Octavio
Last seen for girls in 1986 at #10,912 · #1,276 for boys in 2025, 154 births
Given to boys >99.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2003 · 437 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 11,449since 1908
Octavio over time
Rank among boys' names. Octavio has never cracked the top 500 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,276 | 154 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,364 | 138 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,346 | 140 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,347 | 139 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,514 | 117 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,347 | 132 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,472 | 117 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,375 | 128 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,264 | 144 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,248 | 148 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,065 | 186 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,043 | 192 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,065 | 176 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,155 | 158 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,212 | 144 | |
| 2010 | — | #928 | 217 | |
| 2009 | — | #931 | 222 | |
| 2008 | — | #866 | 245 | |
| 2007 | — | #858 | 243 | |
| 2006 | — | #665 | 342 | |
| 2005 | — | #665 | 321 | |
| 2004 | — | #654 | 313 | |
| 2003 | — | #531 | 437 | |
| 2002 | — | #689 | 264 | |
| 2001 | — | #762 | 225 | |
| 2000 | — | #684 | 259 | |
| 1999 | — | #675 | 250 | |
| 1998 | — | #790 | 193 | |
| 1997 | — | #752 | 198 | |
| 1996 | — | #642 | 261 | |
| 1995 | — | #721 | 219 | |
| 1994 | — | #779 | 185 | |
| 1993 | — | #725 | 205 | |
| 1992 | — | #705 | 212 | |
| 1991 | — | #689 | 215 | |
| 1990 | — | #691 | 215 | |
| 1989 | — | #764 | 168 | |
| 1988 | — | #789 | 144 | |
| 1987 | — | #711 | 165 | |
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | #800 | 129 |
| 1985 | — | #810 | 120 | |
| 1984 | — | #759 | 130 | |
| 1983 | — | #824 | 112 | |
| 1982 | — | #788 | 125 | |
| 1981 | — | #654 | 171 | |
| 1980 | — | #733 | 143 | |
| 1979 | — | #805 | 117 | |
| 1978 | — | #790 | 115 | |
| 1977 | — | #783 | 119 | |
| 1976 | — | #726 | 133 | |
| 1975 | — | #736 | 127 | |
| 1974 | — | #779 | 106 | |
| 1973 | — | #779 | 104 | |
| 1972 | — | #929 | 74 | |
| 1971 | — | #1,026 | 63 | |
| 1970 | — | #968 | 69 | |
| 1969 | — | #965 | 63 | |
| 1968 | — | #986 | 56 | |
| 1967 | — | #900 | 64 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,100 | 45 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,031 | 51 | |
| 1964 | — | #1,059 | 51 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,052 | 52 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,187 | 43 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,196 | 44 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,098 | 50 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,182 | 43 | |
| 1958 | — | #1,483 | 28 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,151 | 45 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,257 | 37 | |
| 1955 | — | #1,419 | 29 | |
| 1954 | — | #1,361 | 31 | |
| 1953 | — | #1,214 | 38 | |
| 1952 | — | #1,485 | 26 | |
| 1951 | — | #1,242 | 35 | |
| 1950 | — | #1,434 | 26 | |
| 1949 | — | #1,322 | 30 | |
| 1948 | — | #1,611 | 21 | |
| 1947 | — | #1,449 | 26 | |
| 1946 | — | #1,557 | 21 | |
| 1945 | — | #1,249 | 28 | |
| 1944 | — | #1,890 | 14 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,577 | 20 | |
| 1942 | — | #1,421 | 24 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,997 | 13 | |
| 1940 | — | #1,894 | 14 | |
| 1939 | — | #1,636 | 17 | |
| 1938 | — | #1,613 | 18 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,756 | 16 | |
| 1936 | — | #1,463 | 21 | |
| 1935 | — | #1,494 | 21 | |
| 1934 | — | #1,323 | 26 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,829 | 15 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,426 | 24 | |
| 1931 | — | #1,538 | 21 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,235 | 33 | |
| 1929 | — | #1,378 | 27 | |
| 1928 | — | #1,480 | 25 | |
| 1927 | — | #1,561 | 24 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,565 | 23 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,679 | 21 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,776 | 20 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,874 | 18 | |
| 1922 | — | #2,486 | 12 | |
| 1921 | — | #2,152 | 15 | |
| 1920 | — | #2,231 | 14 | |
| 1919 | — | #2,877 | 9 | |
| 1918 | — | #2,398 | 12 | |
| 1917 | — | #2,188 | 13 | |
| 1916 | — | #2,543 | 10 | |
| 1915 | — | #2,829 | 8 | |
| 1914 | — | #2,271 | 9 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,803 | 10 | |
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | #1,740 | 5 | |
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | #1,217 | 6 | |
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Octavio! It came in at #1,217, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1909–1912, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Octavio is popular in 2009
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- California#480 · 1 in 3,669
- Texas#551 · 1 in 3,967
- Arizona#648 · 1 in 4,992
- Oklahoma#667 · 1 in 4,291
- New Jersey#710 · 1 in 5,577
Best ever in a state: #272 in California, 2003.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #480 | 66 | 1 in 3,669 |
| Texas | #551 | 47 | 1 in 3,967 |
| Arizona | #648 | 8 | 1 in 4,992 |
| Oklahoma | #667 | 5 | 1 in 4,291 |
| New Jersey | #710 | 8 | 1 in 5,577 |
| Illinois | #873 | 10 | 1 in 7,255 |
| Washington | #901 | 5 | 1 in 7,392 |
| Florida | #1,116 | 9 | 1 in 10,589 |
| Georgia | #1,252 | 5 | 1 in 11,804 |
| New York | #1,809 | 5 | 1 in 21,542 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Octavio
- 88 spots since 2024 (#1,364 → #1,276)
- 71 spots since 2020 (#1,347 → #1,276)
- 211 spots since 2015 (#1,065 → #1,276)
- Biggest jump: 200 spots in 1967 (#1,100 → #900)
- Biggest drop: 284 spots in 2011 (#928 → #1,212)
- Debuted 1908
- Peaked 2003 at #531 (437 births)
- Births halved by 2010, 7 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 43 yrs · run 1972–2010
- Highest: 1 in 4,520 boys born in 2003 were named Octavio (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 11,091 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 25.1% of all boys named Octavio (2,871) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 6 | #1,217 (1908) | #1,217 |
| 1910s | 76 | #1,740 (1911) | #2,331 |
| 1920s | 199 | #1,378 (1929) | #1,818 |
| 1930s | 212 | #1,235 (1930) | #1,531 |
| 1940s | 211 | #1,249 (1945) | #1,597 |
| 1950s | 338 | #1,151 (1957) | #1,323 |
| 1960s | 519 | #900 (1967) | #1,057 |
| 1970s | 1,027 | #726 (1976) | #832 |
| 1980s | 1,407 | #654 (1981) | #763 |
| 1990s | 2,153 | #642 (1996) | #717 |
| 2000s | 2,871 | #531 (2003) | #731 |
| 2010s | 1,610 | #928 (2010) | #1,183 |
| 2020s | 820 | #1,276 (2025) | #1,366 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Octavio in 2009
Top boys' names in 2009
More about 2009
boys
1,983,573 boys got a published name in 2009; 1 in 8,935 of them was named Octavio, which outranked 93.6% of the 14,540 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.