Pat

Last seen for girls in 1991 at #11,509 · Last seen for boys in 2014 at #12,108
Given to girls 60.0% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1941 · 1,900 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
40,123
since 1897

Pat over time

girlsboys

Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201953peak #134, 1941peak #240, 1937girlsboys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025——
2024——
2023——
2022——
2021——
2020——
2019——
2018——
2017——
2016——
2015——
2014—#12,1085
2013—#12,1365
2012——
2011——
2010——
2009——
2008——
2007——
2006—#6,90411
2005—#10,1516
2004——
2003—#10,8945
2002—#10,6675
2001——
2000—#9,1126
1999——
1998—#7,5607
1997—#8,1106
1996——
1995—#4,28014
1994—#5,8689
1993—#6,2288
1992—#3,10521
1991#11,5096#2,60626
1990—#3,05820
1989#10,8476#3,20518
1988—#2,68221
1987#9,8256#2,64120
1986#6,61210#2,60120
1985#9,3076#2,42721
1984#8,1537#2,36421
1983#5,45712#2,14024
1982#6,37110#2,05926
1981—#1,76632
1980#6,31910#2,05826
1979#5,09213#1,75332
1978#4,45915#1,50838
1977#4,23516#1,40742
1976#4,15415#1,22550
1975#3,77417#1,06561
1974#2,61628#1,12453
1973#2,45530#84787
1972#2,59827#82694
1971#1,87746#702139
1970#2,24035#586191
1969#1,95541#515227
1968#1,41863#452289
1967#1,20478#406355
1966#991106#375411
1965#780162#332518
1964#606273#282749
1963#548311#283738
1962#439484#265830
1961#390611#258929
1960#349755#2531,000
1959#2831,002#259948
1958#2741,042#267844
1957#319815#302634
1956#439435#360418
1955#477359#401329
1954#520291#405314
1953#556247#400306
1952#485300#378328
1951#465325#383315
1950#386440#343384
1949#299667#305496
1948#2071,249#272596
1947#1641,824#245720
1946#1471,871#249623
1945#1541,520#264492
1944#1541,592#268495
1943#1451,840#267519
1942#1441,824#248534
1941#1341,900#241530
1940#1341,863#249482
1939#1421,659#255446
1938#1491,533#268420
1937#1471,529#240483
1936#1521,344#262421
1935#1501,327#253458
1934#1621,204#242472
1933#1601,146#270380
1932#1771,061#254449
1931#197926#274407
1930#227734#295373
1929#262597#292363
1928#308457#296360
1927#334407#338287
1926#366338#337297
1925#499198#336295
1924#585158#388240
1923#692112#395227
1922#74296#398229
1921#85375#406223
1920#81978#416204
1919#80077#441180
1918#85970#404215
1917#96452#415185
1916#85663#421177
1915#97946#419166
1914#87045#424128
1913#98130#45690
1912#90331#45675
1911#95821#40949
1910#99719#32458
1909#1,05215#36542
1908#1,13513#38936
1907#1,20611#38833
1906#1,5537#35035
1905#1,6966#34635
1904#1,6596#34035
1903#1,3188#33033
1902#1,4387#33135
1901—#31432
1900—#29250
1899—#34627
1898#1,3797#45220
1897#1,5555#32732
1896—#36727
1895—#30136
1894—#33628
1893—#34127
1892—#38424
1891—#44116
1890—#32229
1889—#41519
1888—#33030
1887—#37719
1886—#35723
1885—#36423
1884—#34426
1883—#38120
1882—#32428
1881—#37520
1880—#52612
First appearance
1897

The first year at least five girls were named Pat! It came in at #1,555, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1899–1901, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.

Where Pat is popular in 1953

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedNHWashington: #305 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 2,494 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedMNIllinois: #414 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 4,970 girlsILWisconsin: #295 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 3,325 girlsWIMichigan: #486 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 6,916 girlsMINew York: #721 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 13,985 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedINOhio: #500 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 8,035 girlsOHPennsylvania: #590 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 11,072 girlsPANew Jersey: #553 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 9,986 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #674 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 9,257 girlsCAUtah: #236 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 1,227 girlsUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedNEMissouri: #339 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 3,493 girlsMOKentucky: #405 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,700 girlsKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedARTennessee: #516 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,563 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #580 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 8,550 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #503 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,770 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #381 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,673 girlsOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedMSAlabama: #420 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 4,543 girlsALGeorgia: #587 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 8,914 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Pat, so not publishedHITexas: #493 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 4,617 girlsTXFlorida: #569 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,146 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Utah#236 · 1 in 1,227
  2. Wisconsin#295 · 1 in 3,325
  3. Washington#305 · 1 in 2,494
  4. Missouri#339 · 1 in 3,493
  5. Oklahoma#381 · 1 in 3,673

Best ever in a state: #30 in Nevada, 1942.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Utah#23681 in 1,227
Wisconsin#295121 in 3,325
Washington#305111 in 2,494
Missouri#339121 in 3,493
Oklahoma#38161 in 3,673
Kentucky#40571 in 4,700
Illinois#414191 in 4,970
Alabama#42081 in 4,543
Michigan#486121 in 6,916
Texas#493241 in 4,617
Ohio#500121 in 8,035
South Carolina#50351 in 5,770
Tennessee#51651 in 7,563
New Jersey#55351 in 9,986
Florida#56951 in 7,146
North Carolina#58061 in 8,550
Georgia#58751 in 8,914
Pennsylvania#590101 in 11,072
California#674151 in 9,257
New York#721111 in 13,985
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Vermont———
Virginia———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Pat
Momentum · girls
Faded out
  • Not published in 2025; last seen 1991
  • Biggest jump: 133 spots in 1926 (#499 → #366)
  • Biggest drop: 213 spots in 1967 (#991 → #1,204)
Rise & fade · girls
44 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1897
  • Peaked 1941 at #134 (1,900 births)
  • Births halved by 1949, 8 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 57 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 57 yrs · run 1910–1966
Share of babies · girls
1 in 614
  • Highest: 1 in 614 girls born in 1940 were named Pat (0.16%)
  • Latest: 1 in 312,501 girls born in 1991 (0.00%)
  • Its best rank, #134 in 1941, was only 1 in 636 (0.16%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1940s
  • 40.3% of all girls named Pat (16,150) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1960
  • Mostly girls until 1959, mostly boys since
all girlsall boys
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1890s12#1,379 (1898)#1,467
1900s73#1,052 (1909)#1,382
1910s454#800 (1919)#917
1920s2,516#262 (1929)#546
1930s12,463#142 (1939)#166
1940s16,150#134 (1941)#168
1950s5,256#274 (1958)#420
1960s2,884#349 (1960)#868
1970s242#1,877 (1971)#3,350
1980s67#5,457 (1983)#7,861
1990s6#11,509 (1991)#11,509

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Pat in 1953

girls
#556
247 births · 1 in 7,617 girls
boys
#400
306 births · 1 in 6,445 boys

Top girls' names in 1953

  1. #1Mary64,389
  2. #2Linda61,281
  3. #3Deborah52,199
  4. #4Patricia51,019
  5. #5Susan44,297
  6. #6Barbara38,473
  7. #7Debra36,856
  8. #8Nancy30,620
  9. #9Karen29,858
  10. #10Pamela25,760
  11. #556Pat247

Top boys' names in 1953

  1. #1Robert86,243
  2. #2James86,066
  3. #3Michael84,198
  4. #4John80,165
  5. #5David76,119
  6. #6William61,829
  7. #7Richard58,389
  8. #8Thomas47,008
  9. #9Charles38,421
  10. #10Gary36,967
  11. #400Pat306
More about 1953

girls

1,881,301 girls got a published name in 1953; 1 in 7,617 of them was named Pat, which outranked 91.4% of the 6,497 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Pat
  1. #552Delois250
  2. #554Beverley249
  3. #555Lela248
  4. #556Pat247
  5. #557Etta246
  6. #558Pam245
  7. #559Harriett244
Biggest movers since 1952
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,253Enola#3,201 → #948
  2. ↑ 885Lu#1,368 → #483
  3. ↑ 749Joni#1,046 → #297
  4. ↑ 553Brooke#1,351 → #798
  5. ↑ 531Lorri#1,430 → #899
Fallers
  1. ↓ 274Roseanna#808 → #1,082
  2. ↓ 253Georgie#946 → #1,199
  3. ↓ 218Pandora#783 → #1,001
  4. ↓ 204Fonda#822 → #1,026
  5. ↓ 195Brinda#935 → #1,130

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

1,972,299 boys got a published name in 1953; 1 in 6,445 of them was named Pat, which outranked 90.8% of the 4,341 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Pat
  1. #397Darwin313
  2. #398Jerrold309
  3. #399Amos307
  4. #400Pat306
  5. #401Woodrow304
  6. #402Barney297
  7. #403Dewayne296
Biggest movers since 1952
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,276Faron#2,251 → #975
  2. ↑ 694Shane#1,213 → #519
  3. ↑ 528Enrico#1,517 → #989
  4. ↑ 441Blaise#1,430 → #989
  5. ↑ 429Robbin#1,268 → #839
Fallers
  1. ↓ 427Durwood#981 → #1,408
  2. ↓ 392Jonnie#939 → #1,331
  3. ↓ 312Elvis#968 → #1,280
  4. ↓ 293Edsel#968 → #1,261
  5. ↓ 292Beverly#766 → #1,058

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1953 →