Peter
Last seen for girls in 2022 at #13,592 · #187 for boys in 2025, 1,954 births
Given to boys 99.7% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1880 · 496 births
- Debut · boys
- 496 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 117 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 589,588since 1880
Peter over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #187 | 1,954 | |
| 2024 | — | #192 | 1,899 | |
| 2023 | — | #210 | 1,750 | |
| 2022 | #13,592 | 6 | #213 | 1,773 |
| 2021 | — | #215 | 1,785 | |
| 2020 | — | #215 | 1,762 | |
| 2019 | — | #212 | 1,821 | |
| 2018 | — | #211 | 1,826 | |
| 2017 | — | #213 | 1,793 | |
| 2016 | — | #207 | 1,927 | |
| 2015 | — | #205 | 1,939 | |
| 2014 | — | #204 | 1,923 | |
| 2013 | — | #206 | 1,854 | |
| 2012 | — | #204 | 1,869 | |
| 2011 | — | #197 | 1,838 | |
| 2010 | — | #193 | 1,935 | |
| 2009 | — | #190 | 2,009 | |
| 2008 | — | #181 | 2,186 | |
| 2007 | — | #177 | 2,340 | |
| 2006 | #17,168 | 5 | #167 | 2,481 |
| 2005 | #14,502 | 6 | #161 | 2,555 |
| 2004 | #12,761 | 7 | #143 | 2,790 |
| 2003 | — | #146 | 2,804 | |
| 2002 | — | #134 | 2,873 | |
| 2001 | — | #133 | 2,950 | |
| 2000 | #13,154 | 6 | #125 | 3,148 |
| 1999 | — | #105 | 3,439 | |
| 1998 | — | #111 | 3,388 | |
| 1997 | #8,334 | 10 | #102 | 3,829 |
| 1996 | #10,567 | 7 | #95 | 4,082 |
| 1995 | #5,958 | 15 | #89 | 4,112 |
| 1994 | #5,713 | 16 | #87 | 4,225 |
| 1993 | #8,719 | 9 | #82 | 4,538 |
| 1992 | #5,267 | 18 | #81 | 4,598 |
| 1991 | #7,430 | 11 | #77 | 4,959 |
| 1990 | #4,523 | 21 | #74 | 5,224 |
| 1989 | #4,358 | 21 | #66 | 5,411 |
| 1988 | #3,306 | 29 | #64 | 5,425 |
| 1987 | #2,915 | 33 | #64 | 5,553 |
| 1986 | #2,300 | 44 | #60 | 5,797 |
| 1985 | #3,008 | 30 | #60 | 5,671 |
| 1984 | #2,266 | 43 | #60 | 5,633 |
| 1983 | #2,475 | 37 | #59 | 5,482 |
| 1982 | #2,369 | 41 | #57 | 5,777 |
| 1981 | #2,723 | 33 | #55 | 5,997 |
| 1980 | #2,154 | 47 | #55 | 5,967 |
| 1979 | #2,430 | 38 | #53 | 6,079 |
| 1978 | #2,431 | 36 | #54 | 5,872 |
| 1977 | #2,557 | 33 | #55 | 5,821 |
| 1976 | #2,387 | 34 | #54 | 5,445 |
| 1975 | #3,155 | 22 | #54 | 5,698 |
| 1974 | #2,433 | 31 | #50 | 5,940 |
| 1973 | #2,689 | 26 | #52 | 5,913 |
| 1972 | #2,398 | 30 | #48 | 6,471 |
| 1971 | #2,107 | 39 | #47 | 7,025 |
| 1970 | #2,043 | 40 | #44 | 8,056 |
| 1969 | #2,102 | 36 | #43 | 7,832 |
| 1968 | #2,205 | 30 | #39 | 8,122 |
| 1967 | #2,492 | 24 | #39 | 8,311 |
| 1966 | #2,022 | 33 | #39 | 8,584 |
| 1965 | #2,744 | 20 | #39 | 9,395 |
| 1964 | #3,244 | 16 | #39 | 9,911 |
| 1963 | #2,543 | 23 | #40 | 9,614 |
| 1962 | #3,161 | 16 | #43 | 9,585 |
| 1961 | #1,838 | 39 | #42 | 10,349 |
| 1960 | #2,061 | 31 | #42 | 10,715 |
| 1959 | #2,191 | 27 | #40 | 11,289 |
| 1958 | #2,581 | 20 | #41 | 10,757 |
| 1957 | #2,218 | 25 | #37 | 11,603 |
| 1956 | #2,622 | 19 | #37 | 11,334 |
| 1955 | #2,553 | 19 | #35 | 11,003 |
| 1954 | #2,592 | 18 | #37 | 10,085 |
| 1953 | #2,173 | 23 | #38 | 9,729 |
| 1952 | #3,040 | 13 | #36 | 9,586 |
| 1951 | #2,810 | 14 | #38 | 8,999 |
| 1950 | #4,738 | 6 | #37 | 8,362 |
| 1949 | #2,514 | 16 | #38 | 8,266 |
| 1948 | #2,126 | 21 | #37 | 8,048 |
| 1947 | #2,279 | 19 | #36 | 8,590 |
| 1946 | #2,482 | 15 | #38 | 7,483 |
| 1945 | #1,795 | 22 | #38 | 6,483 |
| 1944 | #1,808 | 22 | #40 | 6,340 |
| 1943 | #2,151 | 17 | #39 | 6,877 |
| 1942 | #2,046 | 18 | #39 | 6,587 |
| 1941 | #2,397 | 13 | #44 | 5,607 |
| 1940 | #1,792 | 20 | #43 | 5,049 |
| 1939 | #2,592 | 11 | #46 | 4,639 |
| 1938 | #2,021 | 16 | #48 | 4,293 |
| 1937 | #2,196 | 14 | #52 | 3,809 |
| 1936 | #2,263 | 13 | #56 | 3,714 |
| 1935 | #2,575 | 11 | #59 | 3,422 |
| 1934 | #1,556 | 23 | #61 | 3,290 |
| 1933 | #1,970 | 16 | #60 | 3,137 |
| 1932 | #1,634 | 22 | #62 | 3,130 |
| 1931 | #2,024 | 16 | #61 | 3,122 |
| 1930 | #2,110 | 16 | #56 | 3,266 |
| 1929 | #1,555 | 25 | #55 | 3,216 |
| 1928 | #1,469 | 29 | #56 | 3,299 |
| 1927 | #1,619 | 26 | #59 | 3,301 |
| 1926 | #1,997 | 19 | #58 | 3,358 |
| 1925 | #2,617 | 13 | #60 | 3,373 |
| 1924 | #2,212 | 17 | #59 | 3,520 |
| 1923 | #2,091 | 18 | #58 | 3,409 |
| 1922 | #1,730 | 24 | #57 | 3,545 |
| 1921 | #2,282 | 16 | #57 | 3,548 |
| 1920 | #2,172 | 17 | #57 | 3,497 |
| 1919 | #2,156 | 16 | #57 | 3,375 |
| 1918 | #2,822 | 11 | #53 | 3,711 |
| 1917 | #2,428 | 13 | #50 | 3,464 |
| 1916 | #2,368 | 13 | #50 | 3,370 |
| 1915 | #1,672 | 20 | #48 | 3,302 |
| 1914 | #2,009 | 12 | #48 | 2,624 |
| 1913 | #2,164 | 9 | #51 | 1,934 |
| 1912 | #2,979 | 5 | #48 | 1,679 |
| 1911 | #2,463 | 5 | #50 | 845 |
| 1910 | — | #56 | 631 | |
| 1909 | — | #56 | 539 | |
| 1908 | — | #53 | 541 | |
| 1907 | — | #61 | 473 | |
| 1906 | #1,727 | 6 | #59 | 427 |
| 1905 | — | #62 | 409 | |
| 1904 | — | #62 | 395 | |
| 1903 | — | #58 | 372 | |
| 1902 | — | #51 | 433 | |
| 1901 | — | #56 | 343 | |
| 1900 | — | #58 | 443 | |
| 1899 | #1,394 | 6 | #53 | 354 |
| 1898 | — | #54 | 409 | |
| 1897 | — | #51 | 397 | |
| 1896 | — | #52 | 402 | |
| 1895 | — | #53 | 412 | |
| 1894 | — | #55 | 391 | |
| 1893 | — | #53 | 392 | |
| 1892 | — | #45 | 465 | |
| 1891 | — | #45 | 396 | |
| 1890 | — | #43 | 410 | |
| 1889 | — | #45 | 425 | |
| 1888 | — | #41 | 498 | |
| 1887 | #1,036 | 6 | #43 | 421 |
| 1886 | — | #42 | 437 | |
| 1885 | — | #33 | 516 | |
| 1884 | — | #34 | 524 | |
| 1883 | — | #36 | 450 | |
| 1882 | — | #36 | 461 | |
| 1881 | — | #37 | 428 | |
| 1880 | — | #31 | 496 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Peter was already there! It came in at #31, and was given to 496 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1886–1907, when fewer than 500 boys a year got the name.
Where Peter is popular in 2006
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- District of Columbia#56 · 1 in 195
- New Jersey#73 · 1 in 318
- Connecticut#74 · 1 in 263
- Massachusetts#83 · 1 in 350
- New York#85 · 1 in 386
Best ever in a state: #2 in Alaska, 1930.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| District of Columbia | #56 | 24 | 1 in 195 |
| New Jersey | #73 | 148 | 1 in 318 |
| Connecticut | #74 | 64 | 1 in 263 |
| Massachusetts | #83 | 94 | 1 in 350 |
| New York | #85 | 284 | 1 in 386 |
| Vermont | #89 | 8 | 1 in 261 |
| Minnesota | #107 | 68 | 1 in 452 |
| Maryland | #111 | 62 | 1 in 486 |
| New Hampshire | #117 | 12 | 1 in 455 |
| Illinois | #126 | 136 | 1 in 566 |
| Virginia | #131 | 72 | 1 in 611 |
| Alaska | #134 | 8 | 1 in 418 |
| Pennsylvania | #135 | 102 | 1 in 632 |
| Utah | #135 | 49 | 1 in 475 |
| Washington | #136 | 64 | 1 in 568 |
| Colorado | #138 | 58 | 1 in 522 |
| Maine | #139 | 10 | 1 in 551 |
| Oregon | #146 | 36 | 1 in 565 |
| Michigan | #149 | 77 | 1 in 704 |
| Hawaii | #155 | 9 | 1 in 567 |
| Wisconsin | #155 | 41 | 1 in 730 |
| Idaho | #160 | 16 | 1 in 569 |
| Rhode Island | #166 | 6 | 1 in 806 |
| Delaware | #171 | 6 | 1 in 659 |
| Nevada | #172 | 23 | 1 in 679 |
| California | #177 | 328 | 1 in 794 |
| Florida | #177 | 118 | 1 in 876 |
| Montana | #180 | 7 | 1 in 621 |
| North Carolina | #197 | 55 | 1 in 991 |
| Kansas | #213 | 19 | 1 in 885 |
| Missouri | #221 | 30 | 1 in 1,166 |
| Georgia | #222 | 53 | 1 in 1,178 |
| Arizona | #227 | 45 | 1 in 1,007 |
| Ohio | #230 | 52 | 1 in 1,278 |
| Louisiana | #242 | 21 | 1 in 1,195 |
| Indiana | #251 | 30 | 1 in 1,293 |
| Texas | #275 | 125 | 1 in 1,491 |
| Kentucky | #296 | 13 | 1 in 1,845 |
| Iowa | #310 | 10 | 1 in 1,694 |
| New Mexico | #314 | 7 | 1 in 1,624 |
| South Carolina | #317 | 14 | 1 in 1,618 |
| Nebraska | #319 | 7 | 1 in 1,517 |
| Arkansas | #321 | 10 | 1 in 1,562 |
| Tennessee | #350 | 18 | 1 in 2,081 |
| Oklahoma | #359 | 12 | 1 in 1,795 |
| Alabama | #386 | 11 | 1 in 2,297 |
| Mississippi | #495 | 6 | 1 in 2,673 |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Peter
- 5 spots since 2024 (#192 → #187)
- 28 spots since 2020 (#215 → #187)
- 18 spots since 2015 (#205 → #187)
- Biggest jump: 18 spots in 2024 (#210 → #192)
- Biggest drop: 20 spots in 2000 (#105 → #125)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1880 at #31 (496 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 117 yrs · run 1880–1996
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 186 boys born in 1957 were named Peter (0.54%)
- Latest: 1 in 874 boys born in 2025 (0.11%)
- Its best rank, #31 in 1880, was only 1 in 223 (0.45%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 17.4% of all boys named Peter (102,747) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 4,656 | #31 (1880) | #38 |
| 1890s | 4,028 | #43 (1890) | #50 |
| 1900s | 4,375 | #51 (1902) | #58 |
| 1910s | 24,935 | #48 (1915) | #51 |
| 1920s | 34,066 | #55 (1929) | #58 |
| 1930s | 35,822 | #46 (1939) | #56 |
| 1940s | 69,330 | #36 (1947) | #39 |
| 1950s | 102,747 | #35 (1955) | #38 |
| 1960s | 92,418 | #39 (1964) | #41 |
| 1970s | 62,320 | #44 (1970) | #51 |
| 1980s | 56,713 | #55 (1981) | #60 |
| 1990s | 42,394 | #74 (1990) | #90 |
| 2000s | 26,136 | #125 (2000) | #156 |
| 2010s | 18,725 | #193 (2010) | #205 |
| 2020s | 10,923 | #187 (2025) | #205 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Peter in 2006
Top girls' names in 2006
Top boys' names in 2006
More about 2006
girls
1,901,209 girls got a published name in 2006; 1 in 380,242 of them was named Peter, which outranked 14.4% of the 20,064 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Tied with 2,896 names at #17,168; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↑ 8,571Bethzy#9,452 → #881
- ↑ 1,747Rihanna#2,278 → #531
- ↑ 965Yaretzi#1,803 → #838
- ↑ 921Betsy#1,668 → #747
- ↑ 612Evangeline#1,210 → #598
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,055,273 boys got a published name in 2006; 1 in 828 of them was named Peter, which outranked 98.8% of the 14,047 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.