Osvaldo
Last seen for girls in 1999 at #11,385 · #1,401 for boys in 2025, 130 births
Given to boys 99.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2004 · 634 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 14,526since 1917
Osvaldo over time
Rank among boys' names. Osvaldo has never cracked the top 400 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,401 | 130 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,314 | 148 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,271 | 151 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,574 | 112 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,514 | 117 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,408 | 123 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,372 | 130 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,294 | 141 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,202 | 154 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,055 | 187 | |
| 2015 | — | #991 | 208 | |
| 2014 | — | #991 | 209 | |
| 2013 | — | #962 | 208 | |
| 2012 | — | #757 | 302 | |
| 2011 | — | #665 | 356 | |
| 2010 | — | #724 | 317 | |
| 2009 | — | #689 | 352 | |
| 2008 | — | #594 | 423 | |
| 2007 | — | #485 | 551 | |
| 2006 | — | #491 | 529 | |
| 2005 | — | #481 | 522 | |
| 2004 | — | #410 | 634 | |
| 2003 | — | #461 | 546 | |
| 2002 | — | #418 | 595 | |
| 2001 | — | #481 | 491 | |
| 2000 | — | #540 | 399 | |
| 1999 | #11,385 | 7 | #542 | 375 |
| 1998 | — | #514 | 406 | |
| 1997 | — | #516 | 391 | |
| 1996 | — | #497 | 420 | |
| 1995 | — | #595 | 300 | |
| 1994 | #13,430 | 5 | #549 | 352 |
| 1993 | — | #574 | 318 | |
| 1992 | — | #654 | 251 | |
| 1991 | — | #664 | 231 | |
| 1990 | — | #636 | 252 | |
| 1989 | — | #729 | 183 | |
| 1988 | — | #832 | 130 | |
| 1987 | — | #829 | 126 | |
| 1986 | — | #807 | 125 | |
| 1985 | — | #755 | 139 | |
| 1984 | — | #796 | 120 | |
| 1983 | — | #709 | 146 | |
| 1982 | — | #741 | 140 | |
| 1981 | — | #775 | 126 | |
| 1980 | — | #777 | 127 | |
| 1979 | — | #785 | 121 | |
| 1978 | — | #813 | 110 | |
| 1977 | — | #760 | 126 | |
| 1976 | — | #739 | 127 | |
| 1975 | — | #711 | 136 | |
| 1974 | — | #802 | 100 | |
| 1973 | — | #804 | 96 | |
| 1972 | — | #822 | 95 | |
| 1971 | — | #848 | 92 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,005 | 65 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,086 | 51 | |
| 1968 | — | #958 | 58 | |
| 1967 | — | #931 | 60 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,073 | 47 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,206 | 40 | |
| 1964 | — | #1,263 | 38 | |
| 1963 | — | #994 | 58 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,147 | 45 | |
| 1961 | — | #967 | 63 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,434 | 31 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,467 | 29 | |
| 1958 | — | #1,305 | 35 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,457 | 29 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,418 | 30 | |
| 1955 | — | #1,725 | 20 | |
| 1954 | — | #1,762 | 19 | |
| 1953 | — | #1,592 | 23 | |
| 1952 | — | #1,749 | 19 | |
| 1951 | — | #2,495 | 10 | |
| 1950 | — | #3,681 | 5 | |
| 1949 | — | #3,019 | 7 | |
| 1948 | — | #2,608 | 9 | |
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | #2,690 | 8 | |
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | #2,633 | 8 | |
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | #3,459 | 5 | |
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | #3,679 | 5 | |
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | #2,864 | 8 | |
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | #3,981 | 5 | |
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Osvaldo! It came in at #3,981, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1917–1930, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Osvaldo is popular in 2003
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Texas#258 · 1 in 1,359
- Arizona#260 · 1 in 1,336
- California#263 · 1 in 1,609
- Nevada#266 · 1 in 1,320
- Washington#294 · 1 in 1,610
Best ever in a state: #210 in California, 1996.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | #258 | 130 | 1 in 1,359 |
| Arizona | #260 | 30 | 1 in 1,336 |
| California | #263 | 156 | 1 in 1,609 |
| Nevada | #266 | 10 | 1 in 1,320 |
| Washington | #294 | 21 | 1 in 1,610 |
| Illinois | #303 | 43 | 1 in 1,842 |
| Colorado | #323 | 16 | 1 in 1,893 |
| Arkansas | #401 | 6 | 1 in 2,470 |
| Oregon | #434 | 7 | 1 in 2,803 |
| Kansas | #475 | 5 | 1 in 3,334 |
| Georgia | #541 | 15 | 1 in 3,810 |
| Florida | #571 | 21 | 1 in 4,450 |
| Wisconsin | #611 | 5 | 1 in 5,847 |
| Minnesota | #617 | 5 | 1 in 6,007 |
| North Carolina | #683 | 8 | 1 in 6,362 |
| Michigan | #736 | 8 | 1 in 7,086 |
| New Jersey | #908 | 5 | 1 in 9,669 |
| New York | #1,086 | 9 | 1 in 12,407 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Osvaldo
- 87 spots since 2024 (#1,314 → #1,401)
- 7 spots since 2020 (#1,408 → #1,401)
- 410 spots since 2015 (#991 → #1,401)
- Biggest jump: 467 spots in 1961 (#1,434 → #967)
- Biggest drop: 269 spots in 1964 (#994 → #1,263)
- Debuted 1917
- Peaked 2004 at #410 (634 births)
- Births halved by 2010, 6 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 49 yrs · run 1971–2015
- Highest: 1 in 3,131 boys born in 2004 were named Osvaldo (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 13,139 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 34.7% of all boys named Osvaldo (5,042) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 5 | #3,981 (1917) | #3,981 |
| 1920s | 0 | — | — |
| 1930s | 13 | #2,864 (1931) | #3,272 |
| 1940s | 37 | #2,608 (1948) | #2,882 |
| 1950s | 219 | #1,305 (1958) | #1,865 |
| 1960s | 491 | #931 (1967) | #1,106 |
| 1970s | 1,068 | #711 (1975) | #809 |
| 1980s | 1,362 | #709 (1983) | #775 |
| 1990s | 3,296 | #497 (1996) | #574 |
| 2000s | 5,042 | #410 (2004) | #505 |
| 2010s | 2,212 | #665 (2011) | #1,001 |
| 2020s | 781 | #1,271 (2023) | #1,414 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Osvaldo in 2003
Top boys' names in 2003
More about 2003
boys
1,975,349 boys got a published name in 2003; 1 in 3,618 of them was named Osvaldo, which outranked 96.4% of the 12,761 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 11.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).