Omer
Last seen for girls in 2023 at #13,462 · #2,091 for boys in 2025, 70 births
Given to boys 99.2% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1891 · 38 births
- Debut · boys
- 29 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 8,856since 1880
Omer over time
Rank among boys' names. Omer has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #2,091 | 70 | |
| 2024 | — | #2,057 | 73 | |
| 2023 | #13,462 | 6 | #2,221 | 64 |
| 2022 | — | #2,083 | 72 | |
| 2021 | — | #2,464 | 54 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,996 | 71 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,868 | 80 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,707 | 92 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,935 | 74 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,828 | 82 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,931 | 75 | |
| 2014 | — | #2,017 | 70 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,725 | 85 | |
| 2012 | — | #2,209 | 59 | |
| 2011 | — | #2,173 | 60 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,940 | 72 | |
| 2009 | — | #2,381 | 54 | |
| 2008 | — | #2,001 | 70 | |
| 2007 | — | #2,372 | 54 | |
| 2006 | #17,168 | 5 | #1,840 | 74 |
| 2005 | — | #2,081 | 59 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,911 | 64 | |
| 2003 | — | #2,006 | 57 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,832 | 62 | |
| 2001 | — | #1,960 | 55 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,895 | 55 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,995 | 48 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,585 | 66 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,790 | 53 | |
| 1996 | — | #1,842 | 49 | |
| 1995 | — | #1,914 | 44 | |
| 1994 | — | #1,822 | 47 | |
| 1993 | — | #2,050 | 39 | |
| 1992 | — | #2,174 | 35 | |
| 1991 | — | #2,295 | 31 | |
| 1990 | — | #2,373 | 29 | |
| 1989 | — | #2,292 | 29 | |
| 1988 | — | #2,197 | 28 | |
| 1987 | — | #1,793 | 36 | |
| 1986 | — | #2,360 | 23 | |
| 1985 | — | #2,293 | 23 | |
| 1984 | — | #1,796 | 31 | |
| 1983 | — | #1,955 | 27 | |
| 1982 | — | #2,166 | 24 | |
| 1981 | — | #2,204 | 23 | |
| 1980 | — | #1,765 | 32 | |
| 1979 | — | #2,048 | 25 | |
| 1978 | — | #2,134 | 22 | |
| 1977 | — | #2,458 | 18 | |
| 1976 | — | #2,508 | 17 | |
| 1975 | — | #2,288 | 19 | |
| 1974 | — | #1,934 | 23 | |
| 1973 | — | #2,036 | 20 | |
| 1972 | — | #2,080 | 19 | |
| 1971 | — | #2,052 | 20 | |
| 1970 | — | #2,509 | 14 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,914 | 19 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,788 | 20 | |
| 1967 | — | #2,139 | 14 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,540 | 25 | |
| 1965 | — | #2,270 | 13 | |
| 1964 | — | #1,545 | 26 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,744 | 21 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,546 | 26 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,303 | 37 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,434 | 31 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,387 | 32 | |
| 1958 | — | #1,253 | 38 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,411 | 31 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,232 | 38 | |
| 1955 | — | #1,419 | 29 | |
| 1954 | — | #1,112 | 45 | |
| 1953 | — | #1,139 | 42 | |
| 1952 | — | #1,166 | 40 | |
| 1951 | — | #1,150 | 39 | |
| 1950 | — | #989 | 49 | |
| 1949 | — | #1,047 | 45 | |
| 1948 | — | #1,001 | 49 | |
| 1947 | — | #822 | 71 | |
| 1946 | — | #952 | 49 | |
| 1945 | — | #850 | 54 | |
| 1944 | — | #870 | 53 | |
| 1943 | — | #768 | 72 | |
| 1942 | — | #748 | 73 | |
| 1941 | — | #665 | 84 | |
| 1940 | — | #729 | 70 | |
| 1939 | — | #691 | 74 | |
| 1938 | — | #680 | 79 | |
| 1937 | — | #687 | 76 | |
| 1936 | — | #679 | 76 | |
| 1935 | — | #605 | 92 | |
| 1934 | #4,286 | 5 | #615 | 93 |
| 1933 | — | #582 | 99 | |
| 1932 | — | #528 | 122 | |
| 1931 | — | #539 | 117 | |
| 1930 | — | #511 | 136 | |
| 1929 | — | #490 | 143 | |
| 1928 | — | #504 | 144 | |
| 1927 | #3,875 | 7 | #483 | 157 |
| 1926 | #4,306 | 6 | #469 | 165 |
| 1925 | — | #458 | 173 | |
| 1924 | — | #455 | 181 | |
| 1923 | #3,125 | 10 | #442 | 190 |
| 1922 | #4,011 | 7 | #402 | 226 |
| 1921 | — | #412 | 217 | |
| 1920 | — | #437 | 190 | |
| 1919 | — | #414 | 199 | |
| 1918 | #4,809 | 5 | #391 | 234 |
| 1917 | — | #433 | 171 | |
| 1916 | — | #425 | 176 | |
| 1915 | — | #390 | 189 | |
| 1914 | #3,188 | 6 | #393 | 146 |
| 1913 | — | #412 | 110 | |
| 1912 | #2,979 | 5 | #412 | 89 |
| 1911 | — | #548 | 30 | |
| 1910 | — | #447 | 38 | |
| 1909 | — | #530 | 24 | |
| 1908 | — | #365 | 39 | |
| 1907 | — | #381 | 35 | |
| 1906 | — | #465 | 23 | |
| 1905 | — | #549 | 18 | |
| 1904 | — | #482 | 20 | |
| 1903 | — | #430 | 22 | |
| 1902 | — | #355 | 31 | |
| 1901 | — | #407 | 21 | |
| 1900 | — | #518 | 21 | |
| 1899 | — | #376 | 24 | |
| 1898 | — | #329 | 34 | |
| 1897 | — | #404 | 22 | |
| 1896 | — | #301 | 38 | |
| 1895 | — | #368 | 26 | |
| 1894 | #1,485 | 5 | #376 | 24 |
| 1893 | — | #312 | 31 | |
| 1892 | — | #394 | 23 | |
| 1891 | — | #260 | 38 | |
| 1890 | — | #294 | 34 | |
| 1889 | — | #338 | 27 | |
| 1888 | — | #343 | 29 | |
| 1887 | — | #352 | 22 | |
| 1886 | — | #283 | 36 | |
| 1885 | — | #422 | 18 | |
| 1884 | — | #306 | 32 | |
| 1883 | — | #346 | 23 | |
| 1882 | — | #313 | 30 | |
| 1881 | — | #332 | 24 | |
| 1880 | — | #314 | 29 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Omer was already there! It came in at #314, and was given to 29 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1965, when fewer than 14 boys a year got the name.
Where Omer is popular in 1914
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Hampshire#64 · 1 in 270
- Maine#134 · 1 in 651
- Kentucky#144 · 1 in 831
- Indiana#173 · 1 in 1,316
- Massachusetts#177 · 1 in 1,969
Best ever in a state: #64 in New Hampshire, 1914.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Hampshire | #64 | 8 | 1 in 270 |
| Maine | #134 | 6 | 1 in 651 |
| Kentucky | #144 | 16 | 1 in 831 |
| Indiana | #173 | 11 | 1 in 1,316 |
| Massachusetts | #177 | 12 | 1 in 1,969 |
| Arkansas | #209 | 8 | 1 in 1,255 |
| Iowa | #220 | 7 | 1 in 1,683 |
| Missouri | #276 | 7 | 1 in 2,443 |
| Oklahoma | #284 | 5 | 1 in 2,140 |
| Tennessee | #305 | 5 | 1 in 2,670 |
| Ohio | #337 | 6 | 1 in 4,708 |
| Illinois | #368 | 6 | 1 in 5,864 |
| Texas | #615 | 5 | 1 in 5,831 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Omer
- 34 spots since 2024 (#2,057 → #2,091)
- 95 spots since 2020 (#1,996 → #2,091)
- 160 spots since 2015 (#1,931 → #2,091)
- Biggest jump: 139 spots in 1886 (#422 → #283)
- Biggest drop: 179 spots in 1948 (#822 → #1,001)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1891 at #260 (38 births)
- Births halved by 1905, 14 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 69 yrs · run 1880–1947
- Highest: 1 in 2,663 boys born in 1891 were named Omer (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 24,401 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 20.2% of all boys named Omer (1,786) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 270 | #283 (1886) | #335 |
| 1890s | 294 | #260 (1891) | #341 |
| 1900s | 254 | #355 (1902) | #448 |
| 1910s | 1,382 | #390 (1915) | #427 |
| 1920s | 1,786 | #402 (1922) | #455 |
| 1930s | 964 | #511 (1930) | #612 |
| 1940s | 620 | #665 (1941) | #845 |
| 1950s | 383 | #989 (1950) | #1,226 |
| 1960s | 232 | #1,303 (1961) | #1,722 |
| 1970s | 197 | #1,934 (1974) | #2,205 |
| 1980s | 276 | #1,765 (1980) | #2,082 |
| 1990s | 441 | #1,585 (1998) | #1,984 |
| 2000s | 604 | #1,832 (2002) | #2,028 |
| 2010s | 749 | #1,707 (2018) | #1,933 |
| 2020s | 404 | #1,996 (2020) | #2,152 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Omer in 1914
Top girls' names in 1914
Top boys' names in 1914
More about 1914
girls
761,581 girls got a published name in 1914; 1 in 126,930 of them was named Omer, which outranked 24.2% of the 4,206 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,876Zillie7
- #2,876Zofia7
- #2,876Zollie7
- #3,188Omer6
- #3,188Adamae6
- #3,188Addis6
- #3,188Adlena6
- #3,618Aaron5
- #3,618Abelina5
- #3,618Adelee5
Tied with 429 names at #3,188; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
654,762 boys got a published name in 1914; 1 in 4,485 of them was named Omer, which outranked 89.5% of the 3,759 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.