Ocie
#5,917 for girls in 2025, 20 births · Last seen for boys in 2024 at #8,987
Given to girls 60.1% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1896 · 53 births
- Debut · girls
- 8 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,132since 1880
Ocie over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,917 | 20 | — | |
| 2024 | #7,251 | 15 | #8,987 | 8 |
| 2023 | #6,922 | 16 | — | |
| 2022 | #9,056 | 11 | — | |
| 2021 | #13,464 | 6 | #12,146 | 5 |
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | #13,799 | 6 | #10,803 | 6 |
| 2018 | #15,682 | 5 | — | |
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | #16,419 | 5 | — | |
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | #11,257 | 9 | — | |
| 2011 | #16,764 | 5 | #9,600 | 7 |
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | #11,472 | 5 | |
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | #7,416 | 8 | |
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | #6,843 | 8 | |
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | #9,015 | 5 | |
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | #5,109 | 11 | |
| 1993 | — | #7,638 | 6 | |
| 1992 | — | #6,128 | 8 | |
| 1991 | — | #4,760 | 11 | |
| 1990 | — | #4,167 | 13 | |
| 1989 | — | #5,165 | 9 | |
| 1988 | — | #4,162 | 11 | |
| 1987 | — | #6,089 | 6 | |
| 1986 | — | #3,268 | 14 | |
| 1985 | — | #4,698 | 8 | |
| 1984 | #10,422 | 5 | #3,701 | 11 |
| 1983 | — | #4,499 | 8 | |
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 | #2,709 | 17 |
| 1981 | — | #2,569 | 18 | |
| 1980 | — | #3,838 | 10 | |
| 1979 | — | #3,569 | 11 | |
| 1978 | #7,649 | 7 | #3,070 | 13 |
| 1977 | #6,340 | 9 | #4,164 | 8 |
| 1976 | — | #4,012 | 8 | |
| 1975 | — | #3,941 | 8 | |
| 1974 | #6,258 | 8 | #2,946 | 12 |
| 1973 | #6,080 | 8 | #2,606 | 14 |
| 1972 | — | #2,659 | 13 | |
| 1971 | — | #2,464 | 15 | |
| 1970 | #7,995 | 5 | #4,230 | 6 |
| 1969 | #7,471 | 5 | #1,914 | 19 |
| 1968 | #5,147 | 8 | #1,836 | 19 |
| 1967 | — | #2,139 | 14 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,650 | 22 | |
| 1965 | #5,817 | 6 | #1,559 | 25 |
| 1964 | #5,008 | 8 | #1,487 | 28 |
| 1963 | — | #1,628 | 24 | |
| 1962 | #3,438 | 14 | #1,757 | 21 |
| 1961 | #4,882 | 8 | #1,496 | 29 |
| 1960 | #3,688 | 12 | #1,728 | 22 |
| 1959 | #3,619 | 12 | #1,559 | 26 |
| 1958 | #3,747 | 11 | #1,237 | 39 |
| 1957 | #4,918 | 7 | #1,411 | 31 |
| 1956 | #2,530 | 20 | #1,608 | 24 |
| 1955 | #3,095 | 14 | #1,611 | 23 |
| 1954 | #2,378 | 21 | #1,435 | 28 |
| 1953 | #3,269 | 12 | #1,630 | 22 |
| 1952 | #2,200 | 22 | #1,701 | 20 |
| 1951 | #1,740 | 31 | #1,139 | 40 |
| 1950 | #2,781 | 14 | #1,086 | 42 |
| 1949 | #1,543 | 36 | #997 | 49 |
| 1948 | #1,520 | 37 | #1,323 | 30 |
| 1947 | #1,722 | 31 | #1,336 | 30 |
| 1946 | #1,860 | 24 | #1,060 | 42 |
| 1945 | #1,374 | 34 | #1,204 | 30 |
| 1944 | #1,272 | 39 | #1,255 | 28 |
| 1943 | #1,342 | 37 | #1,018 | 43 |
| 1942 | #1,206 | 43 | #991 | 45 |
| 1941 | #1,384 | 31 | #1,129 | 34 |
| 1940 | #1,150 | 40 | #1,031 | 39 |
| 1939 | #1,009 | 49 | #1,168 | 31 |
| 1938 | #984 | 52 | #1,125 | 33 |
| 1937 | #1,070 | 44 | #1,212 | 30 |
| 1936 | #941 | 53 | #1,142 | 33 |
| 1935 | #904 | 58 | #1,011 | 40 |
| 1934 | #1,166 | 37 | #1,007 | 41 |
| 1933 | #1,008 | 47 | #926 | 46 |
| 1932 | #1,015 | 48 | #1,077 | 39 |
| 1931 | #920 | 57 | #939 | 48 |
| 1930 | #971 | 57 | #1,080 | 41 |
| 1929 | #951 | 57 | #888 | 56 |
| 1928 | #870 | 70 | #1,228 | 34 |
| 1927 | #874 | 72 | #937 | 54 |
| 1926 | #829 | 78 | #1,064 | 43 |
| 1925 | #753 | 96 | #1,053 | 43 |
| 1924 | #786 | 91 | #944 | 55 |
| 1923 | #992 | 57 | #1,057 | 45 |
| 1922 | #766 | 91 | #1,058 | 44 |
| 1921 | #699 | 112 | #981 | 51 |
| 1920 | #762 | 91 | #896 | 59 |
| 1919 | #743 | 89 | #790 | 67 |
| 1918 | #671 | 113 | #975 | 47 |
| 1917 | #610 | 126 | #1,033 | 40 |
| 1916 | #567 | 139 | #864 | 53 |
| 1915 | #554 | 134 | #980 | 41 |
| 1914 | #566 | 99 | #870 | 39 |
| 1913 | #551 | 86 | #720 | 41 |
| 1912 | #466 | 104 | #668 | 40 |
| 1911 | #477 | 75 | #824 | 16 |
| 1910 | #466 | 73 | #677 | 19 |
| 1909 | #453 | 68 | #590 | 20 |
| 1908 | #602 | 39 | #712 | 14 |
| 1907 | #451 | 63 | #778 | 12 |
| 1906 | #499 | 48 | #752 | 11 |
| 1905 | #473 | 52 | #741 | 11 |
| 1904 | #405 | 63 | #587 | 15 |
| 1903 | #470 | 46 | #910 | 7 |
| 1902 | #445 | 49 | #615 | 13 |
| 1901 | #452 | 43 | #1,058 | 5 |
| 1900 | #407 | 67 | #743 | 12 |
| 1899 | #526 | 32 | #857 | 7 |
| 1898 | #461 | 45 | — | |
| 1897 | #521 | 32 | #725 | 9 |
| 1896 | #387 | 53 | #722 | 10 |
| 1895 | #638 | 23 | #795 | 8 |
| 1894 | #414 | 45 | #668 | 10 |
| 1893 | #430 | 40 | #705 | 9 |
| 1892 | #498 | 30 | #597 | 12 |
| 1891 | #483 | 28 | — | |
| 1890 | #570 | 21 | #566 | 12 |
| 1889 | #454 | 29 | #789 | 7 |
| 1888 | #525 | 23 | #648 | 10 |
| 1887 | #524 | 18 | #921 | 5 |
| 1886 | #439 | 24 | #758 | 7 |
| 1885 | #658 | 11 | #936 | 5 |
| 1884 | #425 | 22 | #848 | 6 |
| 1883 | #692 | 8 | #597 | 10 |
| 1882 | #507 | 13 | #943 | 5 |
| 1881 | #503 | 11 | #595 | 9 |
| 1880 | #628 | 8 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Ocie was already there! It came in at #628, and was given to 8 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1963, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
See more about Ocie
- 1,334 spots since 2024 (#7,251 → #5,917)
- 10,502 spots since 2015 (#16,419 → #5,917)
- Biggest jump: 267 spots in 1884 (#692 → #425)
- Biggest drop: 233 spots in 1885 (#425 → #658)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1896 at #387 (53 births)
- Births halved by 1946, 50 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 55 yrs · run 1880–1931
- Highest: 1 in 4,371 girls born in 1904 were named Ocie (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 80,363 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #387 in 1896, was only 1 in 4,489 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 25.1% of all girls named Ocie (1,038) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 2011, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 167 | #425 (1884) | #536 |
| 1890s | 349 | #387 (1896) | #493 |
| 1900s | 538 | #405 (1904) | #466 |
| 1910s | 1,038 | #466 (1912) | #567 |
| 1920s | 815 | #699 (1921) | #828 |
| 1930s | 502 | #904 (1935) | #999 |
| 1940s | 352 | #1,150 (1940) | #1,437 |
| 1950s | 164 | #1,740 (1951) | #3,028 |
| 1960s | 61 | #3,438 (1962) | #5,064 |
| 1970s | 37 | #6,080 (1973) | #6,864 |
| 1980s | 11 | #9,237 (1982) | #9,830 |
| 1990s | 0 | — | — |
| 2000s | 0 | — | — |
| 2010s | 30 | #11,257 (2012) | #14,784 |
| 2020s | 68 | #5,917 (2025) | #8,522 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Ocie in 1910
Top girls' names in 1910
Top boys' names in 1910
More about 1910
girls
396,503 girls got a published name in 1910; 1 in 5,432 of them was named Ocie, which outranked 83.3% of the 2,790 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 21.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
194,208 boys got a published name in 1910; 1 in 10,221 of them was named Ocie, which outranked 63.2% of the 1,839 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).