 1929 | #2,011 | 17 | #76 | 2,606 |
| 1928 | #1,961 | 19 | #73 | 2,726 |
| 1927 | #1,669 | 25 | #75 | 2,677 |
| 1926 | #1,997 | 19 | #70 | 2,708 |
| 1925 | #3,116 | 10 | #75 | 2,675 |
| 1924 | #2,809 | 12 | #71 | 2,921 |
| 1923 | #2,169 | 17 | #70 | 2,783 |
| 1922 | #2,387 | 15 | #70 | 2,769 |
| 1921 | #2,941 | 11 | #72 | 2,703 |
| 1920 | #2,590 | 13 | #71 | 2,700 |
| 1919 | #4,251 | 6 | #71 | 2,531 |
| 1918 | #2,519 | 13 | #71 | 2,733 |
| 1917 | #3,344 | 8 | #66 | 2,544 |
| 1916 | #3,552 | 7 | #70 | 2,409 |
| 1915 | #2,900 | 9 | #69 | 2,328 |
| 1914 | — | #68 | 1,870 | |
| 1913 | #2,331 | 8 | #69 | 1,484 |
| 1912 | — | #69 | 1,237 | |
| 1911 | — | #69 | 612 | |
| 1910 | #1,935 | 7 | #83 | 418 |
| 1909 | #1,957 | 6 | #78 | 395 |
| 1908 | — | #86 | 319 | |
| 1907 | — | #76 | 356 | |
| 1906 | — | #85 | 280 | |
| 1905 | — | #96 | 234 | |
| 1904 | — | #85 | 266 | |
| 1903 | — | #85 | 250 | |
| 1902 | — | #90 | 226 | |
| 1901 | — | #84 | 232 | |
| 1900 | — | #94 | 259 | |
| 1899 | — | #83 | 223 | |
| 1898 | — | #86 | 244 | |
| 1897 | — | #89 | 200 | |
| 1896 | #1,416 | 6 | #92 | 218 |
| 1895 | — | #90 | 211 | |
| 1894 | — | #91 | 214 | |
| 1893 | — | #91 | 208 | |
| 1892 | — | #82 | 239 | |
| 1891 | — | #80 | 198 | |
| 1890 | — | #88 | 192 | |
| 1889 | — | #95 | 183 | |
| 1888 | — | #90 | 196 | |
| 1887 | — | #95 | 161 | |
| 1886 | — | #87 | 187 | |
| 1885 | — | #89 | 163 | |
| 1884 | — | #96 | 161 | |
| 1883 | — | #84 | 166 | |
| 1882 | — | #87 | 182 | |
| 1881 | — | #83 | 156 | |
| 1880 | — | #81 | 186 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Philip was already there! It came in at #81, and was given to 186 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1891, when fewer than 200 boys a year got the name.
Where Philip is popular in 1914
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Maine#26 · 1 in 95
- New Hampshire#27 · 1 in 86
- District of Columbia#29 · 1 in 126
- Massachusetts#33 · 1 in 138
- New Jersey#36 · 1 in 160
Best ever in a state: #15 in Maine, 1936.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maine | #26 | 41 | 1 in 95 |
| New Hampshire | #27 | 25 | 1 in 86 |
| District of Columbia | #29 | 12 | 1 in 126 |
| Massachusetts | #33 | 171 | 1 in 138 |
| New Jersey | #36 | 113 | 1 in 160 |
| Vermont | #38 | 14 | 1 in 108 |
| New York | #39 | 419 | 1 in 152 |
| Delaware | #43 | 5 | 1 in 178 |
| Connecticut | #45 | 45 | 1 in 190 |
| California | #54 | 48 | 1 in 273 |
| Rhode Island | #56 | 14 | 1 in 247 |
| Louisiana | #58 | 44 | 1 in 250 |
| Washington | #58 | 19 | 1 in 274 |
| Pennsylvania | #62 | 175 | 1 in 319 |
| Maryland | #63 | 25 | 1 in 303 |
| Illinois | #70 | 104 | 1 in 338 |
| Oregon | #71 | 11 | 1 in 289 |
| Colorado | #74 | 13 | 1 in 317 |
| Idaho | #75 | 8 | 1 in 255 |
| Michigan | #77 | 43 | 1 in 358 |
| Ohio | #77 | 71 | 1 in 398 |
| Indiana | #80 | 39 | 1 in 371 |
| North Dakota | #81 | 13 | 1 in 296 |
| Kansas | #83 | 24 | 1 in 355 |
| Minnesota | #83 | 35 | 1 in 336 |
| Wisconsin | #89 | 34 | 1 in 389 |
| Florida | #93 | 14 | 1 in 456 |
| Iowa | #93 | 27 | 1 in 436 |
| South Dakota | #98 | 8 | 1 in 418 |
| Montana | #99 | 6 | 1 in 456 |
| Utah | #99 | 8 | 1 in 342 |
| Nebraska | #102 | 15 | 1 in 477 |
| Missouri | #104 | 31 | 1 in 552 |
| Virginia | #112 | 23 | 1 in 606 |
| West Virginia | #117 | 13 | 1 in 618 |
| South Carolina | #125 | 18 | 1 in 722 |
| Kentucky | #135 | 18 | 1 in 739 |
| North Carolina | #151 | 22 | 1 in 870 |
| Mississippi | #164 | 13 | 1 in 972 |
| Arkansas | #167 | 11 | 1 in 913 |
| Tennessee | #173 | 12 | 1 in 1,113 |
| Georgia | #188 | 16 | 1 in 1,313 |
| Texas | #195 | 29 | 1 in 1,005 |
| Oklahoma | #207 | 8 | 1 in 1,337 |
| Alabama | #257 | 8 | 1 in 1,963 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Philip
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 7 spots since 2024 (#520 → #527)
- 74 spots since 2020 (#453 → #527)
- 95 spots since 2015 (#432 → #527)
- Biggest jump: 21 spots in 2013 (#408 → #387)
- Biggest drop: 43 spots in 2015 (#389 → #432)
Rise & fade · boys
61 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1941 at #52 (4,166 births)
- Births halved by 1994, 53 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 108 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 108 yrs · run 1880–1971
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 285
- Highest: 1 in 285 boys born in 1948 were named Philip (0.35%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,007 boys born in 2025 (0.03%)
- Its best rank, #52 in 1941, was only 1 in 295 (0.34%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 1950s
- 17.7% of all boys named Philip (60,853) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 1,741 | #81 (1880) | #89 |
| 1890s | 2,147 | #80 (1891) | #87 |
| 1900s | 2,817 | #76 (1907) | #86 |
| 1910s | 18,166 | #66 (1917) | #71 |
| 1920s | 27,268 | #70 (1923) | #72 |
| 1930s | 28,847 | #62 (1937) | #68 |
| 1940s | 48,735 | #52 (1941) | #57 |
| 1950s | 60,853 | #53 (1950) | #62 |
| 1960s | 44,780 | #76 (1960) | #82 |
| 1970s | 31,367 | #83 (1979) | #90 |
| 1980s | 35,733 | #79 (1982) | #86 |
| 1990s | 20,460 | #111 (1990) | #170 |
| 2000s | 10,193 | #255 (2000) | #318 |
| 2010s | 7,216 | #387 (2013) | #416 |
| 2020s | 3,713 | #451 (2021) | #490 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Philip in 1914
boys
#68
1,870 births · 1 in 350 boys
Top boys' names in 1914
More about 1914
boys
654,762 boys got a published name in 1914; 1 in 350 of them was named Philip, which outranked 98.2% of the 3,759 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Philip
Biggest movers since 1913
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.