Omer
Last seen for girls in 2023 at #13,462 · #2,091 for boys in 2025, 70 births
Given to boys 99.2% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1891 · 38 births
- Debut · boys
- 29 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 8,856since 1880
Omer over time
Rank among boys' names. Omer has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #2,091 | 70 | |
| 2024 | — | #2,057 | 73 | |
| 2023 | #13,462 | 6 | #2,221 | 64 |
| 2022 | — | #2,083 | 72 | |
| 2021 | — | #2,464 | 54 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,996 | 71 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,868 | 80 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,707 | 92 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,935 | 74 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,828 | 82 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,931 | 75 | |
| 2014 | — | #2,017 | 70 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,725 | 85 | |
| 2012 | — | #2,209 | 59 | |
| 2011 | — | #2,173 | 60 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,940 | 72 | |
| 2009 | — | #2,381 | 54 | |
| 2008 | — | #2,001 | 70 | |
| 2007 | — | #2,372 | 54 | |
| 2006 | #17,168 | 5 | #1,840 | 74 |
| 2005 | — | #2,081 | 59 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,911 | 64 | |
| 2003 | — | #2,006 | 57 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,832 | 62 | |
| 2001 | — | #1,960 | 55 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,895 | 55 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,995 | 48 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,585 | 66 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,790 | 53 | |
| 1996 | — | #1,842 | 49 | |
| 1995 | — | #1,914 | 44 | |
| 1994 | — | #1,822 | 47 | |
| 1993 | — | #2,050 | 39 | |
| 1992 | — | #2,174 | 35 | |
| 1991 | — | #2,295 | 31 | |
| 1990 | — | #2,373 | 29 | |
| 1989 | — | #2,292 | 29 | |
| 1988 | — | #2,197 | 28 | |
| 1987 | — | #1,793 | 36 | |
| 1986 | — | #2,360 | 23 | |
| 1985 | — | #2,293 | 23 | |
| 1984 | — | #1,796 | 31 | |
| 1983 | — | #1,955 | 27 | |
| 1982 | — | #2,166 | 24 | |
| 1981 | — | #2,204 | 23 | |
| 1980 | — | #1,765 | 32 | |
| 1979 | — | #2,048 | 25 | |
| 1978 | — | #2,134 | 22 | |
| 1977 | — | #2,458 | 18 | |
| 1976 | — | #2,508 | 17 | |
| 1975 | — | #2,288 | 19 | |
| 1974 | — | #1,934 | 23 | |
| 1973 | — | #2,036 | 20 | |
| 1972 | — | #2,080 | 19 | |
| 1971 | — | #2,052 | 20 | |
| 1970 | — | #2,509 | 14 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,914 | 19 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,788 | 20 | |
| 1967 | — | #2,139 | 14 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,540 | 25 | |
| 1965 | — | #2,270 | 13 | |
| 1964 | — | #1,545 | 26 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,744 | 21 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,546 | 26 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,303 | 37 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,434 | 31 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,387 | 32 | |
| 1958 | — | #1,253 | 38 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,411 | 31 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,232 | 38 | |
| 1955 | — | #1,419 | 29 | |
| 1954 | — | #1,112 | 45 | |
| 1953 | — | #1,139 | 42 | |
| 1952 | — | #1,166 | 40 | |
| 1951 | — | #1,150 | 39 | |
| 1950 | — | #989 | 49 | |
| 1949 | — | #1,047 | 45 | |
| 1948 | — | #1,001 | 49 | |
| 1947 | — | #822 | 71 | |
| 1946 | — | #952 | 49 | |
| 1945 | — | #850 | 54 | |
| 1944 | — | #870 | 53 | |
| 1943 | — | #768 | 72 | |
| 1942 | — | #748 | 73 | |
| 1941 | — | #665 | 84 | |
| 1940 | — | #729 | 70 | |
| 1939 | — | #691 | 74 | |
| 1938 | — | #680 | 79 | |
| 1937 | — | #687 | 76 | |
| 1936 | — | #679 | 76 | |
| 1935 | — | #605 | 92 | |
| 1934 | #4,286 | 5 | #615 | 93 |
| 1933 | — | #582 | 99 | |
| 1932 | — | #528 | 122 | |
| 1931 | — | #539 | 117 | |
| 1930 | — | #511 | 136 | |
| 1929 | — | #490 | 143 | |
| 1928 | — | #504 | 144 | |
| 1927 | #3,875 | 7 | #483 | 157 |
| 1926 | #4,306 | 6 | #469 | 165 |
| 1925 | — | #458 | 173 | |
| 1924 | — | #455 | 181 | |
| 1923 | #3,125 | 10 | #442 | 190 |
| 1922 | #4,011 | 7 | #402 | 226 |
| 1921 | — | #412 | 217 | |
| 1920 | — | #437 | 190 | |
| 1919 | — | #414 | 199 | |
| 1918 | #4,809 | 5 | #391 | 234 |
| 1917 | — | #433 | 171 | |
| 1916 | — | #425 | 176 | |
| 1915 | — | #390 | 189 | |
| 1914 | #3,188 | 6 | #393 | 146 |
| 1913 | — | #412 | 110 | |
| 1912 | #2,979 | 5 | #412 | 89 |
| 1911 | — | #548 | 30 | |
| 1910 | — | #447 | 38 | |
| 1909 | — | #530 | 24 | |
| 1908 | — | #365 | 39 | |
| 1907 | — | #381 | 35 | |
| 1906 | — | #465 | 23 | |
| 1905 | — | #549 | 18 | |
| 1904 | — | #482 | 20 | |
| 1903 | — | #430 | 22 | |
| 1902 | — | #355 | 31 | |
| 1901 | — | #407 | 21 | |
| 1900 | — | #518 | 21 | |
| 1899 | — | #376 | 24 | |
| 1898 | — | #329 | 34 | |
| 1897 | — | #404 | 22 | |
| 1896 | — | #301 | 38 | |
| 1895 | — | #368 | 26 | |
| 1894 | #1,485 | 5 | #376 | 24 |
| 1893 | — | #312 | 31 | |
| 1892 | — | #394 | 23 | |
| 1891 | — | #260 | 38 | |
| 1890 | — | #294 | 34 | |
| 1889 | — | #338 | 27 | |
| 1888 | — | #343 | 29 | |
| 1887 | — | #352 | 22 | |
| 1886 | — | #283 | 36 | |
| 1885 | — | #422 | 18 | |
| 1884 | — | #306 | 32 | |
| 1883 | — | #346 | 23 | |
| 1882 | — | #313 | 30 | |
| 1881 | — | #332 | 24 | |
| 1880 | — | #314 | 29 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Omer was already there! It came in at #314, and was given to 29 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1965, when fewer than 14 boys a year got the name.
Where Omer is popular in 1945
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Arkansas#302 · 1 in 3,128
- Kentucky#356 · 1 in 4,595
Best ever in a state: #64 in New Hampshire, 1914.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas | #302 | 6 | 1 in 3,128 |
| Kentucky | #356 | 6 | 1 in 4,595 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Omer
- 34 spots since 2024 (#2,057 → #2,091)
- 95 spots since 2020 (#1,996 → #2,091)
- 160 spots since 2015 (#1,931 → #2,091)
- Biggest jump: 139 spots in 1886 (#422 → #283)
- Biggest drop: 179 spots in 1948 (#822 → #1,001)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1891 at #260 (38 births)
- Births halved by 1905, 14 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 69 yrs · run 1880–1947
- Highest: 1 in 2,663 boys born in 1891 were named Omer (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 24,401 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 20.2% of all boys named Omer (1,786) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 270 | #283 (1886) | #335 |
| 1890s | 294 | #260 (1891) | #341 |
| 1900s | 254 | #355 (1902) | #448 |
| 1910s | 1,382 | #390 (1915) | #427 |
| 1920s | 1,786 | #402 (1922) | #455 |
| 1930s | 964 | #511 (1930) | #612 |
| 1940s | 620 | #665 (1941) | #845 |
| 1950s | 383 | #989 (1950) | #1,226 |
| 1960s | 232 | #1,303 (1961) | #1,722 |
| 1970s | 197 | #1,934 (1974) | #2,205 |
| 1980s | 276 | #1,765 (1980) | #2,082 |
| 1990s | 441 | #1,585 (1998) | #1,984 |
| 2000s | 604 | #1,832 (2002) | #2,028 |
| 2010s | 749 | #1,707 (2018) | #1,933 |
| 2020s | 404 | #1,996 (2020) | #2,152 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Omer in 1945
Top boys' names in 1945
More about 1945
boys
1,345,855 boys got a published name in 1945; 1 in 24,923 of them was named Omer, which outranked 77.5% of the 3,783 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 34.3% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).