Ossie
Last seen for girls in 1980 at #9,095 · Last seen for boys in 2014 at #12,108
Given to girls 63.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1887 · 17 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,917since 1880
Ossie over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | #12,108 | 5 | |
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | #10,921 | 6 | |
| 2006 | — | #10,662 | 6 | |
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | #9,948 | 6 | |
| 2003 | — | #9,581 | 6 | |
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | #10,556 | 5 | |
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | #7,281 | 7 | |
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | #6,816 | 7 | |
| 1992 | — | #6,128 | 8 | |
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | #5,823 | 8 | |
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | #6,089 | 6 | |
| 1986 | — | #6,721 | 5 | |
| 1985 | — | #4,333 | 9 | |
| 1984 | — | #6,315 | 5 | |
| 1983 | — | #3,630 | 11 | |
| 1982 | — | #5,003 | 7 | |
| 1981 | — | #4,961 | 7 | |
| 1980 | #9,095 | 6 | #4,940 | 7 |
| 1979 | — | #3,357 | 12 | |
| 1978 | — | #3,614 | 10 | |
| 1977 | — | #5,845 | 5 | |
| 1976 | — | #2,826 | 14 | |
| 1975 | — | #4,797 | 6 | |
| 1974 | — | #4,190 | 7 | |
| 1973 | — | #4,505 | 6 | |
| 1972 | — | #3,963 | 7 | |
| 1971 | — | #3,963 | 7 | |
| 1970 | — | #2,891 | 11 | |
| 1969 | #7,471 | 5 | #2,415 | 13 |
| 1968 | — | #2,200 | 14 | |
| 1967 | — | #2,242 | 13 | |
| 1966 | #3,558 | 13 | #2,784 | 9 |
| 1965 | #3,952 | 11 | #3,930 | 5 |
| 1964 | #5,008 | 8 | #2,114 | 15 |
| 1963 | #4,019 | 11 | #2,300 | 13 |
| 1962 | #6,578 | 5 | #2,117 | 15 |
| 1961 | #4,546 | 9 | #2,409 | 12 |
| 1960 | #6,390 | 5 | #2,121 | 15 |
| 1959 | #2,869 | 17 | #2,295 | 13 |
| 1958 | #3,379 | 13 | #3,033 | 8 |
| 1957 | #2,486 | 21 | #1,887 | 18 |
| 1956 | #2,929 | 16 | #1,608 | 24 |
| 1955 | #3,571 | 11 | #1,845 | 18 |
| 1954 | #2,076 | 26 | #1,628 | 22 |
| 1953 | #2,173 | 23 | #1,765 | 19 |
| 1952 | #2,126 | 23 | #1,701 | 20 |
| 1951 | #2,016 | 24 | #1,643 | 21 |
| 1950 | #2,053 | 22 | #1,572 | 22 |
| 1949 | #1,603 | 34 | #1,616 | 21 |
| 1948 | #1,901 | 25 | #1,280 | 32 |
| 1947 | #1,822 | 28 | #1,519 | 24 |
| 1946 | #1,723 | 27 | #1,557 | 21 |
| 1945 | #1,450 | 31 | #1,494 | 20 |
| 1944 | #1,340 | 36 | #1,328 | 25 |
| 1943 | #1,556 | 29 | #1,399 | 25 |
| 1942 | #1,229 | 42 | #1,421 | 24 |
| 1941 | #1,501 | 27 | #1,300 | 26 |
| 1940 | #1,150 | 40 | #1,397 | 23 |
| 1939 | #1,160 | 39 | #1,238 | 28 |
| 1938 | #992 | 51 | #1,613 | 18 |
| 1937 | #1,085 | 43 | #1,627 | 18 |
| 1936 | #1,115 | 40 | #1,723 | 16 |
| 1935 | #1,039 | 44 | #1,708 | 17 |
| 1934 | #925 | 55 | #1,293 | 27 |
| 1933 | #957 | 51 | #1,230 | 29 |
| 1932 | #1,070 | 44 | #1,387 | 25 |
| 1931 | #926 | 56 | #1,282 | 29 |
| 1930 | #909 | 64 | #1,330 | 29 |
| 1929 | #968 | 55 | #1,378 | 27 |
| 1928 | #840 | 74 | #1,522 | 24 |
| 1927 | #856 | 74 | #1,603 | 23 |
| 1926 | #958 | 61 | #1,331 | 30 |
| 1925 | #800 | 85 | #1,628 | 22 |
| 1924 | #914 | 69 | #1,727 | 21 |
| 1923 | #838 | 76 | #1,322 | 30 |
| 1922 | #845 | 75 | #1,196 | 36 |
| 1921 | #837 | 78 | #1,448 | 27 |
| 1920 | #791 | 83 | #1,089 | 42 |
| 1919 | #712 | 96 | #1,047 | 42 |
| 1918 | #832 | 74 | #1,446 | 25 |
| 1917 | #800 | 74 | #1,238 | 30 |
| 1916 | #824 | 67 | #1,157 | 32 |
| 1915 | #780 | 71 | #1,454 | 22 |
| 1914 | #747 | 59 | #1,188 | 24 |
| 1913 | #758 | 48 | #1,205 | 18 |
| 1912 | #717 | 49 | #1,059 | 19 |
| 1911 | #754 | 33 | #1,038 | 11 |
| 1910 | #644 | 43 | #707 | 18 |
| 1909 | #614 | 40 | #1,020 | 9 |
| 1908 | #698 | 31 | #825 | 11 |
| 1907 | #666 | 32 | #1,094 | 7 |
| 1906 | #742 | 24 | #1,253 | 5 |
| 1905 | #642 | 30 | #836 | 9 |
| 1904 | #755 | 22 | #874 | 8 |
| 1903 | #628 | 28 | — | |
| 1902 | #688 | 24 | #794 | 9 |
| 1901 | #699 | 21 | — | |
| 1900 | #624 | 32 | #649 | 15 |
| 1899 | #1,181 | 8 | #857 | 7 |
| 1898 | #840 | 16 | #804 | 8 |
| 1897 | #1,037 | 10 | #725 | 9 |
| 1896 | #790 | 17 | — | |
| 1895 | #815 | 15 | #978 | 6 |
| 1894 | #609 | 23 | #1,074 | 5 |
| 1893 | #687 | 18 | — | |
| 1892 | #861 | 12 | #792 | 8 |
| 1891 | #695 | 15 | #963 | 5 |
| 1890 | #940 | 9 | — | |
| 1889 | #687 | 14 | #878 | 6 |
| 1888 | #959 | 8 | #755 | 8 |
| 1887 | #537 | 17 | — | |
| 1886 | #1,108 | 5 | #959 | 5 |
| 1885 | #921 | 6 | #765 | 7 |
| 1884 | #731 | 9 | #848 | 6 |
| 1883 | #754 | 7 | — | |
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | #836 | 5 | #640 | 9 |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Ossie was already there! It came in at #836, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1882, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
See more about Ossie
Momentum · girls
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1980
- Biggest jump: 571 spots in 1887 (#1,108 → #537)
- Biggest drop: 422 spots in 1888 (#537 → #959)
Rise & fade · girls
7 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1887 at #537 (17 births)
- Births halved by 1888, 1 yr later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 50 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 50 yrs · run 1900–1931
Share of babies · girls
1 in 8,587
- Highest: 1 in 8,587 girls born in 1887 were named Ossie (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 276,718 girls born in 1980 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1920s
- 25.0% of all girls named Ossie (730) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1967
- Mostly girls until 1966, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 71 | #537 (1887) | #817 |
| 1890s | 143 | #609 (1894) | #846 |
| 1900s | 284 | #614 (1909) | #676 |
| 1910s | 614 | #644 (1910) | #757 |
| 1920s | 730 | #791 (1920) | #865 |
| 1930s | 487 | #909 (1930) | #1,018 |
| 1940s | 319 | #1,150 (1940) | #1,528 |
| 1950s | 196 | #2,016 (1951) | #2,568 |
| 1960s | 67 | #3,558 (1966) | #5,190 |
| 1970s | 0 | — | — |
| 1980s | 6 | #9,095 (1980) | #9,095 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Ossie in 1896
girls
#790
17 births · 1 in 13,995 girls
Top girls' names in 1896
More about 1896
girls
237,918 girls got a published name in 1896; 1 in 13,995 of them was named Ossie, which outranked 56.7% of the 1,825 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 20.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).