Peighton
#5,554 for girls in 2025, 22 births · Last seen for boys in 2019 at #8,889
Given to girls 96.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2010 · 189 births
- Debut · girls
- 10 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,740since 1992
Peighton over time
Rank among girls' names. Peighton has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,554 | 22 | — | |
| 2024 | #4,893 | 27 | — | |
| 2023 | #3,091 | 53 | — | |
| 2022 | #3,365 | 47 | — | |
| 2021 | #3,157 | 51 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,597 | 65 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,949 | 100 | #8,889 | 8 |
| 2018 | #2,084 | 92 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,828 | 112 | #8,840 | 8 |
| 2016 | #1,573 | 141 | #8,816 | 8 |
| 2015 | #1,566 | 140 | #9,568 | 7 |
| 2014 | #1,510 | 146 | #12,108 | 5 |
| 2013 | #1,338 | 174 | #8,789 | 8 |
| 2012 | #1,279 | 187 | #9,709 | 7 |
| 2011 | #1,292 | 182 | #7,009 | 11 |
| 2010 | #1,263 | 189 | #9,693 | 7 |
| 2009 | #1,366 | 174 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,704 | 131 | — | |
| 2007 | #2,394 | 79 | #8,173 | 9 |
| 2006 | #2,485 | 74 | — | |
| 2005 | #2,580 | 66 | #8,299 | 8 |
| 2004 | #2,652 | 62 | — | |
| 2003 | #2,923 | 52 | — | |
| 2002 | #2,854 | 52 | — | |
| 2001 | #2,881 | 50 | — | |
| 2000 | #2,277 | 68 | — | |
| 1999 | #3,443 | 36 | — | |
| 1998 | #2,691 | 50 | #7,560 | 7 |
| 1997 | #3,302 | 35 | — | |
| 1996 | #3,632 | 30 | — | |
| 1995 | #5,439 | 17 | — | |
| 1994 | #6,672 | 13 | — | |
| 1993 | #6,622 | 13 | — | |
| 1992 | #8,065 | 10 | — | |
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Peighton! It came in at #8,065, and was given to 10 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1992–1994, when fewer than 14 girls a year got the name.
Where Peighton is popular in 2009
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Minnesota#735 · 1 in 4,132
- Michigan#748 · 1 in 4,274
- Alabama#797 · 1 in 4,003
- Ohio#814 · 1 in 4,949
- Missouri#821 · 1 in 4,668
Best ever in a state: #413 in Arkansas, 2012.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minnesota | #735 | 6 | 1 in 4,132 |
| Michigan | #748 | 10 | 1 in 4,274 |
| Alabama | #797 | 5 | 1 in 4,003 |
| Ohio | #814 | 11 | 1 in 4,949 |
| Missouri | #821 | 6 | 1 in 4,668 |
| Tennessee | #1,019 | 5 | 1 in 6,104 |
| New Jersey | #1,028 | 6 | 1 in 6,387 |
| North Carolina | #1,091 | 7 | 1 in 6,631 |
| New York | #1,114 | 13 | 1 in 7,290 |
| Arizona | #1,153 | 5 | 1 in 6,704 |
| Illinois | #1,212 | 8 | 1 in 7,905 |
| Florida | #1,335 | 9 | 1 in 9,148 |
| Texas | #1,456 | 16 | 1 in 10,417 |
| California | #2,627 | 8 | 1 in 27,286 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Peighton
- 661 spots since 2024 (#4,893 → #5,554)
- 2,957 spots since 2020 (#2,597 → #5,554)
- 3,988 spots since 2015 (#1,566 → #5,554)
- Debuted 1992
- Peaked 2010 at #1,263 (189 births)
- Births halved by 2018, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 9,405 girls born in 2010 were named Peighton (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 73,058 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 53.4% of all girls named Peighton (1,463) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 204 | #2,691 (1998) | #4,983 |
| 2000s | 808 | #1,366 (2009) | #2,412 |
| 2010s | 1,463 | #1,263 (2010) | #1,568 |
| 2020s | 265 | #2,597 (2020) | #3,776 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Peighton in 2009
Top girls' names in 2009
More about 2009
girls
1,837,114 girls got a published name in 2009; 1 in 10,558 of them was named Peighton, which outranked 93.2% of the 20,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,358Vanesa175
- #1,358Yaneli175
- #1,358Yuridia175
- #1,366Peighton174
- #1,366Alanah174
- #1,366Alex174
- #1,366Caelyn174
- #1,374Alessia173
- #1,374Bonnie173
- #1,374Constance173
Tied with 7 names at #1,366; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.